New TSX vs. New Accord

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2008, 07:57 PM
  #41  
Cruisin'
 
noki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
compare the 2008 Accord to the 2004-2008 Acura RL, same basic idea except more mainstream... trickle down design

maybe Acura is upcharging too much, there really isn't any much difference "luxury" wise from the Accord without the tech package... better leather on the seats, stereo without the tech package(?), heated mirrors... It is still a nice car (if kinda ugly in 09)
Old 03-25-2008, 08:42 PM
  #42  
Instructor
 
human668's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I think Accord V6 should fit in well under Acura.
Here's my opinion about how Honda/Acura put their Accords in US market. ( since Acura hasn't start to spread to Europe)

Honda :
US 4cyl Accord
Family Seden.
No big changes.

Jp/Eu Accord.
Honda top model (sporty) seden.
Name it Accord Euro.
Keep the 2.4L engine with 201 hp so it'll be more powerful than US Accord.
Market it as the top model Accord.

No V6 for Honda. Concentrate on I4 engine, Honda is famous at it.

Acura:
US V6 Accord Saloon
Luxury family seden
Name it IL (idea comes from Inspire).
Tweak outside and inside a little bit. (Look at Toyota Camry and Lexus GS)
Make it more quiet.
Put in massage seats.
Add a few more goodies to match the image of Acura Advance.

US V6 Accord Coupe
Luxury sport coupe (this one is for compete with G37 coupe)
Name it ISX or ILC (idea comes from Inspire).
Add a few more goodies to match the image of Acura Advance.
A convertible ver. sounds good too.

TL
Luxury Sport Seden (this one go compete with Lexus IS)
Decrease the size a little bit. (about 186 in long and 72 in wide)
Simply a TL-type S. Just drop the name Type-S.

TL- type-S
Luxury Performance Sport Seden ( M3, C-class AMG, IS-F, RS4)
Give it a better name. TL-Mugen, TL-Mugen-S (well...it sound funny), TL-AMS, TL-R, TL..........
Most important!!! Put in a 450hp engine.
Don't forget a RWD base SH-AWD
Old 03-25-2008, 09:25 PM
  #43  
Mmm.. Acura cake
 
Gary757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm torn between a loaded '08 Accord Coupe V6 and a similarly loaded '09 TSX for a little more.

The iPod integration in the new TSX is much better than the simple aux-in plug on the Accord. Though I believe a newer Honda Music Link is on the way which should bring almost the same capabilities to the Accord.
Old 03-26-2008, 07:34 AM
  #44  
Instructor
 
LaZyPiGgY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ I would wait it out a bit if possible because i feel the "other" engine choice might solve all the problems of this new TSX. They might just change the front grill too.

I'm serious about the other engine though. If the 09 TSX gets a V6 or 2.3T OPTION, what will the accord have that it doesn't have?
Old 03-26-2008, 07:59 AM
  #45  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by LaZyPiGgY

I'm serious about the other engine though. If the 09 TSX gets a V6 or 2.3T OPTION, what will the accord have that it doesn't have?

HID's.

Thats IT.
Old 03-26-2008, 01:31 PM
  #46  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
I swear you guys make me play the 'devils advocate' a lot here. Why are Honda/Acura being held to a different standard than other makers?

A base Audi A4 costs less than a loaded Passat and is much smaller with less power.

A base G35 costs less than a loaded Maxima, uses the exact same engine and has less space. (but is RWD)

A base IS 250 is less than a loaded Camry and has less space with less power but RWD. (arent the engines from the same family?)

The point is that all manufactures share engines and technology between their brands. All competitors that have two channels of distribution seem to have overlap between their high line brands and the mass market brands. I believe is is intentional.
Old 03-26-2008, 01:35 PM
  #47  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
I swear you guys make me play the 'devils advocate' a lot here. Why are Honda/Acura being held to a different standard than other makers?

A base Audi A4 costs less than a loaded Passat and is much smaller with less power.

A base G35 costs less than a loaded Maxima, uses the exact same engine and has less space. (but is RWD)

A base IS 250 is less than a loaded Camry and has less space with less power but RWD. (arent the engines from the same family?)

The point is that all manufactures share engines and technology between their brands. All competitors that have two channels of distribution seem to have overlap between their high line brands and the mass market brands. I believe is is intentional.

Who is saying otherwise?

I think the main point being there isn't enough differentiation (content wise) between the TSX and the Accord. If the TSX is a great value then the Accord is an even better one IMO.

But thats nothing new. Thats been the case since the TSX came out. Yet most of us here still bought the TSX.
Old 03-26-2008, 11:48 PM
  #48  
Racer
 
jcondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
At $34,000 with the technology package with the outside apearance of a $25,000 car (if that) I'm looking forward to seeing how the TSX does sales wise, and if it does poorly will Acura even care or do they perceive a rebadged Euro Accord as found money?
34K for a TSX? While I think they are nice cars seems like a lot of coin for a 4 banger. I would much rather have a v6 TL or Accord or something else altogether.

