AcuraZine - Acura Enthusiast Community

AcuraZine - Acura Enthusiast Community (https://acurazine.com/forums/)
-   1G RDX (2007-2012) (https://acurazine.com/forums/1g-rdx-2007-2012-147/)
-   -   Are you guys Ready? (https://acurazine.com/forums/1g-rdx-2007-2012-147/you-guys-ready-977322/)

Poveiro 02-19-2019 06:10 PM

Are you guys Ready?
 
About my RDX...
My RDX as 280000km (174000miles) And as with no trouble beside the wastegate on the turbo. Now in my garage waiting for me to reinstall the Turbo.
Always used regular gas because never noticed the difference the times I tried Super.
Only things not original are breaks, spark plugs, liquids, belt, tires and the compresseur was replaced by Acura under Warranty.
Replaced the pressure switches of the Trans.
So its pretty much all original, there's no mods in my Car.

Very unreliable Acura :thumbsup:

wusty23jd 02-20-2019 09:11 AM

What?:what:

justnspace 02-20-2019 10:24 AM

I didn't understand either.

It really doesn't matter the make or model....
Cars are machines. Machines have moving parts. Moving parts fail.

thoiboi 02-20-2019 11:02 AM

amazing.

schen72 02-20-2019 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by Poveiro (Post 16385375)
About my RDX...
My RDX as 280000km (174000miles) And as with no trouble beside the wastegate on the turbo. Now in my garage waiting for me to reinstall the Turbo.
Always used regular gas because never noticed the difference the times I tried Super.
Only things not original are breaks, spark plugs, liquids, belt, tires and the compresseur was replaced by Acura under Warranty.
Replaced the pressure switches of the Trans.
So its pretty much all original, there's no mods in my Car.

Very unreliable Acura :thumbsup:

Seems pretty reliable to me! the "not original" items you mention are wear items and thus, get worn out. I would, however, use 91+ octane gas because that's what the manual recommends.

Poveiro 02-20-2019 02:40 PM

@justnspace @wusty23jd
Sorry for the missing words that made you not understand.
@schen72 When I went for the test drive the chief of mechanics came with me, we went and fill the tank and when he used regular he told the computer compensates for explosion time, that was the only difference on gas, that people worry to much (not my words) The super here is expensive.
About my RDX...
My RDX as 280000km (174000miles) And as had no trouble beside the wastegate on the turbo. Now in my garage waiting for me to reinstall the Turbo.
Always used regular gas because never noticed the difference the times I tried Super.
The only things not original are breaks, spark plugs, liquids, belt, tires and the compresseur was replaced by Acura under Warranty. (normal wear)
Replaced the pressure switches of the Trans.
So its pretty much all original, there's no mods in my Car.
Very unreliable Acura

schen72 02-20-2019 07:19 PM


Originally Posted by Poveiro (Post 16385993)
@justnspace @wusty23jd
Sorry for the missing words that made you not understand.
@schen72 When I went for the test drive the chief of mechanics came with me, we went and fill the tank and when he used regular he told the computer compensates for explosion time, that was the only difference on gas, that people worry to much (not my words) The super here is expensive.
About my RDX...
My RDX as 280000km (174000miles) And as had no trouble beside the wastegate on the turbo. Now in my garage waiting for me to reinstall the Turbo.
Always used regular gas because never noticed the difference the times I tried Super.
The only things not original are breaks, spark plugs, liquids, belt, tires and the compresseur was replaced by Acura under Warranty. (normal wear)
Replaced the pressure switches of the Trans.
So its pretty much all original, there's no mods in my Car.
Very unreliable Acura

I still can't understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying because you have to replace items that are meant to be worn out (brakes, spark plugs, fluids) that your car is now "unreliable?" If that's the only stuff you've had to replace, isn't that the definition of "reliable?" It sounds like the only non-maintenance issue you've had is a wastegate problem in 174k miles of driving.

As for the gas, I'm sure using regular gas is just fine for a while but if you want the engine to last into old age, I would rather just use whatever the engineers designed it for. But I'm not an automotive engineer, I have no proof one way or the other. I just don't presume to know more than the Honda engineer that designed the engine.

Poveiro 02-22-2019 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by schen72 (Post 16386195)
I still can't understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying because you have to replace items that are meant to be worn out (brakes, spark plugs, fluids) that your car is now "unreliable?" If that's the only stuff you've had to replace, isn't that the definition of "reliable?" It sounds like the only non-maintenance issue you've had is a wastegate problem in 174k miles of driving.

As for the gas, I'm sure using regular gas is just fine for a while but if you want the engine to last into old age, I would rather just use whatever the engineers designed it for. But I'm not an automotive engineer, I have no proof one way or the other. I just don't presume to know more than the Honda engineer that designed the engine.

What I wanted to say to some that have been asking is that the car is very reliable.
Also lots of people criticize the use of regular gas, I just wanted to show yhat its not the gas and that is very reliable.
When I wrote Unreliable I was with a grain of sarcasm.

wusty23jd 02-22-2019 09:39 AM

I'm glad that your RDX has been reliable. That is good to hear. If you want it to continue to be a reliable car, I also recommend that you start using premium gasoline. Similar to Schen, I am not an automotive engineer, but I like to stray on the sight of caution when it comes to factory recommendations.

CSmoney28 02-22-2019 03:10 PM

I only use top tier gasoline stations usually mobile 93 octane gas ⛽️.
 
Using lower octane can ruin your motor, we need it because it helps to reduce knock with the compression were running in our high performance motors.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/acurazi...b6cde1a94.jpeg
This is why you should get top tier gas ⛽️ I use mobile 93 only in my 09’ RDX.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/acurazi...d07540ca6.jpeg
More reasons to use it is that the manufacture of our vehicle recommends it.

schen72 02-22-2019 08:00 PM

My personal philosophy is that if you're leasing or you know you're not going to keep the car for more than 5 years, using regular is fine. By the time any problems develop, it won't be your problem anymore. If you keep cars a long time, like myself, use premium (or the rating the manufacturer recommends). I kept my 99 TL for 18 years.

schen72 02-22-2019 08:01 PM


Originally Posted by Poveiro (Post 16387129)
What I wanted to say to some that have been asking is that the car is very reliable.
Also lots of people criticize the use of regular gas, I just wanted to show yhat its not the gas and that is very reliable.
When I wrote Unreliable I was with a grain of sarcasm.

The sarcasm doesn't come across easily in forum posts.

NBP04TL4ME 02-22-2019 08:08 PM


Originally Posted by schen72 (Post 16387605)
The sarcasm doesn't come across easily in forum posts.


^^this, but I got it.

Poveiro 02-23-2019 10:50 AM


Originally Posted by schen72 (Post 16387604)
My personal philosophy is that if you're leasing or you know you're not going to keep the car for more than 5 years, using regular is fine. By the time any problems develop, it won't be your problem anymore. If you keep cars a long time, like myself, use premium (or the rating the manufacturer recommends). I kept my 99 TL for 18 years.

You are in California, no salt on the roads, here in Quebec its a different story.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands