Honda announces end of v-6 for Accord.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2017, 10:46 AM
  #321  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx
Except they sound pretty great. The A4 growls with that DCT.
Give me that over an anemic v6
Yeah, must "growl" like the small dog in that avatar. lol.
Old 07-28-2017, 10:59 AM
  #322  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,995
Received 8,631 Likes on 6,666 Posts
Old 07-28-2017, 01:43 PM
  #323  
Burning Brakes
 
pyrodan007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,219
Received 546 Likes on 361 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Yeah, must "growl" like the small dog in that avatar. lol.
You car's bark is just as tame, calm down
Old 08-02-2017, 08:16 AM
  #324  
Team Owner
 
svtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 59
Posts: 37,664
Received 3,864 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Originally Posted by pyrodan007
You car's bark is just as tame, calm down
He has a bad case of little dog syndrome.

If you had the automotive equivalent of a Chinese crested dog you would too.
Old 08-02-2017, 08:26 AM
  #325  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by svtmike
He has a bad case of little dog syndrome.

If you had the automotive equivalent of a Chinese crested dog you would too.
Still better than the litle brain syndrome.

If we'd believe those 2.0T fans, they would probably swear that they sound as good as their bigger V6 engine offering (A4 vs S4 for example), which is like having their head deep in sand, obviously.
Old 08-02-2017, 08:31 AM
  #326  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by pyrodan007
You car's bark is just as tame, calm down
Yeah, thats what you think. Actually his fairy godmother changes the pumpkin into a Demon with her magic Sport+ wand.

Old 08-02-2017, 09:17 AM
  #327  
Team Owner
 
svtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 59
Posts: 37,664
Received 3,864 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Still better than the litle brain syndrome.

If we'd believe those 2.0T fans, they would probably swear that they sound as good as their bigger V6 engine offering (A4 vs S4 for example), which is like having their head deep in sand, obviously.
Nice straw man. If you only had a brain....
The following 3 users liked this post by svtmike:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-02-2017), kurtatx (08-02-2017), TacoBello (08-02-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 09:21 AM
  #328  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by svtmike
Nice straw man. If you only had a brain....
Ok get your little d-assery elsewhere....
Old 08-02-2017, 09:22 AM
  #329  
Burning Brakes
 
pyrodan007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,219
Received 546 Likes on 361 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Still better than the litle brain syndrome.

If we'd believe those 2.0T fans, they would probably swear that they sound as good as their bigger V6 engine offering (A4 vs S4 for example), which is like having their head deep in sand, obviously.
So you're saying that pure engine design is responsible for sound, and nothing is due to muffler/exhaust tuning....

Ok then .... Does your V6 sound like this? This is from an even smaller Turbo 4 lol


Ya, don't think so ...
The following users liked this post:
wilspainar (08-02-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 10:10 AM
  #330  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Totally different category of toys. This is a *ridiculous* comparison, not related to any A4 / TLX / Accord discussion. You are talking apples and oranges.

In the past, I bought numerous aftermarket exhausts, one of them was a Borja on a VW 16v (I owned 3) - it did sound great. Porsche 718 are not bad either, not yet to the level of the H6 they had. You think that you are teaching something?

Ya, don't think so ...
Old 08-02-2017, 10:35 AM
  #331  
Burning Brakes
 
pyrodan007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,219
Received 546 Likes on 361 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Totally different category of toys. This is a *ridiculous* comparison, not related to any A4 / TLX / Accord discussion. You are talking apples and oranges.

In the past, I bought numerous aftermarket exhausts, one of them was a Borja on a VW 16v (I owned 3) - it did sound great. Porsche 718 are not bad either, not yet to the level of the H6 they had. You think that you are teaching something?

Ya, don't think so ...
So what the fuck does engine have to do with sound if it can be tuned with muffler?! The entire forum's point exactly, that you have no point. QED.
TLX also sounds anemic, just like the A4, just like the Accord. Unless your TLX was the only one hand tuned by Acura to sound like a [INSERT SPORTS CAR] ...
Old 08-02-2017, 10:43 AM
  #332  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by svtmike
Nice straw man. If you only had a brain....
He loves to call us 2.0Toy fans

Which is ridiculous. I'm not a 2.0Toy fan. I'm a "real engine fan", which is to say, if I'm going to get a V6, I want the motherload 6 cylinder in the BMW 340i, Audi S4. If i'm getting the weight of a 6 cylinder, I want all that appropriate power. 290 HP in a 6 cylinder engine is borderline criminal.
The following 2 users liked this post by kurtatx:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-02-2017), pyrodan007 (08-02-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 12:02 PM
  #333  
Team Owner
 
svtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 59
Posts: 37,664
Received 3,864 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx
290 HP in a 6 cylinder engine is borderline criminal.
It was a good engine in its time.
Old 08-02-2017, 12:23 PM
  #334  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
To be fair, for a luxury car or family car, a V6 is in general more desirable compared to a smaller turbocharged 4-banger in terms of NVH and sound characteristic. It is totally understandable why some folks aren't happy with Honda moving from the J35 to the K20C4 for the Accord. It's a real nice engine that is highly competitive in its segment in terms of NVH, real world mpg, torque, power, and reliability.

IMO, there's no right or wrong for this. It's a matter of personal preference and priorities.
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (08-02-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 01:43 PM
  #335  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx
He loves to call us 2.0Toy fans

Which is ridiculous. I'm not a 2.0Toy fan. I'm a "real engine fan", which is to say, if I'm going to get a V6, I want the motherload 6 cylinder in the BMW 340i, Audi S4. If i'm getting the weight of a 6 cylinder, I want all that appropriate power. 290 HP in a 6 cylinder engine is borderline criminal.
What is criminal is to put a Jetta engine in a $45-50K car. Totally *UNFIT*. Why do you think that EVEN Subaru is selling a 3.6L 256HP 6-cyl. in their LEGACY, although they had a 260HP 2.5T 12 YEARS AGO!!! Because those stressed 2.X Toys feel cheap, cheap, CHEAP..

You are so blinded by the audi and turbo-madness cool-aid that you can't even recognize any Acura strong traits. And then you are complaining about V6 weight although your A4Q weights more than a TLX V6 (3671llbs vs 3617)? LOL.

According to C&D, which is quicker from idle to 60mph? A 340i or a TLX V6? Mmmmm....? They are basically even but technically you are correct if you chose the ,,, TLX V6 (5.8s vs 5.9s for a 2016 340i).

That's an achiever.

Last edited by Saintor; 08-02-2017 at 01:47 PM.
Old 08-02-2017, 01:50 PM
  #336  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
To be fair, for a luxury car or family car, a V6 is in general more desirable compared to a smaller turbocharged 4-banger in terms of NVH and sound characteristic
Quoted for truth.

Again, congrats to Toyota for their new 2018 3.5L V6.
Old 08-02-2017, 01:57 PM
  #337  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Quoted for truth.

Again, congrats to Toyota for their new 2018 3.5L V6.
That way, when Lexus drivers fall asleep at the wheel from pure boredom, they'll have a big, anemic engine to shield them as they plow through a pet shop.
Old 08-02-2017, 02:25 PM
  #338  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Well, somehow Lexus will continue to laugh all the way to the bank....

July 2017 sales
  • ES 6,641 +25.6%
  • Class 4,899 -22.3%
  • 3series 4,084 -39.9%
  • A4 2,652 +1.5%
Old 08-02-2017, 02:26 PM
  #339  
Team Owner
 
svtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 59
Posts: 37,664
Received 3,864 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
What is criminal is to put a Jetta engine in a $45-50K car. Totally *UNFIT*. Why do you think that EVEN Subaru is selling a 3.6L 256HP 6-cyl. in their LEGACY, although they had a 260HP 2.5T 12 YEARS AGO!!! Because those stressed 2.X Toys feel cheap, cheap, CHEAP..

You are so blinded by the audi and turbo-madness cool-aid that you can't even recognize any Acura strong traits. And then you are complaining about V6 weight although your A4Q weights more than a TLX V6 (3671llbs vs 3617)? LOL.

