Stock Dyno of a 2013 Accord V6 6MT
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-19-2013)
#6
here is the auto 13' V6 touring to compare
http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2
240WHP and 225WTQ
http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2
240WHP and 225WTQ
#7
All motor
Good post. Just a 'bit' underrated at 278 crank hp lol. Probably more like 290.
Trending Topics
The following 2 users liked this post by paperboy42190:
BEAR-AvHistory (09-30-2013),
F23A4 (09-25-2013)
#13
All motor
Oh, it's STD? I didn't see the video. Still not bad for a stock car. Makes more power than the 8G, which already goes 13.7 @ 102 stock and I believe is a bit lighter. I wanna run one!!
#14
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
You won't have any problems with a stock one. The 8G is quick, but that 13.7 @ 102, stock is about as typical as TypeS 09 running a 13.9 @ 100 in his intake only '05 TL.
The 6AT in the 9G looks promising since C&D got a 14.1 @ 101 out of one.
The 6AT in the 9G looks promising since C&D got a 14.1 @ 101 out of one.
#15
2013 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L V6 w/Nav 6 Speed Manual Transmission Dyno Test - YouTube
Pretty impressive numbers.
Stock 2013 Honda Accord EX V6 Coupe 6MT
I figured this would be the best place to post this?
Pretty impressive numbers.
Stock 2013 Honda Accord EX V6 Coupe 6MT
I figured this would be the best place to post this?
You are not supposed to watch youtube videos at work. At work you work. Get to work yo sackboi!
That's typical HONDA. Get used to it. Put up with it or get a different ride. MS3 is shit full of torque.
That's second time you whining about torque you know.
But only at high RPM's. You lose all your time before it reaches powerband. lolz
mazdaspeed3god
#16
kekekekeke
#17
All motor
^ They trapped 102.5 in that mag, fool. I believe it was a 14.2 though. Anything over 100mph has 13.x potential. It's been done by actual drivers, don't be an asshat.
#18
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
The following 6 users liked this post by anx1300c:
BEAR-AvHistory (09-26-2013),
EvilVirus (09-23-2013),
justnspace (09-24-2013),
mazdaspeed3God (09-24-2013),
Sonnick (09-23-2013),
and 1 others liked this post.
#20
Anything over 100mph has 13.x potential. It's been done by actual drivers, don't be an asshat.
Firstly, I'm older than you.
Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
mazdagod
#21
All motor
No, 13.x is not usual for a 8G 6-6. With a good driver though, it's entirely possible. The norm would probably be more like 14.2 - 14.4.
The following users liked this post:
F23A4 (09-25-2013)
#22
Senior Moderator
Ever since the 6-6 debuted with the 7G, it's been a sleeper, with performance numbers in the ballpark of more upmarket coupes such as the G37 without the insurance penalty. (Generally speaking)
#26
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Was it on a DynoJet, could not see the top of the chart. 255whp is very nice for a small N/A engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
3
11-14-2015 01:20 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM