Looking for a RLX Sport Hybrid
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Looking for a RLX Sport Hybrid
I sold my TL SH-AWD and am looking for a Sport Hybrid. I'm looking to buy used, a CPO car, preferably a 2016, but would consider a 2017. What I've seen sold, I just missed both these cars, 2016 RLX Sport Hybrid with Advance package, one was priced at about $39,900 and the other at about $39,800. One had just short of 25K miles and the other was just short of 15K miles. Both sold and I'm assuming at asking price or very close to it. Some dealerships are asking more for these car, but they''re not selling at the prices they're asking. Regardless of what the auto pricing guides say, dealerships ask, I'm witnessing cars selling at this pricing level.
If anyone comes across a 2016/2017 RLX Sport Hybrid with the Advance Package, I would appreciate a heads up. Thanking you in advance.
I did test drive a 2018 Sport Hybrid with the Advanced package (the only way they come now), last Saturday. It's a marvelous road machine.
If anyone comes across a 2016/2017 RLX Sport Hybrid with the Advance Package, I would appreciate a heads up. Thanking you in advance.
I did test drive a 2018 Sport Hybrid with the Advanced package (the only way they come now), last Saturday. It's a marvelous road machine.
#4
Advanced
Thread Starter
Found a 2014 (Black on Black) with less than 8K on the odometer in Minneapolis ($35,889):
https://www.bloomington-acura.com/ce...ign=dealer_vdp
https://www.bloomington-acura.com/ce...ign=dealer_vdp
The following users liked this post:
Krlesch (03-24-2018)
#5
Advanced
Thread Starter
And I found one. Bought a 2017 SH/Advance Package, with just short of 10,000 miles. It’s a CPO car with a placed in service date of January 2018. I’ve got a lot of warranty left on this. It was delivered a couple hours ago. Had it shipped from Maryland to OKC. It’s very dirty. I’m taking tomorrow off to clean and do a familiarization with the car.
I test drove a 2018 and that made me pull the trigger on this car.
Just some observations, my opinions really. You can’t beat these cars for the price. I don’t care what Kelly Blue Book says, Mr. Market determines what the selling price is going to be. My point being, these cars sell at way below KBB. Everyone wants a Lexus, MB, BMW, or Audi. These cars have gotten virtually no press, and no exposure. They sit on the lots for months, until the dealer sets it at a price to move.
I test drove a 2018 and that made me pull the trigger on this car.
Just some observations, my opinions really. You can’t beat these cars for the price. I don’t care what Kelly Blue Book says, Mr. Market determines what the selling price is going to be. My point being, these cars sell at way below KBB. Everyone wants a Lexus, MB, BMW, or Audi. These cars have gotten virtually no press, and no exposure. They sit on the lots for months, until the dealer sets it at a price to move.
The following 13 users liked this post by mrrobato:
a35tl (04-17-2018),
fsmith (04-17-2018),
George Knighton (04-17-2018),
hondamore (04-17-2018),
JM2010 SH-AWD (04-17-2018),
and 8 others liked this post.
Trending Topics
#8
Burning Brakes
Congrats on your excellent find! Yes it does looks stunning in white, but then I have a white one also . I hope you enjoy it as much as we have!
Let us know what you think about it, after you have driven it for a little while......for me, after almost 3 years I am still enjoying it as much as when I first got it!
Let us know what you think about it, after you have driven it for a little while......for me, after almost 3 years I am still enjoying it as much as when I first got it!
#9
Grandpa
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes
on
1,475 Posts
The big car's tendency toward neutral handling and transition to oversteer will surprise people who don't know that this is what it's supposed to do.
The following users liked this post:
pgeorg (04-17-2018)
The following 6 users liked this post by miner:
hondamore (04-17-2018),
Ken1997TL (07-11-2018),
Malibu Flyer (04-17-2018),
nist7 (07-10-2018),
teh CL (04-17-2018),
and 1 others liked this post.
#11
Advanced
Thread Starter
I have a 1964 Plymouth Fury, with a push button automatic. Back in the early 60s, Mopars ruled the strip with the 426 Wedge Stage III Cross Ram Engines, and 727 Push Button Automatics. The Old Timers called it, "Typing your way to Victory!"