I assume the 09 tl will be just short of 40K? If so I think both cars will not sell that well.

At 27.5K and 34.5K I think the TSX and TLs offer allot. At 35K and 40K not so much.
Old 03-27-2008, 03:40 AM
  #49  
Mmm.. Acura cake
 
Gary757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LaZyPiGgY
^ I would wait it out a bit if possible because i feel the "other" engine choice might solve all the problems of this new TSX. They might just change the front grill too.

I'm serious about the other engine though. If the 09 TSX gets a V6 or 2.3T OPTION, what will the accord have that it doesn't have?
My concern is the price. The Tech Package could cost around $3000-- a conservative guess based on the RDX Tech Package premium of $3500. Alternative engines will probably add at least another $2000. (The TL-S is $2000 more than a TL+Navi). So that's $5000 over whatever the base price will be -- assume it doesn't change and stays at $28000. That's $33K total versus $30.5K for the loaded V6 Accord Coupe w. Navi. Now is that worth the wait and the extra cost for a backup camera, memory seats, better ipod integration, powered-reverse-mirror, HIDs, Navi Weather&Traffic , and the Acura badge? That's up to the prospective buyer.
Old 03-27-2008, 07:58 AM
  #50  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Never heard or read anything about the differential in the new TSX versue the new Accord. Acura wants to paint it as a lux sports sedan. Does it still have a standard open diff or will this have an LSD for better performance? I can't find any mention of specs on that area so I'm thinking it's not good news.
Old 03-27-2008, 09:32 AM
  #51  
Intermediate
 
bgriffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Age: 39
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary757
My concern is the price. The Tech Package could cost around $3000-- a conservative guess based on the RDX Tech Package premium of $3500. Alternative engines will probably add at least another $2000. (The TL-S is $2000 more than a TL+Navi). So that's $5000 over whatever the base price will be -- assume it doesn't change and stays at $28000. That's $33K total versus $30.5K for the loaded V6 Accord Coupe w. Navi. Now is that worth the wait and the extra cost for a backup camera, memory seats, better ipod integration, powered-reverse-mirror, HIDs, Navi Weather&Traffic , and the Acura badge? That's up to the prospective buyer.
It makes less sense to buy the TSX when you compare it to the $28,160 Accord EX-L w/nav. You lose 11hp with the Accord, but you can use regular gas instead of premium. Also, an approximate savings of $5,000 really helps.
Old 03-27-2008, 09:39 AM
  #52  
Intermediate
 
bgriffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Age: 39
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ I would rather have the TSX. The Accord is huge.
Old 03-27-2008, 03:18 PM
  #53  
Banned
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 620
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you like straight-line speed, by all means get the Accord with a V6. If you like handling, there is really no comparison: TSX>>Accord.
Now that my children have grown, I really have no slightest interest in a car that big (Accord). If anything, I might go smaller than the TSX (Mini with a diesel engine?).
Old 03-28-2008, 03:30 PM
  #54  
TSX Sold! Hello STi!
iTrader: (2)
 
amadeus303's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I couldn't agree more... the Accord definitely looks more like the lux sedan... and truth be told, since you mentioned the brand, I think the redesigned 6 is easier on the eyes than the new TSX from a sheer aesthetic pov.


Originally Posted by wackura
The Accord actualy looks like more of luxury car, and stats wise probably is more qualified to be called one with the exception of no HIDs. The Accord in this color looks especialy stately:



whereas the new TSX, especialy in this color, looks like a cross competitor with a Mazda some number here

Old 03-31-2008, 12:00 PM
  #55  
Pro
 
jackspat2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Torrance, ca
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new accord is ugly IMHO. Always liked the previous generation accords but it's no longer a mid-size sedean. It's FULLSIZE. The car is a boat. There's nothing sporty about it. Sure, we can put 4 wheel disk brakes, abs, vehicle stability control, etc etc. but the truth is, it's a boat on wheels. And comparing it to a TSX, eh, not much comparison imo.

09 TSX = 186 inches in length, 72 inches in width
08 Accord = 194 inches in length, 73 inches in width

Been an avid Honda nut for years, but sort of fail out of love with the new Accord and now the TSX has set me back. Not feeling it anymore. I went out and bought something else the other day.
Old 03-31-2008, 02:49 PM
  #56  
I Quit
 
clee109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 39
Posts: 1,147
Received 54 Likes on 49 Posts
I'm a bit disappointed that the 09 TSX doesn't seem like a complete overhaul. The Accord looks vastly different from the previous generation but the TSX shares sooooo much with the previous generation.

