3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is it okay if I wait overnight after sipping Seafoam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2012, 02:38 PM
  #1  
Proud owner of a...
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
serbj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 202
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Question Is it okay if I wait overnight after sipping Seafoam?

Trying to be a nice neighbor, I prefer sipping the Seafoam from vacuum line at night. Is it okay to wait overnight and drive the car the next day? Or should I wait 5~15 mins. as recommended, restart the engine, and drive?

Doing Seafoam can be tiring due to our vacuum line is really tightened, and I prefer driving when I'm well rested and really have some places to go.
Old 02-24-2012, 02:41 PM
  #2  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 38
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Don't wait overnight. Go for a drive a few mins later.

Why are you doing the seafoam anyway?
Old 02-24-2012, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Proud owner of a...
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
serbj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 202
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by SharksBreath
Don't wait overnight. Go for a drive a few mins later.

Why are you doing the seafoam anyway?
I do the Seafoam before spark plug changes. I just want to baby my NGK Laser Iridium plugs
Old 02-24-2012, 03:30 PM
  #4  
Dogmatic Dinosaur
 
jda123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 49
Posts: 1,532
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
It will be fine. It will start to chug and smoke in the morning once it start to heat up. Don't pull out in front of anybody.
Old 02-24-2012, 03:39 PM
  #5  
Proud owner of a...
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
serbj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 202
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by jda123
It will be fine. It will start to chug and smoke in the morning once it start to heat up. Don't pull out in front of anybody.
Oh really? That sounds nice. I'm not a good night driver, especially when it's very late (3am).
Old 02-24-2012, 03:52 PM
  #6  
Dogmatic Dinosaur
 
jda123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 49
Posts: 1,532
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
Back when I had my accord, there was a few times that I put it in and forgot. I would get down the road a little bit the next morning and then it would go "spy hunter" once it got a little bit warm.

My accord had over 400K and the sea foam really did help to boost manifold vacuum - 3 treatments (1 can) allowed me to pull more than 1 lb more which helped the vintage MAP sensor take my MPG up quite a bit on that antiquated computer. Now, at 400K, I imagine that I had more carbon buildup that most of us have in our TLs. My Acrua does not blow as much white smoke as my Accord did. My olds with brand new heads blows none. I do think that it does something, but to varying degrees based on how much accumulation is in there. Results will vary.
Old 02-24-2012, 07:37 PM
  #7  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
First, you should never seafoam your car through the intake or the oil. Gas tank only and even then it's pointless if you've always run premium. Ask yourself why you're running seafoam in the first place and you will find it hard to answer. Unless your car has at least 200,000 miles on it, it's pointless to use it through the intake and even then I would not do it. If you've ever pulled an engine apart at that kind of mileage there's just not much carbon at all especially a modern EFI engine.

Too many things to go wrong from hydrolocking to killing a converter or 02 sensor. It's a lot of risk for zero gain.

If you must do it, do not let it sit overnight.

Last, the smoke you see is nothing more than the seafoam itself burning. It's not some magical buildup "burning" off.
The following users liked this post:
mcmguti (02-29-2012)
Old 02-24-2012, 07:40 PM
  #8  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
^dunno if it was ACTUALLY the seafoam, but I did seafoam right before I bent a rod. :/
Old 02-24-2012, 09:16 PM
  #9  
Instructor
 
hleapha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Columbia, SC
Age: 38
Posts: 174
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
^dunno if it was ACTUALLY the seafoam, but I did seafoam right before I bent a rod. :/
What is Hydrolocking?

I'll take car maintenance no-no's for 1000.
Old 02-24-2012, 09:19 PM
  #10  
Proud owner of a...
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
serbj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 202
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
First, you should never seafoam your car through the intake or the oil. Gas tank only and even then it's pointless if you've always run premium. Ask yourself why you're running seafoam in the first place and you will find it hard to answer. Unless your car has at least 200,000 miles on it, it's pointless to use it through the intake and even then I would not do it. If you've ever pulled an engine apart at that kind of mileage there's just not much carbon at all especially a modern EFI engine.

Too many things to go wrong from hydrolocking to killing a converter or 02 sensor. It's a lot of risk for zero gain.

If you must do it, do not let it sit overnight.

Last, the smoke you see is nothing more than the seafoam itself burning. It's not some magical buildup "burning" off.
I actually did research before doing it: http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-gen...-sea-foam.html

I hear both arguments (a. Seafoam is great; b. Seafoam is scam), but I have never found any research or rationale to support either arguments.
Old 02-24-2012, 09:19 PM
  #11  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 38
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Old 02-24-2012, 10:03 PM
  #12  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
I had to stop reading that thread on the first page, too much BS. So one guy gained 100 miles per tank for 33% better mileage and another's car ran great AFTER PUTTING IT IN THE OIL! To top it off he had to add oil to "thicken up the mixture" and then claimed the newfound performance went away after changing the oil. It would be funny if it did not mislead those looking for facts.

The worst were the people seafoaming their almost new TL with 10,000 miles and claiming a difference. The best any product like this can do is restore performance to how it was when the car was new. People were seafoaming new cars, seeing some smoke from the seafoam burning and imagining a performance increase.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:01 AM
  #13  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
First, you should never seafoam your car through the intake or the oil. Gas tank only and even then it's pointless if you've always run premium. Ask yourself why you're running seafoam in the first place and you will find it hard to answer. Unless your car has at least 200,000 miles on it, it's pointless to use it through the intake and even then I would not do it. If you've ever pulled an engine apart at that kind of mileage there's just not much carbon at all especially a modern EFI engine.

Too many things to go wrong from hydrolocking to killing a converter or 02 sensor. It's a lot of risk for zero gain.

If you must do it, do not let it sit overnight.

Last, the smoke you see is nothing more than the seafoam itself burning. It's not some magical buildup "burning" off.
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I had to stop reading that thread on the first page, too much BS.
People were seafoaming new cars, seeing some smoke from the seafoam burning and imagining a performance increase.

Don't even like to reply to these threads, but as Matt jumped in, just thought I'd back him up.
Old 02-25-2012, 08:39 AM
  #14  
Instructor
 
snowtrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 126
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not even sure seafoam does anything. Obviously, it's going to smoke like crazy because anything you pour into the engine will smoke. Then you have to change the plugs and the oil? Let me know if you notice a difference after.
Old 02-25-2012, 08:57 AM
  #15  
Early Shifter
iTrader: (2)
 
ohsixMTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lancaster, PA
Age: 39
Posts: 733
Received 65 Likes on 54 Posts
Seafoam brings the lulz. Use it in the gas tank if you must but you're better off with premium fuel and the occasional bottle of Lucas.
Old 02-25-2012, 10:00 AM
  #16  
Dogmatic Dinosaur
 
jda123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 49
Posts: 1,532
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
I don't know anything about anything and I don't even care.

...but, if it is just the seafoam burning, how come you cannot get any white smoke out of a new car (I never got a new car or new engine to smoke), yet a car with lots of miles will smoke like crazy. Seems like it would smoke equally if it was the Seafoam burning. Has anybody actually seen a new car smoke with their own eyes? Mine would not.

Also, if there is a point where carbon buildup can start to become an "issue," what is the harm in doing it beforehand?
Old 02-25-2012, 11:01 AM
  #17  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by jda123
I don't know anything about anything and I don't even care.

...but, if it is just the seafoam burning, how come you cannot get any white smoke out of a new car (I never got a new car or new engine to smoke), yet a car with lots of miles will smoke like crazy. Seems like it would smoke equally if it was the Seafoam burning. Has anybody actually seen a new car smoke with their own eyes? Mine would not.

