Tire Pressure
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Tire Pressure
The door pillar says 35 psi front, 33 psi rear. How many follow this 2 lb difference? Even if you add a couple pounds per tire which many people do, do you follow the 2 lb front/rear difference? Dealer service says they do 35 psi all around. Thanks.
#3
Carbon Bronze Pearl 2008
Those numbers 35/33 are recommended for maximum ride comfort and fuel economy. Feel free to play around with pressures that best suit your liking. I personally like a higher pressure year round as the 35/33 seems too mushy for my taste. Remember, always set your pressures when the tires are “cold” or the car hasn’t been driven for a few hours and hasn’t been sitting in direct sun, etc. Also, remember the RDX is a front heavy front biased car (even with AWD) so the front tires will naturally heat up more than the rears when driving hence naturally increasing their PSI. With that said, I usually set the fronts +1 PSI to whatever I choose for the rear. After a little driving the fronts will naturally become +2 over the rears. Always remember to check your pressures year round as well as they can significantly change say from winter to summer and vice versa.
The following 2 users liked this post by Carbon2008RDX:
justnspace (03-19-2017),
romer (03-18-2017)
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (03-19-2017)
#6
Pro
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
with the same engine, in all of acura's product...why are some calling for 5w-30 and then the newer ones calling for 0w-20? because of the strict government requirements
they call for an entire fleet of vehicles to be in a certain MPG range.
by dropping the weight of oil, ACROSS The whole lineup, Acura and other manufactures are able to meet those requirements
a lower viscosity oil will gain MPG. if you are looking at individual vehicles...the lower viscosity will only gain a slight increase...but if you look at the WHOLE entire fleet, that .1 MPG adds up
same thing with tire pressure...the whole entire fleet gets cranked up to 37PSI
they call for an entire fleet of vehicles to be in a certain MPG range.
by dropping the weight of oil, ACROSS The whole lineup, Acura and other manufactures are able to meet those requirements
a lower viscosity oil will gain MPG. if you are looking at individual vehicles...the lower viscosity will only gain a slight increase...but if you look at the WHOLE entire fleet, that .1 MPG adds up
same thing with tire pressure...the whole entire fleet gets cranked up to 37PSI
Last edited by justnspace; 03-19-2017 at 08:17 AM.
Trending Topics
The following users liked this post:
wsw (03-09-2019)
#9
Pro
Certainly increasing the CAFE is one of the reasons for suggesting the use of 0W20, but wouldn't the best fuel economy be obtained when internal engine friction is reduced? Isn't reducing internal friction a good thing for extending the life of the engine and our wallets?
If using 0W20 caused increased engine wear (or damage) would the manufacturer use it at the risk of causing increased warranty repairs? Or does the government CAFE mandate mean that manufacturers are actually reducing engine reliability to meet the new standards.
#10
The goal of the manufacturer is "good enough" - to get the vehicle to the warranty threshold with a minimum of issues. What happens after that they don't care about so much.
A good example is GDI engines. No longer does fuel wash over the back sides of intake valves so they will run hotter and coke up. There will be a lot of engine issues in the coming years but more efficient and better MPG for now so all is good. And, the average Joe brooms the car before shit happens.
A good example is GDI engines. No longer does fuel wash over the back sides of intake valves so they will run hotter and coke up. There will be a lot of engine issues in the coming years but more efficient and better MPG for now so all is good. And, the average Joe brooms the car before shit happens.
#11
Didn't say it is bad for your car, just perhaps not what is best. People who think manufacturers have the customer's best interest as their number one priority are the same people who believe the car salesman is their friend.
#12
Racer
#13
Pro
Certainly increasing the CAFE is one of the reasons for suggesting the use of 0W20, but wouldn't the best fuel economy be obtained when internal engine friction is reduced? Isn't reducing internal friction a good thing for extending the life of the engine and our wallets?
If using 0W20 caused increased engine wear (or damage) would the manufacturer use it at the risk of causing increased warranty repairs? .
If using 0W20 caused increased engine wear (or damage) would the manufacturer use it at the risk of causing increased warranty repairs? .
One definition of oil that I found is "to form a lubricant film on the contact surfaces that is sufficiently capable of supporting loads and thus preventing wear and premature fatigue"
Perhaps in the old days (pre synthetic), oils with higher viscosity were better off at supporting the "loads". Isn't the advantage of synthetic oils that the molecules form tighter bonds and do not break down as quickly as conventional oil? Isn't that why the oil change interval has increased so much since the introduction of synthetic oil? Perhaps the theory that more viscous oils were "best" was true when comparing conventional to conventional, because of increased molecular bonding, but I think all synthetic oils benefit from increase molecular bonding and therefore increased load bearing capability.
In the old days car engines were not built to the same tight tolerances as they are today (at least not assembly line engines). I'm just guessing here, but perhaps thicker (more viscous) oils were used to compensate for looser tolerances in connecting rods and wrist pins. The thicker oil perhaps reduced engine clatter in the looser fitting components. I remember the days when people added a can of STP (like pouring corn syrup) before selling their cars to reduce clacking engine sounds (apparently adding sawdust was also useful). Now that factory built engines are tighter, they no longer need the higher viscosity oils.
#17
Pro
Ok then- what do YOU think is the optimum oil viscosity for the 3.5l V6 in the RDX? If it's not 0W20 then why?
#19
Pro