4G TL (2009-2014)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

BMW 335xi vs 2012 TL, Epic Fail Acura?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2011, 03:08 PM
  #41  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
Sounds like the BMW is your car of choice

However, if it was my money, I would take the less expensive, more reliable, roomier, more technologically advanced, better performing, more fuel efficient, quieter, and more luxurious Acura TL.

I usually don't like to pay more for less, and for me, the BMW falls under that category, unless the only thing I was looking for was prestige.
HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD.............i see lots of people coming on this forum .........acura owners and non acura owners .......bashing the new TL.....stop @#%&*!% looking at it and comparing it then............

If i don't like someting i dont sit there and compare it to something else price wise and all that BS i say i dont like it ...who cares what the cost is ........i am in the business of buying exactly what i like ........and want .........

the 3 series BMW is a nice car ....great if a name is all you yern for......the car has no room ......and is no where near as reliable as a TL ......

Your mind is set on a BMW "GET ONE" that's my ....no hostility intended ........
Old 04-14-2011, 04:22 PM
  #42  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 30
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
And your point in posting this thread in a forum full of current 4G TL (and Acura) owners was...? Were you looking for something?

Your opening statement of "For just $100 more a month, would you not rather drive the BMW?" A) makes it sound like you're more concerned with image and B) doesn't account for the raping your rear end will take once the gimmicky free-maintenance is up.

People seem to get their panties wet with the German engineering.
Old 04-14-2011, 04:34 PM
  #43  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
People seem to get their panties wet with the German engineering.
because pumping beamer,benz&bently just doesnt feel the same in an AC.........LOL ......SMH ......
Old 04-14-2011, 04:40 PM
  #44  
I feel strongly both ways
 
PsychDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 75
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Holy crap! Those are some wild prices you're throwing at us. In April of 2009 I bought my FWD TL Tech for $34,460 (before tax).
Old 04-14-2011, 04:51 PM
  #45  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
And your point in posting this thread in a forum full of current 4G TL (and Acura) owners was...? Were you looking for something?

Your opening statement of "For just $100 more a month, would you not rather drive the BMW?" A) makes it sound like you're more concerned with image and B) doesn't account for the raping your rear end will take once the gimmicky free-maintenance is up.

People seem to get their panties wet with the German engineering.
For the record, I don't have a problem with my image whether I am driving a TL or 335xi. They are both are nice cars.

This rear end raping is based on your personal experience or do we have some objective statistics available showing that BMW cost more to service and maintain after 4 years? It most likley will cost more, but how much more? Is it really that bad? Who knows what could happen to the TL after 4 years. I know the transmission failed on my TL.

After 4 years, you can trade in the car or you go to an independent mechanic.
Old 04-14-2011, 04:51 PM
  #46  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
BMWs dont excite me, unless you are talking about an M, and the 3 series is hyper generic at this point. They all blend in to the background of every parking lot i've ever rolled into.

Say what you want about the TL's styling, but its still a fucking head turner. No TL goes unnoticed by me

disclaimer: dont own a TL; shopped beamer; died of boredom
Old 04-14-2011, 04:54 PM
  #47  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4
Can't say that happens everyday but often enough that I will want a usable rear middle seat. Even just for short trips to restaurants.

Well then you should probably ask yourself if you care more about the one person who sits in the middle (Acura), or the two people people who will be sitting in the ends with their leg circulation cut off (BMW).


You know what, I have never really tried the TL system or the 16 speaker BMW one. So, I said "on paper". Thankfully the way I optioned the car, the Bimmer will not have iDrive.

Well it has been overwhelmingly been shown that the TL's system is the best. Period.

No iDrive? So the BMW you are looking at isn't as optioned out as the TL... another factor of the not as expensive price on the BMW.


I did try the navigation on the TL and the user interface sucked period.

Again, the TL has been said to have one of the best navi systems in the industry. If you thought the TL navi sucked, then other navis will be just painful.

The BMW is running on run-flats. Still the TL is a great running car. I am impressed.

