The 2006 TSX has bad gas mileage.
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 2006 TSX has bad gas mileage.
The whole time i have had my car i average 22.6 mpg for the 600 miles i have driven. The audi a4 has less hp and a turbo engine and gets better gas mileage. It gets a-24/32, m- 23/34. Why is that? also isnt it heavier? I thought i would get much better gas milage. I have filled up my car twice already and i have 600 miles on it.
#3
Unauthorized User
City driving will give you low mpg, try driving on highway, That's where you get the 30+ mpg. I noticed the same thing when i drive in the city i only get around 20ish mpg, but when i get on the highway that's when you notice the higher mpg.
The following users liked this post:
GuessWork915 (10-24-2022)
The following users liked this post:
GuessWork915 (10-24-2022)
#7
無限 本田 CL9
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oakland, California
Age: 44
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
when I fill the gas tank up, the range on my navi tells me I can go 497 miles; my low fuel light usually comes on between 400 - 420 miles... so anything in between those numbers between fill-up is normal to me.. after a while of owning a tsx, you wont pay attention to the fuel economy as much.. we all know it can achieve great numbers if you baby it (especially on the highway) but that kinda takes away the fun of driving =)
Trending Topics
#8
Let me help you!
First, the stated EPA fuel economy rating for the 2006 TSX:
Manual: 22/30 mpg
Automatic: 22/31 mpg
The first number is the city driving. The second number is what you'd get if most of the miles is highway/freeway.
So it looks about right. Your fuel economy will improve after you've gained some more miles. Mine still isn't on par with everyone else's, but it is better than my first month with the car.
Second, the stated EPA ratings are like laboratory results. They don't exactly reflect real-time driving. We all do a mixture of city and highway driving. You can't exactly compare your real-time value to the EPA rating of another car. You need to ask around and see what they're actually getting.
I average around 21-22 mpg, but i don't do any freeway driving. I live 4 miles from work, and I get stopped at a traffic light almost every half mile. I also accelerate fast/hard all the time. In my first couple of months, I was averaging around 16-18 mpg. Thus, I've seen an improvement (despite my driving style becoming more aggressive now that I don't have to baby the car as much). When I went to Vegas, my mpg was around 28 mpg with all highway, so my car needs some more time before it reaches the stated ratings.
Depending on how you drive, you can get your TSX to be very fuel-efficient. I think there's a thread where people try to get 500 miles out of a single tank of gas. But then you wouldn't be able to enjoy your car as much. I don't mind paying for a little bit more of gas if it means I can have fun driving.
Manual: 22/30 mpg
Automatic: 22/31 mpg
The first number is the city driving. The second number is what you'd get if most of the miles is highway/freeway.
So it looks about right. Your fuel economy will improve after you've gained some more miles. Mine still isn't on par with everyone else's, but it is better than my first month with the car.
Second, the stated EPA ratings are like laboratory results. They don't exactly reflect real-time driving. We all do a mixture of city and highway driving. You can't exactly compare your real-time value to the EPA rating of another car. You need to ask around and see what they're actually getting.
I average around 21-22 mpg, but i don't do any freeway driving. I live 4 miles from work, and I get stopped at a traffic light almost every half mile. I also accelerate fast/hard all the time. In my first couple of months, I was averaging around 16-18 mpg. Thus, I've seen an improvement (despite my driving style becoming more aggressive now that I don't have to baby the car as much). When I went to Vegas, my mpg was around 28 mpg with all highway, so my car needs some more time before it reaches the stated ratings.
Depending on how you drive, you can get your TSX to be very fuel-efficient. I think there's a thread where people try to get 500 miles out of a single tank of gas. But then you wouldn't be able to enjoy your car as much. I don't mind paying for a little bit more of gas if it means I can have fun driving.
#9
Do you have the 5AT or 6MT?
Psychologically, I feel that manuals gets better gas mileage in the city because it can free wheel in neutral and coast a lot, whereas the auto still has to crank the torque converter.
Psychologically, I feel that manuals gets better gas mileage in the city because it can free wheel in neutral and coast a lot, whereas the auto still has to crank the torque converter.
#11
Just returned from a roadtrip and averaged 33.5 mpg's. This was over several mountain passes and an average speed between 70-75, sometimes higher. Car only has about 1,500 miles. Was averaging about 21 in town, a lot of very short trips, which kills mpg's.
The following users liked this post:
GuessWork915 (10-24-2022)
#12
Engineer
Originally Posted by tsturbo
Just returned from a roadtrip and averaged 33.5 mpg's. This was over several mountain passes and an average speed between 70-75, sometimes higher. Car only has about 1,500 miles. Was averaging about 21 in town, a lot of very short trips, which kills mpg's.
first road trip i went on with the tsx was boston to montreal and i got about 32-33 mpg while going about 75-80mph the whole trip...
ussually i avg about 24mpg... city driving, limited highway...
#13
Recovering SUV Addict...
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Age: 46
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See, this is the problem with all the misleading numbers out there. You get Chevy and whoever stating they have X amount of vehicles that get 30 or more MPG, but in fine, tiny ass print a the bottom of the screen it says "average based on highway mileage under controlled conditions". Thus, people begin to panic when they get 22-23 mpg. It's normal. There's many many other people out there getting FAR worse MPG than you. Take a look at anyone in anything 10 years old or older. chances are you're getting 50% more MPG than most of them. I listened to some guy complain that his 1989 Lincoln Towncar only gets about 14mpg...well, there's a reason for that.
Not to be a prick, but really, if you were that concerned about gas mileage, you bought the wrong car and should have done more research beforehand. The TSX isn't an MPG champ - it's a sport-lux hybrid (not engine).
Not to be a prick, but really, if you were that concerned about gas mileage, you bought the wrong car and should have done more research beforehand. The TSX isn't an MPG champ - it's a sport-lux hybrid (not engine).
#14
Advanced.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm at 7300 miles in my 2006 and around town, I get between 22-24 on average. On the interstate, around 34 on average. As I always say, if you can't afford the gas that goes into the car, you can't afford the car. So, get used to the lower city averages.
#16
Someone stole "My Garage"
In my 2004 (w/ a 2006 short block), since the new engine was put in, I've driven approx. 2900 miles. My MPG calculations say I'm averaging 25.61 mpg (US) over that time.
That's about 90% city driving. I'd say the new engine is closer to being fully broken in now... I can feel it and my fuel consumption has gone up a bit throughout the entire 2900 miles.
That's about 90% city driving. I'd say the new engine is closer to being fully broken in now... I can feel it and my fuel consumption has gone up a bit throughout the entire 2900 miles.
#17
Burning Brakes
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Age: 40
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'm at 1500 miles, but have yet to see any significant post-break in mpg increases. am i still in a second-stage break in period or something?
i know it depends on how it was broken in and how i drive, but is there a ballpark mile mark where i should start to see better mpg?
i did the break in in this thread:https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=break
(now i see that i'm still in the extended break-in until around 3000)
i know it depends on how it was broken in and how i drive, but is there a ballpark mile mark where i should start to see better mpg?
i did the break in in this thread:https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...ighlight=break
(now i see that i'm still in the extended break-in until around 3000)
#18
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jesuswalks
it gets a-24/32, m- 23/34.
Seriously, around campus I literally got about 17mpg due to all the damn stops, crosswalks, stop lights, etc... I don't complain about it because when I get on the highway I pull a cool 34mpg while doing 70-75mph.
Maybe it's your driving? I'm sure if you got behind the wheels of an audi it'll be about the same.
#19
[QUOTE=curls]In my 2004 (w/ a 2006 short block), since the new engine was put in, I've driven approx. 2900 miles.QUOTE]
What's the reason for the '06 short block?
What's the reason for the '06 short block?
#20
Let me help you!
Originally Posted by Ronin317
Not to be a prick, but really, if you were that concerned about gas mileage, you bought the wrong car and should have done more research beforehand. The TSX isn't an MPG champ - it's a sport-lux hybrid (not engine).
True, depending on what review you read, the car is considered sporty or luxury. However, this mostly relates to the interior features and the suspension. The engine itself wasn't designed to be all-powerful. It's 4-cylinders is more fuel-efficient than the 6-cylinder TL.
RL: 18/26 mpg
TL: 20/29 mpg (both auto and MT)
TSX: 22/30 mpg (MT) and 22/31 mpg (auto)
RSX: 27/34 mpg (base MT)
25/34 mpg (base auto)
23/31 mpg (type-s)
If he wanted a fuel-efficient Acura with 4-doors, then he chose correctly. The RSX is the only one with better gas mileage, but most RSX owners I've seen on the road definitely don't drive like a grandma.
A car with all features standard for less than $30k, with great fuel economy -->
Sure, he could have gotten a civic hybrid or prius, but then he wouldn't have as much fun driving.
#23
Got Phó?
Originally Posted by JTso
I just filled up my tank today and got 26.11 mpg city/hwy. That's with average 4k rpm shifts and red line often. Average hwy speed is 70. I'd say that's damn good gas mileage with all the mods I have.
#24
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
Did you pick that out of some info tab on the car? Try reading the TSX posted MPG I heard it gets 22-30MT and 22-31AT
Seriously, around campus I literally got about 17mpg due to all the damn stops, crosswalks, stop lights, etc... I don't complain about it because when I get on the highway I pull a cool 34mpg while doing 70-75mph.
Maybe it's your driving? I'm sure if you got behind the wheels of an audi it'll be about the same.
Seriously, around campus I literally got about 17mpg due to all the damn stops, crosswalks, stop lights, etc... I don't complain about it because when I get on the highway I pull a cool 34mpg while doing 70-75mph.
Maybe it's your driving? I'm sure if you got behind the wheels of an audi it'll be about the same.
That mpg i posed was for the audi, showing how a car that has a turbo gets better gas mileage. it also has 200 hp where the tsx has 5 more.
#27
Someone stole "My Garage"
[QUOTE=tsturbo]
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28541
Should give you the details of it.
Originally Posted by curls
In my 2004 (w/ a 2006 short block), since the new engine was put in, I've driven approx. 2900 miles.QUOTE]
What's the reason for the '06 short block?
What's the reason for the '06 short block?
Should give you the details of it.
#28
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jesuswalks
That mpg i posed was for the audi, showing how a car that has a turbo gets better gas mileage. it also has 200 hp where the tsx has 5 more.
But I would assume turbos have more efficient milage.
#29
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Age: 59
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
...
But I would assume turbos have more efficient milage.
But I would assume turbos have more efficient milage.
#30
Instructor
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i noticed an improvement in gas mileage after the first few thousand miles. i usually average about 26mpg with a mix of city/highway, and when it's predominantly highway i get around 30-31mpg. now only if our car was designed to run on regular fuel!
#31
Recovering SUV Addict...
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Age: 46
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SoCaliTrojan
I'm confused. You say the car is a sport-lux hybrid, but not the engine. If the engine's not a sporty engine, then wouldn't it have great MPG?
True, depending on what review you read, the car is considered sporty or luxury. However, this mostly relates to the interior features and the suspension. The engine itself wasn't designed to be all-powerful. It's 4-cylinders is more fuel-efficient than the 6-cylinder TL.
RL: 18/26 mpg
TL: 20/29 mpg (both auto and MT)
TSX: 22/30 mpg (MT) and 22/31 mpg (auto)
RSX: 27/34 mpg (base MT)
25/34 mpg (base auto)
23/31 mpg (type-s)
If he wanted a fuel-efficient Acura with 4-doors, then he chose correctly. The RSX is the only one with better gas mileage, but most RSX owners I've seen on the road definitely don't drive like a grandma.
A car with all features standard for less than $30k, with great fuel economy -->
Sure, he could have gotten a civic hybrid or prius, but then he wouldn't have as much fun driving.
True, depending on what review you read, the car is considered sporty or luxury. However, this mostly relates to the interior features and the suspension. The engine itself wasn't designed to be all-powerful. It's 4-cylinders is more fuel-efficient than the 6-cylinder TL.
RL: 18/26 mpg
TL: 20/29 mpg (both auto and MT)
TSX: 22/30 mpg (MT) and 22/31 mpg (auto)
RSX: 27/34 mpg (base MT)
25/34 mpg (base auto)
23/31 mpg (type-s)
If he wanted a fuel-efficient Acura with 4-doors, then he chose correctly. The RSX is the only one with better gas mileage, but most RSX owners I've seen on the road definitely don't drive like a grandma.
A car with all features standard for less than $30k, with great fuel economy -->
Sure, he could have gotten a civic hybrid or prius, but then he wouldn't have as much fun driving.
#32
best road trip ever in my tsx
Took a road trip from Oregon to Atlanta covering 2600 miles across the continent. My 06 TSX drove like a champ up and down the mountains across Utah and the plains of Wyoming and Nebraska. I also got a chance to test out the gas mileage on the TSX, both with regular and premium unleaded. My average speed was 83 mph. The pictures speak for itself.
#34
Took a road trip from Oregon to Atlanta covering 2600 miles across the continent. My 06 TSX drove like a champ up and down the mountains across Utah and the plains of Wyoming and Nebraska. I also got a chance to test out the gas mileage on the TSX, both with regular and premium unleaded. My average speed was 83 mph. The pictures speak for itself.
My 06 is horrible in terms of mileage. I've averaged roughly 25.5 mpg in the last few thousand miles, but the only reason it's that high is because of my trips to NorCal and back. I seriously think I only get about 16mpg in the city
#35
are you calculating your mileage correctly, or are you referring to the navigation calculator? when i took delivery of my car, the MPG was on 19 until i finally reset it after ~2 tanks and it showed the correct mixed city/highway (of around 26-27). the first few hundred miles that i drove were at 70mph on the highway, which is 30-32 mpg territory, but the nav system MPG readout didn't change an inch.
maybe try resetting it and go from there? otherwise, you can't beat filling up, driving x number of miles, filling up again, and dividing the total miles by the # of gallons you put in. over time, it will give you a more accurate depiction of your gas mileage.
maybe try resetting it and go from there? otherwise, you can't beat filling up, driving x number of miles, filling up again, and dividing the total miles by the # of gallons you put in. over time, it will give you a more accurate depiction of your gas mileage.
#37
Advanced
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 66
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you see below his 72MPG it says he's driven 6 miles on the car. So it most likely means he just filled up after getting off the highway.
#38
Mike D from Ohio
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ohio
Age: 42
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not done averaging yet. It missed out on a lot of lower instances that should contribute to your average. Its just like saying you got a 100% on one exam and declaring that your average is 100% when its really going to turn out lower in the end. You kind of have to understand the way averages work. If you calculate an average after 2 seconds of driving on the highway with the accelerator not pressed, you get like 100MPG at that instant. You want the average over the whole 'school year.' If you reset it, you'll notice that it goes something like 72, to 12, to 65, to 21, to 40, etc... until it zeros in or converges on the actual average. Averages are more valid after driving a long time. You're not getting 72MPG... I'd bet a testicle.
I was getting 13 MPG overall in March because I was leaving it in the lowest gear so I can bounce around and have fun with the torque. Then I had to intervene and stop having so much fun. For city streets with 25mph speed limits, I found that if I punch it at first and enjoy 1st gear and most of 2nd and just let off the accelerator after shifting to 3rd, I get 20MPG city. It's a trade off. You either have to pick fun or fuel economy. I found my way of driving so that I'm in the middle. That is, I get some fun and some fuel economy.
There are tips of course. I can tell you what I know about getting better fuel econ:
1) of course, stay in the highest gear possible for your speed so you can cruise more,
2) I take great advantage of downward hills.
3) If you rev it enough in 1st gear, skip 2nd and just cruise in 3rd
4) cruise control when possible
5) pick roads with less stop signs and higher speed limits so you can cruise.
6) blow off red lights...... just joking.
If you watch the instantaneous fuel econ, you'll notice that you get 60MPG after letting off the gas to cruise. You get around 0-5 when accelerating. So stopping and going really hurts bad.
I was getting 13 MPG overall in March because I was leaving it in the lowest gear so I can bounce around and have fun with the torque. Then I had to intervene and stop having so much fun. For city streets with 25mph speed limits, I found that if I punch it at first and enjoy 1st gear and most of 2nd and just let off the accelerator after shifting to 3rd, I get 20MPG city. It's a trade off. You either have to pick fun or fuel economy. I found my way of driving so that I'm in the middle. That is, I get some fun and some fuel economy.
There are tips of course. I can tell you what I know about getting better fuel econ:
1) of course, stay in the highest gear possible for your speed so you can cruise more,
2) I take great advantage of downward hills.
3) If you rev it enough in 1st gear, skip 2nd and just cruise in 3rd
4) cruise control when possible
5) pick roads with less stop signs and higher speed limits so you can cruise.
6) blow off red lights...... just joking.
If you watch the instantaneous fuel econ, you'll notice that you get 60MPG after letting off the gas to cruise. You get around 0-5 when accelerating. So stopping and going really hurts bad.
#39
Three Wheelin'
The TSX is awful for city mpg, and one of my biggest gripes with the car. It's a high performance 4 cyl moving a decent amount of car, though, so I guess one shouldn't really complain. Here's our stats from another thread:
Year of your car - 2007
- Cost of fill up + price of gasoline in your area - Depends on how low we take the tank of course, but around $56.00+ is a safe bet (we use Premium only).
- MPG - This is where it gets very tricky, and we have experienced dismal city readings since day one unfortunately. Our worst tank was 16+mpg while the engine was still breaking in and we are lucky to get 20+ most of the time. I don't think anything is wrong with the car per se, just a combination of factors working against us (e.g. very short trips to the office, all stop and go, crappy gas in our area, etc.). On our all highway trips to go back home and see family, we can easily pull 33+, though.
- % of highway driving - regularly, 5% on an entire tank at best.
-Mileage: 10,500
Year of your car - 2007
- Cost of fill up + price of gasoline in your area - Depends on how low we take the tank of course, but around $56.00+ is a safe bet (we use Premium only).
- MPG - This is where it gets very tricky, and we have experienced dismal city readings since day one unfortunately. Our worst tank was 16+mpg while the engine was still breaking in and we are lucky to get 20+ most of the time. I don't think anything is wrong with the car per se, just a combination of factors working against us (e.g. very short trips to the office, all stop and go, crappy gas in our area, etc.). On our all highway trips to go back home and see family, we can easily pull 33+, though.
- % of highway driving - regularly, 5% on an entire tank at best.
-Mileage: 10,500
#40
Racer
I found out that by having you RPM under 2000 you can get excellent gas mileage. So when your doing city driving try not to have your RPM over 2000. I garantee you will see a difference in your gas mileage.