Car and Driver slams RDX Aspec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2018, 06:53 PM
  #41  
Burning Brakes
 
HotRodW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 780
Received 276 Likes on 180 Posts
Originally Posted by durt
I wonder if putting the transmission in S mode makes much difference to 0-60 / 1/4 mile times. Maybe C/D left it in D?
C/D shifted manually according to the test sheet (attached), likely because previous runs indicated it was the fastest method.

Attached Files
Old 08-28-2018, 07:24 PM
  #42  
Burning Brakes
 
MI-RDX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 993
Received 257 Likes on 177 Posts
Test sheet shows the shift point as 6600RPM. Peak torque range for this engine is 1600-4600RPM and falls off after that. They may have achieved better times shifting around 5000RPM or so to take advantage of the better torque at the lower RPM and making better use of the gearing. It would at a minimum be an interesting comparison.
Old 08-28-2018, 11:37 PM
  #43  
Pro
 
supafamous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 48
Posts: 739
Received 292 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by HotRodW
C/D shifted manually according to the test sheet (attached), likely because previous runs indicated it was the fastest method.
Here's the Accord test sheet from C/D : https://hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/fi...1530111461.pdf

From this we can see the traction limited Accord (FWD) actually launches harder than RDX which shouldn't be happening and it ends up consistently behind the rest of the way. A BMW X3 does 0-60 in 6.2s and is 250 lbs heavier so I'm going to suggest it was a soft motor this time around and not testing methodology.
Old 08-31-2018, 12:38 PM
  #44  
4th Gear
 
durt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just test drove a ‘19 RDX AWD and it does feel a bit sluggish right off the line if you just stomp on the throttle pedal with no brake torquing. I imagine it needs brake torque to build boost to get the quicker acceleration test times we’ve seen from other tests. Perhaps the reviewer in this article didn’t do this. Quite a bit different feel off the line without brake torquing than the 2nd gen with AWD which would squeal the front tires off the line.
Old 08-31-2018, 02:39 PM
  #45  
Unregistered Member
 
Tom2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 3,472
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by chickdr
It shouldn't with an FI engine. NA motors are adversely affected, but turbos should not be.
Turbo engines are indeed affected by altitude, but they are less affected than naturally aspirated engines. It's really just simple math.

Old 08-31-2018, 03:37 PM
  #46  
Moderator
 
CheeseyPoofs McNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,993
Received 1,405 Likes on 636 Posts
Originally Posted by HONDAFIXER
This guy does not know how to launch a turbo car. Hold brake,build boost and then launch
I thought the same thing while watching his review a few days ago. That said - nothing wrong with his method (or lack thereof) if he tests every car the same way. Actually this is a more real-world representation of how most people drive the car and provides a good apples to apples comparison with his other reviews. All that said - I find the reviewer a bit annoying personally
Old 08-31-2018, 06:18 PM
  #47  
Suzuka Master
 
RDX10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,351
Received 875 Likes on 669 Posts
Originally Posted by CheeseyPoofs McNut
I thought the same thing while watching his review a few days ago. That said - nothing wrong with his method (or lack thereof) if he tests every car the same way. Actually this is a more real-world representation of how most people drive the car and provides a good apples to apples comparison with his other reviews. All that said - I find the reviewer a bit annoying personally
He's so damn obnoxious.
Old 09-07-2018, 10:19 AM
  #48  
10th Gear
 
107main's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Age: 82
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not enough difference between them.

After I studied them, I would just probably get a base with Tech package in FWD. This setup has a lot of features, you pay a bunch more to get a few more bells and whistles, but spent thousands more. My favorite wheels are: 1. a spec wheels(but they say they drop MPG a bit. 2. the base model spoke wheels. 3. I dont even like the advance wheels. Other than this, if you look at options, there are not that many to justify the higher prices, unlike other vehicles I have studied. The a spec is just window dressing, that I do like, but do not like the limited interior colors at two. My wife said NO RED and she means it, and that only leaves the ebony or whatever you call it. I do not like the difference color piping around the seats, it should be the same color and I dont want a dark color, gray would be nicer for the a-spec for me. I may just opt for a new Pilot as it is less money, no new engine to worry about. No it aint as pretty as the RDX, but I can live with it and it has more room.
Old 09-07-2018, 10:27 AM
  #49  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
It seems to me that Acura simply didn’t pay C/D enough money for them to give the RDX a great review.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bender13
2G RL (2005-2012)
24
08-27-2018 07:52 PM
Shadzilla
2G CL Transmission Recall Q & A
5
01-06-2005 11:09 PM



Quick Reply: Car and Driver slams RDX Aspec



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.