Acura is back!
#81
Team Owner
Lol! you are indeed misleaded. That 'torque' is a big [flat] joke. An Accord 2.4 is quicker than a 1.5, NOT the contrary.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-manual-review
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...al-test-review
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-manual-review
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...al-test-review
Weird. I was expecting maybe the transmission ratios changed but they are identical. The power is about the same, the 2018 is lighter, and it has a lot more traction (see the braking and skidpad results) so you would certainly think the 2018 should be quicker. Interesting.
#82
Team Owner
Ok now that all of the excitement is out of the way...
I doubt the real wood trim will make to production.
I doubt the real metal trim will make it to production.
I doubt the 16 way adjustable seats will make it to production.
We know the mirrors won't make it to production.
I bet the HUD will only be on the most expensive package.
I bet the adaptive suspension will only be on the most expensive package.
I bet the 21 inch wheels are an A-spec option. Otherwise it will be 19s or 18s for lower trims. 19s or 20s for the higher trims.
Anything else to consider? Unfortunately, as badass of a vehicle the whole package is, I just can't fathom the price tag for it all. I get the feeling Acura can't either and as such, won't give us it all. For those who cry that Acura needs to give us more excitement for the same price... we have no idea what Acura profit margins are and it is asinine to think we do. They price their vehicles as they see fit and we can choose to buy, or not. That's about it.
I doubt the real wood trim will make to production.
I doubt the real metal trim will make it to production.
I doubt the 16 way adjustable seats will make it to production.
We know the mirrors won't make it to production.
I bet the HUD will only be on the most expensive package.
I bet the adaptive suspension will only be on the most expensive package.
I bet the 21 inch wheels are an A-spec option. Otherwise it will be 19s or 18s for lower trims. 19s or 20s for the higher trims.
Anything else to consider? Unfortunately, as badass of a vehicle the whole package is, I just can't fathom the price tag for it all. I get the feeling Acura can't either and as such, won't give us it all. For those who cry that Acura needs to give us more excitement for the same price... we have no idea what Acura profit margins are and it is asinine to think we do. They price their vehicles as they see fit and we can choose to buy, or not. That's about it.
Last edited by TacoBello; 01-15-2018 at 09:43 PM.
#83
Team Owner
That red will never see anything but the show circuit.
#84
Team Owner
Yes agreed. To me that's not a huge deal though. I mean, it is a gorgeous color and I do like it, but it'll look good in other colors also, so no harm no foul. Honda has had some nice deep reds in the past though. Not like this- but still nice. Maybe they'll offer a different version of red.
#86
Team Owner
Isn't that the red NSX color? Isn't it like a 6000 dollar premium for the NSX? Something tells me it won't be offered on the RDX. Maybe at the MMC...
#87
So, as you guys may or may not recall, I broke the news on here, a while back, that the Type-S would return AND the TLX-Type S would get 400+ hp . Nice to be validated! Not sure why you guys aren't more excited about this?! A TLX-S is probably going to be my next car
The following users liked this post:
hadokenuh (01-16-2018)
#88
Moderator
Ok now that all of the excitement is out of the way...
I doubt the real wood trim will make to production.
I doubt the real metal trim will make it to production.
I doubt the 16 way adjustable seats will make it to production.
We know the mirrors won't make it to production.
I bet the HUD will only be on the most expensive package.
I bet the adaptive suspension will only be on the most expensive package.
Anything else to consider? Unfortunately, as badass of a vehicle the whole package is, I just can't fathom the price tag for it all. I get the feeling Acura can't either and as such, won't give us it all. For those who cry that Acura needs to give us more excitement for the same price... we have no idea what Acura profit margins are and it is asinine to think we do. They price their vehicles as they see fit and we can choose to buy, or not. That's about it.
I doubt the real wood trim will make to production.
I doubt the real metal trim will make it to production.
I doubt the 16 way adjustable seats will make it to production.
We know the mirrors won't make it to production.
I bet the HUD will only be on the most expensive package.
I bet the adaptive suspension will only be on the most expensive package.
Anything else to consider? Unfortunately, as badass of a vehicle the whole package is, I just can't fathom the price tag for it all. I get the feeling Acura can't either and as such, won't give us it all. For those who cry that Acura needs to give us more excitement for the same price... we have no idea what Acura profit margins are and it is asinine to think we do. They price their vehicles as they see fit and we can choose to buy, or not. That's about it.
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (01-16-2018)
#89
Azine Jabroni
Acura’s tendency to make “concept/prototype” models that look like production models is sad. I’m just ready for the neutering of the thing.
#90
Lola
They aren't going to give you 275/21 tires like the ones on the RDX showcar even for the future Type-S model.
#91
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,494
Received 869 Likes
on
413 Posts
Of course some of the high end features will be on the higher trim models. You ain't getting all this stuff for nothing! As for the real aluminum and wood, I would expect to see that on the Advance/Elite models, much like the real wood trim on the MDX. It was specifically mentioned in the presentation, so I bet it will be an option. Given that we are perhaps 6-8 months away from release, I would not expect the overall look to change much, if at all. I also suspect the "accidental" pics with an ASpec bumper is no accident.
The following users liked this post:
F23A4 (01-17-2018)
#92
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Lol! you are indeed misleaded. That 'torque' is a big [flat] joke. An Accord 2.4 is quicker than a 1.5, NOT the contrary.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-manual-review
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...al-test-review
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-manual-review
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...al-test-review
BTW in the interest of un-cherry picking I noticed you forgot? to include the 2.4 AT vs the 1.5T AT. Cutting to the chase as it were 0-60 2.4AT 7.6 seconds 1.5T AT 7.3seconds.
People who want a quicker Accord can go up 500CC to 2.0T & get 0-60 in 5.5 seconds which is quicker then your V6 3.5L TLX which is bigger then the 2.0T by 1.5L.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ec-test-review
Remember your engine is 500CC 1/2L bigger them mine. By the time you get to 60 I will be in the low 70's. What is interesting is the base Stinger GT @ $40K with a 3.3T will also make 70+ as you make 60MPH.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...gt-test-review
So yes turbos are very good at running way over there displacement compared to N/A engines that you prefer. Nice to see HONDA & by default ACURA seeing the light & abandoning the N/A as each new model comes out.
There is hope yet that they will get back in the game.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 01-16-2018 at 08:55 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by BEAR-AvHistory:
#94
Banned
Originally Posted by Bear
By the time you get to 60 I will be in the low 70's.
Last edited by Saintor; 01-16-2018 at 10:26 AM.
#96
Team Owner
Weird. I was expecting maybe the transmission ratios changed but they are identical. The power is about the same, the 2018 is lighter, and it has a lot more traction (see the braking and skidpad results) so you would certainly think the 2018 should be quicker. Interesting.
I wonder if it is the same as whoever it was trying to dyno the accord 2.0T and failing miserably at it, and publishing completely wrong numbers.
#97
Yes, I am excited for Acura's new direction, the 3.0L V6 Turbo, the new Type S, and, that they will actually deliver cars which will be very satisfying to driving enthusiasts once again.
I expect the "Type S" that I crave will be well outside of my price range though, which is why I keep saying I hope they also redo the ILX but get it right this time. I'll never stop repeating how great it could be to have a properly "Acurized" current gen Civic platform ILX with noise deadening foam, stronger steel/stiffened frame in some parts, Acura aesthetics (rather than boy racer/ricer Honda CTR aesthetics) and perhaps adaptive damping/active suspension? An exciting light little fun to drive Acura (again)? Yes please sign me up now. I want to see an Acura that can match cars like the Golf GTi, MazdaSpeed 3 (and Miata), Audi S3 in terms of "fun to drive" and engaging. [Not [i]just the model to beat the Kia Stinger and Audi A4]
As long as us "bottom feeders" (I can only afford below ~$40K models) get something like a 2.4L Turbo option, I'm happy. I got my current 2018 3.5L V6 TLX Tech model for ~$37K. What I'm hoping (but don't nesc expect) is that the old 2.4L "base" TLX will be updated with the 2.0T engine and they will choose a more powerful option to replace the current 3.5L V6 models and notuse an engine that is better than the 2.0T only in the "Type S".
If the lowest model of the next TLX comes in the 2.0T engine, I'll be happy and "downgrade" to that from my V6 eventually. However, if they are so lame as to try to put a 1.5T in a TLX, all they'd get from me in response to that would be a paper bag of poo at their door step, ring the doorbell, and run behind a bush to watch and laugh...
I expect the "Type S" that I crave will be well outside of my price range though, which is why I keep saying I hope they also redo the ILX but get it right this time. I'll never stop repeating how great it could be to have a properly "Acurized" current gen Civic platform ILX with noise deadening foam, stronger steel/stiffened frame in some parts, Acura aesthetics (rather than boy racer/ricer Honda CTR aesthetics) and perhaps adaptive damping/active suspension? An exciting light little fun to drive Acura (again)? Yes please sign me up now. I want to see an Acura that can match cars like the Golf GTi, MazdaSpeed 3 (and Miata), Audi S3 in terms of "fun to drive" and engaging. [Not [i]just the model to beat the Kia Stinger and Audi A4]
If the lowest model of the next TLX comes in the 2.0T engine, I'll be happy and "downgrade" to that from my V6 eventually. However, if they are so lame as to try to put a 1.5T in a TLX, all they'd get from me in response to that would be a paper bag of poo at their door step, ring the doorbell, and run behind a bush to watch and laugh...
Last edited by Christopher.; 01-16-2018 at 11:20 AM.
#98
Team Owner
It will be a 2.0T.
It's upscale of the Accord. The highest Accord engine will be the base engine in the TLX. There's no way they will sell the TLX with 190hp lol.
It's upscale of the Accord. The highest Accord engine will be the base engine in the TLX. There's no way they will sell the TLX with 190hp lol.
The following 2 users liked this post by TacoBello:
BEAR-AvHistory (01-16-2018),
kurtatx (01-16-2018)
#99
Azine Jabroni
Makes more economical sense to use the 2.0T wherever possible and then develop performance V6 models. Then you can dump the I4/V6 TLX confusion and go with a 2.0T TLX with 290 HP and a V6T TLX with 340+.
You can do all that with a reasonable price tag. You can get Audis and BMWs for under $40K.
Sedans
TLX (2.0T)/TLX Type-S/R (V6T)/Whatever replaces the RLX
Yeah, it would be lot more expensive to get into the brand, but it appears customers are willing to pay that or go with a Honda. Minimal cannibalism.
You can do all that with a reasonable price tag. You can get Audis and BMWs for under $40K.
Sedans
TLX (2.0T)/TLX Type-S/R (V6T)/Whatever replaces the RLX
Yeah, it would be lot more expensive to get into the brand, but it appears customers are willing to pay that or go with a Honda. Minimal cannibalism.
#100
I'll be like the boy outside the candy shop looking in the window sadly/longingly at the V6T, but, I'd still be happy with the 2.0T TLX - hopefully they will make a few other incremental improvements such as slightly better brakes, perhaps trim a little bit of weight, and we're probably all very curious to see what happens with the transmission...
No matter what people are saying about current Audis having less reliability issues and Acura not being up to the standard they once were, I'm still sure that the overall cost of ownership/long term maintenance costs are still significantly lower on Acura vs Audi. Who knows, perhaps time will prove me wrong? I shall find out, at least anecdotally with mine. I expect I can get work done at a Honda shop for a lot less than Audi shops typically charge...
No matter what people are saying about current Audis having less reliability issues and Acura not being up to the standard they once were, I'm still sure that the overall cost of ownership/long term maintenance costs are still significantly lower on Acura vs Audi. Who knows, perhaps time will prove me wrong? I shall find out, at least anecdotally with mine. I expect I can get work done at a Honda shop for a lot less than Audi shops typically charge...
#101
not superchaged
The 2018 V6 A-Spec has a sticker price of $45,000 so it ain't cheap. For about $5,000 more you can get well equiped Audi A4 Quattro with a more powerful engine and a lot more tech. For people looking for a car in that price range then $5,000 isn't much more for the better car especially if you are leasing one.
If the TLX comes with a 300hp/300tq 2.0T engine, 10 speed auto and the new RDX interior I'd gladly pay $50,000 for it.
If the TLX comes with a 300hp/300tq 2.0T engine, 10 speed auto and the new RDX interior I'd gladly pay $50,000 for it.
#102
Team Owner
The 2018 V6 A-Spec has a sticker price of $45,000 so it ain't cheap. For about $5,000 more you can get well equiped Audi A4 Quattro with a more powerful engine and a lot more tech. For people looking for a car in that price range then $5,000 isn't much more for the better car especially if you are leasing one.
If the TLX comes with a 300hp/300tq 2.0T engine, 10 speed auto and the new RDX interior I'd gladly pay $50,000 for it.
If the TLX comes with a 300hp/300tq 2.0T engine, 10 speed auto and the new RDX interior I'd gladly pay $50,000 for it.
Small correction from an A4 owner: Manufacturer specs say the TLX V6 is more powerful. Heck, my 3G TL is too. The Audi is rated at 252 hp.
#103
I would be surprised if there isn't at least some configuration of next gen Acura ILX/TLX with the 2.0T engine coming in at ~$30K - $35K?
Last edited by Christopher.; 01-16-2018 at 11:57 AM.
#104
not superchaged
You are right I should have worded better. The Audi isn't more powerful but it is faster going from 0-60 and quarter mile (at least according to C&D)
OK one more thing I need to word better. Maybe I should have my coffee first before I write more stupid stuff.
You are right I would expect some trim to start in the mid to high $30s with the top trim with everything topping out at $50K. At $50K I would expect to have a lot of the goodies from the new RDX.
You are right I would expect some trim to start in the mid to high $30s with the top trim with everything topping out at $50K. At $50K I would expect to have a lot of the goodies from the new RDX.
Yes, but, seeing as I got the 2018 V6 Tech package TLX new for ~$36K I'd expect that the 2.0T TLX (non A-Spec/Type S) will be ~$40,000 at most, out the door, for the base models?
I would be surprised if there isn't at least some configuration of Acura ILX/TLX with the 2.0T engine coming in at ~$30K - $35K?
I would be surprised if there isn't at least some configuration of Acura ILX/TLX with the 2.0T engine coming in at ~$30K - $35K?
#105
Banned
The 2018 V6 A-Spec has a sticker price of $45,000 so it ain't cheap. For about $5,000 more you can get well equiped Audi A4 Quattro with a more powerful engine and a lot more tech. For people looking for a car in that price range then $5,000 isn't much more for the better car especially if you are leasing one.
If the TLX comes with a 300hp/300tq 2.0T engine, 10 speed auto and the new RDX interior I'd gladly pay $50,000 for it.
If the TLX comes with a 300hp/300tq 2.0T engine, 10 speed auto and the new RDX interior I'd gladly pay $50,000 for it.
#106
not superchaged
You are right, 3.0T for $50K is better, kinda like where the Kia Stinger is priced.
I was thinking $50K for the 2.0T because that's where the Germans are at.
I was thinking $50K for the 2.0T because that's where the Germans are at.
#107
Azine Jabroni
The V6 is dying at the hands of the better 2.0T.
#108
not superchaged
By V6 I think he meant the new 3.0T V6 Acura will offer not the current 3.5L NA V6
The Germans all use a 2.0T I4 as the base engine and 3.0T I6/V6 as the upgraded engine so I imagine Acura is going to do the same.
I think $50K for a loaded 3.0T V6 sounds about right. It'll be right there with the Kia Stinger and probably the Genesis G70 while undercutting the German 6 cylinder models.
The Germans all use a 2.0T I4 as the base engine and 3.0T I6/V6 as the upgraded engine so I imagine Acura is going to do the same.
I think $50K for a loaded 3.0T V6 sounds about right. It'll be right there with the Kia Stinger and probably the Genesis G70 while undercutting the German 6 cylinder models.
#109
Moderator
Let's keep this one on-topic and civil. Any off-topic sidebar discussions (feel free to do that via PM or over in Car Talk) or personal attacks will be deleted.
#110
Intermediate
I'm interested to see what Acura does with the engines. The 2.0 makes something like 250hp in the Accord and the current V6 makes 290. I assume they'll bump the regular V6 to 300+ and the turbo V6 to make around 400 in a type-s model. I wonder if they'll either detune the 2.0 to make the current V6 a more attractive upgrade.
#111
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Yes, but, seeing as I got the 2018 V6 Tech package TLX new for ~$36K (sticker price $40K) I'd expect that the 2.0T TLX (non A-Spec/Type S) will be ~$40,000 at most, out the door, for the base models?
I would be surprised if there isn't at least some configuration of next gen Acura ILX/TLX with the 2.0T engine coming in at ~$30K - $35K?
I would be surprised if there isn't at least some configuration of next gen Acura ILX/TLX with the 2.0T engine coming in at ~$30K - $35K?
Think even with a 2T & 3T they will maintain the current price structure with a modest % jump. The S would just get slotted in at the top. So all in they could go $47.5/$48K. There is some thought that $50K would be a third rail for the TLX due to its current public perception as a value build.
Kia has 3 versions of its 365BHP 3.3T GT starting at $38K including the big engine which is PAWS V6 Tech money. Mid trim $45K & the top version is $50K so it will be interesting to see what the take rate is for each price point.
Kia also has that it is a RWD base going for it. At these power levels 350BHP & up the TLX has to be AWD & FWD/PAWS is out as a 3L package option.
Kia has 3 versions of its 365BHP 3.3T GT starting at $38K including the big engine which is PAWS V6 Tech money. Mid trim $45K & the top version is $50K so it will be interesting to see what the take rate is for each price point.
Kia also has that it is a RWD base going for it. At these power levels 350BHP & up the TLX has to be AWD & FWD/PAWS is out as a 3L package option.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 01-16-2018 at 01:17 PM.
#112
Moderator
I'm interested to see what Acura does with the engines. The 2.0 makes something like 250hp in the Accord and the current V6 makes 290. I assume they'll bump the regular V6 to 300+ and the turbo V6 to make around 400 in a type-s model. I wonder if they'll either detune the 2.0 to make the current V6 a more attractive upgrade.
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (01-16-2018)
#113
I'm interested to see what Acura does with the engines. The 2.0 makes something like 250hp in the Accord and the current V6 makes 290. I assume they'll bump the regular V6 to 300+ and the turbo V6 to make around 400 in a type-s model. I wonder if they'll either detune the 2.0 to make the current V6 a more attractive upgrade.
The following 2 users liked this post by fiatlux:
BEAR-AvHistory (01-16-2018),
JackRydden224 (01-16-2018)
#114
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
ACURA has heard the "why be satisfied with average & hype?" & build a car that can actually do what your adds say it can do. They are going all Turbo 4 & 6 so for the first time in years they will be competitive with their horsepower ratings. If they are mindful of the expenses & price it intelligently they can once again regain the 3G's position as the value leader bang for the buck car.
There main opposition will be the Stinger due to price which is a good thing because it will be an incentive to do better. If they do better they should sell more then 35,000 cars a year & you guys can congratulate yourselves on what a great choice you made.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 01-16-2018 at 02:50 PM.
#115
Banned
#116
Banned
The N/A engine is dead & the Turbo is now king in ACURALAND
Case in evidence, Q50 3.7 2015 vs Q50 3.0T
Compare Side-by-Side
The 3.7 was already booking booking 5-60mph in an astounding 5.3s.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...37-test-review
Almost nothing published for the 3.0T 300HP. This kind of Infiniti non-sense can happen to Acura too.
Of course, the 400HP version does better, but that's not the point. I don't mind a 3.0T, really. The point is having an affordable glorious sounding 6-pot without having to spend 10-12K for it. Instead having to deal with a sh*tty sounding 2.0Toy, that is.
#118
A few years out? What in like 4 years? Next year the TLX should have it, I'm confused at Acura strategy or should I say disappointed at them being so behind. Yeah I'll definitely be in something else by then
#119
Racer
That's my issue. I'm looking to buy this year or i would hold off until 2019 if I knew a new tlx was coming. I don't think I can wait until 2020, definitely not 2021. So it looks like I'll be moving on.
#120
Azine Jabroni
The only reason is marketing, for people like you.
Case in evidence, Q50 3.7 2015 vs Q50 3.0T
Compare Side-by-Side
The 3.7 was already booking booking 5-60mph in an astounding 5.3s.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...37-test-review
Almost nothing published for the 3.0T 300HP. This kind of Infiniti non-sense can happen to Acura too.
Of course, the 400HP version does better, but that's not the point. I don't mind a 3.0T, really. The point is having an affordable glorious sounding 6-pot without having to spend 10-12K for it. Instead having to deal with a sh*tty sounding 2.0Toy, that is.
Case in evidence, Q50 3.7 2015 vs Q50 3.0T
Compare Side-by-Side
The 3.7 was already booking booking 5-60mph in an astounding 5.3s.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...37-test-review
Almost nothing published for the 3.0T 300HP. This kind of Infiniti non-sense can happen to Acura too.
Of course, the 400HP version does better, but that's not the point. I don't mind a 3.0T, really. The point is having an affordable glorious sounding 6-pot without having to spend 10-12K for it. Instead having to deal with a sh*tty sounding 2.0Toy, that is.
Give it a rest. V6 is dead and rightly so.