Acura reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2018, 02:13 PM
  #1  
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
anoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Roseville, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,659
Received 389 Likes on 294 Posts
Acura reliability

Consumer reports doesn't seem to think very highly of Acura & Honda in terms of reliability. Audi and BMW rate higher!
https://www.freep.com/story/money/ca...ts/1750950002/
Complete list is available at above link.

I hope they are wrong. I have tended to think of Acura as a brand that builds very reliable cars.
Old 10-25-2018, 03:01 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
CheeseyPoofs McNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,993
Received 1,405 Likes on 636 Posts
I think Acura is trending up after working through the issues with the TLX from a few years back. Honda is taking a hit from the all new Accord I would assume. Next year at this time Honda should be back in the top 10.
The following users liked this post:
kurtatx (10-26-2018)
Old 10-25-2018, 04:18 PM
  #3  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,158 Likes on 1,386 Posts
Originally Posted by CheeseyPoofs McNut
I think Acura is trending up after working through the issues with the TLX from a few years back. Honda is taking a hit from the all new Accord I would assume. Next year at this time Honda should be back in the top 10.
Yup. It really is that simple. Especially for a brand like Acura with 5 models. It doesn't take a lot for them to shoot up the rankings but it doesn't take much for them to fall, either.
The following users liked this post:
37tzee (10-26-2018)
Old 10-25-2018, 08:25 PM
  #4  
Racer
 
JustMe...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: IL
Posts: 268
Received 101 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by CheeseyPoofs McNut
I think Acura is trending up after working through the issues with the TLX from a few years back. Honda is taking a hit from the all new Accord I would assume. Next year at this time Honda should be back in the top 10.
Honda is going to take a huge hit with their oil in gas issue, on the gen 5 CRV, that they just recently acknowledged. I'm waiting to make my decision between the RDX, Q5 and X3, until the RDX goes through the cold months. The RDX seems to be the best "bang for the buck" vehicle in the group.
The following users liked this post:
37tzee (10-26-2018)
Old 10-25-2018, 08:47 PM
  #5  
Instructor
 
MrJames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 216
Received 70 Likes on 46 Posts
Here is the whole list.
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-...reliable-cars/
Acura: The past few years have seen Acura—Honda’s luxury brand—add new automatic transmissions and infotainment systems, and they caused reliability headaches. These problems have been worked out on most models, although the MDX is still below average in these two areas.
Honda’s premium brand makes cars and SUVs positioned above the mainstream but below Lexus and the European luxury competitors. The engines and transmissions combine to provide good power and fuel economy. Ride and handling are sound but they aren’t standout qualities. Acura’s controls and touch screens tend to be annoying and unintuitive. The MDX and RDX SUVs, and the TLX sedan, scored well in our tests. But we were entirely unimpressed with the ILX and RLX sedans. Reliability, once a strength, is now positions Acura as the lowest-ranked Japanese nameplate, mostly due to problems with transmissions and infotainment systems.
2019 RDX
The third-generation RDX gave up the previous model's V6 engine in favor of a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that is paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission. It's an energetic powertrain once it gets past its initial hesitation. We got 22 mpg overall. The RDX is enjoyable to drive. It feels lively and engaging, and has nimble handling. We did, however, find the controls to be extremely distracting. They use a touch pad to interact with the center screen. That forces drivers to divert their attention from the road. The RDX is also saddled with a cumbersome push-button gear selector. The seats are comfortable and interior room is on par with the class. All RDXs come standard with the AcuraWatch safety system, which includes forward-collision warning and automatic emergency braking; blind-spot warning is optional.
Mostly positive for the RDX. They weren't fans of the new infotainment controls and the push button tranny. Then again they dinged the infotainment system on the MDX so they don't seem to like the old setup either. Could be worse. See Volvo.
The following users liked this post:
mechonit (11-04-2018)
Old 10-25-2018, 09:12 PM
  #6  
Burning Brakes
 
acuraada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 853
Received 147 Likes on 112 Posts
Reviews are different from Reliability *Survery* It has nothing to do with how CR thinks about the seats comfort or how unintuitive the new infotainment system has become. The impact of 2019 RDX probably hasn't hit the survey yet, even if it did, it is a small sampling.
Old 10-26-2018, 08:48 AM
  #7  
Racer
 
Coolguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Age: 48
Posts: 294
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
ConsumerReports are not car experts.. I won't trust their reviews..
The following 2 users liked this post by Coolguy:
DHood (10-26-2018), knakane (11-02-2018)
Old 10-26-2018, 08:56 AM
  #8  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,158 Likes on 1,386 Posts
Originally Posted by Coolguy
ConsumerReports are not car experts.. I won't trust their reviews..
Sure, but the survey gets impressions of what people think. You may be more educated than the average driver re: cars, but your impressions likely fit within a distribution. reliability and customer satisfaction are BOTH credible at consumer reports. The rest...not so much.
The following 2 users liked this post by kurtatx:
ssacuraho (11-02-2018), TacoBello (10-26-2018)
Old 10-26-2018, 09:43 AM
  #9  
Advanced
 
Boltface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 91
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
I bought a '99 Jeep and had a number of problems. Several years later I read an article in CR about reliability and looked at the owners data. It was right on the button. CR even had an article about don't buy used Jeeps in that series and listed all the problems I had. Now I look at the reliability data. Don't read the reviews.
The following users liked this post:
Curious3GTL (10-26-2018)
Old 10-26-2018, 09:44 AM
  #10  
Advanced
 
DHood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 87
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by acuraada
Reviews are different from Reliability *Survery* It has nothing to do with how CR thinks about the seats comfort or how unintuitive the new infotainment system has become. The impact of 2019 RDX probably hasn't hit the survey yet, even if it did, it is a small sampling.
Totally agree, the Third Generation 2019 has not been surveyed yet.
Old 10-26-2018, 01:18 PM
  #11  
Burning Brakes
 
acuraada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 853
Received 147 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by Coolguy
ConsumerReports are not car experts.. I won't trust their reviews..
First of all, it’s not a review but an owners survey.

And as supposed to the editors of poplar auto magazines where their revenue depends on car manufacturers ad dollars and car loaners?

Right.
The following 2 users liked this post by acuraada:
Curious3GTL (10-26-2018), WheelMcCoy (11-03-2018)
Old 10-26-2018, 02:24 PM
  #12  
Racer
 
hddnav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 365
Received 146 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Coolguy
ConsumerReports are not car experts.. I won't trust their reviews..
Don't need to be car experts to compile reader data for ownership trouble experience. Some data is better than the zero data other car magazines use as a basis.
The following 2 users liked this post by hddnav:
SandwichViking (10-26-2018), WheelMcCoy (11-03-2018)
Old 10-27-2018, 07:54 AM
  #13  
Advanced
 
PWMDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Age: 46
Posts: 77
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
The problem with many reliability surveys/reports is they treat all issues as being equal. So things like infotainment issues, even benign issues like how menus are arranged causing user frustration with what is otherwise a normally functioning unit, weigh as much as major engine/transmission problems. As an example, I’ve owned quite a few cars with infotainment units that had horrible reviews but I got used to them and after a while they are a non-issue. What I really care about as a consumer as far as reliability is how will the major/expensive components hold up over time and will I need to pay out of pocket at some point to replace them? Infotainment menus arrangements are what they are and as long as it works I do not think that “problem” weighs as much on reliability as an engine/transmission that needs to be replaced.

Now I’m not saying Honda/Acura doesn’t deserve some of the negative feedback. The 9-speed ZF transmission had several YEARS of poor reviews and problems and yet they still decided to put this into the MDX/Pilot. Several years then goes by before they actually reengineer anything about it. I don’t know if that’s just being lazy or cheep or both. That said, I own a 2018 Pilot with the 9-speed transmission. Would I say it’s the smoothest transmission ever? No, but I do not find it’s shifting to be a big deal day-to-day and as long as it lasts I could care less. Now if someone put a survey in front on me and it asked about the transmission? Sure, I’d mark off it’s not perfect.

