Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…
View Poll Results: Am I crazy for thinking that a TO recpient should be required?
You're stupid! "undisclosed-recipients" is totally fine. Find another way to filter out spam.
22.22%
I agree! Nobody should be allowed to send an e-mail without defining a TO recipient!
22.22%
What's SMTP?
0
0%
Whiskers
55.56%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

IT: Mark E-Mail To "undisclosed-recipients" As SPAM?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-14-2010, 01:32 PM
  #1  
Sweet!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
thunder04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,104
Received 80 Likes on 69 Posts
IT: Mark E-Mail To "undisclosed-recipients" As SPAM?

rant...

We've been receiving a good bit of spam from legitimate mail servers with legitimate headers with quote-on-quote "legitimate" content....at least legitimate to our spam filter. Most likely due to a computer with a virus/malware that's using the company's mail server to send the e-mails out (which makes sense since some organizations don't require SMTP authentication when it comes to internal clients).

My boss doesn't like it.

The only commonality I see with these e-mails is that they are to "undisclosed-recipients." I set up our spam filter to mark messages to "undisclosed-recipients" as spam. All was well until my boss couldn't receive mass (marketing) e-mail from our Apple rep. So, I had to remove the rule.

Well, here we are again! My boss is complaining about this, and I brought up the best solution I can think of, which we had in the past, and why we no longer have it. He's in a meeting, so I have to wait for his response.

Anywho, I'm in the mindset that no e-mail should have a blank TO field. Whenever I BCC everybody and don't have a TO recipient, I put myself as the TO (and teach others to do the same). Am I crazy? Is it absurd to assume others should do the same?

Last edited by thunder04; 12-14-2010 at 01:35 PM.
Old 12-14-2010, 01:48 PM
  #2  
Team Owner
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,456
Received 2,211 Likes on 1,210 Posts
There are some things that can not be taught to users, this is one.
Old 12-14-2010, 01:54 PM
  #3  
Bent = #1
 
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Marietta, GA
Age: 40
Posts: 13,473
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
can you not set the same spam filter, but have an exception just for his apple emails?
Old 12-14-2010, 01:59 PM
  #4  
COME AT ME BRO!
 
evilone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: st.johns, NL (CANUKISTAN)
Age: 44
Posts: 9,796
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
i do not understand the words that are coming out of your e-mouth!
Old 12-14-2010, 02:06 PM
  #5  
Sweet!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
thunder04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,104
Received 80 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by hornyleprechaun
can you not set the same spam filter, but have an exception just for his apple emails?
I can, but his worry was "If my Apple e-mails get bounced, what other important messages will get bounced?!"

I remembered wrong...I had the messages bounced with a note about needing a TO recipient.
Old 12-15-2010, 12:16 AM
  #6  
S E L L
 
Gfaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Modesto, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,767
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qORouZ-qOgg
Old 12-15-2010, 01:08 AM
  #7  
2011 ZCP E92 M3!!
iTrader: (5)
 
dave_ramkumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queens,New York
Age: 35
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^

just watch that on DVD yesterday , it was good
Old 12-15-2010, 01:13 AM
  #8  
S E L L
 
Gfaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Modesto, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,767
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
^ The minions were hilarious.
Old 12-15-2010, 02:39 AM
  #9  
Registered but harmless
 
Will Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 14,857
Received 1,149 Likes on 775 Posts
You're stupid!
I've seen confidential e-mails sent to undisclosed recipients to make it harder for the recipients to discuss the subject matter with each other.

Here's a silly idea-- what is your company's practice with e-mails?
If no one sends to undisclosed recipients, then tell your boss to suck it up, or register his own personal e-mail for the marketing.
Originally Posted by Gfaze
^ The minions were hilarious.
...and thread almost derailed by evil minions!
Old 12-15-2010, 06:41 AM
  #10  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,918
Received 1,236 Likes on 825 Posts
Buy an antispam solution...
Old 12-15-2010, 12:01 PM
  #11  
Sweet!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
thunder04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,104
Received 80 Likes on 69 Posts
^ I'd rather learn how to utilize the resources we have than to purchase something. Not to mention I work for a school district and our technology budget has not increased a penny since 1999.

I spent the day learning how to write SpamAssassin rules and have a decent solution for now.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KB1_EJ6
Car Parts for Sale
9
11-13-2016 09:51 PM
KB1_EJ6
Car Parts for Sale
11
08-28-2016 08:25 AM
dirko
3G TL (2004-2008)
8
10-01-2015 08:45 PM
TxRzrBk
3G TL Problems & Fixes
0
09-17-2015 01:07 PM



Quick Reply: IT: Mark E-Mail To "undisclosed-recipients" As SPAM?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.