RLX Sales
#241
The reality is they needed to build up the brand and a FWD RLX was not the way. Honestly they should have done SH-AWD and had it be more 50/50 split this take away the FWD stigma or 60/40 like Audi Quattro and then they need to come up with some less bland styling. And have they not figured our the grille is still part of the problem. I can't think of anyone that has such a large slab of metal as part of their grille. The old 3G style cross bar A logo was fine. Unfortunately they are way too deep now into this design.
Personally, I don't want to see more trim levels, I want to see more models with fewer trims among them. Don't forget that between 2004-06 Acura sold nearly 70K TLs a year with (essentially) two trim levels. I've seen no evidence that the explosion of trims has resulted in increased sales or (more importantly) happier customers.
I don't want options, I want fully loaded cars priced right so it doesn't matter if you're "forced" to take a feature you might not want, the price is too good.
In ~10 years SH-AWD did little to raise the brand awareness or 'prestige', dump it. It costs money, sacrifices fuel efficiency and interior space.
I don't want 'better styling', I want I want 'boring' styling that doesn't piss anyone off. Audi makes the most slab sided and boring cars and everybody fawns over them. Stop listening to auto rags! They complain if it's a 1G TSX (boring) and complain if it's a 4G TL (overdone). Just make conservative cars with good, clean lines.
#242
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Yes, but the NSX is just one car. To create a platform that can support compact and midsize RWD sedans ala Cadillac or Infiniti would probably cost billions. And the fact that Honda is much smaller than GM matter. Also, the fact that Honda is an independent company (unlike Nissan) matters. Finally, the fact that Honda is more a motor cycle company than car company (based on revenues) matters. In other words, luxury sedans are NOT Honda's priority. In fact, I think the only reason why they are bringing back the NSX is to show what their hybrid motor technology can do.
Maybe they can divert some of the money they invested in those technologies and build a true driver's platform with an exciting design. Get rid of that ugly beak, they have taken a slight step back with interior plastics which they can easily turn around. New sheet metal is not that expensive. Get some bold styling. That was what caused me to leave, not whether it was FWD based.
Yeah I know people have brought up Infiniti and the fact that they have developed proper RWD performance luxury cars and yet they still lag, but why does it seem like Cadillac is gaining ground? I argue it's as simple as a new platform and daring design. Cadillac made a decision that they were going to go a different direction from their past and didn't just dip their toe in the water, but dove in head first. History will determine whether they will succeed long term, but so far they seem to be doing well. Quite honestly their Achilles heal will be if they can't continue improving quality.
#243
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Personally, I don't want to see more trim levels, I want to see more models with fewer trims among them. Don't forget that between 2004-06 Acura sold nearly 70K TLs a year with (essentially) two trim levels. I've seen no evidence that the explosion of trims has resulted in increased sales or (more importantly) happier customers.
.
.
#244
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
I have only needed a loaner twice and each time, the loaners were filthy. In one case the interior border lined on gross with spilled coffee all over the console.
Compare that with Acura who made sure the car was washed and vacuumed, even if it was snowing/raining outside. Same with the one and only time we have gotten one from BMW when our X5 was in for service. We got a 3 series that was spotless. Even Toyota when we had our Landcruiser. Sometimes the loaner was a Yaris or Prius, but at least it was clean.
Some of the stories over on the Cadillac forums is that their dealers are giving them Nissan Versas and other econoboxes. You wouldn't see that at a Mercedes dealership.
I know it sounds like first world problems/gripes, but if you want to be considered part of the big boys, you better act like it too. That's what got Lexus all the attention in the beginning. In addition to the cars, I remember the big deal that was made of the Saturday morning continental breakfast spread while you brought your car in for a hand wash.
#245
It was an attractive car, simple and not offensive. Same with the 1G TSX. Keep it simple, the rags will always slag on Acura for their styling (and buttons).
#246
Summer is Coming
Yes and no. If they truly desire the intangibles such as prestige etc. then the path is clear. However, let's be clear that just because you follow the path, it does not guarantee sales and financial success (these two are not necessarily the same thing).
Personally, I don't want to see more trim levels, I want to see more models with fewer trims among them. Don't forget that between 2004-06 Acura sold nearly 70K TLs a year with (essentially) two trim levels. I've seen no evidence that the explosion of trims has resulted in increased sales or (more importantly) happier customers.
I don't want options, I want fully loaded cars priced right so it doesn't matter if you're "forced" to take a feature you might not want, the price is too good.
In ~10 years SH-AWD did little to raise the brand awareness or 'prestige', dump it. It costs money, sacrifices fuel efficiency and interior space.
I don't want 'better styling', I want I want 'boring' styling that doesn't piss anyone off. Audi makes the most slab sided and boring cars and everybody fawns over them. Stop listening to auto rags! They complain if it's a 1G TSX (boring) and complain if it's a 4G TL (overdone). Just make conservative cars with good, clean lines.
Personally, I don't want to see more trim levels, I want to see more models with fewer trims among them. Don't forget that between 2004-06 Acura sold nearly 70K TLs a year with (essentially) two trim levels. I've seen no evidence that the explosion of trims has resulted in increased sales or (more importantly) happier customers.
I don't want options, I want fully loaded cars priced right so it doesn't matter if you're "forced" to take a feature you might not want, the price is too good.
In ~10 years SH-AWD did little to raise the brand awareness or 'prestige', dump it. It costs money, sacrifices fuel efficiency and interior space.
I don't want 'better styling', I want I want 'boring' styling that doesn't piss anyone off. Audi makes the most slab sided and boring cars and everybody fawns over them. Stop listening to auto rags! They complain if it's a 1G TSX (boring) and complain if it's a 4G TL (overdone). Just make conservative cars with good, clean lines.
SH-AWD... I personally don't need it and don't want to pay for it and don't want the MPG hit. Some really want it which I understand, but not me.
More and more I see that Acura is not going to have anything to offer me when I sell my car. Too bad since it has served me well.
#247
Suzuka Master
Yes, but the NSX is just one car. To create a platform that can support compact and midsize RWD sedans ala Cadillac or Infiniti would probably cost billions. And the fact that Honda is much smaller than GM matter. Also, the fact that Honda is an independent company (unlike Nissan) matters. Finally, the fact that Honda is more a motor cycle company than car company (based on revenues) matters. In other words, luxury sedans are NOT Honda's priority. In fact, I think the only reason why they are bringing back the NSX is to show what their hybrid motor technology can do.
Also all this it would cost billions to develop a RWD platform to me while true is a weak excuse. They have AWD platforms already all they need to do is tweak them and make them AWD with rear bias (like Audi A6) and then offer a lower cost FWD version (again like Audi A6) and then the AWD version that has either 50/50 spilt or 60/40 split like Audi , add in some decent styling and they would have a success.
What does amaze me is all these reviewers that say the RLX looks like an Accord? Huh, what drugs are they on? Just because of similarities in the center stack? There is no angle I look at an RLX and confuse it with an Accord.
#248
As for the Accord similarity. I think it's a (somewhat) valid discussion. The Accord has always echoed the styling theme of the Legend/RL/RLX. I believe that it's because they occupied the same showroom in Japan so there should be a family resemblance. Especially if you're trying to cast a positive halo over the mass market car with your top line model.
Edited to add: On the styling discussion. I don't see the similarity a negative. What irks me is when people/press make it a negative as if it's exclusive to Honda/Acura when others with multiple lines also do it. Audi/VW, Nissan/Infiniti etc.
Last edited by Colin; 06-04-2013 at 02:16 PM.
#249
Suzuka Master
IMO, that's just silly. Pull out when you're selling 150,000 to 180,000 new cars a year? Who is to say that they're not exactly where they want to be? I've said it before but its worth repeating. Despite all the hatred, Honda might be executing their plan to a 'T'. They might hit 200,000 cars this year without building a single dedicated chassis, RWD, or a V-8.
As for the Accord similarity. I think it's a (somewhat) valid discussion. The Accord has always echoed the styling theme of the Legend/RL/RLX. I believe that it's because they occupied the same showroom in Japan so there should be a family resemblance. Especially if you're trying to cast a positive halo over the mass market car with your top line model.
