View Poll Results: RDX or ???
RDX
50
92.59%
X3
2
3.70%
RAV4
0
0%
Other
2
3.70%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll
Purchasing an RDX?
12-12-2005, 08:49 PM
#1
I feel the need...
Thread Starter
Purchasing an RDX?
Who is seriously planning to purchase/lease an RDX?
If it was available when my wife needed a new car, this would have been our first choice. She wanted an X3 but I held her off with a new CRV until the RDX is released. I won't make the same mistake (TSX) and buy a first year model run though...will probably buy an '08.
We don't need the towing capability or storage of a large SUV, so if the RDX is all that it appears - it will be near perfect for our needs unless something crazy happens...
If it was available when my wife needed a new car, this would have been our first choice. She wanted an X3 but I held her off with a new CRV until the RDX is released. I won't make the same mistake (TSX) and buy a first year model run though...will probably buy an '08.
We don't need the towing capability or storage of a large SUV, so if the RDX is all that it appears - it will be near perfect for our needs unless something crazy happens...
12-13-2005, 02:10 PM
#4
Instructor
It is impossible to say....
....anything right now without knowing any details of the powertrain!! (although I voted that I would buy the RDX - I'm assuming it will come with a V6).
As far as I'm concerned the RDX is a virtual lock for me (I've decided 100% to buy it) provided it comes with a V6 (or better
)....that is EXTREMELY impportant, and will be the crucial and ONLY deciding factor.
If it comes with anything like a NA four-banger or a turbo 4 or whatever ALL BETS ARE OFF. Even the new RAV4 has a 269-horse 3.5L V6 for cryin out loud!!!
.....Besides that unknown, the RDX has exactly what I want in an SUV, and I can pretty much figure out what else will show up, as far as features go, from what Acura has released lately on models like the TL etc. (basically a "mini MDX" 
)
As far as I'm concerned the RDX is a virtual lock for me (I've decided 100% to buy it) provided it comes with a V6 (or better
)....that is EXTREMELY impportant, and will be the crucial and ONLY deciding factor. If it comes with anything like a NA four-banger or a turbo 4 or whatever ALL BETS ARE OFF. Even the new RAV4 has a 269-horse 3.5L V6 for cryin out loud!!!
.....Besides that unknown, the RDX has exactly what I want in an SUV, and I can pretty much figure out what else will show up, as far as features go, from what Acura has released lately on models like the TL etc. (basically a "mini MDX" )
12-13-2005, 04:37 PM
#5
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too early to tell
Too early to tell, need the following:
1) Need to see the RDX in person, if it's true to the concept...great!!
2) Need to see some specs/features, it has to be fit my needs of course.
3) Need to see the $$$$
4) Need to see the 2007 CRV redesign and compare it to the RDX. I don't want to pay an extra $5,000. for the Acura nameplate to get essentially the same vehicle.
Luckily I can wait for the results to all of the above, I'm in no rush after all my Accord still has less than 100,000 miles (98 Accord 85000miles & counting).
1) Need to see the RDX in person, if it's true to the concept...great!!
2) Need to see some specs/features, it has to be fit my needs of course.
3) Need to see the $$$$
4) Need to see the 2007 CRV redesign and compare it to the RDX. I don't want to pay an extra $5,000. for the Acura nameplate to get essentially the same vehicle.
Luckily I can wait for the results to all of the above, I'm in no rush after all my Accord still has less than 100,000 miles (98 Accord 85000miles & counting).
12-13-2005, 05:39 PM
#6
Instructor
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Too early to tell, need the following:
1) Need to see the RDX in person, if it's true to the concept...great!!
2) Need to see some specs/features, it has to be fit my needs of course.
3) Need to see the $$$$
1) Need to see the RDX in person, if it's true to the concept...great!!
2) Need to see some specs/features, it has to be fit my needs of course.
3) Need to see the $$$$
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
4) Need to see the 2007 CRV redesign and compare it to the RDX. I don't want to pay an extra $5,000. for the Acura nameplate to get essentially the same vehicle.
....again the only reason I might even look at a CRV is, if the CRV ends up getting a V6 option and the RDX doesn't ....can you imagine how ludicrous that would be??
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Luckily I can wait for the results to all of the above, I'm in no rush after all my Accord still has less than 100,000 miles (98 Accord 85000miles & counting).
....my 2000 LS 400 has just a tick over 50K miles on it and I just installed the Alpine NVE-N872A Nav system to tide me through the next couple years or more (one guy in the Lexus magazine had driven his '90 LS 555,000 miles without any major problems 
)....besides, I would never get a first year model, even it is a Honda/Acura!!....maybe in it's second or third year, once the bugs are all worked out!!
12-13-2005, 10:28 PM
#7
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm planning on getting one to replace my 03 MDX although it won't be a first year model, I've learned my lesson.
Agree with the earlier poster on the Acura/Honda nav system, just purchased an 06 TSX with nav and it's incredible, main reason I would get rid of the (non-navi) MDX which has otherwise been flawless.
Agree with the earlier poster on the Acura/Honda nav system, just purchased an 06 TSX with nav and it's incredible, main reason I would get rid of the (non-navi) MDX which has otherwise been flawless.
Trending Topics
12-14-2005, 12:55 PM
#8
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vicpai
Like I said above really don't need to see anything, except what's under the hood. If it's a V6, then I'm sold!!
Really won't work for me because one of the BIGGEST reasons for me to get this vehicle is to get that AWESOME Honda/Acura Nav system with the XM NAVTRAFFIC as in the RL.....I'm willing to pay any amount of money to get an ACURA NAV SYSTEM .....there's nothing even REMOTELY CLOSE to a Honda/Acura Nav system, OEM or AFTERMARKET
....again the only reason I might even look at a CRV is, if the CRV ends up getting a V6 option and the RDX doesn't ....can you imagine how ludicrous that would be??
Really won't work for me because one of the BIGGEST reasons for me to get this vehicle is to get that AWESOME Honda/Acura Nav system with the XM NAVTRAFFIC as in the RL.....I'm willing to pay any amount of money to get an ACURA NAV SYSTEM .....there's nothing even REMOTELY CLOSE to a Honda/Acura Nav system, OEM or AFTERMARKET
....again the only reason I might even look at a CRV is, if the CRV ends up getting a V6 option and the RDX doesn't ....can you imagine how ludicrous that would be??
..of course I'm just speculating.
Wife would like to be the first one in San Antonio to be driving one 
12-27-2005, 09:45 PM
#11
Intermediate
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the real car won't be anything like the car show concept = they never are. A car show is the place to show concept car but I do not think it is apropriate to show the concept car crap on acura.com. I'll bet the seats aren't available in orange and the steering wheel looks nothing like the concept.
I personally think it is ugly and looks like several others cars than have the "shoe look" to them. Acura has borrowed old design to compete with similar cars which are now becomming old themselves. I'm not impressed.
THe RL is now officially boring and I won't be surprised if the RDX suffers a similar fate.
I personally think it is ugly and looks like several others cars than have the "shoe look" to them. Acura has borrowed old design to compete with similar cars which are now becomming old themselves. I'm not impressed.
THe RL is now officially boring and I won't be surprised if the RDX suffers a similar fate.
12-28-2005, 03:33 PM
#12
Instructor
As far as the RL goes....
......I think it's a FANTASTIC vehicle in virtually all respects, except for the fact that it needs MORE FRIGGIN POWER...what were these dammed people at Honda thinking .....it's got close to 4100lbs of weight to carry, it's got that POWER SAPPING SH-AWD, and they stick a gutless 3.5L V6 in there???...go figure .....I know Honda has always been deadset against a V8, but they could've at least put a LARGER DISPLACEMENT V6 in there that produced 30 to 40 more lb.ft. of torque to move this heavy beast in a way worthy of it's FLAGSHIP status. Remember, we're not talking a mid-range model here, but Acura's absolute TOP-OF-THE-LINE vehicle.....and that's why it's so important!!
With everything else, they HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON THE HEAD!!!!!!:
The biggest praise goes to them for making it SHORTER!! (Honda deserves a GOLD MEDAL just for this, or maybe even the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE!!! 
)...that was a very brave move to not give in to the stupid American mentality of supersizing everything, and ruining it in the process ....look what Toyota did to the new RAV4 
.....and then, the RLs got possibly the best interior and features of any vehicle at ANY PRICE, period!!....I've not heard a better sound system than the one in the new TL and RL, OEM or aftermarket....and don't get me started on the Nav system...Honda's Navi is the ONLY one out there that's worth calling a Nav system!!....everything else sucks big time!!
.....it's got close to 4100lbs of weight to carry, it's got that POWER SAPPING SH-AWD, and they stick a gutless 3.5L V6 in there???...go figure .....I know Honda has always been deadset against a V8, but they could've at least put a LARGER DISPLACEMENT V6 in there that produced 30 to 40 more lb.ft. of torque to move this heavy beast in a way worthy of it's FLAGSHIP status. Remember, we're not talking a mid-range model here, but Acura's absolute TOP-OF-THE-LINE vehicle.....and that's why it's so important!!With everything else, they HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON THE HEAD!!!!!!:
The biggest praise goes to them for making it SHORTER!!
(Honda deserves a GOLD MEDAL just for this, or maybe even the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE!!! )...that was a very brave move to not give in to the stupid American mentality of supersizing everything, and ruining it in the process ....look what Toyota did to the new RAV4 .....and then, the RLs got possibly the best interior and features of any vehicle at ANY PRICE, period!!....I've not heard a better sound system than the one in the new TL and RL, OEM or aftermarket....and don't get me started on the Nav system...Honda's Navi is the ONLY one out there that's worth calling a Nav system!!....everything else sucks big time!!
01-01-2006, 02:15 PM
#13
I'm a llama :(
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually Acura's flagship is the NSX. j/k.
I don't understand what Honda is doing with the RL. It needs that Modulo front bumper and 18" wheels. That alone would make it at least LOOK like it could be a $50k car. But maybe they leaving room for an update. And it needs more power. 0-60 in 7 some odd seconds is not good enough for a luxury car. I like the size, but I think it doesn't look stately enough to be a flagship sedan. I mean, it's the same size as the TL.
j/k.I don't understand what Honda is doing with the RL. It needs that Modulo front bumper and 18" wheels. That alone would make it at least LOOK like it could be a $50k car. But maybe they leaving room for an update. And it needs more power. 0-60 in 7 some odd seconds is not good enough for a luxury car. I like the size, but I think it doesn't look stately enough to be a flagship sedan. I mean, it's the same size as the TL.
01-11-2006, 04:35 PM
#14
I feel the need...
Thread Starter
I got a chance to get up close at the auto show today.
1. Appears smaller than the current gen CRV, at least by interior volume and ride height.
2. Front end looks a little busy, but final production version may be cleaned up.
3. Couldn't see the interior - it wasn't open. But judging by the brochure and pics I've seen it's a home run.
4. PRICE??? My guess is that they'll move the next gen MDX further upscale so it will be a miracle if we see a base price below 30k. I'm hoping MSRP will be $31,995 without navi.
1. Appears smaller than the current gen CRV, at least by interior volume and ride height.
2. Front end looks a little busy, but final production version may be cleaned up.
3. Couldn't see the interior - it wasn't open. But judging by the brochure and pics I've seen it's a home run.
4. PRICE??? My guess is that they'll move the next gen MDX further upscale so it will be a miracle if we see a base price below 30k. I'm hoping MSRP will be $31,995 without navi.
01-11-2006, 04:53 PM
#15
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PistonFan
I got a chance to get up close at the auto show today.
1. Appears smaller than the current gen CRV, at least by interior volume and ride height.
1. Appears smaller than the current gen CRV, at least by interior volume and ride height.
Originally Posted by PistonFan
2. Front end looks a little busy, but final production version may be cleaned up.
Originally Posted by PistonFan
3. Couldn't see the interior - it wasn't open. But judging by the brochure and pics I've seen it's a home run.
01-11-2006, 11:12 PM
#16
I may be fat but I'm slow
It's going to come down to one of three choices for me...
1. '08/'09 TSX, which will hopefully have a similar drivetrain to the RDX
2. RDX
3. Keep my '04 TSX and buy an '02-'03 S2000
Probably going to be either 1 or 3, gotta see where life's at and what Acura has done to the 2g TSX...but if I end up in Chicago like I plan on, I might need some AWD.
For now, I love my '04.
1. '08/'09 TSX, which will hopefully have a similar drivetrain to the RDX
2. RDX
3. Keep my '04 TSX and buy an '02-'03 S2000
Probably going to be either 1 or 3, gotta see where life's at and what Acura has done to the 2g TSX...but if I end up in Chicago like I plan on, I might need some AWD.
For now, I love my '04.
01-12-2006, 12:27 AM
#17
My bolonga has a 1st name
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
rav4? who in the hell would cross shop these two? i dont care if they're similar in power... this is like comparing a jetta to a TSX to me... they're just in two differen leagues.
01-12-2006, 12:29 AM
#18
My bolonga has a 1st name
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by HondaGuy347
It's going to come down to one of three choices for me...
1. '08/'09 TSX, which will hopefully have a similar drivetrain to the RDX
2. RDX
3. Keep my '04 TSX and buy an '02-'03 S2000
Probably going to be either 1 or 3, gotta see where life's at and what Acura has done to the 2g TSX...but if I end up in Chicago like I plan on, I might need some AWD.
For now, I love my '04.
1. '08/'09 TSX, which will hopefully have a similar drivetrain to the RDX
2. RDX
3. Keep my '04 TSX and buy an '02-'03 S2000
Probably going to be either 1 or 3, gotta see where life's at and what Acura has done to the 2g TSX...but if I end up in Chicago like I plan on, I might need some AWD.
For now, I love my '04.
except option 4 for me is if my current business venture works out, i might be going for that new G35 coupe that makes drool uncontrolably everyime i see it.
01-12-2006, 10:51 AM
#19
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97AcuraCL
rav4? who in the hell would cross shop these two? i dont care if they're similar in power... this is like comparing a jetta to a TSX to me... they're just in two differen leagues.
01-12-2006, 06:24 PM
#20
I feel the need...
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Was the Mazda CX-7 also there, which seemed larger??
The front is growing on me, I like the concept better but this looks fine to me now.
There's a brochure, can you scan it for the rest of us?
The front is growing on me, I like the concept better but this looks fine to me now.
There's a brochure, can you scan it for the rest of us?
Actually, I totally forgot about the CX-7, not a big fan of the styling - sorry.
As for the brochure, I should have defined it better - it's more like a 8 1/2" X 17" marketing slick folded into three sections. Nothing new in it, same pics which are widely available and no new information other than what's already known:
Features
2.3 liter, 240 hp DOHC i-VTEC Turbo
Super Handling All-Wheel Drive
F1 style paddle shifters
Acura Nav System w/ Voice Recognition
HandsFreeLink
AcuraLink satellite comm system w/ real-time traffic
Acura/ELS Surround
ACE body structure
VSA w/ traction control
Xenon (HID) headlights *NOT bi-xenon
available summer 2006
If you still want me to scan it, I will.
01-12-2006, 09:05 PM
#22
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Bad anology dude, the TSX has been in two comparisons against the Jetta GLI in the past two months - Edmunds and Car & Driver. It lost both!! The Car & Driver comparison also included the V6 Accord 6-spd and it too beat the TSX.
01-12-2006, 09:11 PM
#23
I may be fat but I'm slow
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
And yet, the TSX is still one of the Car & Driver 10Best along with still being universally lauded by the automotive press. So those two recent articles aren't exactly telling the whole story, are they?
IMO, it's pretty much a moot point, because the Jetta and TSX are on alternating generations. When I bought my TSX in '04, the last-gen Jetta was out, and it wasn't as good (and was a sorority girl/teeny bopper/metrosexual favorite, ruling it out for me). Now the new Jetta is out, and the TSX is in the middle of it's lifespan, so the Jetta has leapt ahead. I won't be ready to buy a new car until the new TSX is out, at which point it will probably leap back ahead of the Jetta, since it will be in the middle of it's life cycle.
Besides, my family and I have had so many good experiences with Acura and Honda products, that I don't see myself switching brands.
01-13-2006, 05:59 AM
#25
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HondaGuy347
The explanation given by C/D was that subjectively, the TSX tests extremely well, thus it won Ten Best. However, objectively, the TSX lags behind the Jetta in almost every performance category, and their comparos are weighted on the objective side.
IMO, it's pretty much a moot point, because the Jetta and TSX are on alternating generations. When I bought my TSX in '04, the last-gen Jetta was out, and it wasn't as good (and was a sorority girl/teeny bopper/metrosexual favorite, ruling it out for me). Now the new Jetta is out, and the TSX is in the middle of it's lifespan, so the Jetta has leapt ahead. I won't be ready to buy a new car until the new TSX is out, at which point it will probably leap back ahead of the Jetta, since it will be in the middle of it's life cycle.
Besides, my family and I have had so many good experiences with Acura and Honda products, that I don't see myself switching brands.
IMO, it's pretty much a moot point, because the Jetta and TSX are on alternating generations. When I bought my TSX in '04, the last-gen Jetta was out, and it wasn't as good (and was a sorority girl/teeny bopper/metrosexual favorite, ruling it out for me). Now the new Jetta is out, and the TSX is in the middle of it's lifespan, so the Jetta has leapt ahead. I won't be ready to buy a new car until the new TSX is out, at which point it will probably leap back ahead of the Jetta, since it will be in the middle of it's life cycle.
Besides, my family and I have had so many good experiences with Acura and Honda products, that I don't see myself switching brands.
01-14-2006, 09:52 AM
#29
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by HondaGuy347
Two quick impressions:
1. I see they are giving up the touch screen for that joystick thing...
2. No manaul tranny mentioned.
1. I see they are giving up the touch screen for that joystick thing...
2. No manaul tranny mentioned.
2. Because the RDX is moving upscale, a manual tranny is unlikely. The paddle shifters are a lot of fun to use when you are in a sporty mood and they actually do improve the performance of the car. Several car mags produced better 0-60 times with the RL using the paddles than leaving it in "Drive". The standard "Drive" setting is programmed to produce smooth acceleration and is less performance oriented whereas the paddle shifters allow you to choose your shift points for maximum performance (with visions of Senna, Prost, Button and Barrichello dancing in your head).
01-14-2006, 02:06 PM
#30
Cruisin'
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 46
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buying A Rdx
I am the Internet Sales Manager @ Acura of South Bay in Torrance California.
First I will say that we are already getting people coming in saying they want the first RDX we get. This is going to be a hot car and will definitely require being on a waiting list. If you are interested in purchasing an RDX send me an email and I will update you with info. We have not yet started a waiting list but it will be coming soon.
Lea
rigol@autonation.com
First I will say that we are already getting people coming in saying they want the first RDX we get. This is going to be a hot car and will definitely require being on a waiting list. If you are interested in purchasing an RDX send me an email and I will update you with info. We have not yet started a waiting list but it will be coming soon.
Lea
rigol@autonation.com
01-14-2006, 08:47 PM
#31
I may be fat but I'm slow
Originally Posted by hondamore
1. If it is like the RL's system, I believe that you will find the voice activated Nav system even easier than using touch screen. For those who don't like the voice activation, the control dial is very easy and intuitive to use.
2. Because the RDX is moving upscale, a manual tranny is unlikely. The paddle shifters are a lot of fun to use when you are in a sporty mood and they actually do improve the performance of the car. Several car mags produced better 0-60 times with the RL using the paddles than leaving it in "Drive". The standard "Drive" setting is programmed to produce smooth acceleration and is less performance oriented whereas the paddle shifters allow you to choose your shift points for maximum performance (with visions of Senna, Prost, Button and Barrichello dancing in your head).
2. Because the RDX is moving upscale, a manual tranny is unlikely. The paddle shifters are a lot of fun to use when you are in a sporty mood and they actually do improve the performance of the car. Several car mags produced better 0-60 times with the RL using the paddles than leaving it in "Drive". The standard "Drive" setting is programmed to produce smooth acceleration and is less performance oriented whereas the paddle shifters allow you to choose your shift points for maximum performance (with visions of Senna, Prost, Button and Barrichello dancing in your head).
As for a manual, I am not really interested in a manual, or in paddle shifters. I put my TSX in drive and off I go. I just dont want to hear everyone else's bleatings about not being able to get a manual, I bet they are as bad as the whinning about FWD for the TSX.
01-15-2006, 08:59 AM
#32
Team Nighthawk Mambo King
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Westfield, MA
Age: 64
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by LannyM
I'll be spending some time over here, because right now it appears that an RDX will replace my wife's Ody when her lease is up.....
01-21-2006, 12:17 AM
#33
Buying the RL
My real desire was the SH-AWD for Montana winters and thought that if the RDX was up to the task I'd seriously consider it, but I have a 4WD pickup for hauling and since it appears that the turbo 4 in the RDX won't be good for MPG and the friend that saw the RDX in Detroit said he didn't sit much higher than in his RL, I decided to buy the RL (besides the fact that I got a killer deal).
Thanks to everyone for their great opinions, insights and guesses. I'm sorry that I got people stirred up with my post talking about pictures at the show when I really should have put a question mark in the thread line.
I hope that the RDX turns out to be the perfect car for all that want it.
Bye
Ben
Thanks to everyone for their great opinions, insights and guesses. I'm sorry that I got people stirred up with my post talking about pictures at the show when I really should have put a question mark in the thread line.
I hope that the RDX turns out to be the perfect car for all that want it.
Bye
Ben
01-25-2006, 08:52 PM
#34
I feel the need...
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Infamous425
so far im liking it alot but i will wait until the audi Q5 and infiniti cx comes out first
When are those models coming out?
01-27-2006, 04:16 PM
#37
Advanced
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 64
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I signed up!
Put a deposit down at dealer in Chicago.
Dealer logged it as MSRP + Destination. No price discussions or expected. Don't expect ANY dealing to happen.
Asked what color, I said "what colors?", he laughed and said put down anything. I said White.
I am #12 in line at this dealer and they said delivery in May (yea, right).
Dealer logged it as MSRP + Destination. No price discussions or expected. Don't expect ANY dealing to happen.
Asked what color, I said "what colors?", he laughed and said put down anything. I said White.
I am #12 in line at this dealer and they said delivery in May (yea, right).
01-27-2006, 07:28 PM
#38
10th Gear
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1092
Put a deposit down at dealer in Chicago.
Dealer logged it as MSRP + Destination. No price discussions or expected. Don't expect ANY dealing to happen.
Asked what color, I said "what colors?", he laughed and said put down anything. I said White.
I am #12 in line at this dealer and they said delivery in May (yea, right).
Dealer logged it as MSRP + Destination. No price discussions or expected. Don't expect ANY dealing to happen.
Asked what color, I said "what colors?", he laughed and said put down anything. I said White.
I am #12 in line at this dealer and they said delivery in May (yea, right).
01-28-2006, 04:48 AM
#39
Cruisin'
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 63
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by louiswei
Not unless you are a member of Costco...
01-29-2006, 12:25 PM
#40
Cape Breton Type-S
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Breaton Nova Scotia
Age: 51
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With out a doubt i will be getting the RDX...who cares if its first production year...platform ...tranny and powertrain has been proven...and its Honda/Acura....i have an A-spec now and have put my preorder deposit on one already.....