RDX Reported to have 2.2L Turbo and SH-AWD
#4
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Stevens24
I have serious doubts about that. every credible source has stated 200-250 hp. and I don't see Honda releasing engine info more than a year in advance
Honda is great at not leaking info.
But in the past, not leaking information was a way to protect sales of existing models, (RL, TL) There's nothing to protect here, so a calculated media leak is possible to begin stirring interest.
#6
Pro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, that puts the pwr between the TSX and TL like Acura said would happen. At this stage in the game a V6 may be out and leaves a bigger engine for the MDX.
So far Volvo is doing well with a turbo in the XC90. A V8 is coming but look at the price point the XC competes in. V8 are still "in" when it comes to SUVs.
I'm sure whatever Honda does will be great. It'll just take some time for Honda fans to embrase a turbo on our shores.
So far Volvo is doing well with a turbo in the XC90. A V8 is coming but look at the price point the XC competes in. V8 are still "in" when it comes to SUVs.
I'm sure whatever Honda does will be great. It'll just take some time for Honda fans to embrase a turbo on our shores.
#7
Racer
Just got April's Motor Trend and they state on page 22:
Honda's Caddy Rival - Based on the next-gen Honda CR-V, the RD-X launches next year with the RL's SHAW and a 260 HP, 2.2 liter turbocharged four making about 260 pound-feet. It'll be the first factory turbocharged from Honda.
Honda's Caddy Rival - Based on the next-gen Honda CR-V, the RD-X launches next year with the RL's SHAW and a 260 HP, 2.2 liter turbocharged four making about 260 pound-feet. It'll be the first factory turbocharged from Honda.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by frainc
Just got April's Motor Trend and they state on page 22:
Honda's Caddy Rival - Based on the next-gen Honda CR-V, the RD-X launches next year with the RL's SHAW and a 260 HP, 2.2 liter turbocharged four making about 260 pound-feet. It'll be the first factory turbocharged from Honda.
Honda's Caddy Rival - Based on the next-gen Honda CR-V, the RD-X launches next year with the RL's SHAW and a 260 HP, 2.2 liter turbocharged four making about 260 pound-feet. It'll be the first factory turbocharged from Honda.
They also said, "It won't be tha last."
#9
Do you guys have any idea what this means if they do put a turbo powerplant in a 4 cylinder form in any new vehicles? That is only the beginning. It is ABOUT TIME honda begins to think about forced induction. I have an 05 RSX-S. I hope to god that RDX carries a K-series engine(it should). I'll swap it into my car and hang on. This is the best news I have ever heard. This is better then when george bush got re-elected!
#10
Intermediate
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Look's like a mitten....
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vybzkartel
They also said, "It won't be tha last."
I think the RDX would be really an interesting vehicle with a turbo. Can't wait for more info and speculation.
#11
Originally Posted by Precision Crafted
Well, that puts the pwr between the TSX and TL like Acura said would happen. At this stage in the game a V6 may be out and leaves a bigger engine for the MDX.
So far Volvo is doing well with a turbo in the XC90. A V8 is coming but look at the price point the XC competes in. V8 are still "in" when it comes to SUVs.
I'm sure whatever Honda does will be great. It'll just take some time for Honda fans to embrase a turbo on our shores.
So far Volvo is doing well with a turbo in the XC90. A V8 is coming but look at the price point the XC competes in. V8 are still "in" when it comes to SUVs.
I'm sure whatever Honda does will be great. It'll just take some time for Honda fans to embrase a turbo on our shores.
#12
04 TL 6MT NAVI ABP/Q
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Simi Valley, CA 805
Age: 47
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hondapwr
Do you guys have any idea what this means if they do put a turbo powerplant in a 4 cylinder form in any new vehicles? That is only the beginning. It is ABOUT TIME honda begins to think about forced induction. I have an 05 RSX-S. I hope to god that RDX carries a K-series engine(it should). I'll swap it into my car and hang on. This is the best news I have ever heard. This is better then when george bush got re-elected!
Hahaha, people will be buying junkers, crashing into stopped or parked RDX's in the rear end, and then watching to see which junk yard ends up with the car once the Insurance says its a total loss. Just so they can get the Factory Turbo K Series.
I dont know about this Turbo 4 though. Still seems a bit flakey. It really makes me wonder why if Honda was gonna release a Turbo Anything, why the hell they would start with a Small SUV rather than a Civic or RSX where the market is more open. I'm thinking they will stick with the same engine as the TSX personally.
#13
Pro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Casper42
Hahaha, people will be buying junkers, crashing into stopped or parked RDX's in the rear end, and then watching to see which junk yard ends up with the car once the Insurance says its a total loss. Just so they can get the Factory Turbo K Series.
I dont know about this Turbo 4 though. Still seems a bit flakey. It really makes me wonder why if Honda was gonna release a Turbo Anything, why the hell they would start with a Small SUV rather than a Civic or RSX where the market is more open. I'm thinking they will stick with the same engine as the TSX personally.
I dont know about this Turbo 4 though. Still seems a bit flakey. It really makes me wonder why if Honda was gonna release a Turbo Anything, why the hell they would start with a Small SUV rather than a Civic or RSX where the market is more open. I'm thinking they will stick with the same engine as the TSX personally.
The RSX is dead! The Civic market may not want a turbo. Most of the new Civic owners I see are family people of look as if a turbo is not in there plans other wise they would have bought something else. This seemed to be the case when you had Turbo Dodge Shadows and Turbo Sunbirds. Granted those turbos were horrible at best but the Civic still out sold them.
Also, a turbo in the Acura family seems to make more sense at this point.
#14
Instructor
You and I seem to be on the same page!!
Originally Posted by DEI99662
I really hope Honda is not going to put a 2.2L in it. I am hoping for the Accords 3.0L V6 with SH-AWD.
#15
Instructor
They seem to be making that statement....
Originally Posted by frainc
Just got April's Motor Trend and they state on page 22:
Honda's Caddy Rival - Based on the next-gen Honda CR-V, the RD-X launches next year with the RL's SHAW and a 260 HP, 2.2 liter turbocharged four making about 260 pound-feet. It'll be the first factory turbocharged from Honda.
Honda's Caddy Rival - Based on the next-gen Honda CR-V, the RD-X launches next year with the RL's SHAW and a 260 HP, 2.2 liter turbocharged four making about 260 pound-feet. It'll be the first factory turbocharged from Honda.
#16
Pro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At this point, who knows how the rumored turbo will perform. Many discounted the TSX for being a 4 banger only while others offered a 6 cylinder and so far it has been a success.
#17
Frozen Wannabe Oracle
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Age: 42
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
*IF* Honda does put a turbo 4 into the RDX (I don't really think they will, but you never know,) it will be the smoothest application of a turbo possible with today's technology. For reference, look at the praise that the diesel engine in the Euro Accord gets; it's widely viewed as being one of, if not the most gas-like diesel engine on the market. Heck, even the VTEC cross over in Honda's non-sport models is pretty smooth. Honda is one of the best at making technology transparent to the end user.
Regardless, writing off a vehicle based solely on its number of cylinders is ignorant at best.
Regardless, writing off a vehicle based solely on its number of cylinders is ignorant at best.
#18
I'm a llama :(
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Professor Gascan
*IF* Honda does put a turbo 4 into the RDX (I don't really think they will, but you never know,) it will be the smoothest application of a turbo possible with today's technology. For reference, look at the praise that the diesel engine in the Euro Accord gets; it's widely viewed as being one of, if not the most gas-like diesel engine on the market. Heck, even the VTEC cross over in Honda's non-sport models is pretty smooth. Honda is one of the best at making technology transparent to the end user.
Regardless, writing off a vehicle based solely on its number of cylinders is ignorant at best.
Regardless, writing off a vehicle based solely on its number of cylinders is ignorant at best.
Well f'n said.
A factory turbo car from Honda in the US is a big step forward and will benefit the whole line-up as they start turboing more cars. It's Honda's way to always one-up the competition and the RDX will bring lots of good things.
#19
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 37
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well...I am hoping for a 2.2L Turbo...it a 4 banger and 2200cc displacement...it should save a lot of gas...it has 260hp/torque...it just as good as a V6...It also a great second car IMHO.
#20
Instructor
While I agree to some degree with your statements, I don't think you get my point!!
Originally Posted by Professor Gascan
*IF* Honda does put a turbo 4 into the RDX (I don't really think they will, but you never know,) it will be the smoothest application of a turbo possible with today's technology.
Originally Posted by Professor Gascan
For reference, look at the praise that the diesel engine in the Euro Accord gets; it's widely viewed as being one of, if not the most gas-like diesel engine on the market. Heck, even the VTEC cross over in Honda's non-sport models is pretty smooth. Honda is one of the best at making technology transparent to the end user.
Originally Posted by Professor Gascan
Regardless, writing off a vehicle based solely on its number of cylinders is ignorant at best.
#21
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
People were saying the exact same thing about the TSX and it's "4-Banger" until it hit the streets...then they were singing the praises of refinement. What they continue to harp on now is the power. Now, let's say they turbo that engine. It keeps the refinement and gives them the power they want.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
#22
Instructor
The "refinement" they're talking about....
Originally Posted by AcuraFan
People were saying the exact same thing about the TSX and it's "4-Banger" until it hit the streets...then they were singing the praises of refinement. What they continue to harp on now is the power. Now, let's say they turbo that engine. It keeps the refinement and gives them the power they want.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
What I am talking about is engine noise and vibration, when agressively accelerating and overall agressive driving. The 4-banger DEFINITELY makes itself known when doing this!!!....I've driven the TSX several times to be able to opine on this (and at one point had even considered buying one)
a 4 cylinder is DEFINITELY not in the same league as a "6", just as a "6" will not be in the same league as an "8".
.....TURBO is a whole different story...like many have pointed out above, advanced technology CAN bring refinement to a turbocharged engine.
#23
Pro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the turbo is true, I think Honda is "testing" the waters. If the RDX is a sucess and the engine is praised then they may expand to other models.
The TSX is a great car, but I too was tired of a 4 banger especially in the summer with the A/C on. I could feel the drag. The drag is there with the TL but not as bad. Now if a turbo were an option then things would have been different. With that said, the turbo may be more effective with a manual tranny instead of an auto. The other thing I'd like to see with this new motor is a 6 speed auto.
The TSX is a great car, but I too was tired of a 4 banger especially in the summer with the A/C on. I could feel the drag. The drag is there with the TL but not as bad. Now if a turbo were an option then things would have been different. With that said, the turbo may be more effective with a manual tranny instead of an auto. The other thing I'd like to see with this new motor is a 6 speed auto.
#24
Obnoxious Philadelphian
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Professor Gascan
*IF* Honda does put a turbo 4 into the RDX (I don't really think they will, but you never know,) it will be the smoothest application of a turbo possible with today's technology. For reference, look at the praise that the diesel engine in the Euro Accord gets; it's widely viewed as being one of, if not the most gas-like diesel engine on the market. Heck, even the VTEC cross over in Honda's non-sport models is pretty smooth. Honda is one of the best at making technology transparent to the end user.
Regardless, writing off a vehicle based solely on its number of cylinders is ignorant at best.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ExcelerateRep
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
0
09-22-2015 10:39 AM