3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is it possible that the 6MT's are this much better than the 5AT's fuel economy wise??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2011, 07:01 PM
  #1  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
JTS97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,242
Received 946 Likes on 650 Posts
Is it possible that the 6MT's are this much better than the 5AT's fuel economy wise??

So I picked up my 08 6mt Type S about a month ago and have finally been able to go through a couple full tanks of gas using the same gas station and even down to the exact same pump. I just averaged 25.4mpg and thats without any highway use just far suburban driving. Not to mention it was by no means an easy driven tank as im still learning to drive this manual optimally and ofcourse im still having my fun times with this new to me Type S 6mt. My previous TL was an 07 Type S automatic. Also doing the same driving and same gas station (I use the same station which is on my way too and from work) I think I usually only averaged 19 to 21ish in that one. Whats weird is if I remember correctly the automatic is actually rated at better mpg on the window sticker correct?
Also, for what its worth the MID said I averaged 26mpg so that thing is apparently pretty close since my own calculations gave me 25.4.

So my 07 auto Type S got 19-21ish and now my 08 Type S manual 25ish. Im happy because I thought it was going to be the other way around.

Anyone else experience the same thing?

James
Old 04-24-2011, 07:03 PM
  #2  
the overexplainer
 
ez12a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: OC, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 3,287
Received 385 Likes on 337 Posts
Nope, it's actually rated with the 6MT on top in terms of MPG at least for 04s.

6MT
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/19711.shtml

Auto
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/19712.shtml

that 6th gear is invaluable.
Old 04-24-2011, 07:33 PM
  #3  
Advanced
 
xander12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 82
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I read that there was a 1mpg difference. So hojw about performance? Having owned bojth is it night and day? Much faster?
Old 04-24-2011, 07:44 PM
  #4  
Advanced
 
6 MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 610
Age: 38
Posts: 77
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I could've sworn the 04 6mt was rated at 20 city 30 highway...
Old 04-24-2011, 08:06 PM
  #5  
Instructor
 
TL SLEEPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: south carolina
Age: 42
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 04 auto just took a 300 mile trip today and I got 27 for the average
Old 04-24-2011, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte
Age: 35
Posts: 36,657
Received 9,495 Likes on 6,167 Posts
Having an extra gear must help the MPG when on the highway but I'm not sure it would help when in the city. Maybe the 6MT is lighter?
Old 04-24-2011, 09:12 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
^by a hundred pounds or so
Old 04-24-2011, 09:14 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte
Age: 35
Posts: 36,657
Received 9,495 Likes on 6,167 Posts
That's gotta help the MPG but the OP states a 4-6 MPG increase with the 6MT.
Old 04-24-2011, 09:26 PM
  #9  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
Originally Posted by hondanews.com
2007 TL
Automatic transmission - 3674 lb (1666 kg)
Manual transmission - 3559 lb (1614 kg)
.
Old 04-24-2011, 10:29 PM
  #10  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
correct me if im wrong, but isnt the 5th gear in the auto actually higher than the 6th gear in the stick? as in, it'll rev lower rpm for cruising in the top gear?
Old 04-24-2011, 10:34 PM
  #11  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
Originally Posted by hondanews.com
2007
base - TL-s
1st 2.697 - 3.933
2nd 1.606 - 2.478
3rd 1.071 - 1.700
4th 0.693 - 1.250
5th 0.490 - 0.975
6th - 0.770
Reverse1.888 - 4.008
Final 4.312 3.285
didnt copy table correctly. TL-s ratio's on the right side. and of course 6th gear is tl-s
Old 04-24-2011, 10:40 PM
  #12  
Senior Moderator
 
csmeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Space Coast, FL
Posts: 20,834
Received 1,989 Likes on 1,412 Posts
Originally Posted by CLtotheTL32
Having an extra gear must help the MPG when on the highway but I'm not sure it would help when in the city. Maybe the 6MT is lighter?
even though the 6MT has an extra gear, the auto is actually revving lower at highway speeds.

A member did the calculations a while ago and the theoretical top speed based ONLY on transmission and redline was that the TL 6MT would max out at like 175 and the Auto would max out at 220MPH.
Old 04-24-2011, 11:05 PM
  #13  
Advanced
 
xander12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 82
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
So in theory the at should burn less gas at cruising speed on the highway?
Old 04-24-2011, 11:41 PM
  #14  
the overexplainer
 
ez12a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: OC, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 3,287
Received 385 Likes on 337 Posts
at which gear/speed does the AT lock up?
Old 04-25-2011, 01:25 AM
  #15  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
Originally Posted by csmeance
even though the 6MT has an extra gear, the auto is actually revving lower at highway speeds.

A member did the calculations a while ago and the theoretical top speed based ONLY on transmission and redline was that the TL 6MT would max out at like 175 and the Auto would max out at 220MPH.
really? at 132mph for the tl-s 5at, im alrdy at about 5k rpm. so you're saying if it could spin to the rev limiter at like ~7100rpm it would be up to 220mph(given enough power)? thats only 2100rpm more.
Old 04-25-2011, 01:27 AM
  #16  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
Originally Posted by ez12a
at which gear/speed does the AT lock up?
you mean when the torque converter locks up? probably 3rd gear or so.
Old 04-25-2011, 02:13 AM
  #17  
Senior Moderator
 
csmeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Space Coast, FL
Posts: 20,834
Received 1,989 Likes on 1,412 Posts
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
really? at 132mph for the tl-s 5at, im alrdy at about 5k rpm. so you're saying if it could spin to the rev limiter at like ~7100rpm it would be up to 220mph(given enough power)? thats only 2100rpm more.
This is with the rev limiter removed and such and like I had said, purely based on ratios with some other factors. If I remember correctly, it was factors with some sort of teeth, the final drive, the gear ratio and the max rev limit.