According to C&D, which is quicker from idle to 60mph? A 340i or a TLX V6? Mmmmm....? They are basically even but technically you are correct if you chose the ,,, TLX V6 (5.8s vs 5.9s for a 2016 340i).

That's an achiever.
You know what is criminal in a luxury car today?? FWD. Totally unfit.

Lol. You are a world class cherry picker.

TLX SHAWD is almost 100 lbs heavier than the Audi.

TLX SHAWD is 15% less efficient than the Audi.

TLX SHAWD is slower to sixty than the Audi.

Quite the achiever.

Lol.
The following 5 users liked this post by svtmike:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-02-2017), hadokenuh (08-02-2017), kurtatx (08-02-2017), pyrodan007 (08-02-2017), TacoBello (08-02-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 02:31 PM
  #340  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by svtmike
You know what is criminal in a luxury car today?? FWD. Totally unfit.

Lol. You are a world class cherry picker.

TLX SHAWD is almost 100 lbs heavier than the Audi.

TLX SHAWD is 15% less efficient than the Audi.

TLX SHAWD is slower to sixty than the Audi.

Quite the achiever.

Lol.
All of this, all the while the A4 cabin is noticeably quieter and more luxurious.

And I absolutely hate bashing the TLX because I understand why people buy it, but 'aintor brings it out in me.
The following 4 users liked this post by kurtatx:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-02-2017), hadokenuh (08-02-2017), pyrodan007 (08-02-2017), TacoBello (08-02-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 02:32 PM
  #341  
Racer
 
wilspainar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: OH
Age: 44
Posts: 303
Received 62 Likes on 38 Posts
I had my fun with Audi, those repair bills do not agree with my wallet.
Old 08-02-2017, 02:32 PM
  #342  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by wilspainar
I had my fun with Audi, those repair bills do not agree with my wallet.
I totally understand that, but that's a different discussion.
Old 08-02-2017, 03:39 PM
  #343  
Burning Brakes
 
hadokenuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,000
Received 153 Likes on 125 Posts
But but but the Acura is cheaper and more reliable.
Old 08-02-2017, 03:43 PM
  #344  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,888
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
I think this thread has run its course.
The following 2 users liked this post by F23A4:
kurtatx (08-02-2017), steve_97060 (08-05-2017)
Old 08-02-2017, 03:52 PM
  #345  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
In before the
Old 08-02-2017, 07:17 PM
  #346  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by hadokenuh
But but but the Acura is cheaper and more reliable.
There are lots of new looks that things are changing.



Acura is still hanging on but a lot of brand new owners are not happy campers.
The following users liked this post:
wilspainar (08-03-2017)
Old 08-03-2017, 06:37 AM
  #347  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by svtmike
TLX SHAWD is almost 100 lbs heavier than the Audi.
All your typical nonsense. Fits your "Excels at nothing" mantra.

OF COURSE, the new S4 (closest config as the SH-AWD) is heavier than the SH-AWD. Not that I care by a +/- 3% (2% of which is within instrument's margin error), but this addresses the kid's lame pretext.

Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
There are lots of new looks that things are changing.
Unrelated to I4T vs V6, but the recent TLX's reliability is fine (zero issue on mine after almost 2 years) and as an Honda, this is one great car to bring to 250-400K miles. I wouldn't dare to do that in a BMW or Audi.

Last edited by Saintor; 08-03-2017 at 06:42 AM.
Old 08-03-2017, 06:39 AM
  #348  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
because you dont have the skill or resources to do so?
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-03-2017)
Old 08-03-2017, 06:56 AM
  #349  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
All your typical nonsense. Fits your "Excels at nothing" mantra.

OF COURSE, the new S4 (closest config as the SH-AWD) is heavier than the SH-AWD. Not that I care by a +/- 3% (2% of which is within instrument's margin error), but this addresses the kid's lame pretext.



