P2R 3inch Cat Back installed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2008, 10:39 PM
  #41  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
poisx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: DARK ALLY
Posts: 1,558
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gnuts
he has the 3.5.
i think u right. Not more can be done to our cars that has not beign done NA. so if pushing those HP it def had to be 3.5 running very healthy.
Old 11-10-2008, 11:40 PM
  #42  
Uses turn signals in my
 
TCM 01 CL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,108
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by poisx7
is ur shop in maryland ??
since Nupe did most of his work in ur shop ??
I wud like to know.
P2R is located in South Florida near where I live (which is why I usually volunteer to test things such as their plenums and 4" intake). I don't see where CLS6SpeedNupe claimed to have his work done in their shop, P2R most likely shipped the exhaust up north.

With all due respect sir, could you please type more clearly? It is sometimes very hard to read some of the stuff you have typed and I am sure other members would appreciate it too. Thanks.
Old 11-11-2008, 01:15 AM
  #43  
Your Garage
iTrader: (22)
 
DC3328's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S. FL.
Age: 36
Posts: 4,085
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
nice numbers, but being a tease isnt cool..
Old 11-11-2008, 07:51 AM
  #44  
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
CivicB18B1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Windsor, ontario
Age: 38
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
post a video clip please!
Old 11-11-2008, 08:05 AM
  #45  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
correct me if i'm wrong, but only the midsection is 3"... in which case i wouldn't consider it a 3inch catback.

but it looks like a clean y-split, but i'd like to see pictures of the transition from cat to 3".

nice numbers. i knew someone would do it.
Old 11-11-2008, 09:12 AM
  #46  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
correct me if i'm wrong, but only the midsection is 3"... in which case i wouldn't consider it a 3inch catback.
Thats correct, then I guess its just a good HP producing regular cat back.
Old 11-11-2008, 09:54 AM
  #47  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
That piping just look strange under the car. Soooo big.
Old 11-11-2008, 09:55 AM
  #48  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
That piping just look strange under the car. Soooo big.
lol I just walked past my window at work and looked into the parking lot at the back of the car and was thinking the same thing, looks good though
Old 11-11-2008, 10:59 AM
  #49  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
Thats correct, then I guess its just a good HP producing regular cat back.
it looks like a good design to me. i'm running a complete 2.5" catback and experienced nothing but gains. so i'd have to say it's more than likely a 3" midsection would show benefit.

actually over on the 3G TL section, there is a 6spd guy who ran some ridiculous 1/4 mile times with a complete 3" catback and very minimal mods.

what a lot of people don't understand about cars in general, is that a properly designed motor and exhaust combo receives almost all of it's back pressure from the headers. the way acura designs with the headers and j-pipe, the cat will provide some back pressure too. and then everything catback tends to make up a very low percentage of back pressure.

Last edited by CleanCL; 11-11-2008 at 11:03 AM.
Old 11-11-2008, 11:05 AM
  #50  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
it looks like a good design to me. i'm running a complete 2.5" catback and experienced nothing but gains. so i'd have to say it's more than likely a 3" midsection would show benefit.

actually over on the 3G TL section, there is a 6spd guy who ran some ridiculous 1/4 mile times with a complete 3" catback and very minimal mods.

what a lot of people don't understand about cars in general, is that a properly designed motor and exhaust combo receives almost all of it's back pressure from the headers. the way acura designs with the headers and j-pipe, the cat will provide some back pressure too. and then everything catback tends to make up a very low percentage of back pressure.
yea I agree 2.5 all the way back should be the minimum these cars should get. Most people talk about 2.5 mid section to 2.25 y pipe but I dont see how that will help over the stock system if thats 2.25.
Old 11-11-2008, 11:24 AM
  #51  
OG 3.x^7 rawr
iTrader: (5)
 
SPoolinspOON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Centreville, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
damn, looks like i'm going to need to plan my exhaust setup in my forecast....damit MO
Old 11-11-2008, 11:29 AM
  #52  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPoolinspOON
damn, looks like i'm going to need to plan my exhaust setup in my forecast....damit MO
yea make sure you get that 2.5 inch into 2.25 like you said you were going to get two weeks ago when I was trying to convince you to get this one that I have
Old 11-13-2008, 06:53 AM
  #53  
OG 3.x^7 rawr
iTrader: (5)
 
SPoolinspOON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Centreville, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
only problem with 3" if I was to get it would be finding a resonator to keep the sucker quite.
Old 11-13-2008, 09:52 AM
  #54  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by SPoolinspOON
only problem with 3" if I was to get it would be finding a resonator to keep the sucker quite.
magnaflow.
Old 11-13-2008, 11:44 AM
  #55  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
EL19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,340
Received 193 Likes on 150 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
magnaflow.
agree I hve a 2.5" magnaflow resonator and it made a BIG ass difference in sound. They make resonators all the way to 4inches from what ive seen.
Old 11-13-2008, 12:13 PM
  #56  
10th Gear
 
Sideshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a great thread!
After years of forum members getting zero gains from a Catback, it is very encouraging to see NA #'s like CLS6SpeedNupe's!! Realizing of course he is undoubtedly highly modified (all available bolt-ons, A/F tuner, P&P?) and probably a 3.5 conversion.
My question is what size Magnaflow resonator are people running? I'm not sure if I should go with the 14", 18", or 22"? Not really feeling straight pipes.
Thanks!
Old 11-13-2008, 12:19 PM
  #57  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea I have to get a resonator, it sounds good and all but when im chilling and driving its louder than I want. The #1 thing on my list to get right now though is one of the o2 sensor things for the cat that stops your from throwing CELs because even before the cat back my car has been constantly throwing code p420 for the high flow cat and its been killing my gas mileage.
Old 11-13-2008, 12:20 PM
  #58  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to go the track to tomorrow if this rain out here clears but I need some better wheels and sticky tires because with all this TQ i know I wont run THE BEST times the car should be running with its power
Old 11-13-2008, 01:11 PM
  #59  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
i would go with this bad boy.

http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/s...e=main&id=7843
Old 11-13-2008, 01:18 PM
  #60  
MP90 uninstalled
 
jproy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
great work
Old 11-13-2008, 02:25 PM
  #61  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
yea for that cost my will car will just stay loud for a little bit longer, lol. Only thing im doing to her from now untill next year is to get my AEM FIC working and dyno tune, and get the o2 sensor thing to stop the CELs
Old 11-13-2008, 02:25 PM
  #62  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jproy
great work
Thanks sir, almost there.
Old 11-13-2008, 09:45 PM
  #63  
OG 3.x^7 rawr
iTrader: (5)
 
SPoolinspOON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Centreville, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
damn! That resonator is HUGE!

Thing is 30" in length!
Old 11-13-2008, 10:57 PM
  #64  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn I didnt even think about it when I saw the 30 inches, thing will probably add some weight to the exhuast.
Old 11-14-2008, 12:43 PM
  #65  
MP90 uninstalled
 
jproy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
http://www.allmagnaflow.com/product.php?productid=453

Look here. I bought one there. I found it as low as 79.99. I put the 24in 2.5 in/out on mine but I see you only need 3". It made a night and day diff. Back to stock sound but a little more bass. I have the same setup you do but mine is 2.5 to dual 2.25. Sounded horrible without. No rasp period! You might want to try the 18" in 3". It may do wonders for you and keep a bit more bass. These are the best resonators I have come across.
Old 11-14-2008, 12:53 PM
  #66  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
it's an acura, install the 30" and keep it classy.
Old 11-14-2008, 01:08 PM
  #67  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
EL19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,340
Received 193 Likes on 150 Posts
18" would be too small, I have an 18" 2.5 in and out maganaflow resonator and it still drones like shit, Ill probably grab that 30".
Old 11-14-2008, 01:25 PM
  #68  
OG 3.x^7 rawr
iTrader: (5)
 
SPoolinspOON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Centreville, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Have any of you guys used an AERO resonator? I've read that AERO>magnaflow.....not sure if its true or not.
Old 11-14-2008, 03:02 PM
  #69  
MP90 uninstalled
 
jproy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
it's an acura, install the 30" and keep it classy.
when I said bass I did not mean ressonance nor ricer sound in any way. Maybe the 30" is what is needed with the 3" but with the 24" 2.5" it is quiet as stock and the riciest of riceboys would never be able to tell it wasnt stock without looking at it. Too bad there is not a 3"x24" option. I agree, its an Acura, keep it that way.
Old 11-14-2008, 04:40 PM
  #70  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would these cause any slow down in flow and power loss?
Old 11-14-2008, 06:52 PM
  #71  
Unregistered user
iTrader: (2)
 
LIPPSTUH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Irvine
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i would think so...
Old 11-14-2008, 08:41 PM
  #72  
MP90 uninstalled
 
jproy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don’t think they cause any restriction. The design of the resonator is essentially what you have there now. There is a 3" completely unrestricted piece of pipe through the middle of the muffler. The difference is that the 3" piece of pipe is perforated and the packing is wrapped around the perforations on the outside of the pipe and that is encased in the muffler housing. There are cut away designs on the Magnaflow website. I looked through mine and it was just like a piece of 2.5” pipe except for the smooth perforations from the inside. Call Magnaflow and speak with an engineer. Sound waves are canceled without the use of restriction in their design from what I understand. I am no exhaust expert. What I can tell you with some degree of certainty is that it works damn well and there was no loss of power on my car. Could be the infamous butt dyno acting up again but I may have gained a bit of power. The challenge was getting the 6”er under the car. It hangs down a bit but I have not hit it with anything yet. If you look at the car from the side and kneel down you can see the resonator. If I ran over something large enough it would compromise the resonator.

This is a 24” overall 3”x6” round polished. It’s just like mine but in the 3” pipe. I found it for $86 on other sites. Find what you want on the Magnaflow site then google “Magnaflow (and the part #)”. All Magnaflow products can be had for half retail.
http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/s...e=main&id=7847

Check out this 3” in dual 2.5” out 6” round resonator also.
http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/s...e=main&id=7850
Old 11-14-2008, 08:52 PM
  #73  
MP90 uninstalled
 
jproy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I was wrong. They do make a 3" through 6"x24". I would highly recomend you try it. It is the one listed in the post above. My system resonated like hell before I put the Magnaflow resonator on. Keep in mind that resonance was with some knock off brand 4" 14" resonator.
Old 11-15-2008, 12:54 AM
  #74  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
magnaflows are all straight through design, no restriction in flow. when you get the resonator and look through it, you will understand.
Old 11-15-2008, 03:45 AM
  #75  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
magnaflows are all straight through design, no restriction in flow. when you get the resonator and look through it, you will understand.
i understand
Old 11-19-2008, 12:45 PM
  #76  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I trying to be the first NA CL or TL to cross 300whp. I think all I need right now is a TB spacer and a tune and I can do it. Maybe even just the tune will do it.
Old 11-19-2008, 03:47 PM
  #77  
MP90 uninstalled
 
jproy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
TB spacer will not do anything special. You need to remove the coolant flow through hoses on the TB and connect them together so the hot coolant does not flow through the TB. Honda did this to prevent ice from forming in the TB during very cold weather. The TB spacer is intended to stop heat from the coolant warming the TB from soaking the UIM. Removing and looping the coolant flow through has the same effect with no need to remove the TB. I do not think there are any gains air flow wise from the TB spacer. This is what I did to mine.
Old 11-19-2008, 04:20 PM
  #78  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jproy
TB spacer will not do anything special. You need to remove the coolant flow through hoses on the TB and connect them together so the hot coolant does not flow through the TB. Honda did this to prevent ice from forming in the TB during very cold weather. The TB spacer is intended to stop heat from the coolant warming the TB from soaking the UIM. Removing and looping the coolant flow through has the same effect with no need to remove the TB. I do not think there are any gains air flow wise from the TB spacer. This is what I did to mine.
Hmm..... DIY Pics please brother.
Old 11-19-2008, 08:43 PM
  #79  
Instructor
 
GRNMCHN03cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: albuquerque, NM
Age: 39
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
I trying to be the first NA CL or TL to cross 300whp. I think all I need right now is a TB spacer and a tune and I can do it. Maybe even just the tune will do it.
Also if you are looking to just hit 300 on the dyno, you could ice the crap out of the intake manifold before a run. should help a bit. Along with the coolant line redirection and a better tune you should hit 300 hopefully
Old 11-19-2008, 09:40 PM
  #80  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by jproy
TB spacer will not do anything special. You need to remove the coolant flow through hoses on the TB and connect them together so the hot coolant does not flow through the TB. Honda did this to prevent ice from forming in the TB during very cold weather. The TB spacer is intended to stop heat from the coolant warming the TB from soaking the UIM. Removing and looping the coolant flow through has the same effect with no need to remove the TB. I do not think there are any gains air flow wise from the TB spacer. This is what I did to mine.
i agree. more importantly remove the hot coolant. but the throttle body spacer (or 2 stacked together) provides a bigger charge of air in the intake manifold. it definitely doesn't hurt. on his setup, he might see something.

a couple other small mods to do... EGR removal (removes hot exhaust air from intake). and i think you should try out a larger intake manifold spacer like this.



and here's a look at an egr block off.



PM me if you're interested, i have both for sale.


Quick Reply: P2R 3inch Cat Back installed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.