new 2013 RDX looks nice but ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2012, 06:12 PM
  #1  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
mav238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hometown - Vancouver
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
new 2013 RDX looks nice but ...

Still purely gas powered. Hybrid tech is becoming more common, unless absolutely need to change to a new RDX, will wait for hybrid version of suvfrom honda or audi. Jmho
Old 04-18-2012, 06:53 PM
  #2  
10th Gear
 
markrogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough, you are entitled.

The mileage boost of the new RDX is significant enough, however, that it will make sense for a lot of people as is. If / when Acura does a hybrid, the increment will need to be small enough or else it won't have a return for most people. This is the issue with the Lexus RX, where a hybrid is available, but most people need >5 years to justify buying it. Some do it anyway for "psychic reasons", but most just pass.
Old 04-18-2012, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Burning Brakes
 
HotRodW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 780
Received 276 Likes on 180 Posts
Honestly, I don't have an interest in a hybrid powertrain for the RDX. The extra weight and additional expense simply aren't worth it for my type of driving (mostly highway). With cylinder deactivation, the new RDX matches the highway fuel economy of the $45k RX Hybrid. And when/if they upgrade to the ZF 9-speed auto, I can foresee 30+ mpg. Pretty impressive stuff.
Old 04-19-2012, 01:43 AM
  #4  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
mav238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hometown - Vancouver
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by HotRodW
Honestly, I don't have an interest in a hybrid powertrain for the RDX. The extra weight and additional expense simply aren't worth it for my type of driving (mostly highway). With cylinder deactivation, the new RDX matches the highway fuel economy of the $45k RX Hybrid. And when/if they upgrade to the ZF 9-speed auto, I can foresee 30+ mpg. Pretty impressive stuff.
True, but most realistic driving conditions is in city, where the new engine is pretty much the same as the turbo 4.
Old 04-19-2012, 09:08 AM
  #5  
Intermediate
 
f1nzup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my research, the breakeven point for the savings from better gas mileage is around year 8 for the additional cost of the hybrid. I rarely hang on to vehicle for that long so I cannot justify buying a hybrid.
Old 04-19-2012, 05:34 PM
  #6  
Instructor
 
Dorsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 245
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by f1nzup
In my research, the breakeven point for the savings from better gas mileage is around year 8 for the additional cost of the hybrid. I rarely hang on to vehicle for that long so I cannot justify buying a hybrid.
I have the opposite reason for avoiding them. I keep cars a long time and worry about the cost of an aging hybrid and inability to do more complex repairs. I read that GM says the cost of the battery pack in their small EV is $12k to 15k. I can see people getting into a situation where the car needs batteries but the cost of the batteries far exceeds the value of the car with new batteries.
Old 04-19-2012, 05:56 PM
  #7  
Instructor
 
corduroygt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mav238
True, but most realistic driving conditions is in city, where the new engine is pretty much the same as the turbo 4.
It can turn off 2 or 3 cylinders plus the simple AWD system also means even better mileage in the city.
Old 04-20-2012, 10:27 AM
  #8  
mrgold35
 
mrgold35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 6,717
Received 1,508 Likes on 1,176 Posts
I would be real interested in seeing the "real world" 2013 RDX combined mpgs. Acura must have really improved the aerodynamics to get up to 28 mpg on the hwy for a V-6 SUV. The speed limit is 75 to 80 mph in NM and southern TX, how much of a mpg hit will the RDX take at those speeds?

The time Acura took to develop a 6AT could have been better spent developing a 8AT transmission with a little more effort. The 8AT will improve 0-60 times and mpgs (and we don’t have to wait 10-12 years to see it).
Old 04-20-2012, 10:35 AM
  #9  
Instructor
 
jfarabaugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Malvern, PA
Age: 44
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mrgold35
I would be real interested in seeing the "real world" 2013 RDX combined mpgs. Acura must have really improved the aerodynamics to get up to 28 mpg on the hwy for a V-6 SUV. The speed limit is 75 to 80 mph in NM and southern TX, how much of a mpg hit will the RDX take at those speeds?

The time Acura took to develop a 6AT could have been better spent developing a 8AT transmission with a little more effort. The 8AT will improve 0-60 times and mpgs (and we don’t have to wait 10-12 years to see it).
From the fuel eco thread

https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...80&postcount=8
The following users liked this post:
R*D*X* (04-23-2012)
Old 04-26-2012, 01:46 AM
  #10  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Moved thread to the new 2nd gen RDX forum.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snorf
2G RDX (2013-2018)
429
11-04-2019 06:44 AM
JazzoRenee
2G RDX (2013-2018)
10
09-16-2015 06:12 PM
vbgregg
4G TL (2009-2014)
2
09-11-2015 05:38 PM
Charlespsu
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
09-02-2015 09:54 AM



Quick Reply: new 2013 RDX looks nice but ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.