SpaceBot

Anyone else in a similar situation? I'm considering either or....the RDX is most likely going to be the one I shoot for, but the XC40 is also a very nice offering.

I really do like the design and style of the XC40. It's not as peppy at just 240HP, but maybe it has less weight? Big issue is that this is the 1st generation of the platform. Acura RDX is now 3rd gen.

Anyways, anyone else considering the XC40 as well?

JetsJetsJets

I am in somewhat similar position. My wife and I looking to go smaller from our current MDX and at the top of the list is the new RDX (I owned a 13). Other cars on our potential list include XC60 (XC40 seems a little too small for us), Q5, maybe X3.

Looking to test drive all of the above in next month.

taz98spin

Was looking at the XC40, but no ventilated seat option. So most likely will go for the RDX, but will still check out the XC60 soon!

SK1124

The cost of a loaded XC60 is absurd. I considered it until I built one fully loaded and it was in the high 70K CDN range.

Notte

I am considering BMW X3, Volvo xc40 / xc60 and now the RDX 2019.

- I really liked driving the Volvo, its definitely fun however cargo room is an issue so if i decided on the Volvo, would probably be xc60.
- RDX (not drive tested yet) only comes in 1 engine option currently. I really don't need that power. The packages seem odd to me. A-spec is the choice for me but I can not get options I want. Dealer accessories always was bad experience for me in the past.
- BMW - really solid feeling, nothing rattles in that car period. Quiet and refine. Price is +++ over others however

The decision process is harder than ever. These SUV's do a lot of things well. My advice is to make a list of importance to you and narrow it down

I'll update more on this later after my decision

Socalmark

HotRodW

CPO's are where the value is when buying a Volvo. Let somebody else suffer the massive depreciation, and enjoy the extended warranty in the process. I was quoted $51k US on a loaded 7k-mile T6 with an original MSRP of $64k+, and I hadn't even started negotiating. Just be sure to check the Carfax. It seems when Volvos go bad, they go bad in a big way.

iforyou

iTrader: (1)

I think there's a pretty big difference size wise between the two:

XC40:
WHEELBASE: 106.4 in
LENGTH: 174.2 in
WIDTH: 73.0 in HEIGHT: 65.0 in
PASSENGER VOLUME: 95 cu ft
CARGO VOLUME: 21 cu ft

RDX
WHEELBASE: 108.3 in
LENGTH: 186.8 in
WIDTH: 74.8 in HEIGHT: 65.7 in
PASSENGER VOLUME: 105 cu ft
CARGO VOLUME: 30 cu ft

I personally would find the XC40 to be too small coming from a 1g RDX. It depends so much on whether size is important to you or not.

SpaceBot

Very interesting. So similar, marginally different from one and other. The length is almost a foot more than the XC40. What about weight though? The XC40 is only pushing some 240HP....the RDX is doing 270+ but does it weigh more? 0-60 times for XC40 are alittle over 6 seconds I believe.

iforyou

iTrader: (1)

Here is a C/D test:
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...isfying-review

Weight: 3854lb, so about 200lb less than an AWD fully loaded RDX.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 6.2 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 16.4 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 26.8 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 7.0 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.4 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 4.5 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.8 sec @ 95 mph

These numbers are on par, with the current 2018 RDX:
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...ed-test-review

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 6.2 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 16.4 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 26.8 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.3 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.6 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 4.4 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.5 sec @ 96 mph

The new RDX is said to be slightly faster than the old one, but no real data available yet.

FWIW, here are XC60 dimensions:
DIMENSIONS:
WHEELBASE: 112.8 in
LENGTH: 184.6 in
WIDTH: 74.9 in HEIGHT: 65.3 in
PASSENGER VOLUME: 100 cu ft
CARGO VOLUME: 30 cu ft
CURB WEIGHT: 4107 lb

As you can see, that's a lot closer to the new RDX. Even then, the passenger volume is still less than the new RDX. The XC40 has 10% less passenger volume, I'd think you can definitely feel the difference.

supafamous

I'm in the market and my includes the C300 Wagon (Canada! Canada! Canada!), the V60, the X3 and RDX. The Mercedes and the RDX are my top two and the pricing isn't dramatically different (about $5-10k depending on equipment).

I sat in the XC40 and it's a bit too small for me (hoping to start a family soon) and the XC60 pricing is pretty high for what it is.

Stuff I crossed off: 3 series wagon (limp chassis), Q5 (back seat too small), A5 Sportback (Merc wagon beats it), CR-V (not enough power).

ostrich

I have not checked out the new XC40, but I must say that I was rather disappointed with the new XC60. The new Volvo's are amazingly good looking, and their interiors are beautifully designed. However, with every single one that I have tried (XC60, V90) I have to say that I was NOT impressed with the engine, the ride, and the level of refinement. Somehow, the Volvo's just don't drive as well as they look. There is a level of cheapness in how they drive, esp. when compared to their main rivals. And when loaded, their prices shoot through the roof. So after the test drives, I completely gave up on the new Volvo's.

Therefore, I don't have any good hope for the XC40 either. So this may sound completely biased but before I even test drive either of them, I would say go with the 2019 RDX totally....

ostrich

Now that is a tough one, as I loved the C300 wagon too!!! :-) However, when I was in the market for a new car last year, the only ones available in my area were all black or white and I was just not so keen on that.... but one thing that the 2019 RDX would probably beat the C300 wagon is the interior space and the ground clearance, which may not be as big a factor for you in Victoria, than it is for us here in snowy Alberta!!! :-)

JoelEDC

I ended up trading in my 2015 Acura RDX lease and downsizing to a BMW X1 a few weeks ago. I wanted the 2019 RDX but wasn't interested in waiting who knows how long for discounts and lease deals. The exterior styling of the XC40 was not for me, and since it's a new model the incentives and deals didn't seem as aggressive as the X1. Plus the X1 is almost as roomy as the RDX on the inside, especially in the cargo area. Just something to consider.....

mhcrowder

I currently drive/own a 2015 Mazda CX-5 Touring. I've started my search for a new vehicle and hopefully will be in the market about this time next year. I've also decided to look at up-scaling to get a little bit more luxury. One other requirement that I have is a minimum towing capacity of 2000 lbs, but would prefer 3000+ lbs. I was disappointed to see the RDX maintained the 2018 tow capacity of 1500lbs. Vehicles that I'm now currently looking at are the Lincoln MKC, Volvo XC40, Audi Q5, and new Mazda CX-5.

Search Continues.....

==
Michael

warrenj3139

I saw a black XC40 R Design today while picking up my younger son for school. I have to say -- I found it quite attractive sitting on its 20" wheels. A little squat for sure, but in my opinion, it's a nicely designed vehicle. I do worry about it being a bit too small for me, though we will still have a 17 RDX Advance for our heavier hauling should I need it. One thing I like about the XC40 is that you can pick the "sports" spec in the R Design and still add all of the luxury/convenience options from the Inscription luxury trim -- something we all know we can't do on the RDX. The R Design with everything checks in at around 44-45k MSRP. Downside is even loaded, it lacks the Heads up Display of the RDX Advance and the ventilated seats of the Aspec. It would have the surround view monitor I can't get on my Aspec though.

It's going to be an interesting 6 months for me while I sort all this out.

KeithL

ostrich

Yeah, there is a lot of body roll with the Volvo's and the ride is NEITHER sporty NOR luxurious. The engine sounds cheap. I was so disappointed as I thought that the V90 was the best looking vehicle around, and so wished that I would like it.... it's funny that the press seems to be so smitten by the new good looking Volvo's that they just kind of ignore these critical issues..... here in Canada, Volvo's are also ridiculously expensive, when compared to the US pricing.... gimme a 2019 RDX any time!!! LOL

SpaceBot

I'm revisiting this thread because it appears Volve has added a Polstar Software upgrade option for the XC40. It brings the HP to 252 from 249, but torque goes to 295 from 258. Additionally, throttle response, handling, shifting, have all been increased/improved. Not sure if this link will work, but you can see more info on the software upgrade here: https://engineered.polestar.com/us/u...XC40&market=us

Now, given the weight of the RDX, is it possible the XC40 could hold it's own against the RDX with this new performance update?

