Honda Acura Sales Going Through the Roof: Is This the Start of a Winning Streak?
#1
Honda Acura Sales Going Through the Roof: Is This the Start of a Winning Streak?
" Acura clocked an impressive sales spike toward the end of 2014; could its future be just as exciting, if not more so? Let's look through the windshield to see what lies ahead for Acura and Honda."
Read more here, Honda Acura Sales Going Through the Roof: Is This the Start of a Winning Streak? (HMC)
Read more here, Honda Acura Sales Going Through the Roof: Is This the Start of a Winning Streak? (HMC)
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (02-16-2015)
#2
" Acura clocked an impressive sales spike toward the end of 2014; could its future be just as exciting, if not more so? Let's look through the windshield to see what lies ahead for Acura and Honda."
Read more here, Honda Acura Sales Going Through the Roof: Is This the Start of a Winning Streak? (HMC)
Read more here, Honda Acura Sales Going Through the Roof: Is This the Start of a Winning Streak? (HMC)
Oct 4,900
Nov 4,233
Dec 3,834
Jan 2,892
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
#3
I'm curious what others think of the TLX US sales:
Oct 4,900
Nov 4,233
Dec 3,834
Jan 2,892
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
Oct 4,900
Nov 4,233
Dec 3,834
Jan 2,892
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
The following users liked this post:
CheeseyPoofs McNut (02-05-2015)
#4
I'm curious what others think of the TLX US sales:
Oct 4,900
Nov 4,233
Dec 3,834
Jan 2,892
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
Oct 4,900
Nov 4,233
Dec 3,834
Jan 2,892
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
The following users liked this post:
CheeseyPoofs McNut (02-05-2015)
#5
I'm curious what others think of the TLX US sales:
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
Clearly the winter months are the slowest for car sales however we're seeing a trend downward since the initial sales numbers (likely boosted by the Acura Advantage Program) peaked in Oct. The next 3 or 4 months will tell the tale methinks.
We're also pretty strong in 4 cylinder vs. 6 in the TLX. IMO, the TLX interest has eased dramatically in Dec-Jan and I suspect that the ILX getting the 2.4 + DCT is the reason. The pending release of a new competitor always puts people in a 'holding pattern' till they can see both before they make a decision.
The following 2 users liked this post by Colin:
CheeseyPoofs McNut (02-05-2015),
jim256 (02-05-2015)
#6
Seasonality (slower sales during Thanksgiving/Christmas time) is surely one reason. But there are more: dramatically lower gas price has made many to purchase bigger engined, muscle cars or trucks. Acura is more known for fuel efficiency within the classes of its vehicles. There is a 'substitution' effect. I know a friend of mine eventually bought a pre-owned Audi with lower MPG and he was in the market for a brand-new TLX until the gas price dropped. His pre-owned Audi has low miles and cost nearly the same as a brand-new TLX. I also wonder if the transmission problems have held back some potential buyers.
#7
Seasonality (slower sales during Thanksgiving/Christmas time) is surely one reason. But there are more: dramatically lower gas price has made many to purchase bigger engined, muscle cars or trucks. Acura is more known for fuel efficiency within the classes of its vehicles. There is a 'substitution' effect. I know a friend of mine eventually bought a pre-owned Audi with lower MPG and he was in the market for a brand-new TLX until the gas price dropped. His pre-owned Audi has low miles and cost nearly the same as a brand-new TLX. I also wonder if the transmission problems have held back some potential buyers.
Trending Topics
The following users liked this post:
silverTL6 (02-06-2015)
#10
Wrong comparison...in 2014 TSX and TL were already on their way out.
I'm tracking sales of the TLX with the oldest reliable data available on goodcarbadcar.net for the TSX + TL
January 2011 (with both the TL and TSX already over 2 years old) saw sales of the TSX + TL at 3533
One year earlier, January 2010, sales of the two models combined was 3792 with the TL actually outselling the TSX.
Acura is saving money producing only one model for sure.....is still too early to tell but the tentative initial trend I see is for the TLX not being that great sales success that many expected.
Last edited by saturno_v; 02-05-2015 at 03:21 PM.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (02-05-2015)
#11
^^ True and it's all been hashed over before. When comparing TL+TSX vs TLX, many people don't take into account a general trend away from sedans to CUVs. Especially as our sedan buyers' family's continue to grow. I have many clients where this has happened, one in particular: '04 TSX > '08 TSX > '11 RDX > '13 RDX and she has had another child and wants to move to MDX.
They are! And it works both ways. Remember that monster month when gas prices were REALLY high and the Civic sold 50K units in one month?
They are! And it works both ways. Remember that monster month when gas prices were REALLY high and the Civic sold 50K units in one month?
#12
Click -> Trucks, SUVs power blazing January auto sales
People are, indeed, *that* shorsighted!
#13
^^ You guys are way too kind! People are not short sighted....they are just plain stupid!
*lol* Sorry for the perception of being disrespectful but enough of this politically correctness...Lets call a spade a spade.
*lol* Sorry for the perception of being disrespectful but enough of this politically correctness...Lets call a spade a spade.
The following users liked this post:
YeuEmMaiMai (03-04-2015)
#14
^^ True and it's all been hashed over before. When comparing TL+TSX vs TLX, many people don't take into account a general trend away from sedans to CUVs. Especially as our sedan buyers' family's continue to grow. I have many clients where this has happened, one in particular: '04 TSX > '08 TSX > '11 RDX > '13 RDX and she has had another child and wants to move to MDX.
I believe that Acura is way more successful contender within the SUV/Crossover buying crowd than the sport sedan folks.
#15
^^ All true. But I also think that with the revised ILX and new NSX on the horizon, and the potential of an Acura version of the HR-V being discussed, H/A are poised for a good run in the next couple of years. Thus, despite all the things they are not, the things that they are should appeal to a lot of folks.
The following users liked this post:
Stew4HD (02-05-2015)
#17
One year earlier, January 2010, sales of the two models combined was 3792 with the TL actually outselling the TSX.
Acura is saving money producing only one model for sure.....is still too early to tell but the tentative initial trend I see is for the TLX not being that great sales success that many expected.
Acura is saving money producing only one model for sure.....is still too early to tell but the tentative initial trend I see is for the TLX not being that great sales success that many expected.
Who says that the sales of the TLX must surpass the highest levels of the TSX &TL combined to be considered a success? Thus far it seems Acura, and outsiders are saying it is doing better than expected, and has even had supply issues. My dealership can't keep up with demand for the 4 cylinder version; same for the SH-AWD Advance models. Their supply issues don't seem unique.
Yes the TLX with 2 engine choices replaced the TSX & TL, but it doesn't occupy both segments those vehicles belonged to by itself in Acura's lineup.
Back in 2010, Acura didn't have the ILX to steer entry level shoppers to. That roll fell on the TSX. The ILX & TLX together are occupying the segments formerly held by the TSX & TL.
The MDX is a winner,The NSX is generating all kinds of buzz, and the ILX seems to be headed in the right direction, and the RDX was doing well before its refresh which is due soon. Of course sales numbers now don't mean anything for sales 2 years from now, but as long as it is out of the gate in better fashion than the 4th Gen's debut, the folks up top should be quite happy with the TLX, and the rest of the lineup except for the RLX which is in bad need of a redo from top to bottom.
Last edited by Mr Hyde; 02-06-2015 at 04:21 PM.
The following users liked this post:
invalidsearch (02-10-2015)
#18
Not sure about other parts of the country but here in New England we were hit with back to back snowstorms in the last 8 days in January. Hard to sell cars when they're buried under 3 feet of snow. And just when they clear them all, another 2 feet falls from the sky!
#22
Thanks Weather, totally agree. The low gas price honeymoon is about over. In the local neighborhoods gas at all brands and grades has gone up about 28 cents in last week. The shale oil companies will not let it stay where it was nationally two weeks ago and already reportedly exporting to other countries.
#23
What a surprise you don't see something positive regarding the TLX.
Who says that the sales of the TLX must surpass the highest levels of the TSX &TL combined to be considered a success? Thus far it seems Acura, and outsiders are saying it is doing better than expected, and has even had supply issues. My dealership can't keep up with demand for the 4 cylinder version; same for the SH-AWD Advance models. Their supply issues don't seem unique.
Yes the TLX with 2 engine choices replaced the TSX & TL, but it doesn't occupy both segments those vehicles belonged to by itself in Acura's lineup.
Back in 2010, Acura didn't have the ILX to steer entry level shoppers to. That roll fell on the TSX. The ILX & TLX together are occupying the segments formerly held by the TSX & TL.
The MDX is a winner,The NSX is generating all kinds of buzz, and the ILX seems to be headed in the right direction, and the RDX was doing well before its refresh which is due soon. Of course sales numbers now don't mean anything for sales 2 years from now, but as long as it is out of the gate in better fashion than the 4th Gen's debut, the folks up top should be quite happy with the TLX, and the rest of the lineup except for the RLX which is in bad need of a redo from top to bottom.
Who says that the sales of the TLX must surpass the highest levels of the TSX &TL combined to be considered a success? Thus far it seems Acura, and outsiders are saying it is doing better than expected, and has even had supply issues. My dealership can't keep up with demand for the 4 cylinder version; same for the SH-AWD Advance models. Their supply issues don't seem unique.
Yes the TLX with 2 engine choices replaced the TSX & TL, but it doesn't occupy both segments those vehicles belonged to by itself in Acura's lineup.
Back in 2010, Acura didn't have the ILX to steer entry level shoppers to. That roll fell on the TSX. The ILX & TLX together are occupying the segments formerly held by the TSX & TL.
The MDX is a winner,The NSX is generating all kinds of buzz, and the ILX seems to be headed in the right direction, and the RDX was doing well before its refresh which is due soon. Of course sales numbers now don't mean anything for sales 2 years from now, but as long as it is out of the gate in better fashion than the 4th Gen's debut, the folks up top should be quite happy with the TLX, and the rest of the lineup except for the RLX which is in bad need of a redo from top to bottom.
Last edited by TheAcAvenger; 02-09-2015 at 01:41 PM.
#24
Come on, Hyde. We both know that the 4th gen shouldn't be the benchmark for whether the TLX is a success or a flop. There would be no need for talking about "starting a winning streak" if the 4th gen hadn't taken TL sales from hero to zero in the first place. If/When TLX sales start to look closer to 3G or 2G sales than 4G sales, it will have to be considered a success by TLX fans and detractors alike. But I don't think anyone should be jumping to conclusions just because it's outselling the 4G.
The 2G and 3G were released when things were different. The segment is very different today than it was then.
#26
Why are we comparing the sales to any earlier model? If we must compare, then I think the 4G has to be the benchmark for success. That is the previous model, like it or not.
The 2G and 3G were released when things were different. The segment is very different today than it was then.
The 2G and 3G were released when things were different. The segment is very different today than it was then.
Why is Acura the outlier? The 4G barely sold half as many annual units as the 2nd gen or 3rd gen. We're talking a 30k to 40k difference per year. Being better than the 4G is like saying a meal was good because it didn't give you food poisoning. If the logic is that the 4G looked and felt "larger" than the cars listed above, slotting between a 3/5, A4/A6, G35/M35 that still wouldn't apply to the TLX, which has moved nicely back into the thick of things.
I'm not saying it has to sell as many units as the 3G to be considered a success. That's not going to happen overnight. I just think it's doing a disservice by comparing it to a flop. If the car is as good as it's strongest supporters make it out to be, then why not compare it to Acura's best?
Last edited by TheAcAvenger; 02-09-2015 at 06:09 PM.
#28
#29
So, you guys don't think Acura can measure success against the 4G because it didn't sell well and if Acura sells more TLX's then it doesn't count towards success?
Who decides the benchmark anyway? You? Me?
#30
Come on, Hyde. We both know that the 4th gen shouldn't be the benchmark for whether the TLX is a success or a flop. There would be no need for talking about "starting a winning streak" if the 4th gen hadn't taken TL sales from hero to zero in the first place. If/When TLX sales start to look closer to 3G or 2G sales than 4G sales, it will have to be considered a success by TLX fans and detractors alike. But I don't think anyone should be jumping to conclusions just because it's outselling the 4G.
Acura lost significant volume with the 4G, and the 3G was one of the best selling cars in its class. In 6 years time, those buyers went somewhere. Some moved on to SUVs, some moved on to other makes, and/or classes and will never return. Either way, I totally agree that the market is different than it was 6-11 years ago. The entry level market has shifted, and there's many more models in that category now that never existed before.
The damage has been done, and Acura may never recover sedan sales to the level of the 3G, but if sales are in between 4G, and 3G levels, I would definitely take that as a step in the right direction.
No one is saying otherwise, or throwing a parade just yet, its just too early to make any conclusions, but a trend is a trend, and it's all anyone has to go one right now.
Last edited by Mr Hyde; 02-10-2015 at 02:10 PM.
#32
Why would you use the 3G when we all know the TLX cannot match that? The 3 series has taken over the segment and won't be un-throned any time soon. The 3G hit a sweet spot at the right time.
So, you guys don't think Acura can measure success against the 4G because it didn't sell well and if Acura sells more TLX's then it doesn't count towards success?
Who decides the benchmark anyway? You? Me?
So, you guys don't think Acura can measure success against the 4G because it didn't sell well and if Acura sells more TLX's then it doesn't count towards success?
Who decides the benchmark anyway? You? Me?
#34
^^ All true. But I also think that with the revised ILX and new NSX on the horizon, and the potential of an Acura version of the HR-V being discussed, H/A are poised for a good run in the next couple of years. Thus, despite all the things they are not, the things that they are should appeal to a lot of folks.
Bring on the Acura IDX!
#35
Why are we comparing the sales to any earlier model? If we must compare, then I think the 4G has to be the benchmark for success. That is the previous model, like it or not.
The 2G and 3G were released when things were different. The segment is very different today than it was then.
The 2G and 3G were released when things were different. The segment is very different today than it was then.
#36
Hmm.. first release December sales..
3rd gen TL sales: 5,853 (following year was 7,211)
4th gen TL sales: 3,167
1st gen TLX sales: 3,834
#winning
4th gen runs a close 2nd to ugliest cars Acura has ever produced, only losing to the ZDX.. and that was in the shadow of a global recession, high unemployment, high fuel cost, global migration.. yet the TLX barely eclipses their sales numbers.
Also consider that the TLX is the replacement for not just the TL, but also the TSX. Filling in the lower tier is the ILX. If you take the TLX + ILX sales and compare to the TL and TSX sales.. it's a real indicator of the success of the TLX.
TLX + ILX sales: 3,834 + 1,730 = 5,564
4G TL + TSX sales: 3,167 + 2,926 = 6,093 (following year was 3,275 + 4,393 = 7,668)
3G TL + TSX sales: 5,853 + 1,851 = 7,704 (following year was 7,211 + 3,004 = 10,215)
Sure you can say the ILX is a flop.. but then the TLX should fill that market gap alone..
3rd gen TL sales: 5,853 (following year was 7,211)
4th gen TL sales: 3,167
1st gen TLX sales: 3,834
#winning
4th gen runs a close 2nd to ugliest cars Acura has ever produced, only losing to the ZDX.. and that was in the shadow of a global recession, high unemployment, high fuel cost, global migration.. yet the TLX barely eclipses their sales numbers.
Also consider that the TLX is the replacement for not just the TL, but also the TSX. Filling in the lower tier is the ILX. If you take the TLX + ILX sales and compare to the TL and TSX sales.. it's a real indicator of the success of the TLX.
TLX + ILX sales: 3,834 + 1,730 = 5,564
4G TL + TSX sales: 3,167 + 2,926 = 6,093 (following year was 3,275 + 4,393 = 7,668)
3G TL + TSX sales: 5,853 + 1,851 = 7,704 (following year was 7,211 + 3,004 = 10,215)
Sure you can say the ILX is a flop.. but then the TLX should fill that market gap alone..
#37
Can we finally let go of the comparison to the 3G? That was years ago people. It is not fair to compare TLX sales to the 3G nor the 4G for that matter. The 3G was released during a time when Acura was a technology leader and better competed with the likes of Lexus, Cadillac, Infiniti, and the Germans. The 4G was released during economic hardships (with a hate it or love it design that was ahead of its time) and most people were being frugal with their spending. Fast forward to today when you have cars like the Accord, and Camry being cross shopped with the TLX (why because they're loaded with tech and offer alot of bang for your buck that wasn't offered years ago during the days of the 3G and consumers had to shop luxury brands just to have certain features). Hence why 3G sales were through the roof. And while the 3G was nice, can we finally admit that there wasn't anything really spectacular about its exterior design. A design that has not stood the test of time and looks quite dated.
The TLX is a nice car also, but seems more like a TSX replacement so it would make more sense to compare it to former TSX sales. The TLX feels like a downgrade from the 4G TL.
The TLX is a nice car also, but seems more like a TSX replacement so it would make more sense to compare it to former TSX sales. The TLX feels like a downgrade from the 4G TL.
Last edited by MisterZDX; 02-11-2015 at 12:15 PM.
The following users liked this post:
blacktsxwagon (02-11-2015)
#38
TLX + ILX sales: 3,834 + 1,730 = 5,564
4G TL + TSX sales: 3,167 + 2,926 = 6,093 (following year was 3,275 + 4,393 = 7,668)
3G TL + TSX sales: 5,853 + 1,851 = 7,704 (following year was 7,211 + 3,004 = 10,215)
Sure you can say the ILX is a flop.. but then the TLX should fill that market gap alone..
Those things don't change anything I posted above either, and again, no one said that the TLX just hit a grand slam, just maybe a double or triple. It's still a source of optimism as it's a complete reversal of the sales of what they were fielding in the segment for the last 6 yrs, and a step in the right direction.
Last edited by Mr Hyde; 02-11-2015 at 12:19 PM.
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (02-11-2015)
#39
^ I agree but there are some here that feel that the TLX must outsell the 3G in order to be successful. As I have asked before, by whose standard is the success measured? We can go round and round all day about and even be ridiculed for our opinions but what ends?
#40
IMHO or not so humble opinion this is a circular debate. The TLX has lost sales for each of the months listed but there have been a lot of external influences on the numbers that can’t be quantified.
Think waiting for March, April, May & June returns will tell if the car is a success or not by whatever yardstick you want to use.
Think waiting for March, April, May & June returns will tell if the car is a success or not by whatever yardstick you want to use.