Also, if there is a point where carbon buildup can start to become an "issue," what is the harm in doing it beforehand?
I've seen the benefits of water/meth injection before. Pistons looked brand new with a light brown tint, combustion chamber was nearly perfectly clean, even the headers and turbine side of the turbo were perfectly clean.

However, there's just so little carbon buildup in an EFI engine assuming it's running right that there's just not anything to gain by it. Sure, at some point in some extreme case I'm sure seafoam can help even though water does the exact same thing lol. I've never seen enough carbon to cause hotspots or to raise compression ratio. There are plenty pictures on this site of TLs with the heads off and you can clearly see the piston crowns and practically no carbon at all. Same with the heads.

I'm crazy about preventative maintenance. I know some of my oil choices and OCI are too conservative. I tend to be that way but using seafoam as preventative maintenance is taking a risk for little to no gain.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:06 PM
  #18  
Dogmatic Dinosaur
 
jda123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 49
Posts: 1,532
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
Ok, we were talking about two different thing.

I can totally see why the people think that the product has nothing to offer in the combustion chamber.

The benefit (perceived, or no) for me was always in the intake and valves to beat back the EGR residue on the areas where the injectors don't spray fuel. Of course, if this was happening, then it is necessary to put it in the intake.
Old 02-25-2012, 06:52 PM
  #19  
David_Dude
 
Acura_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 13,283
Received 581 Likes on 515 Posts
I like when IHC post. I learn so much.
Old 02-25-2012, 07:13 PM
  #20  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by jda123
Ok, we were talking about two different thing.

I can totally see why the people think that the product has nothing to offer in the combustion chamber.

The benefit (perceived, or no) for me was always in the intake and valves to beat back the EGR residue on the areas where the injectors don't spray fuel. Of course, if this was happening, then it is necessary to put it in the intake.
Imagine the direct injection guys with a million miles worth of buildup in 20,000 miles lol. It might do something in there but how much do you really think is happening from flowing a little solvent that's not really in a mist form flowing through the intake? I can't say it does nothing but chances are it's little to nothing in the intake.

A little off topic but I like to run an oil with a super low NOACK value so there's less PCV crap coming though there. I wish there was a way to disable the EGR and not run into pinging without buying a $2,000 ECU.

Way off topic but I've always had plans to tear the engine down once this car is ready for the junkyard. Only two different oils run for it's entire life and no seafoam ever added. It's only seen regular fuel once since new and only run fuel injector cleaner once when it was new and I thought I got a batch of bad gas. So one day, maybe in the next 5 years I'll be able to open it up and see what it looks like inside.

I'm not trying to discredit or argue with anyone, especially yourself, I just don't see any real value to this stuff. My main problem as always been the guys that claim 100mpg and 100hp increase lol.
Old 02-25-2012, 09:01 PM
  #21  
Dogmatic Dinosaur
 
jda123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 49
Posts: 1,532
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
You will need 15-20 years before your TL is ready for the junkyard. Even with 450K, I had somebody give me $1,000 for my 92 accord. I hope that you don't ever find out by needing a head gasket or anything.

One day, if you start to get MAP CEL lights, give it a try. Of course, not too many of us are near that kind of mileage, but some day...

I am going with "it might work" still. It really helps clean out gummed up carbs on my lawn equipment from sitting over the winter - I mean it works in like 5 minutes rather than a few tankfuls like using gas alone.
Old 02-25-2012, 09:10 PM
  #22  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
Originally Posted by hleapha
What is Hydrolocking?

I'll take car maintenance no-no's for 1000.
Yeah I think? Couldn't figure out what actually happened. The guy who replaced the engine was confused.
Old 02-25-2012, 10:04 PM
  #23  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by jda123
You will need 15-20 years before your TL is ready for the junkyard. Even with 450K, I had somebody give me $1,000 for my 92 accord. I hope that you don't ever find out by needing a head gasket or anything.

One day, if you start to get MAP CEL lights, give it a try. Of course, not too many of us are near that kind of mileage, but some day...