Either way, folks with the 5AT have gotten to 155 MPH with a good amount of power left to go.
Old 04-25-2011, 02:44 AM
  #18  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
o.O how? i have a speed governor at 132mph...
Old 04-25-2011, 06:38 AM
  #19  
Registered Member
 
SouthernBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suburb of Manassas, VA
Posts: 8,342
Received 162 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
correct me if im wrong, but isnt the 5th gear in the auto actually higher than the 6th gear in the stick? as in, it'll rev lower rpm for cruising in the top gear?
Yes it is. At 60 MPH, my '04 manual is turning 2000 RPM in 6th gear. At that same speed, my '05 automatic is turning 1725 RPM. Yet my manual will get slightly better mileage than my automatic. I attribute this to four factors. 1) There is less parasitic loss with a manual. 2) The automatic will "hunt" for the ideal gear when road conditions are such that this is necessary; the manual doesn't. 3) Less throttle opening is needed with the manual to maintain speed (we're assuming the use of cruise control for the purposes of precision) than with the automatic because of the increased torque multiplication of the lower gear ratio in the manual (this can reach a point of diminishing returns). 4) At 2000 RPM, the engine is operating at a more efficient speed than at 1725 RPM and is producing more torque and horsepower at the higher engine speed.

The best I have ever gotten on the road with my '04 manual was on a vacation trip in the summer with the A/C operating the entire time, at speeds between 62 and 76 MPH in moderately heavy mid-day Sunday traffic (on I-95). On the first leg of the trip, I recorded 33.94 MPG. Notice, this was NOT using the MID as it was a calculated result.
Old 04-25-2011, 08:41 AM
  #20  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
JTS97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,242
Received 946 Likes on 650 Posts
Nice results and thanks for all the input. It is pretty interesting how this all works out with the differences between the two. Regardless of all that stuff nothing beats the hard facts from us actual drivers.
Im still very surprised at this figure because I was almost certain that with the way I have been driving my Type S and still having fun with my new car I thought for sure maybe 20mpg. But 25.4!! without ever touching the highway!!! SWEEEEEET So from my experiences with my driving techniques im seeing approximately atleast 4mpg better economy in my Type S 6mt than I did with my Type S 5at. And again this is using the exact same gas station even down to the same pump #13 Phillips 66/Cunoco station 93 octane.
I wont really get a chance to do an entire highway trip since Im rarely on the highway but on my drive home from picking the car up the MID said 31mpg. Very respectable!

James
Old 04-25-2011, 09:09 AM
  #21  
Burning Brakes
 
callahan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Age: 35
Posts: 990
Received 73 Likes on 71 Posts
I drive a combination of highway and city in my 04 Tl 6mt with 133k on it and I avg 28.5, last summer i managed to get a couple tanks over 30mpg.
Old 04-25-2011, 10:38 AM
  #22  
Registered Member
 
SouthernBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suburb of Manassas, VA
Posts: 8,342
Received 162 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by JTS97Z28
Nice results and thanks for all the input. It is pretty interesting how this all works out with the differences between the two. Regardless of all that stuff nothing beats the hard facts from us actual drivers.
Im still very surprised at this figure because I was almost certain that with the way I have been driving my Type S and still having fun with my new car I thought for sure maybe 20mpg. But 25.4!! without ever touching the highway!!! SWEEEEEET So from my experiences with my driving techniques im seeing approximately atleast 4mpg better economy in my Type S 6mt than I did with my Type S 5at. And again this is using the exact same gas station even down to the same pump #13 Phillips 66/Cunoco station 93 octane.
I wont really get a chance to do an entire highway trip since Im rarely on the highway but on my drive home from picking the car up the MID said 31mpg. Very respectable!

James
Do keep in mind that your fuel economy increases during the warmer months so comparing mileage when it's warm to what you saw when the weather was colder is not a valid comparison.
Old 04-25-2011, 03:52 PM
  #23  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (6)
 
vp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NoVA
Posts: 875
Received 59 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by csmeance
This is with the rev limiter removed and such and like I had said, purely based on ratios with some other factors. If I remember correctly, it was factors with some sort of teeth, the final drive, the gear ratio and the max rev limit.

Either way, folks with the 5AT have gotten to 155 MPH with a good amount of power left to go.
How did the 5AT folks manage to get to 155mph, I though 132mph was the max.
Old 04-25-2011, 05:23 PM
  #24  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
JTS97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,242
Received 946 Likes on 650 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
Do keep in mind that your fuel economy increases during the warmer months so comparing mileage when it's warm to what you saw when the weather was colder is not a valid comparison.
I understand this but its been a year since I have had my automatic Type S and im just speaking of a general number. I just remember getting 19-21ish in that car all the time. And this last tank in my new 08 6mt was hardly summer temps. The weather has been real crappy around here in Chicago. Some days kinda warm but mostly 40's. So this tank has been by no means "summer" driving. But you are right there is a difference between summer and winter driving economy.

James
Old 04-25-2011, 05:59 PM
  #25  
the overexplainer
 
ez12a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: OC, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 3,287
Received 385 Likes on 337 Posts
not to mention they do switch between a "summer" and "winter" formula, and their prices are different.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
105
08-18-2019 10:38 PM
adrian_s2k
1G RDX (2007-2012)
23
01-12-2016 04:25 PM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
c1souk
5G TLX (2015-2020)
17
09-28-2015 11:20 AM



Quick Reply: Is it possible that the 6MT's are this much better than the 5AT's fuel economy wise??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.