The following users liked this post:
wstr75 (04-25-2018)
#12
▒JDM ¥ KING▒
Congrats! Looks great! Light interior too I can see.
#14
Drifting
I noticed some time ago that BMW would never use the TL (my car) or the RLX SH on their site as a comparison car to the 535, and with good reason. Both will smoke a 535!
#15
Pro
Grats! As others have said here, after three years, I still look forward to every time I have to take a trip in my '14 RLX Sport Hybrid. It is an amazing car. And so far, pretty much nothing has broken (one blind-spot sensor). Yes, the infotainment system is slow, but other than that, it's been a joy!
#18
Advanced
Thread Starter
I’ve had the car since Monday. It’s as good as I had hoped it would be.
It took me a day to quit reaching for the shifter. I’m good with the buttons, don’t have to look any more.
The infotainmentment system is clunky. However, I take solace in the fact I didn’t pay $175,000.00 for a sucky infotainment system.
2018 Porsche Panamera Turbo Sport Turismo Group Review: Where Station Wagon Meets Supercar - The Drive
“No, it's this new infotainment setup with all the hard buttons in a giant sheet of shiny black plastic.
BUT IT LOOKS SO PRETTY.
It, for lack of a better term, sucks.”
This car is truly a sleeper. It’s faster than it feels. I haven’t tried to take on any high speed sweepers yet. Really haven’t pushed this car except for some straight line hard acceleration. My impression of hard acceleration is that it’s quiet and effortless, no strum and drang, it reminds me a bit of the acceleration of a passenger jet on take off.
Without a doubt in my mind, this car is the best bang for the buck on the market. 377 horses, 341 ft-lbs of torque, hybrid technology putting a boat load of torque to the wheels as soon as the electric motor shaft turns, luxurious interior, great sound system, and Honda reliability. What’s not to like?
Of course, Best Bang for the Buck cuts both ways. Not a lot of demand for the car, so re-sale could be rough unless you can find the right person. That’s okay, I don’t plan on parting with this car for a while.
I’ve always wanted an Acura since the Legend came out. I’ve owned the TL SH-AWD and now this. Both great cars, under appreciated by the American public. I really don’t see that changing anytime soon.
It took me a day to quit reaching for the shifter. I’m good with the buttons, don’t have to look any more.
The infotainmentment system is clunky. However, I take solace in the fact I didn’t pay $175,000.00 for a sucky infotainment system.
2018 Porsche Panamera Turbo Sport Turismo Group Review: Where Station Wagon Meets Supercar - The Drive
“No, it's this new infotainment setup with all the hard buttons in a giant sheet of shiny black plastic.
BUT IT LOOKS SO PRETTY.
It, for lack of a better term, sucks.”
This car is truly a sleeper. It’s faster than it feels. I haven’t tried to take on any high speed sweepers yet. Really haven’t pushed this car except for some straight line hard acceleration. My impression of hard acceleration is that it’s quiet and effortless, no strum and drang, it reminds me a bit of the acceleration of a passenger jet on take off.
Without a doubt in my mind, this car is the best bang for the buck on the market. 377 horses, 341 ft-lbs of torque, hybrid technology putting a boat load of torque to the wheels as soon as the electric motor shaft turns, luxurious interior, great sound system, and Honda reliability. What’s not to like?
Of course, Best Bang for the Buck cuts both ways. Not a lot of demand for the car, so re-sale could be rough unless you can find the right person. That’s okay, I don’t plan on parting with this car for a while.
I’ve always wanted an Acura since the Legend came out. I’ve owned the TL SH-AWD and now this. Both great cars, under appreciated by the American public. I really don’t see that changing anytime soon.
The following 7 users liked this post by mrrobato:
a35tl (04-24-2018),
fsmith (04-22-2018),
hondamore (04-22-2018),
JM2010 SH-AWD (04-23-2018),
Malibu Flyer (04-23-2018),
and 2 others liked this post.
#19
I remember that car...you just had to push ONE button..
Then the hand of God came down and everything........... transformed...........Your perception of Reality on the way to......... Nirvana ..
As for BMW you have to to to the 550/ M Series for $ 90...120...Thousand to exceed the SH performance
Last edited by Philisophe; 04-22-2018 at 02:28 PM.
#20
Pro
This car is truly a sleeper. It’s faster than it feels. I haven’t tried to take on any high speed sweepers yet. Really haven’t pushed this car except for some straight line hard acceleration. My impression of hard acceleration is that it’s quiet and effortless, no strum and drang, it reminds me a bit of the acceleration of a passenger jet on take off.
#21
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,953
Received 1,236 Likes
on
1,023 Posts
I've been contemplating one of these....... Hard to beat the value.
#22
▒JDM ¥ KING▒
I'm looking for one too! Wish me luck
#23
Advanced
Thread Starter
I've owned this car for four months and have put maybe 700 miles on it. I only drive it on the weekends. I had an opportunity the past couple days to drive it to work. Works about 25 miles away. I run down I-35 for about 15 miles and East on I-40 maybe 5 miles. I owned a 2012 TL SH-AWD prior to this car.
I leave for work about 4:15 am. Most the time traffic is sparse, sometimes a little bit more than sparse. I was going 80 mph and floored the accelerator. The car had strong acceleration up to 120 mph. I was running out of road due to coming up on a couple vehicles, so that was the run. The car felt like it had another 10 - 15 mph of hard acceleration left in it. My TL started running out of steam at 120 mph. Going from 120 to 128 was fairly slow for the TL. The RLX SH is a much, much better high speed car than the TL. I think the RLX SH is a 90 mph cruiser. I feel safe and I feel like I have enough reaction time, it's not white knuckles driving. Running down a straight road the RLX feels planted.
The transition from I-35 to I-40 is a 90 degree overpass sweeper. I entered the sweeper at 81 and maintained it all the way through. The RLX-SH was not planted as well as the TL, not close. I've taken the TL into that sweeper at 90 and exited at about 95. The TL felt like it was on rails, the RLX-SH, not so much. It wasn't bad, just not planted like the TL.
I prefer the RLX SH over the TL SH-AWD. The RLX is a better riding car, it's more supple, and thats why it doesn't corner like the TL. I think the RLX-SH does everything better than the TL SH-AWD but cornering.
I leave for work about 4:15 am. Most the time traffic is sparse, sometimes a little bit more than sparse. I was going 80 mph and floored the accelerator. The car had strong acceleration up to 120 mph. I was running out of road due to coming up on a couple vehicles, so that was the run. The car felt like it had another 10 - 15 mph of hard acceleration left in it. My TL started running out of steam at 120 mph. Going from 120 to 128 was fairly slow for the TL. The RLX SH is a much, much better high speed car than the TL. I think the RLX SH is a 90 mph cruiser. I feel safe and I feel like I have enough reaction time, it's not white knuckles driving. Running down a straight road the RLX feels planted.
The transition from I-35 to I-40 is a 90 degree overpass sweeper. I entered the sweeper at 81 and maintained it all the way through. The RLX-SH was not planted as well as the TL, not close. I've taken the TL into that sweeper at 90 and exited at about 95. The TL felt like it was on rails, the RLX-SH, not so much. It wasn't bad, just not planted like the TL.
I prefer the RLX SH over the TL SH-AWD. The RLX is a better riding car, it's more supple, and thats why it doesn't corner like the TL. I think the RLX-SH does everything better than the TL SH-AWD but cornering.
The following 4 users liked this post by mrrobato:
#24
Grandpa
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes
on
1,475 Posts
Not that it might matter at 90 mph, but just so you are aware: The fuel economy will begin to suffer greatly at that speed. :-)
My lifetime average is 31 mpg. I'm lucky that I commute on country roads that allow EV mode ⅓ of the time.
At 90, you don't get any electric power for forward momentum any longer (although they will still come on to vector you through a turn or even to change lanes). In consequence of virtually complete reliance on the V6 motor, the fuel economy plummets.
My lifetime average is 31 mpg. I'm lucky that I commute on country roads that allow EV mode ⅓ of the time.
At 90, you don't get any electric power for forward momentum any longer (although they will still come on to vector you through a turn or even to change lanes). In consequence of virtually complete reliance on the V6 motor, the fuel economy plummets.
#25
will they vector at 90 (or anything above the cutoff)?
I thought they flat out cut off.
I thought they flat out cut off.
#26
Burning Brakes
The transition from I-35 to I-40 is a 90 degree overpass sweeper. I entered the sweeper at 81 and maintained it all the way through. The RLX-SH was not planted as well as the TL, not close. I've taken the TL into that sweeper at 90 and exited at about 95. The TL felt like it was on rails, the RLX-SH, not so much. It wasn't bad, just not planted like the TL.
I prefer the RLX SH over the TL SH-AWD. The RLX is a better riding car, it's more supple, and thats why it doesn't corner like the TL. I think the RLX-SH does everything better than the TL SH-AWD but cornering.
I prefer the RLX SH over the TL SH-AWD. The RLX is a better riding car, it's more supple, and thats why it doesn't corner like the TL. I think the RLX-SH does everything better than the TL SH-AWD but cornering.
Although I believe the better cornering ability on the TL is coming mostly from the mechanical SH-AWD, and less from the suspension setup. I don't think the electric motors have the "strength" to vector the rear wheels, as much as is needed.
I say this because as soon as the 2016+ SH's suspension settles in a turn, it is extremely capable.....
#27
Advanced
Thread Starter
The last time I looked I was getting around 25mpg for running around town, and I don't drive particularly slow. I'm thrilled with the 25mpg.
I made a post citing one of the car mags, based on an Acura interview. The rear electric motors stop providing power at 78 mph. However, they'll still vector for steering.
I've never found a definitive answer for the front 47hp motor. Does it cut out? If so, at what speed.
"Part of the beauty of the system is that the motors are fairly small, made possible by gearing them down. A planetary gearset couples the motors to their
respective wheels at a 10.38:1 ratio. The problem with that is that at about 78 mph, as the motors reach 11,000 rpm, they begin to produce too much voltage
for the electric systems to handle reliably.
The solution is to decouple the motors from the rear wheels at high speeds—which is also a boon to efficiency. (And let's be honest—you don't actually
need four-wheel drive at high speeds. If you're spinning your front wheels at 80 mph, you may as well start dialing 9-1-1.)" https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-car...x-coolest-awd/"
The article implies that the front electric motor continues to supply power above the 78 mph cutoff for the rear electric motors.
https://acurazine.com/forums/third-g...018-sh-968891/
I made a post citing one of the car mags, based on an Acura interview. The rear electric motors stop providing power at 78 mph. However, they'll still vector for steering.
I've never found a definitive answer for the front 47hp motor. Does it cut out? If so, at what speed.
"Part of the beauty of the system is that the motors are fairly small, made possible by gearing them down. A planetary gearset couples the motors to their
respective wheels at a 10.38:1 ratio. The problem with that is that at about 78 mph, as the motors reach 11,000 rpm, they begin to produce too much voltage
for the electric systems to handle reliably.
The solution is to decouple the motors from the rear wheels at high speeds—which is also a boon to efficiency. (And let's be honest—you don't actually
need four-wheel drive at high speeds. If you're spinning your front wheels at 80 mph, you may as well start dialing 9-1-1.)" https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-car...x-coolest-awd/"
The article implies that the front electric motor continues to supply power above the 78 mph cutoff for the rear electric motors.
https://acurazine.com/forums/third-g...018-sh-968891/
#28
I did see an article that said the planetary gearset would provide vectoring if motors were off. However, I don't see how it would work since the vectoring would have to be equal and opposite for each wheel. Doesn't seem like that would fit the situation at high speed.
I see a totally different vectoring behavior at high speed compared to low speed in sweeping turns. And, I don't recall seeing any vectoring at 80+ in the screen
I see a totally different vectoring behavior at high speed compared to low speed in sweeping turns. And, I don't recall seeing any vectoring at 80+ in the screen
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RLX-Sport Hybrid
3G RLX (2013+)
40
02-03-2016 12:10 PM