Example: side profile, the rear most window is identical, the headlights wrap the same with what almost seems the same size amber area etc... the trunk follows the exact lines, the interior still has the same flow with the brushed trim pieces, seats are the same. It looks like it should have just been a 2 year make over, not an all new model..... Just my .02
Old 03-31-2008, 03:58 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 620
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree with you. I was all pumped up about the 2nd gen TSX when I saw the Sport4 concept. The reality is, they put an all-new car into the same old body style, except that they screwed up the front end.
Old 04-04-2008, 07:56 AM
  #58  
Cruisin'
 
mstylady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I test drove both the '08 Honda Accord EXL V6 and the '08 TSX (both Manual and Auto). I went with the '08 TSX 6 Speed; hopefully will have it next week. My very first brand new car was a Honda Civic; how I loved that car! I swore my next car would be an Accord. Let me throw in here as well I drove the '06 EXL V6 6speed right after driving the '08; the '06 in my opinion was nicer (setting aside the manual v auto issue)--cleaner lines, less clutter. I had not even test-driven the TSX at that point (last week) and would have taken the '06 EXL V6 6 speed stick in a heartbeat (7400 miles), except the dealer wanted $26,366 for it! Don't get me wrong the '08 Accord is really nice, but two things stick out that bothered me: the pleated leather seats and the cluttered dash; I'm up on technology and have no problems figuring things out, so it's not any perceived difficulty; it just makes the vehicle look too busy for my liking. The pleated leather seats as opposed to the '06 (granted, used) leather seats were not as inviting to me. As soon as I got in the TSX I had to have it. Combined with the clean lines of the exterior, the interior (getting non-nav, drove both though) plus the drive of course, sold me. In the end, I guess it's just really a personal preference. Also, I am not buying; I am leasing--Acura had far more attractive incentives to lease than Honda, who has had minimal lease support. I could not afford the Acura otherwise.
Old 04-04-2008, 05:16 PM
  #59  
CGP Ebony
 
xenonhid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,042
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Arrow

Originally Posted by clee109
I'm a bit disappointed that the 09 TSX doesn't seem like a complete overhaul. The Accord looks vastly different from the previous generation but the TSX shares sooooo much with the previous generation.

Clee109, I agree it does look similar to the 1st gen TSX. However, they re-designed it in a fashion that is not aesthetically pleasing.

IMO,

1)they should have modeled it after the sports4, (BTW, 09 TSX does not look like sports4, those who say it looks similar, please share with us what you are smoking )

or

2)Redesign it so it maintains the clean sharp lines of the 1st gen tsx.

But instead it looks like designers threw everthing in a blender and = wah la! the 09 TSX.

For me its not a single aesthetic characteristic in the 09 TSX, but rather the combination of them that just does not flow well.
Old 04-12-2008, 06:48 PM
  #60  
Intermediate
 
TL929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 41
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the 09 TSX had another grill it would look really good. And maybe another 20hp wouldn't hurt.
Old 04-13-2008, 06:59 PM
  #61  
Intermediate
 
anTo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TL929
If the 09 TSX had another grill it would look really good. And maybe another 20hp wouldn't hurt.
agreed heh
Old 04-14-2008, 08:43 AM
  #62  
Make a hole, coming thru!
 
davidspalding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere between 70 and 125 mph
Posts: 2,945
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by TL929
If the 09 TSX had another grill it would look really good. ...
Yikes, isn't that one enough? Two would be doubly awful looking.

P.S. nice avatar. ... Stylish.
Old 04-18-2008, 10:46 PM
  #63  
JDM Addict
Thread Starter
 
MMsTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona Bay
Age: 47
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jackspat2
The new accord is ugly IMHO. Always liked the previous generation accords but it's no longer a mid-size sedean. It's FULLSIZE. The car is a boat. There's nothing sporty about it. Sure, we can put 4 wheel disk brakes, abs, vehicle stability control, etc etc. but the truth is, it's a boat on wheels. And comparing it to a TSX, eh, not much comparison imo.

You sure about that?

I might beg to differ:









http://www.mugen-power.com/street/in...ion/index.html

The new Accord can certainly be made to look much nicer than it is.



God Bless Mugen!
Old 04-19-2008, 02:16 AM
  #64  
D
 
Draconis77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Age: 42
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MMsTSX
You sure about that?

I might beg to differ:



The new Accord can certainly be made to look much nicer than it is.



God Bless Mugen!
I'm sure after the TSX has been out for a little while it will be able to made to look much nicer than it does as well. Standard, I would have to say the TSX looks better than the US Accord.
Old 04-20-2008, 09:08 AM
  #65  
5th Gear
 
VTEC Madness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cmd
Totally agree. I use to own a SAAB 9-3 and 9-5. I hated the sound of the TSX doors if they were slammed. Perhaps sound deadening would help?

