sleeperblue

I was looking at 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times for both cars I own, interesting how close they are...

2003 TL-s (stock):
0-60: 6.5 sec.
1/4 mile: 14.9

1988 MR2sc (stock):
0=60: 6.5 sec.
1/4 mile: 15.1

one day I will be in one of the cars and the other will pull up to a light...

Seikoja

if u can find a stock mr2 that can do 15.1 dont race it buy it cause i dont think those cars can do 15.8 when they were new trust me on that. lol

Rajca

iTrader: (8)

i did 14.95 twice in my 02type-s with a k&n filter and also test drove an 1990ish mr2 and that thing was slow!

Blazing GT

You have a TL TYPE S? it must be sick

wildcat71

1988 Toyota MR2sc (supercharge T-bar) (Horsepower 145 )

Curb Weight - Manual (lb.) 2494

2003 Acura TL-S (non-navi) (Horsepower 260 @ 6100 RPM )

Curb Weight - Automatic (lb.) 3558



the MR2 should possibly be quicker being that it is a lighter car and its a manual gearbox.

sbuswell

i doubt the mr2 is faster even new. now that its 20 years old most are probably close to dead or have been rebuilt and modified to hell.

Mokos23

that's what i was thinking

sleeperblue

Not close to dead... not modified to hell, waiting to install a new pulley system to raise boost... The MR2 feels as fast as the TL-s, and definitely more nimble in the corners...

In 1988 the MR2sc was one of the fastest cars 0-60... ah the smog era...

don