Unrelated to I4T vs V6, but the recent TLX's reliability is fine (zero issue on mine after almost 2 years) and as an Honda, this is one great car to bring to 250-400K miles. I wouldn't dare to do that in a BMW or Audi.
There is no Acura equivalent to the S4. The SH-AWD isn't even as fast as the A4
Old 08-03-2017, 06:59 AM
  #350  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx
There is no Acura equivalent to the S4. The SH-AWD isn't even as fast as the A4
Of course it isn't. But they have both a close configuration for weight comparison, although the TLX is almost 4" longer. The TLX has a larger engine, but the S4 has all the FI hardware explaining why it is a tad heavier.

Last edited by Saintor; 08-03-2017 at 07:05 AM.
Old 08-03-2017, 11:17 AM
  #351  
Burning Brakes
 
hadokenuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,000
Received 153 Likes on 125 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
There are lots of new looks that things are changing.
Acura is still hanging on but a lot of brand new owners are not happy campers.
You didn't take me seriously on that comment, did you?
Old 08-03-2017, 11:24 AM
  #352  
Team Owner
 
svtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Age: 59
Posts: 37,664
Received 3,864 Likes on 2,031 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
Of course it isn't. But they have both a close configuration for weight comparison, although the TLX is almost 4" longer. The TLX has a larger engine, but the S4 has all the FI hardware explaining why it is a tad heavier.
TLX SHAWD to A4 Quattro is a sensible comparison because most buyers in the segment will cross-shop them before buying the A4.

Dragging the S4 into the conversation is just moving the goalposts to a different flawed comparison that attempts to cast the TLX as technically superior when it is not.
The following 2 users liked this post by svtmike:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-03-2017), kurtatx (08-03-2017)
Old 08-03-2017, 11:54 AM
  #353  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by hadokenuh
You didn't take me seriously on that comment, did you?
Though the charts were interesting to post. Personal experience with 4 BMW's & 1 Acura. The Acura TL is still ahead of the BMW's in total issues that required the dealer to resolve.

Some small issues like a dead LED tail light two weeks into TL's ownership are easily overlooked except for 4 visits to the dealer to get it fixed, but a 6MT rebuild on a TSB issue at 22K miles sort of puts a chink in the Acura dependability thing.

The TL issues were listed as they occurred on the TL forum. BMW issues listed on there forum as the occurred. IIRC some bad fuel injectors on the 335is were the worse issue. Since I had modified that one up to 410WHP the injectors may have been a self inflicted wound.

To be fair none of the cars has gone down on the road.
Old 08-03-2017, 12:08 PM
  #354  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintor
What is criminal is to put a Jetta engine in a $45-50K car. Totally *UNFIT*. Why do you think that EVEN Subaru is selling a 3.6L 256HP 6-cyl. in their LEGACY, although they had a 260HP 2.5T 12 YEARS AGO!!! Because those stressed 2.X Toys feel cheap, cheap, CHEAP..

You are so blinded by the audi and turbo-madness cool-aid that you can't even recognize any Acura strong traits. And then you are complaining about V6 weight although your A4Q weights more than a TLX V6 (3671llbs vs 3617)? LOL.

According to C&D, which is quicker from idle to 60mph? A 340i or a TLX V6? Mmmmm....? They are basically even but technically you are correct if you chose the ,,, TLX V6 (5.8s vs 5.9s for a 2016 340i).

That's an achiever.
You need to realize that the J35- in fact, any J series engine, for that matter- are appliance engines. The engine in your TLX is the same as the white deep freeze you have sitting in your garage. They're both built for long term use. They're both built to require very little maintenance. They don't do anything extraordinary, but are efficient at what they do.

One could argue that the A4 or 340i have engines in the same category (I wouldn't agree, but I'm sure you would). Here's the thing, though. There really isn't much you can do to change the characteristics of the TLX engine. You can spend 3-5k on mods and gain a whopping 25hp. With the A4 or 340i? A relatively inexpensive computer chip- sometimes that won't even void your warranty- will highly change the characteristics of that engine. $1500 bucks and doing a direct plug and play change to the car, 10 minutes later, you now have something way more special. And it retains warranty. And it changes throttle response, peak horsepower, peak torque, and sometimes even improves fuel economy. With essentially zero modding whatsoever. No super loud exhaust. No exhaust smell in the cabin from PCDs, no negative attributes whatsoever. Now in the case of the A4, you have that mated to a DCT transmission, and whoa... TLX!!!

And if that chip doesn't do it for you, you can of course do what the TLX guys do and install a full exhaust and squeeze even more power from the platform. Without even touching the boost levels whatsoever, beyond what the chip already has done.

I'm also surprised you bash Audi interiors so much. I never knew why people loved Audis so much, until I sat in one for the very first time, back in like 2013. And then I *instantly* knew why. I went into the dealership with a "meh, overpriced" mantra, and walked out thinking "whoa, what was I thinking?"
The following 3 users liked this post by TacoBello:
BEAR-AvHistory (08-03-2017), justnspace (08-03-2017), kurtatx (08-03-2017)
Old 08-03-2017, 12:24 PM
  #355  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (2)
 
aIRpeACE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philly, PA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,273
Received 95 Likes on 80 Posts
why?
Old 08-03-2017, 03:13 PM
  #356  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoBello
I'm also surprised you bash Audi interiors so much. I never knew why people loved Audis so much, until I sat in one for the very first time, back in like 2013. And then I *instantly* knew why. I went into the dealership with a "meh, overpriced" mantra, and walked out thinking "whoa, what was I thinking?"
Back in 2011 when I bought my 08 A4, I was skeptical. My wife encouraged me to try an Audi just to see it. We were literally floored. It took a lot for us to say "We'll keep it under consideration" when, in fact, the quality blew us away. Even in Feb when I was set on buying a 3 or 4 series, I gave the Audi a shot and the A4 just blew the interior quality out of the water.
Old 08-03-2017, 05:16 PM
  #357  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
There are lots of new looks that things are changing.

Acura is still hanging on but a lot of brand new owners are not happy campers.
Wouldn't be surprised if most of those so called initial issues were from the dual screen setup lol.
The following users liked this post:
F23A4 (08-03-2017)
Old 08-03-2017, 05:43 PM
  #358  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,888
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
I was going to post the same comment earlier.
Old 08-03-2017, 06:10 PM
  #359  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
I was going to post the same comment earlier.
Most likely difficulty of people to use the electronics, but the same issues exist with many brands. I have not used half the stuff available in the 440, most likely never will.

I do think when people get off on the wrong foot with any car anything that comes up as an issue later will put them out of sorts. I think the point is really all about perception being the reality. I believe Honda is still living on the solid reliability record wracked quite a bit earlier in its history.

Based on family experience two pilots one we still have were good trucks. One Acura & two Hondas were definitely not bullet proof. One MT & one AT rebuilt or replaced. The AT as a result of the class action suite logged because Honda would not take any responsibly for a very poorly designed unit.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 08-03-2017 at 06:12 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Monte TLS,MAX (08-03-2017)
Old 08-04-2017, 03:56 AM
  #360  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,888
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
I on the other hand haven't had an issue with any of the Honda's I've had since returning to the brand in 2007. ( I left the brand back in 02 due to a transmission failure in my 99 Accord. Departing to the Nissan camp, I owned a Quest, Maxima and Murano during this Honda hiatus....Quest needed a tranny in year five, but the Maxima blew its MaF sensor and the Murano needed the throttle body replaced both problems occurring in their first year.)

Despite the tragedy that's befallen many of my TLX V6 brethren (many with first year models) my TLX V6 has been trouble free mechanically, as was the 14 Accord Sport, 12 Accord EX and 07 AV6 that preceded. (Not to mention my current 15 MDX, and the 12 MDX and 09 MDX that preceded it.)

Re: JD Power, I do think that The infotainment setup is largely likely why the brand doesn't rank as well as it should. While I do enjoy the aesthetics of the unit, the interface is poor. The current '18 seems to have addressed some of the interface issues.

I do think that JD Power's VDS should have a "less holistic" version, addressing only car mechanicals. A radio that isn't user friendly won't put me on the side of the road but a bad tranny is a different story.

Last edited by F23A4; 08-04-2017 at 04:36 AM.
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (08-04-2017)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.