As far as Accord vs TSX. The Accord is VERY nice and has WAY too many similar parts/design to bash it. Now that the 09 TSX has come to light, if I were in the market I'd have to really give thought to a V6 Accord. The style is in many ways nicer -- the grill has doesn't look like it came from Saturn and the TSX fenders look like they were studying the old Altima a bit too much. Over all not real impress with the new design. Seems like step backwards were Accord took a step in the right direction -- and if you don't have kids, get a coupe!!
Having had owned a 9-5 and a 9-3 the sound of the doors slamming should have been the least of your concerns.
Old 04-20-2008, 03:42 PM
  #66  
Instructor
 
spurfan15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Age: 36
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary757
My concern is the price. The Tech Package could cost around $3000-- a conservative guess based on the RDX Tech Package premium of $3500. Alternative engines will probably add at least another $2000. (The TL-S is $2000 more than a TL+Navi). So that's $5000 over whatever the base price will be -- assume it doesn't change and stays at $28000. That's $33K total versus $30.5K for the loaded V6 Accord Coupe w. Navi. Now is that worth the wait and the extra cost for a backup camera, memory seats, better ipod integration, powered-reverse-mirror, HIDs, Navi Weather&Traffic , and the Acura badge? That's up to the prospective buyer.
As you said it's really up to the prospective buyer. I think for the feature set and high quality you get with the Accord or TSX, both are pretty good values. The TSX especially (with tech package) has quite an impressive tech feature list.

My preference at this point is the TSX, because of the HIDs, the better tech features, and the size/handling advantage. The new Accord really is a boat. It is a wonderful car for families seeking a big, comfortable sedan, but for a younger driver with no kids to haul around, the Accord is just too big. The Accord coupe is really nice, but I do prefer smaller sedans over coupes.

The thing that annoys me about the TSX right now is its engine choice. The TSX's sole engine puts out 11 more HP and 10 ft-lb more torque than the Accord's premium I4 engine. That difference is basically negated by the TSX's additional weight. The TSX has nice HP and torque curves and it has to handle better than the Accord, but the vehicle has insufficient power IMO. Add to that the fact that the TSX's engine requires premium fuel, and it is quite upsetting how little performance advantage the TSX offers.

The TSX (engine wise) seems like it was launched half ready. The diesel engine (hopefully ~180 HP) should be added next model year, and another engine may come after. The diesel will offer fuel efficiency, smooth city & highway driving (good, easy shifting and plenty of low end torque). The addition of the diesel alone will make the car far more complete and refined. Then if Acura can add a turbo 4 or V6, it'll make the TSX even more attractive to potential buyers (V6 probably won't happen -- it'll intrude on the TL too much).

To sum it up: the Accord is too big for me, but it's a great car. The TSX is better in size and offers wonderful tech features (esp HIDs). I like the TSX and think it's a good value, but it really needs additional engine options to be a complete car offering. My big concern at this point is the additional cost of secondary engines. If the diesel costs 2k extra, the car will approach 35k. Acura needs to price it wisely or no one will buy it -- especially with diesel costing $4.49/gallon around me.
Old 04-20-2008, 03:59 PM
  #67  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by spurfan15
My big concern at this point is the additional cost of secondary engines. If the diesel costs 2k extra, the car will approach 35k. Acura needs to price it wisely or no one will buy it -- especially with diesel costing $4.49/gallon around me.
I agree, an additional concern is the number of possible variations of the car we'll have to stock. There are already 4 versions plus the color combos to inventory. Assuming the diesel comes with stick and auto, that makes at least 6 car combos. I am hopeful they will bundle the diesel engine with the tech package only like the TL-S.
Old 04-21-2008, 03:40 AM
  #68  
Three Wheelin'
 
krio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Age: 50
Posts: 1,751
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by LaZyPiGgY
^ I would wait it out a bit if possible because i feel the "other" engine choice might solve all the problems of this new TSX. They might just change the front grill too.

I'm serious about the other engine though. If the 09 TSX gets a V6 or 2.3T OPTION, what will the accord have that it doesn't have?
the TSX will be offered with a new engine (and the diesel too) after the launch of the 2 engines TL 2009.
And the TL will get a more powerful engine in the mid cycle, after the launch of the next RL in 2011.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IBankMouse
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
06-13-2020 12:53 PM
blacktsxwagon
5G TLX (2015-2020)
42
10-27-2015 10:12 PM
kev87a
4G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
5
10-18-2015 02:03 AM
c1souk
5G TLX (2015-2020)
17
09-28-2015 11:20 AM
Eggs999bacon
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-24-2015 10:08 AM



Quick Reply: New TSX vs. New Accord



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.