Edited to add: On the styling discussion. I don't see the similarity a negative. What irks me is when people/press make it a negative as if it's exclusive to Honda/Acura when others with multiple lines also do it. Audi/VW, Nissan/Infiniti etc.
As for the Accord similarity. I think it's a (somewhat) valid discussion. The Accord has always echoed the styling theme of the Legend/RL/RLX. I believe that it's because they occupied the same showroom in Japan so there should be a family resemblance. Especially if you're trying to cast a positive halo over the mass market car with your top line model.
Edited to add: On the styling discussion. I don't see the similarity a negative. What irks me is when people/press make it a negative as if it's exclusive to Honda/Acura when others with multiple lines also do it. Audi/VW, Nissan/Infiniti etc.
#250
Personally I think they should become an SUV company exclusively like Land Rover, because they just can't seem to get their act together with cars.
#251
If you were running the show, I'd love to see how you respond to shareholders that you're going to sacrifice 80K in car (in an off year) sales because some on the internet aren't happy with the job you're doing on them. Heck, I bet Infiniti doesn't do 80K a year in sedan sales. Lexus might not even to that much.
Can they improve? Absolutely. I've outlined areas I'd like to see them do in post #241.
#252
I share the comment about my irk on bashing Honda/Acura for sharing similar plateform etc when other companies are doing it as well. I am of the opinion that Acura CAN do fantastic cars but it seems lately, something (or someone) is holding them back. We know the success and the rave reviews from the 1G TSX and the 3G TL....why did things go so bad so fast, especially amongst car reviewers which we all know have some influence on some people. I still think that the following that BMW and other German brands are largely influenced by what people read....people want to follow the masses. I heard many people they hated their Corolla but just bought it because everyone said it was a good and reliable car even though they didn't like it....go figure.
I bought my TL when many hated it...why? Because I liked it which is how it should be. That being said, we all want Acura to be successful and bring the love and passion into the brand because we are passionate. Almost feels like a parent who is trying to save their children from making stupid decision...we all want them to succeed and try and hand all the right options for them on a silver platter hoping they will just grab them and run with it. We all wish we could have 30 minutes with the top 3 executive at Acura....don't we?!
I bought my TL when many hated it...why? Because I liked it which is how it should be. That being said, we all want Acura to be successful and bring the love and passion into the brand because we are passionate. Almost feels like a parent who is trying to save their children from making stupid decision...we all want them to succeed and try and hand all the right options for them on a silver platter hoping they will just grab them and run with it. We all wish we could have 30 minutes with the top 3 executive at Acura....don't we?!
#253
Burning Brakes
I don't want 'better styling', I want I want 'boring' styling that doesn't piss anyone off. Audi makes the most slab sided and boring cars and everybody fawns over them. Stop listening to auto rags! They complain if it's a 1G TSX (boring) and complain if it's a 4G TL (overdone). Just make conservative cars with good, clean lines.
Honda and Acura tried a similar style in their Crosstour and ZDX respectively, but they don't sell well. Maybe Honda/Acura's execution was flawed; the A5 Sportback is certainly more elegant. Or maybe the U.S. just doesn't like sportbacks.
#254
If you put the starting pricetag in the low $40's, what would the pricing on a TLX look like when it comes out?
#255
Three Wheelin'
Speaking of Cadillacs, I finally rode in the back of an XTS. My new employer used a livery (car driving) service to transport me from the airport to the conference center. I liked riding in it! I hope the RLX presents a similarly comfortable experience. And I still believe livery service and rental car fleets are a big source of Cadillac car sales.
Actually with Cadillac their other weakness is the dealer/service dept experience. There were a few of us commenting in the Cadillac forums on this.
I have only needed a loaner twice and each time, the loaners were filthy. In one case the interior border lined on gross with spilled coffee all over the console.
Compare that with Acura who made sure the car was washed and vacuumed, even if it was snowing/raining outside. Same with the one and only time we have gotten one from BMW when our X5 was in for service. We got a 3 series that was spotless. Even Toyota when we had our Landcruiser. Sometimes the loaner was a Yaris or Prius, but at least it was clean.
Some of the stories over on the Cadillac forums is that their dealers are giving them Nissan Versas and other econoboxes. You wouldn't see that at a Mercedes dealership.
I know it sounds like first world problems/gripes, but if you want to be considered part of the big boys, you better act like it too. That's what got Lexus all the attention in the beginning. In addition to the cars, I remember the big deal that was made of the Saturday morning continental breakfast spread while you brought your car in for a hand wash.
I have only needed a loaner twice and each time, the loaners were filthy. In one case the interior border lined on gross with spilled coffee all over the console.
Compare that with Acura who made sure the car was washed and vacuumed, even if it was snowing/raining outside. Same with the one and only time we have gotten one from BMW when our X5 was in for service. We got a 3 series that was spotless. Even Toyota when we had our Landcruiser. Sometimes the loaner was a Yaris or Prius, but at least it was clean.
Some of the stories over on the Cadillac forums is that their dealers are giving them Nissan Versas and other econoboxes. You wouldn't see that at a Mercedes dealership.
I know it sounds like first world problems/gripes, but if you want to be considered part of the big boys, you better act like it too. That's what got Lexus all the attention in the beginning. In addition to the cars, I remember the big deal that was made of the Saturday morning continental breakfast spread while you brought your car in for a hand wash.
#256
Also speaking of Cadillacs, I absolutely loved the design of the ATS. Its design moved me (like the 3G TL's looks moved me when I first saw it) to investigate it when I saw it. But I couldn't jump on a GM product after all the issues I'd seen with them in the past, so I lurked on a Cadillac forum or two (I've seen some of you guys on these forums) and have been watching with interest for the past 1+ years to see what early reports are. I would've loved to buy the car, but am still apprehensive after seeing various quirky and sometimes scary issues popping up on the car in the forums. I've decided to hold off on the ATS for now. I am now looking a the Q50 and IS350. One thing I loved about my TL is that for the pounding I put it through and the way I drive, it's been pretty reliable. I want another car that'll last 150,000+ miles. I would like it to be an Acura, but I swear they're doing everything to make sure it isn't them, and the RLX and ILX are causing me to worry a bit. Then the TLX, which is the car I'd probably get is nowhere in site. Talk about being in entry-luxury sports sedan purgatory. That being said, Acura is still near the top of my list for the reasons others have mentioned. Among them, value (perceived or otherwise) and reliability. BTW, I'm among those who don't really care about SH-AWD, Krell audio, etc. If they jack the price up by making things like that standard, I wouldn't look at Acura.
#257
Suzuka Master
I like the look of the Q50 and I love my M37S, but Infiniti build quality is not on par with Acura and their reseal values sucks. I am curios to see how the Q50 rollout goes. Infiniti is in the process of improving Quality at their plants and has some new measurement they use, unfortunately the only plant to hit the goals is the plant that turns out the M, so the q50 is still being made at the G plant.
#258
Millions of people eat at fast food restaurants every year too. That doesn't mean the food is good, or that McDonald's shouldn't aim higher and do better.
If I were running the show, I would hope to take more pride in my work and not allow people such as Mendel et al to continue pushing products such as the ILX, RLX, and ZDX (and regardless of what Infiniti, Lexus, or "everybody else" is doing).
#259
Last year Acura sold 156K (of which the "hated" sedans contributed 79K). So yes, 80K is probably too high a number based on past history but I still believe the ILX will do 30K but it's going to be tough for TL and TSX to pull in 50K combined. We'll need to see how production pans out, with the new Special Edition TL coming, they're slowing production on the other trims. This could put additional constraints on this model.
BTW, "If I were running the show, I would hope to take more pride in my work " is a far different tone than "Personally I think they should become an SUV company exclusively like Land Rover, because they just can't seem to get their act together with cars." and deserves a different reply. The former is perfectly reasonable but the later, nonsensical. Even if they only do 50K in the last year in the market for this gen TL and TSX, nobody is going to write off 50K in volume.
Last edited by Colin; 06-05-2013 at 02:24 PM.
#260
Burning Brakes
I like the look of the Q50 and I love my M37S, but Infiniti build quality is not on par with Acura and their reseal values sucks. I am curios to see how the Q50 rollout goes. Infiniti is in the process of improving Quality at their plants and has some new measurement they use, unfortunately the only plant to hit the goals is the plant that turns out the M, so the q50 is still being made at the G plant.
#261
First of all, nobody said the cars were "hated" except you. Second, you keep making my point for me, but just I can't make it any plainer to understand: start making cars that more people want to buy.
Tons of people bought the new Civic when it came out. Many probably don't even care what they're driving. Many probably liked it the way it was. And Honda thought the Civic was "good enough" as is. That was until the backlash started, and they realized that "good enough" wasn't going to cut it, so they rushed an update into production to MAKE THE CAR THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE MADE IN THE FIRST PLACE. THIS IS WHAT ACURA HAS DONE WITH THE ILX, RLX, ETC. Instead of making cars that are more than just over-baked Civics and Accords with LED headlights, they figured they were "good enough". THAT is what has to stop.
I was trying to offer constructive criticism and ideas, not start a war. I would think and hope that Acura would be interested in what all customers (and yes, I am an Acura owner) have to say.
Tons of people bought the new Civic when it came out. Many probably don't even care what they're driving. Many probably liked it the way it was. And Honda thought the Civic was "good enough" as is. That was until the backlash started, and they realized that "good enough" wasn't going to cut it, so they rushed an update into production to MAKE THE CAR THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE MADE IN THE FIRST PLACE. THIS IS WHAT ACURA HAS DONE WITH THE ILX, RLX, ETC. Instead of making cars that are more than just over-baked Civics and Accords with LED headlights, they figured they were "good enough". THAT is what has to stop.
I was trying to offer constructive criticism and ideas, not start a war. I would think and hope that Acura would be interested in what all customers (and yes, I am an Acura owner) have to say.
The following 3 users liked this post by 4thaccord:
#262
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
ILX: $26k - $34k
The current pricing scheme is fine as long as they fix this car up.
TLX: $32k - $50k
Base FWD 2.4: $32k
Tech FWD 2.4: $35.5k
Base FWD 3.5: $36k
Tech FWD 3.5: $39.5k
Advance FWD 3.5: $42k
Base AWD 3.5: $39k
Tech AWD 3.5: $42.5k
Advance AWD 3.5: $45k
Hybrid AWD 3.5: $50k
RLX: $44k - $70k
#264
This is how I think Acura should price their sedans:
ILX: $26k - $34k
The current pricing scheme is fine as long as they fix this car up.
TLX: $32k - $50k
Base FWD 2.4: $32k
Tech FWD 2.4: $35.5k
Base FWD 3.5: $36k
Tech FWD 3.5: $39.5k
Advance FWD 3.5: $42k
Base AWD 3.5: $39k
Tech AWD 3.5: $42.5k
Advance AWD 3.5: $45k
Hybrid AWD 3.5: $50k
RLX: $44k - $70k
ILX: $26k - $34k
The current pricing scheme is fine as long as they fix this car up.
TLX: $32k - $50k
Base FWD 2.4: $32k
Tech FWD 2.4: $35.5k
Base FWD 3.5: $36k
Tech FWD 3.5: $39.5k
Advance FWD 3.5: $42k
Base AWD 3.5: $39k
Tech AWD 3.5: $42.5k
Advance AWD 3.5: $45k
Hybrid AWD 3.5: $50k
RLX: $44k - $70k
#265
I think that the TL and TSX in their last year in this body style will combine for ~50K in sales, and the ILX will add ~30K. I'll go out on a limb and suggest that these 80K people don't hate their cars as much as you do.
If you were running the show, I'd love to see how you respond to shareholders that you're going to sacrifice 80K in car (in an off year) sales because some on the internet aren't happy with the job you're doing on them. Heck, I bet Infiniti doesn't do 80K a year in sedan sales. Lexus might not even to that much.
Can they improve? Absolutely. I've outlined areas I'd like to see them do in post #241.
If you were running the show, I'd love to see how you respond to shareholders that you're going to sacrifice 80K in car (in an off year) sales because some on the internet aren't happy with the job you're doing on them. Heck, I bet Infiniti doesn't do 80K a year in sedan sales. Lexus might not even to that much.
Can they improve? Absolutely. I've outlined areas I'd like to see them do in post #241.
It would have been great idea of Acura had launched a Sub-RDX SUV with 2.4L DI Accord Engine.
#266
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Also speaking of Cadillacs, I absolutely loved the design of the ATS. Its design moved me (like the 3G TL's looks moved me when I first saw it) to investigate it when I saw it. But I couldn't jump on a GM product after all the issues I'd seen with them in the past, so I lurked on a Cadillac forum or two (I've seen some of you guys on these forums) and have been watching with interest for the past 1+ years to see what early reports are. I would've loved to buy the car, but am still apprehensive after seeing various quirky and sometimes scary issues popping up on the car in the forums. I've decided to hold off on the ATS for now. I am now looking a the Q50 and IS350. One thing I loved about my TL is that for the pounding I put it through and the way I drive, it's been pretty reliable. I want another car that'll last 150,000+ miles. I would like it to be an Acura, but I swear they're doing everything to make sure it isn't them, and the RLX and ILX are causing me to worry a bit. Then the TLX, which is the car I'd probably get is nowhere in site. Talk about being in entry-luxury sports sedan purgatory. That being said, Acura is still near the top of my list for the reasons others have mentioned. Among them, value (perceived or otherwise) and reliability. BTW, I'm among those who don't really care about SH-AWD, Krell audio, etc. If they jack the price up by making things like that standard, I wouldn't look at Acura.
Having said all that, I think the ATS has been relatively solid.
#267
Midnight Marauder
Not sure how credible this source is, but they gave the ATS 4 out 5 for reliability.
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...S/Reliability/
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...S/Reliability/
#268
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Not sure how credible this source is, but they gave the ATS 4 out 5 for reliability.
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...S/Reliability/
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...S/Reliability/
#269
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
Looks sensible. However, I think it's all but confirmed that the TLX will also spawn a coupe version that should also be factored in. Also, the hybrid will be a 4 cylinder FWD. I don't believe there are plans for a AWD Hybrid. That said, I think if they were to do a TLX Coupe Hybrid, it could offer the marketplace something different, especially paired with a 3.5. Wow, how cool would that be, a RLX Hybrid drivetrain in a TLX Coupe body? Would it sell?
Looking at that, that seems to be a lot of trims once you add in a coupe version.
Not sure how credible this source is, but they gave the ATS 4 out 5 for reliability.
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...S/Reliability/
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...S/Reliability/
#270
Midnight Marauder
Looks sensible. However, I think it's all but confirmed that the TLX will also spawn a coupe version that should also be factored in. Also, the hybrid will be a 4 cylinder FWD. I don't believe there are plans for a AWD Hybrid. That said, I think if they were to do a TLX Coupe Hybrid, it could offer the marketplace something different, especially paired with a 3.5. Wow, how cool would that be, a RLX Hybrid drivetrain in a TLX Coupe body? Would it sell?
I just don't think the Acura brand currently has the brand equity to sell for much more than the 50-55k range. But if they launched the TLX coupe as sort of a little brother to the NSX, and market it correctly, then I think it would have a good chance of being successful. However, given their recent track record with new model launches, I wouldn't hold my breath.
#271
Intermediate
I do not know about the ILX, we where given one as a loaner and it sucked. Felt cheap, the transmission clunked loudly and even jerked when putting it in gear. They need a sporty low end, bring the Integra back.
#272
Burning Brakes
I don't know now about current G series, but we have 05 g35x. And its fit and finish really bad. Wind noise( rear windows) all kind noises when you hit pothole (interior) interior plastic super cheep. Last Infiniti in my family.
#273
Interesting thought, I would imagine it would come down to how much and how well the design is executed.
I just don't think the Acura brand currently has the brand equity to sell for much more than the 50-55k range. But if they launched the TLX coupe as sort of a little brother to the NSX, and market it correctly, then I think it would have a good chance of being successful. However, given their recent track record with new model launches, I wouldn't hold my breath.
I just don't think the Acura brand currently has the brand equity to sell for much more than the 50-55k range. But if they launched the TLX coupe as sort of a little brother to the NSX, and market it correctly, then I think it would have a good chance of being successful. However, given their recent track record with new model launches, I wouldn't hold my breath.
Let's play 'what if'? What if they make a Acura version of the Accord Coupe. AT and MT, LEDs, FWD for sure, AWD if they're using the mechanical SH-AWD in the TLX sedan. This would have to be $35-45K depending on content.
What if they pull a page from history (Fiat X/19, Toyota MR2) and take the sub-assemblies holding the engine and rear suspension and swap them front to rear? This could create a Mid-Engine RWD sports car without needing to fully reengineer the drivetrain. What if were NA only, 310 hp, 6MT, LED. Could this sell for the same price as the original NSX? Say ~60K?
Well now you've gone and hurt my feelings. We had 3 Integra GS-Rs ('94. '97. '99) and I currently have a 6MT ILX. This is better in every way except possibly handling feel. 200hp vs. 170hp (on the old hp scale), HID vs. halogen, 6MT vs. 5MT, Leather vs. Cloth, and all the new luxury items like bluetooth, pusbutton start, USB etc. Most of this applies to the automatic version of the ILX as well, so long as you're not talking about the base version (cloth). LOL just my (gotta defend my car)
Last edited by Colin; 06-06-2013 at 08:04 PM.
#274
Midnight Marauder
Generally, I agree with both of you. Execution will be key, and there is reason to doubt their resolve.
Let's play 'what if'? What if they make a Acura version of the Accord Coupe. AT and MT, LEDs, FWD for sure, AWD if they're using the mechanical SH-AWD in the TLX sedan. This would have to be $35-45K depending on content.
What if they pull a page from history (Fiat X/19, Toyota MR2) and take the sub-assemblies holding the engine and rear suspension and swap them front to rear? This could create a Mid-Engine RWD sports car without needing to fully reengineer the drivetrain. What if were NA only, 310 hp, 6MT, LED. Could this sell for the same price as the original NSX? Say ~60K?
Let's play 'what if'? What if they make a Acura version of the Accord Coupe. AT and MT, LEDs, FWD for sure, AWD if they're using the mechanical SH-AWD in the TLX sedan. This would have to be $35-45K depending on content.
What if they pull a page from history (Fiat X/19, Toyota MR2) and take the sub-assemblies holding the engine and rear suspension and swap them front to rear? This could create a Mid-Engine RWD sports car without needing to fully reengineer the drivetrain. What if were NA only, 310 hp, 6MT, LED. Could this sell for the same price as the original NSX? Say ~60K?
Option 2: this would be really interesting. It would provide an additional halo that the brand needs badly. Having two cars with mid-engined sport car credentials could really bring some brand equity back to Acura. If they create this car, please bring back the "Precision Crafted Performance" tag line and requisite marketing campaign.
With all that said, I don't think the cars will sell in large numbers, and it wouldn't really matter because that would make them exclusive for good reasons. But what it would do is bring Acura back into the conversation when speaking about premium performance vehicles. It'll bring people into the showrooms to buy the bread and butter cars.
Last edited by jwong77; 06-07-2013 at 02:20 AM.
The following users liked this post:
GoHawks (06-07-2013)
#275
Summer is Coming
.....
I bought my TL when many hated it...why? Because I liked it which is how it should be. That being said, we all want Acura to be successful and bring the love and passion into the brand because we are passionate. Almost feels like a parent who is trying to save their children from making stupid decision...we all want them to succeed and try and hand all the right options for them on a silver platter hoping they will just grab them and run with it. We all wish we could have 30 minutes with the top 3 executive at Acura....don't we?!
I bought my TL when many hated it...why? Because I liked it which is how it should be. That being said, we all want Acura to be successful and bring the love and passion into the brand because we are passionate. Almost feels like a parent who is trying to save their children from making stupid decision...we all want them to succeed and try and hand all the right options for them on a silver platter hoping they will just grab them and run with it. We all wish we could have 30 minutes with the top 3 executive at Acura....don't we?!
Also speaking of Cadillacs, I absolutely loved the design of the ATS. Its design moved me (like the 3G TL's looks moved me when I first saw it) to investigate it when I saw it. But I couldn't jump on a GM product after all the issues I'd seen with them in the past, so I lurked on a Cadillac forum or two (I've seen some of you guys on these forums) and have been watching with interest for the past 1+ years to see what early reports are. I would've loved to buy the car, but am still apprehensive after seeing various quirky and sometimes scary issues popping up on the car in the forums. I've decided to hold off on the ATS for now. I am now looking a the Q50 and IS350. One thing I loved about my TL is that for the pounding I put it through and the way I drive, it's been pretty reliable. I want another car that'll last 150,000+ miles. I would like it to be an Acura, but I swear they're doing everything to make sure it isn't them, and the RLX and ILX are causing me to worry a bit. Then the TLX, which is the car I'd probably get is nowhere in site. Talk about being in entry-luxury sports sedan purgatory. That being said, Acura is still near the top of my list for the reasons others have mentioned. Among them, value (perceived or otherwise) and reliability. BTW, I'm among those who don't really care about SH-AWD, Krell audio, etc. If they jack the price up by making things like that standard, I wouldn't look at Acura.
I like the look of the Q50 and I love my M37S, but Infiniti build quality is not on par with Acura and their reseal values sucks. I am curios to see how the Q50 rollout goes. Infiniti is in the process of improving Quality at their plants and has some new measurement they use, unfortunately the only plant to hit the goals is the plant that turns out the M, so the q50 is still being made at the G plant.
"...So far, only one plant -- the Tochigi assembly plant -- has passed muster. It makes the Q50, the replacement for the G sedan. It also builds the following vehicles, listed by their current names and what they soon will be renamed under Infiniti's new nomenclature: the M sedan (Q70) and EX and FX crossovers (QX50 and QX70). It also makes the Nissan GT-R sports car and the 370Z sporty coupe. "
#276
Option 1: they already played this game with the first and second gen CL, which both flopped more or less from a sales standpoint, I personally owned a first gen back in college.
But what it would do is bring Acura back into the conversation when speaking about premium performance vehicles. It'll bring people into the showrooms to buy the bread and butter cars.
But what it would do is bring Acura back into the conversation when speaking about premium performance vehicles. It'll bring people into the showrooms to buy the bread and butter cars.
As for a TLX Coupe. The challenge would be to make something that is not just a Accord Coupe copy. IMO, this is why (if it were me) it would only be SH-AWD. For price considerations, the mechanical one makes the most sense, and it might finally give this drivetrain some real attention. I would NOT be excited if it were FWD only.
#277
Midnight Marauder
Unfortunately, I'm not old enough to comment on how the Legend coupe fared. Though I got the impression it did well with the press and in turn was a positive for the Acura brand. Did it do enough to help increase sales of the Integra?
#278
Senior Moderator
Been gone for a couple of weeks, and I come back to sad news on RLX sales.
Hopefully it's just a blip and things will pick up. Rather than speculate on what's wrong, I'll be optimistic.
Hopefully it's just a blip and things will pick up. Rather than speculate on what's wrong, I'll be optimistic.
#280
Drifting
Would most consider the 2G RL a success or failure? Either way, there were 17,527 RL's sold in 2005. At 400ish units being sold per month, the RLX has a long way to go before it's even living up to its predecessor. Hell, the 1G 3.5RL was selling substantially more at the end of its cycle than the RLX is right now. I hope Acura is really grinding away at the AWD model. It really is pitiful that Acura offers AWD on 4 out of 7 cars in its lineup...and the flagship model is not one of them.
Last edited by BDoggPrelude; 06-16-2013 at 03:38 AM.