I am going with "it might work" still. It really helps clean out gummed up carbs on my lawn equipment from sitting over the winter - I mean it works in like 5 minutes rather than a few tankfuls like using gas alone.
I hope you're right. Another 10-15 years would be great. I bought this car with the intention of driving it into the ground, that's the only reason I bought new.

I agree, a solvent like seafoam works great in carbs especially with questionable gas. It has it's place, it's just that top tier fuel has all the detergents you'll need. Good oil and regular changes will leave no deposits in the crank case. Fuel feedback EFI has such precise fuel metering that combustion chamber deposits are not an issue for a very long time. That leaves EGR and PCV deposits in the intake tract or a batch of bad gas or a car that was run on cheap regular fuel or not driven much by the previous owner.

Was your Accord a 4cylinder or V6 model?
Old 02-25-2012, 10:10 PM
  #24  
Dogmatic Dinosaur
 
jda123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 49
Posts: 1,532
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts
I had the 4. It was so old that you had to use a paper clip and count the flashes when the CEL went off. Your TL will go as long as you want - I imagine that a few radiator fan motors, wheel bearings, main seals, etc. won't be any trouble.

Last edited by jda123; 02-25-2012 at 10:13 PM.
Old 02-25-2012, 11:09 PM
  #25  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by jda123
I had the 4. It was so old that you had to use a paper clip and count the flashes when the CEL went off. Your TL will go as long as you want - I imagine that a few radiator fan motors, wheel bearings, main seals, etc. won't be any trouble.
That's reassuring. Just got a notice that the IRS is garnishing my wages over a local tax scam. My tax prepparer is in jail and had to pay back $1,000,000. I don't owe a single penny to them but that seems to not matter. I've learned that the IRS does not obey the judicial system, or have any laws governing their actions. I can win over and over against them and they keep taking my money. There's no system of checks and balances. They're literally thieves that can legally steal your money. That's off topic (just very pissed right now) but it's important the TL last a lot longer due to these bastards.

I've been lucky so far, 107k and I've only replaced a battery and headlight (and many cosmetic wear items). It's been a great experience so far. I'm actually looking forward to doing the timing belt (I'm late, I know) and pulling the valve covers for the valve adjustment. It looks brand new under there, like I poured oil over a brand new head. Can't wait to post pictures of it with the cover off.

Anyway, back on topic.
Old 02-25-2012, 11:14 PM
  #26  
.
 
optical24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 167
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I would never use seafoam in my TL since it uses premium gas. However, with a vehicle that uses regular gasoline do you think seafoam poured in the gas tank will benefit (I have 91' Accord with 400k)?
Old 02-25-2012, 11:30 PM
  #27  
Racer
 
cinobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 396
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
I really like seafoam BUT
1: it seems like a waste in my cars i never can see or tell any difference
2: my 30yr old 2 stroke sthil chainsaw idles when it didn't and runs a lot better after running some in the gas.....
3: use your own judgment with the stuff its pretty pricey.
Old 02-25-2012, 11:38 PM
  #28  
TL-S
iTrader: (4)
 
quanaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairfax, Va
Posts: 2,544
Received 412 Likes on 365 Posts
Wow... This is all news to me. Good info.
Old 02-26-2012, 12:08 AM
  #29  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by optical24
I would never use seafoam in my TL since it uses premium gas. However, with a vehicle that uses regular gasoline do you think seafoam poured in the gas tank will benefit (I have 91' Accord with 400k)?
I think that car would have a good chance at seeing an improvement.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mike734
2G RL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
4
12-10-2021 01:25 PM
08KBP_VA
2G RL (2005-2012)
44
10-22-2019 01:55 PM
ITSJESTER
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
17
12-06-2018 02:29 AM
Jimmy_D
5G TLX (2015-2020)
31
10-07-2015 11:52 PM
Sarlacc
Console & Computer Gaming
5
09-30-2015 02:15 PM



Quick Reply: Is it okay if I wait overnight after sipping Seafoam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.