TacoBello

bluntman72

I compared these two vehicles before choosing the RDX. I was looking to get the Inscription XC40 because I liked all of the tech included with it. The self-parking feature was a nice party trick, but I don't think I would use that often. I noticed a few quality control issues in the tester and a rather harsh ride (because of the short wheelbase?). My wife held the deciding vote, she just didn't like the cabin of the Volvo but immediately fell in love with the cabin (and the seats) in the RDX.

Madd Dog

TacoBello

That’s a bit an interesting justification.

It’s not like the engine is only going into production for one year. It will be out for several years. And I’m pretty sure Volvo isnt going to tell customers “sorry, your two year old car can no longer be repaired because we made no spare parts.” This isn’t ferrari or something. They still move countless thousands of units every year.

Leasing would be no different financing for the first several years. You’re protected by warranty. You’ll get your repairs.

Also, don’t forget about the aftermarket- they will continue to make parts for a while, even if Volvo didn’t. I don’t know what parts prices are, but I’m betting oem parts are hella expensive anyway.

Madd Dog

Master47

ednigma

I had a friend who worked for the GM tech center in Warren Michigan and he told me years ago that federal law requires automakers to provide a supply of parts for ten years after the discontinuation of a model. Not sure if that is still the case, but I own a 1997 BMW M3 and can still order original BMW replacement parts from the dealer and online (the E36 chassis end of life'd in the 1999 model year). The only part I couldn't get was the headliner which is a M3 only anthracite color, the dealer even searched inventory in Germany.

TacoBello

TacoBello

quantum7

Just wondering if anyone has done a drive comparison of the XC40 and RDX. I know that the XC40 is smaller but for me that might be alright. I have no experience with Volvo but the XC40 is getting very good reviews (Alex, Driven, etc). When I configured the R-Design and the Aspec the Volvo was about $3500 less. Any guess if Acura with eventually bring a more powerful CDX to the North America?

RDX10

I don't think you will find very many reviews comparing the XC40 and RDX simply because of the class differences.

But IMO the XC40 is a sexy little ute. It's also very boxy on the inside and outside meaning that despite its' smaller exterior size, it actually has a decent amount of interior space. I also really like all the little unique and funky touches like the D pillar and carpet material up the inner door, and my FAVORITE feature on any new car, the little garbage bin in the center console. You can tell that Volvo REALLY tried maximizing the interior space.

The RDX is also really sexy but it's hardly a compact crossover anymore. It used to be 180" long in gen 1 (which was why I liked it so much) and it's now a whopping 188 inches long, longer than a ford edge by an inch! The Xc40 is something like 174" iirc. But on the flip side the Xc40 may be too compact, but of course that depends on your needs. For 3K difference I'd spring for the RDX personally just because it's nice having some space, it might be more reliable long term, and lastly SH-AWD is far superior to the haldex system in the Xc40.

anoop

I was keen on evaluating an XC40 because Volvo is known to have the best seats and I actually prefer a smaller car. 2 problems -- The 1st is that Volvo apparently is building very few XC40s so they are in very short supply. It is very hard to actually see/try one in person. Most are sold even before they make it to the dealer. As a result dealer was always pushing the XC60. The 2nd problem is reliability. The new breed of Volvos seem to be having a lot of issues. Go here: https://forums.swedespeed.com/forumd...C40-(CMA-2019-). By comparison, RDX forums hardly have anyone reporting any issues.

In the end, because of convenience (I actually got to drive the car) and expected reliability, I went with the RDX.