Point is all of these reliability surveys must be taken with a grain of salt IMO.....

Old 11-02-2018, 06:12 PM
  #14  
Racer
 
knakane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Age: 45
Posts: 309
Received 96 Likes on 59 Posts
I guess my question would be CR's sample size in relation to total owners - meaning what percentage of owners of any vehicle actually will take the time to complete a survey. Do they specify the sample size and compare that to the total number of owners. I have a hard time trusting CR completely because I believe at one point in the past few years they were caught doing some sort of pay for good reviews thing...but i am not 100% sure & a quick google search yielded nothing of substance...

Personally I love the 3g RDX for its mechanical properties (driving, engine, etc), but the infotainment, in my opinion is in an Alpha or Beta state and is not nearly ready for public consumption. Some of the foolery that has happened to my system is fine because i am fairly tech savvy but if these things happened to my mom or dad, the battery would be dead, there would never be an iOS device connected and the car would just sit.
Old 11-03-2018, 07:47 PM
  #15  
Instructor
 
Havasubum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 126
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by knakane
I guess my question would be CR's sample size in relation to total owners - meaning what percentage of owners of any vehicle actually will take the time to complete a survey. Do they specify the sample size and compare that to the total number of owners. I have a hard time trusting CR completely because I believe at one point in the past few years they were caught doing some sort of pay for good reviews thing...but i am not 100% sure & a quick google search yielded nothing of substance...

Personally I love the 3g RDX for its mechanical properties (driving, engine, etc), but the infotainment, in my opinion is in an Alpha or Beta state and is not nearly ready for public consumption. Some of the foolery that has happened to my system is fine because i am fairly tech savvy but if these things happened to my mom or dad, the battery would be dead, there would never be an iOS device connected and the car would just sit.
I totally agree with your assessment. The car is a delight to drive. The absence of a CVT transmission is a huge plus. The car drives like a dream. However, and I mean a huge however, the rear hatch doesn't operate properly in comparison to the 2018. Watch out because it will close on you and will NOT reverse when encountering resistance like the 2018. Moreover, the infotainment system flat out stinks. I cannot hear any bass in my advance model unless I drive up the volume to the point it is too noisy in the cabin. Furthermore, the features are glitchy. I have a hard time ending a phone call; I see "system error..." on the HUD when trying to change channels at times on XM/Sirius; and I get an error "loading..." upon start up when listening to FM. I also feel the real time traffic is a mess. Why on earth would the engineers saddle us with the real time traffic delivered via FM radio rather than XM/Sirius? It doesn't work unless you drive in a large congested transportation corridor (i.e. major city). Acura told me I live in a "fringe" area because the real time traffic feature is crap. I guess a major portion of SW Riverside County in southern CA with a population of 500K isn't uber enough. Ugh.
Old 11-03-2018, 10:26 PM
  #16  
Instructor
 
OliveBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 37
Posts: 118
Received 70 Likes on 36 Posts
One thing that makes me really happy about this particular car is how easy it is to get to components. As an amateur mechanic I feel I could fix a lot of the parts of this car since it's easy to get to.

Oil changes looks to be a breeze as the drain bolt and the oil filter are close by each other -- not hidden in weird ways. Changing out stuff like the differential fluid, transfer case fluid, etc.

Recharging the AC if need be looks easy. Pretty easy to get to the other components like the spark plugs.

Overall, pretty happy with the components. As long as you take good care of the fluids and components, I think this car will last a long time.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oBMTo
1G CL (1997-1999)
29
03-23-2007 08:28 AM
moreace_RENAMED
Car Talk
9
10-15-2003 10:29 PM
1000bpm
2G TL (1999-2003)
23
06-09-2001 10:54 PM



Quick Reply: Acura reliability



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.