Being run-flat or not will not affect the grip of the tire. It does add weight but in this case the BMW is lighter overall.

Please show me where you get your data from. I have the sale brochures right next to me as I am typing this.

TL 11.9/8 (L/100Km)
335xi 12.2/7.9 (L/100Km)

www.bmwusa.com
www.acura.com


Stock to stock my money is on the BMW every time until that HPFP fails. With a tune, the 335 will most likely walk on the TL.

So would mine, but only if the drivers were perfectly equal. Other then that, it's a drivers race.

Again BMW did have run flat tires

Like I said, being run-flats doesn't affect the grip of the tire.

In the spec chart pdf they did.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...ff5f424d86.pdf

Thanks for finding this for me. However, the TL used was pre mid-model change. The 2012 model is 3 db quieter making it a 73 if using R&T numbers which makes it quieter than the 335.


Since when does TL have real aluminum. The 2011 and 2012 that I saw both had aluminum looking plastic trims. Personally I would opt for the brush aluminum trim with the Bimmer.

The metal trim in the TL has always been real. It is a metal vapor that is deposited onto a plastic. It is like gold-plated metal (gold on the outside but something else on the inside). This method weighs less and it also doesn't get dented as easily as just the regular thin metal strips normally used.


There are better deals to be had on both cars. BMW Canada is more aggressive at the moment that's for sure. Just because the TL is "2012" that just came out doesn't mean anything. It is just marketing.


I mentioned in an earlier post that the BMW 335xi is equipped with executive package and sports seat. There are a few things that it comes with the TL doesn't have, namely 16 Speaker 825watt sound system, Bi-Xenon Adaptive Headlight, Heated Steering Wheel, 60:40 Split Folding Rear Seat and real aluminum/wood trims.

There are also a lot more things that the TL comes with that the BMW you equipped doesn't have. It all just depends on what you are looking for.

I might be getting a good deal on the TL thanks to bigfoot1523. Looks I might be in a TL after all. Awesome forum.
.
Old 04-14-2011, 04:57 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
jasonwdp10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 933
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by KillerG
BMWs dont excite me, unless you are talking about an M, and the 3 series is hyper generic at this point. They all blend in to the background of every parking lot i've ever rolled into.

Say what you want about the TL's styling, but its still a fucking head turner. No TL goes unnoticed by me

disclaimer: dont own a TL; shopped beamer; died of boredom
wait so they're boring because they're common or because you think they drive poorly?
Old 04-14-2011, 05:13 PM
  #49  
US Navy Seabees
 
Ruby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NH
Age: 39
Posts: 1,264
Received 75 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by DanO4GTL
We just sold our 545i last month and bought an Acura. Wait until your FREE maintenance runs out, the battery dies and BMW wants to $495 for a new one. I, being thrifty, and not your typical "just do it" BMW owner, skipped this and bought a battery myself, which BMW then informed me needs to be "registered" to the car. Cost for this, $300.

The ticky-tack costs of owning a BMW will keep me away for a while if not for life.
Whaaat? That is just plain ridiculous.
Old 04-14-2011, 05:37 PM
  #50  
Racer
 
wakattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 286
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
This thread is heading for lock lock land.
Old 04-14-2011, 05:49 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
jasonwdp10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 933
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by wakattack
This thread is heading for lock lock land.
It happens with every thread that involves a non-acura vehicle. Nice crowd we got here...
Old 04-14-2011, 06:00 PM
  #52  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by wakattack
This thread is heading for lock lock land.
Why would you say that? Everyone in here has been civil and there hasn't been any name calling or anything. It's a healthy conversation.
Old 04-14-2011, 06:19 PM
  #53  
Instructor
 
Hamma Tyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Colts Neck, NJ
Posts: 244
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
This thread is hysterical.....comparing the TL to a BMW and the BMW getting a fair shake? Impossible! That would be like anyone here joining Bimmerfest and attempting to compare the TL to a BMW. You would be laughed right off the board.

I'm not sure why the TL is even compared to the 3 being the TL is the same size as the 5. These damn cars keep growing!
Old 04-14-2011, 06:24 PM
  #54  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
listen i like BM's just as much as the next person ...but i literally know 2 people that have had no issues what so ever from thier BMW..2 everybody else always has some type of issue and when it is in the shop always expensive.......O.D expensive to get repaired......not to mention two people i know that have beamers went out and purchased a second car ......and guess what it was? drum roll please.........AN ACURA specifically a TL.....as a matter of fact a friend of mines who owned a BM and his father owned a BM traded his BM in for a NISSAN MAXIMA......SO........

but if its any consolation i am looking at the 6 series ....

Last edited by TRIUMPHT; 04-14-2011 at 06:30 PM.
Old 04-14-2011, 06:25 PM
  #55  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
no problem with interior room if you're 5'7" 125 lb likes me
Old 04-14-2011, 06:37 PM
  #56  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Hamma Tyme
This thread is hysterical.....comparing the TL to a BMW and the BMW getting a fair shake? Impossible! That would be like anyone here joining Bimmerfest and attempting to compare the TL to a BMW. You would be laughed right off the board.

I'm not sure why the TL is even compared to the 3 being the TL is the same size as the 5. These damn cars keep growing!
I don't think any of the points made to compare the two cars are outrageous by any means. Obviously people here will prefer the TL, but most of the people here are debating with facts.
Old 04-14-2011, 06:39 PM
  #57  
Instructor
 
n-spring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 180
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by TRIUMPHT
listen i like BM's just as much as the next person ...but i literally know 2 people that have had no issues what so ever from thier BMW..2 everybody else always has some type of issue and when it is in the shop always expensive.......O.D expensive to get repaired......not to mention two people i know that have beamers went out and purchased a second car ......and guess what it was? drum roll please.........AN ACURA specifically a TL.....as a matter of fact a friend of mines who owned a BM and his father owned a BM traded his BM in for a NISSAN MAXIMA......SO........

but if its any consolation i am looking at the 6 series ....
I'm sorry, but I couldn't help reading this without substituting "bowel movement" for BM.
Old 04-14-2011, 06:42 PM
  #58  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by n-spring
i'm sorry, but i couldn't help reading this without substituting "bowel movement" for bm.
lol smh
Old 04-14-2011, 06:48 PM
  #59  
Instructor
 
Hamma Tyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Colts Neck, NJ
Posts: 244
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
I don't think any of the points made to compare the two cars are outrageous by any means. Obviously people here will prefer the TL, but most of the people here are debating with facts.
From what I read so far, not entirely but let's leave it at that. Afterall, it's an Acura board and not a BMW board obviously.
Old 04-14-2011, 06:55 PM
  #60  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Hamma Tyme
From what I read so far, not entirely but let's leave it at that. Afterall, it's an Acura board and not a BMW board obviously.
Even though it is an Acura forum, that doesn't mean you can't defend other brands. Besides, if someone is wrong, you might be doing them a favor by letting them know so they don't spread incorrect information.
Old 04-14-2011, 07:15 PM
  #61  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonwdp10
wait so they're boring because they're common or because you think they drive poorly?
They are boring to look at. I am falling asleep just thinking about a 3 series right now
Old 04-14-2011, 07:42 PM
  #62  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Guys, I am not on a mission to bash the TL here. After all it is one of the only two cars on my shopping list. The point of starting this thread is to provide some feedback to Acura.

The TL drives great and performs exceptionally well in crash tests. But the exterior and interior design leaves a lot to be desired. Just imagine if the 4th gen TL looked better inside out. How many more TL are going to be on the road today.

If Honda cares to listen, please fix the rear middle seat headroom. While that will have to wait until the 5th gen TL, power to match VQ engine would be nice in the mean time.

For those that disagree with me on the navigation interface. Do you think you can type in an address faster with touch screen or the rotate/tilt/click control?
Old 04-14-2011, 08:47 PM
  #63  
Advanced
 
rafcio53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I bought my TL last November at Erin Mills Acura. The sales person was very professional and never rushed me to buy. He was only answering my questions. If you would like I can let you know his name and I'm sure he'll give you a good deal like he did for me.
As for owning the BMW - I just don't think so. I like my spacious TL better. It doesn't have the image BMW has, but I don't care about that.

Last edited by rafcio53; 04-14-2011 at 08:49 PM.
Old 04-14-2011, 09:00 PM
  #64  
Pro
 
218TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Point, NY
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Definitely 335. HPFP warrantied to 10 years if you're worried about that. Better handling, better speed, turbo is nuts, "free" maintenance is well worth it, better engineering..I could go on but I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings.
Old 04-14-2011, 09:03 PM
  #65  
Pro
 
218TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Point, NY
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4
Guys, I am not on a mission to bash the TL here. After all it is one of the only two cars on my shopping list. The point of starting this thread is to provide some feedback to Acura.

The TL drives great and performs exceptionally well in crash tests. But the exterior and interior design leaves a lot to be desired. Just imagine if the 4th gen TL looked better inside out. How many more TL are going to be on the road today.

If Honda cares to listen, please fix the rear middle seat headroom. While that will have to wait until the 5th gen TL, power to match VQ engine would be nice in the mean time.

For those that disagree with me on the navigation interface. Do you think you can type in an address faster with touch screen or the rotate/tilt/click control?
I have both (3G, 335). You get used to both of them and the speed of entry is negligible. I could be wrong, but doesn't the 4G no longer have touch screen?
Old 04-14-2011, 09:07 PM
  #66  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by 218TL
I have both (3G, 335). You get used to both of them and the speed of entry is negligible. I could be wrong, but doesn't the 4G no longer have touch screen?
You are correct, the 4G no longer have touch screen. I actually think that touch screen will be the superior solution, assuming that you don't alter the system setting when you are moving.
Old 04-14-2011, 09:20 PM
  #67  
Drifting
 
Treblig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,334
Received 218 Likes on 174 Posts
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4

For those that disagree with me on the navigation interface. Do you think you can type in an address faster with touch screen or the rotate/tilt/click control?
Give voice commands a try. Works pretty well and you can do it on the fly without taking your eyes off of the road.
Old 04-14-2011, 09:32 PM
  #68  
Pro
 
218TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Point, NY
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had a long response set up being unbiased but Safari decided to close. Guess I'll let the vast amount of fallacies slide.
Old 04-14-2011, 09:36 PM
  #69  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by 218TL
I had a long response set up being unbiased but Safari decided to close. Guess I'll let the vast amount of fallacies slide.
LOL, that's why you should be running Firefox instead.

I would love to hear you opinion on this if you are still willing to share.
Old 04-14-2011, 09:49 PM
  #70  
Suzuka Master
 
Stew4HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 5,564
Received 1,092 Likes on 714 Posts
Epic fail Acura? Where the hell does that come from? Sounds to me like each car has their pluses and minuses in the comparo.

Let's all jump on the Bimmer forums and bash thier cars.. just to stir things up. Heck, it seems every other car in my area is a BMW, MB or Audi, so what am I doing not going with the cattle? Should I just run with the pack? Nope.

It's funny how the German cars don't seem to have the reliability rating of the Acura. It's one of the major things on my list of importance when car buying. The 0-60 times and top speed.

As for the lack of touch screen? I like the position of the screen on the 4G, the screen on the 12 is very nice and bright, easy to navigate and voice control does what I need. It's easier to talk than type, eyes on the road, hands upon the wheel... let it roll baby, roll.. all night long

Last edited by Stew4HD; 04-14-2011 at 09:52 PM.
Old 04-14-2011, 10:41 PM
  #71  
10th Gear
 
DanO4GTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought a battery on my own. No way I was paying $500 for a battery! But... BMW's require the battery to be registered to the car. (Essentially, telling the car's electronics that the battery has been replaced) This can only be done by a BMW dealer. The dealership charges $300 to do this.
Old 04-14-2011, 10:49 PM
  #72  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
I am not sure why I even bother to post here, because you have your own reasoning and you are going to make your own decision regardless of what the TL owners here have to say.

All I want to say is that, I did have the chance to get a BMW a couple of weeks ago. I went for the TL SH-AWD Elite and I could not be happier. I love how it rides, and I love the wonderful stereo system which is far superior to that stereo in the BMW. I absolutely like the interior design of the TL, and I find the 3 series interior design to be very dated and cold. Oh, and I really enjoy the unique look of the 2012 TL, while there are tons of 3 series out there.

Get what makes you happy. There is no need to justify anything. If you like a Yugo or Skoda, get one. Who cares? If you want to give Acura feedback, write to their corporate office.

Last edited by ostrich; 04-14-2011 at 10:52 PM.
Old 04-14-2011, 11:03 PM
  #73  
Walk the walk
 
Shoot2Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 652
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Generally leasing a car is the primary epic fail.
Old 04-14-2011, 11:26 PM
  #74  
Safety Car
 
erick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 35
Posts: 4,163
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I only read the first 2/3 of your post, OP. In my honest opinion, a car is only as good as the dealership that services it. If you find that the manager and sales rep weren't up to par at your local Acura dealer (especially after several years of business), go with BMW. It doesn't hurt to venture out...if it goes wrong with BMW, take as a lesson and make your way back to Acura. Note: BMW isn't a car to own, more like lease or rent until the warranty gives way. It's your choice 100 bones per month isn't terrible. Good luck with which ever car you buy!
Old 04-15-2011, 07:07 AM
  #75  
Walk the walk
 
Shoot2Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 652
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Agree, if you have a BMW short term is the way to go. I would still guess that buying and selling would still be less costly by a few grand. I currently have a 740 and learned the pros and cons of BMW. I happy with "Smart" versus "Ultimate"
Old 04-15-2011, 07:40 AM
  #76  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4
The TL drives great and performs exceptionally well in crash tests. But the exterior and interior design leaves a lot to be desired. Just imagine if the 4th gen TL looked better inside out. How many more TL are going to be on the road today.
I just went through this last year. I have owned 6 different TLs and the last was my 09 AWD. I loved the ride, the electronics, but never did warm up to the styling. I then went hunting for a new ride, looks at BMW 328 then 335, A4, Volvo S60, G37 all whic I thought were better styled cars and eventually wound up in a M37S which IMO is a real sexy machine. BUT I have learned looks are not everything. The M37S goes for about $14K more than my AWD TL did and while I love the interior and styling, and the car drives nicely (not same ride as AWD TL). And Infiniti builds a fairly reliable car, but what I have learned is that Acrua's strenghts are in reliability, resale and build quality. The M37S feels tinny, has a lot of body flex and the electronics are so aweful it is not even funny. The ELS in the Acura is as good as and actually better anything else I heard in the cars I cross shopped. Acura's BT, Navi and voice commands are light years ahead of the competition. I'm glad Acura is heaed in the right direction with styling, but honestly as soon as I can I am back in an Acura. Whie extreme I woudl take a TSX Tech over my my M37S at this point. If youjust car about looks at ride sure there are choices, but if you want a well built reliable car that rides and is very engaging then Acura baby all the way.
Old 04-15-2011, 08:12 AM
  #77  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4
The TL drives great and performs exceptionally well in crash tests. But the exterior and interior design leaves a lot to be desired. Just imagine if the 4th gen TL looked better inside out. How many more TL are going to be on the road today.
that is where i say you made your decision......if you think the car is ugly then look no furthur...................why drive in something you can't stand to look at?......................regardless of how much it costs or how it performs.........if you think it's ugly ...on to the next car ...........
Old 04-15-2011, 09:37 AM
  #78  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by TRIUMPHT
that is where i say you made your decision......if you think the car is ugly then look no furthur...................why drive in something you can't stand to look at?......................regardless of how much it costs or how it performs.........if you think it's ugly ...on to the next car ...........
The 2012 redesign does look better than the 09-11 design.

I want 6spd, 300hp, and AWD, therefore my options are extremely limited.

I think the TL's 6spd gearbox, engine and awd drivetrain is just as good as the 335xi. The 335 might have more power, but far less reliable. The HPFP issue is just as bad as the 2gen TL transmission and it can be potentially dangerous. So, I would rather avoid that.

It just so happens that BMW is very aggressive with its pricing at the moment when Acura is not. The TL comes with some features that I don't value such as the navigation system and voice command while lacking some features on the Bimmer that I do value such as Bi-Xenon adaptive headlight and heated steering wheel, folding rear seats.

At the moment if I pay cash, the TL cost about 53.5K and the 335xi 58.5K. The difference is just less under $5000. BMW have "pre-paid" service for 4 years. Acura has slightly longer powertrain warranty 1 year/20,000km more.

As much problems people have had with the N54/N55 engine. The power from a Dinan tuned 335 is hard to forget. Decisions, decisions, decisions.
Old 04-15-2011, 11:04 AM
  #79  
Advanced
 
CalgaryAWDTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4
The 2012 redesign does look better than the 09-11 design.

I want 6spd, 300hp, and AWD, therefore my options are extremely limited.

I think the TL's 6spd gearbox, engine and awd drivetrain is just as good as the 335xi. The 335 might have more power, but far less reliable. The HPFP issue is just as bad as the 2gen TL transmission and it can be potentially dangerous. So, I would rather avoid that.

It just so happens that BMW is very aggressive with its pricing at the moment when Acura is not. The TL comes with some features that I don't value such as the navigation system and voice command while lacking some features on the Bimmer that I do value such as Bi-Xenon adaptive headlight and heated steering wheel, folding rear seats.

At the moment if I pay cash, the TL cost about 53.5K and the 335xi 58.5K. The difference is just less under $5000. BMW have "pre-paid" service for 4 years. Acura has slightly longer powertrain warranty 1 year/20,000km more.

As much problems people have had with the N54/N55 engine. The power from a Dinan tuned 335 is hard to forget. Decisions, decisions, decisions.
In the last 4 years alone I have owned 3 BMW (2005 M3, 2008 M3, 2009 335d). I now drive a 2010 AWD TL and love it for many of the reasons others do as well: value, resale, reliabilty, and uniqueness. I actually much prefer the looks of the '09-'11 TL to the '12 but beauty is only in the eye of the beholder and other than that it really does not matter what others think of the design as long as you're happy with it.

OP, other than the M models in the 3 series which usually is the only BMW that makes Consumer Reports most reliable list year after year (how ironic it's the high strung BMW), I wouldn't touch a E90/92 series with that N54 or N55 engine due to the infamous HPFP problems. The 335D(diesal) is the car to have with all that monstous 425lbs of TQ but it's just too bad it doesn't come in AWD.

By the way, I paid $39,500 plus 5% sales tax for my AWD TL minus the nav package which I don't care for anyways. A comparably equipped 3 series/5 series was 15/25K more!!

The smart money on a BMW is a high residual lease but owning one is risky and especially now with the new model out shortly. Having said that, there is no freakn way I would pay anything more than $45K for a TL in Canada.
Old 04-15-2011, 11:40 AM
  #80  
Drifting
 
Treblig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,334
Received 218 Likes on 174 Posts
Originally Posted by SL1200MK4
...The HPFP issue is just as bad as the 2gen TL transmission and it can be potentially dangerous. So, I would rather avoid that.
That in itself would, for me, rule out the BMW and no measure of features or free maintenance would change that. Now I'm not saying you should necessarily buy the TL, but I certainly wouldn't be looking at buying the BMW.


Quick Reply: BMW 335xi vs 2012 TL, Epic Fail Acura?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.