Attention Attention Info On Supercharger !!!!!!!!!!!!!
#1
Old Skool 3.2TL member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore MD
Age: 46
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Attention Attention Info On Supercharger !!!!!!!!!!!!!
we will not have any final details on the kit until production, but the
prototype kit has been running on the V6 98-01 Accord, and now is being
fitted to the 2001 CL-S.
Thanks,
Comptech USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan Cohen" <HA65MPH@acura-tl.com>
To: "Aaron Roseli" <aaronr@comptechusa.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Info on supercharger...
> Please. Please tell me if it will fit the 3.2 because I heard it suppost
to be for the 3.0.
>
> Thanks again Evan
>
> --- "Aaron Roseli" <aaronr@comptechusa.com>
> > wrote:
> >Hello,
> >The S/C Kit for the V6 cars will not be out for the new couple of
> >months...we will not have any info on the Kit until the Kit is Finalized
and
> >available to the public.
> >Keep updated on our website.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Comptech USA
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Evan Cohen" <HA65MPH@acura-tl.com>
> >To: <info@comptechusa.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:14 AM
> >Subject: Info on supercharger...
> >
> >
> >> Please give me all the detials you can refrence to the 3.2 supercharger
> >for the 3.0 accord and/or 3.2TL(acura)
> >> I am very interested to know if it will work on my TL.
price/details/when
> >will it come out & any other info you can give me.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Evan Cohen
prototype kit has been running on the V6 98-01 Accord, and now is being
fitted to the 2001 CL-S.
Thanks,
Comptech USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan Cohen" <HA65MPH@acura-tl.com>
To: "Aaron Roseli" <aaronr@comptechusa.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Info on supercharger...
> Please. Please tell me if it will fit the 3.2 because I heard it suppost
to be for the 3.0.
>
> Thanks again Evan
>
> --- "Aaron Roseli" <aaronr@comptechusa.com>
> > wrote:
> >Hello,
> >The S/C Kit for the V6 cars will not be out for the new couple of
> >months...we will not have any info on the Kit until the Kit is Finalized
and
> >available to the public.
> >Keep updated on our website.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Comptech USA
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Evan Cohen" <HA65MPH@acura-tl.com>
> >To: <info@comptechusa.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:14 AM
> >Subject: Info on supercharger...
> >
> >
> >> Please give me all the detials you can refrence to the 3.2 supercharger
> >for the 3.0 accord and/or 3.2TL(acura)
> >> I am very interested to know if it will work on my TL.
price/details/when
> >will it come out & any other info you can give me.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Evan Cohen
#7
Community Architect
robb m.
robb m.
Originally posted by snook789
ya they started up the CL-S with the supercharger last night
ya they started up the CL-S with the supercharger last night
Trending Topics
#9
i agree w/ soundspeed
this fine piece of bolt on is gonna get our tranny killed!
definately alot of problems, they better make an intercooler, and other things to benefit from the sc
but then on the other hand i think it would be very tempting for the supercharger to be coming out
definately alot of problems, they better make an intercooler, and other things to benefit from the sc
but then on the other hand i think it would be very tempting for the supercharger to be coming out
#11
Originally posted by HA 65MPH
Would A Torque Converter be the remedy for the transmission?
Would A Torque Converter be the remedy for the transmission?
So in addition to the 5-6 grand for the sc, you would also need to buy a torque converter. How much do those go for? How hard are they to install? How much would installation be? Even with the tc, how long will the tranny hold out?
So many questions.
#12
Originally posted by SoundSpeed
You mean a high-performance torque converter? There is one on ACP, a level 10 torque converter, but it is for the accord. I don't know if that would eliminate the problems, the transmission is still going to be dealing with the load.
So in addition to the 5-6 grand for the sc, you would also need to buy a torque converter. How much do those go for? How hard are they to install? How much would installation be? Even with the tc, how long will the tranny hold out?
So many questions.
You mean a high-performance torque converter? There is one on ACP, a level 10 torque converter, but it is for the accord. I don't know if that would eliminate the problems, the transmission is still going to be dealing with the load.
So in addition to the 5-6 grand for the sc, you would also need to buy a torque converter. How much do those go for? How hard are they to install? How much would installation be? Even with the tc, how long will the tranny hold out?
So many questions.
So cheap way Nos or Expensive way SC
Mr.T
#14
Nitrous is bad for you. I wouldn't even put it in a Civic. I just think nitrous is too risky for any car. There are much more "engine- safer" ways to add a little power.
#15
Why does everyone assume a torque converter will make everything better?
It doesn't make your tranny any stronger. Hell I had a friend that got an aftermarket torque converter specifically made for his car that eventually ate up his transmission, and he had to drop it and go back to stock. (was a GS400)
The best thing to do would be to get a tranny cooler, (which can be found for less than $50 and are a DIY install). And get a valve body recalibration. That would actually do your tranny some good.
It doesn't make your tranny any stronger. Hell I had a friend that got an aftermarket torque converter specifically made for his car that eventually ate up his transmission, and he had to drop it and go back to stock. (was a GS400)
The best thing to do would be to get a tranny cooler, (which can be found for less than $50 and are a DIY install). And get a valve body recalibration. That would actually do your tranny some good.
#17
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by F=ma
Why does everyone assume a torque converter will make everything better?
It doesn't make your tranny any stronger. Hell I had a friend that got an aftermarket torque converter specifically made for his car that eventually ate up his transmission, and he had to drop it and go back to stock. (was a GS400)
The best thing to do would be to get a tranny cooler, (which can be found for less than $50 and are a DIY install). And get a valve body recalibration. That would actually do your tranny some good.
Why does everyone assume a torque converter will make everything better?
It doesn't make your tranny any stronger. Hell I had a friend that got an aftermarket torque converter specifically made for his car that eventually ate up his transmission, and he had to drop it and go back to stock. (was a GS400)
The best thing to do would be to get a tranny cooler, (which can be found for less than $50 and are a DIY install). And get a valve body recalibration. That would actually do your tranny some good.
#18
Originally posted by SoundSpeed
I know this has been discussed 10 thousand times already, but I am thinking you guys should still worry about the transmission taking that load on.
I know this has been discussed 10 thousand times already, but I am thinking you guys should still worry about the transmission taking that load on.
#19
Three Wheelin'
Higher stall torque converter will increase transmission fluid
temps, it's a performance bolt on NOT a reliability bolt on.
Intercoolers reduces the effeciency of the supercharger, especially
compared to a sc that's mounted directly to the intake manifold.
For the amount of boost we'll be running (on type s, I guess they'll
give us 4psi), it's worthless money.
I'd rather have it cost 3500 w/o intercooler than 4500 with intercooler.
temps, it's a performance bolt on NOT a reliability bolt on.
Intercoolers reduces the effeciency of the supercharger, especially
compared to a sc that's mounted directly to the intake manifold.
For the amount of boost we'll be running (on type s, I guess they'll
give us 4psi), it's worthless money.
I'd rather have it cost 3500 w/o intercooler than 4500 with intercooler.
#20
Originally posted by Closer
Higher stall torque converter will increase transmission fluid
temps, it's a performance bolt on NOT a reliability bolt on.
Intercoolers reduces the effeciency of the supercharger, especially
compared to a sc that's mounted directly to the intake manifold.
For the amount of boost we'll be running (on type s, I guess they'll
give us 4psi), it's worthless money.
I'd rather have it cost 3500 w/o intercooler than 4500 with intercooler.
Higher stall torque converter will increase transmission fluid
temps, it's a performance bolt on NOT a reliability bolt on.
Intercoolers reduces the effeciency of the supercharger, especially
compared to a sc that's mounted directly to the intake manifold.
For the amount of boost we'll be running (on type s, I guess they'll
give us 4psi), it's worthless money.
I'd rather have it cost 3500 w/o intercooler than 4500 with intercooler.
what are u talking about? intercoolers allow for cooler air into the SC, how do they decrease efficiency?
#21
Three Wheelin'
The extra piping, restrictions and turbulence reduces the
effeciency of the supercharger. Thus the sc will work harder to
output the same amount of compressed air.
It's an old ford/chevy debate.
Supercharger A: intercooled
Supercharger B: non-intercooled
SC-a will have to run through extra piping and work harder to
produce it's output. SC-b has less load, so the sc doesn't have
to work as hard as sc-a.
Efficiency of a sc can be measured by the heat of the output.
SC-a, even though it's intercooled, it will put out a higher
temperture output initially (before the intercooler).
When you're talking small amounts of boost with relativly low
increases in temperture, an intercooler is more money and strain
than it's worth. At higher pressures, with a huge increase in
temps, then intercooler is very important.
effeciency of the supercharger. Thus the sc will work harder to
output the same amount of compressed air.
It's an old ford/chevy debate.
Supercharger A: intercooled
Supercharger B: non-intercooled
SC-a will have to run through extra piping and work harder to
produce it's output. SC-b has less load, so the sc doesn't have
to work as hard as sc-a.
Efficiency of a sc can be measured by the heat of the output.
SC-a, even though it's intercooled, it will put out a higher
temperture output initially (before the intercooler).
When you're talking small amounts of boost with relativly low
increases in temperture, an intercooler is more money and strain
than it's worth. At higher pressures, with a huge increase in
temps, then intercooler is very important.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
Joe Avesyan
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
09-29-2015 03:57 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM