Accord Sport 6mt 0-60 in 6.6 - TLX 4cyl 8 Dct 0-60 in ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2014, 02:22 PM
  #41  
Burning Brakes
 
hadokenuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,000
Received 153 Likes on 125 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
High output horsepower and excellent fuel economy just don't mix, for naturally-aspirated automotive engines, unless there is a major breakthrough in engine technology.
Agree to some extent but things have always been improving over time. For example, my 1995 Accord LX got 130hp (old rating system - should be less than today's standards) and 24mpg combined. The 2013 Accord is rated at 185hp (new system) and gets 30+ mpg.
Old 02-27-2014, 02:45 PM
  #42  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
High output horsepower and excellent fuel economy just don't mix, for naturally-aspirated automotive engines, unless there is a major breakthrough in engine technology.

However, performance-hybrid engines and force-induction engines are different stories.
To an extent, I dont buy that one bit. We arent talking about a high strung 1.5L popping out 240+ hp at 8500 rpm. I consider My NA 3.7 fully built and fairly high strung. I can pull away on a gen 1 CTS-V and a 335i on the hwy. I have no problems getting the same 28-32 mpg hwy as my old 3.2 and i know i have a shitload more torque and hp than before.
Just look at what the Corvettes have been doing. They have no problem getting into the 30+mpg hwy with 400+ hp
Old 02-27-2014, 02:46 PM
  #43  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by hadokenuh
Agree to some extent but things have always been improving over time. For example, my 1995 Accord LX got 130hp (old rating system - should be less than today's standards) and 24mpg combined. The 2013 Accord is rated at 185hp (new system) and gets 30+ mpg.
Yup, my old 160 hp 5MT RSX would struggle to do 25-27 mpg, the 201 hp 6MT ILX does 29-31 mpg.
Old 02-27-2014, 05:23 PM
  #44  
2G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
.
Old 02-27-2014, 05:23 PM
  #45  
2G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
Highway mileage always sounds best, because the vehicle is running on super-tall, overdriven top gear all day long, and some even with half the cylinder banks disabled.

However, city mileage and/or 50%-city/50%-highway is a more realistic comparison measurement for high hp vehicles.
Old 02-27-2014, 07:35 PM
  #46  
Drifting
 
JM2010 SH-AWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,372
Received 563 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by hadokenuh
Agree to some extent but things have always been improving over time. For example, my 1995 Accord LX got 130hp (old rating system - should be less than today's standards) and 24mpg combined. The 2013 Accord is rated at 185hp (new system) and gets 30+ mpg.

As an example, our 2003 Accord went 0-60 in maybe 8 seconds and got at most 34 mpg on the highway. Our '13 has been measured at 6.6 and gets 40+ mpg in straight highway driving. The old car got about 27 mpg in combined driving; the '13 is averaging about 31 or so. Things that were once thought impossible can be accomplished with advanced engineering and materials.
Old 02-27-2014, 08:43 PM
  #47  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Yup, my old 160 hp 5MT RSX would struggle to do 25-27 mpg, the 201 hp 6MT ILX does 29-31 mpg.
Our 86 Integra 5MT 113HP would average ~28-29 in mixed driving. My 05 TL 6MT 258HP gets ~27. ~1000 pounds more and 2X+ the power with only slightly less fuel usage. Modern engines are pretty good for efficiency.
Old 02-27-2014, 08:51 PM
  #48  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Yup, in fact, NOT being the fastest has been a longtime H/A trait. It has always been the complete package that made the product appealing. I'm not holding my breath, but I hope the TLX gets DWB front suspension. This would help separate it from the Accord in perception and would surly yield a more well rounded car from a handling perspective.

Yeah, and being the fastest is a fleeting title as new cars are introduced.
+1, also want to see a upper/lower control arm front suspension in the TLX. The one thing that Acura has stuck with for the mid/upper sedans from the beginning was DWB front suspension. Understand the use in the Accord and other Honda models but to me it's worth the extra cost.
Old 02-27-2014, 08:56 PM
  #49  
David_Dude
 
Acura_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 13,283
Received 581 Likes on 515 Posts
Old 02-27-2014, 09:07 PM
  #50  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
+1, also want to see a upper/lower control arm front suspension in the TLX. The one thing that Acura has stuck with for the mid/upper sedans from the beginning was DWB front suspension. Understand the use in the Accord and other Honda models but to me it's worth the extra cost.
I agree 100%! Just thinking that it's 50/50 at this point for or against DWB. I'd happily swap PAWS for DWB if given the choice.
Old 02-27-2014, 09:17 PM
  #51  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
I agree 100%! Just thinking that it's 50/50 at this point for or against DWB. I'd happily swap PAWS for DWB if given the choice.
Why couldn't we get both? I would happily sacrifice real leather for P-AWS.
Old 02-27-2014, 09:38 PM
  #52  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
^^ LOL, both would be OK but don't sacrifice leather... EVER AGAIN. No more base ILX or RLX.
Old 02-28-2014, 06:50 AM
  #53  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
^^ LOL, both would be OK but don't sacrifice leather... EVER AGAIN. No more base ILX or RLX.
Honestly, I find some of the leatherette that competitors have to be pretty good and most buyers would not be able to tell the difference. Not saying we should get cloth seats, but a high quality leatherette that saves a bit per car would be just fine with me if the trade-off is I can get a little more power out of the motor and P-AWS along with the double-wishbone suspension setup.
Old 02-28-2014, 10:47 AM
  #54  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
Originally Posted by Nari
Honestly, the Accord is an engineering masterpiece in my eyes. So many compromises balanced so well. Its one of the finest sedans available at any price .



The thing is, the wide ratio stack of an 8 speed transmission should really allow both like nedmundo said. A really tall 7th and 8th gear for highway fuel economy and the ability of the engine to quickly get into it's most efficient operating range and stay there in city traffic.

The 8 speed used by BMW is the same off the shelf ZF unit used by many other car manufacturers now including the Ram pickup . Not a bad thing since its an excellent transmission but how many parts can different manufacturers share before they lose a chunk of what makes them special. Hondas and Acuras transmissions, going way back, have been more like automated manuals and lack planetary gearsets typical on just about every other automatic car. This is one of the things that contributes to the light and lively feel of Acuras and Hondas. It appears that that Acuras new DCT transmissions are done in house thus preserving this history. Although the 9 speed used in the TLX 3.5 I'm not sure about.
+1 always liked the Honda approach to their AT's as well. Never the norm, sorta like their 4 valve motors with SOHC's, and the high mounted front upper control arm with the tall knuckle (first seen on the 2G Prelude in 83)
Old 02-28-2014, 11:05 AM
  #55  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Why is DWB so important to everybody? Despite what one poster said about struts are only for cheap cars Ferrari, Lamborghini & Porsche all use them.
Old 02-28-2014, 11:13 AM
  #56  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Why is DWB so important to everybody? Despite what one poster said about struts are only for cheap cars Ferrari, Lamborghini & Porsche all use them.
DWB gives more precise camber control over the travel of the suspension which provides a better contact patch with the tire to the road.

DWB is also used on all Ferrari, Lamborghini, and Porsches. They use a coil over damper arrangement that are technically not struts since they only provide structural support in the tube dimension. A strut provides additionally lateral support in place of the upper arm.
The following 2 users liked this post by Legend2TL:
internalaudit (03-01-2014), VR1 (02-28-2014)
Old 02-28-2014, 11:51 AM
  #57  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Was curious what the answer would be with the TLX. Not sure based on typical usage that DWS is all that necessary as opposed to a nice to have thing for the enthusiast forum guys. I would guess 99% of the buyers have no clue or could care less using what is under the car as long as its comfortable. Tell a typical prospect it has DWS & the response would be “what’s that”. Most would take Leather if a trade off was necessary.

BTW Agree with double wishbones & coil overs for more precise wheel placement. I am using that style front suspension on the car I am building but its use will be a lot different than a 4 door daily driver that needs to be built to a specific price.
Old 02-28-2014, 01:16 PM
  #58  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Honestly, I find some of the leatherette that competitors have to be pretty good and most buyers would not be able to tell the difference.
I agree, that for some the prestige of driving a BMW outweighs the fact they took pleather to get the car. For others, just knowing the difference (even if some cannot see it) is the difference. IMO, this is a reason there is a market for fake Rolex's and one for real Rolex's.

Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Why is DWB so important to everybody?
From my point of view, some of the answer is the same as the above answer to the leather question. For some customers, knowing they have a suspension modeled after race cars is enough, for others, they might actually exploit the difference. From a sales perspective, I welcome the opportunity to explain something "new" to customers.
Old 02-28-2014, 08:04 PM
  #59  
Instructor
 
H_CAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 189
Received 80 Likes on 42 Posts
The 2013 Accord drives just as good as any Accord before it and it's the first one with struts...
Old 03-01-2014, 05:49 AM
  #60  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
^ but that brings the question could the 2013 9G Accord been better with a DWB?

FWIW, the first two generations of Accords had struts. The 3G which came out in 86 copied the 2G Prelude front DWB suspension.

Last edited by Legend2TL; 03-01-2014 at 05:52 AM.
The following users liked this post:
internalaudit (03-01-2014)
Old 03-01-2014, 09:43 AM
  #61  
Drifting
 
JM2010 SH-AWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,372
Received 563 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by H_CAR
The 2013 Accord drives just as good as any Accord before it and it's the first one with struts...

We have an '03 and a '13 Accord. Granted, the '03 (which my son drives now) has nearly 200K miles on it, but I believe the '13 handles better than the '03. The newer car is a bit softer and does lose a little steering feel with EPS, but overall, turn-in is crisper and the car tracks beautifully.


I don't know whether the TLX will offer DWB, but I'm confident that with Acura suspension tuning and the already very solid platform of the 9G Accord, it will handle very well.
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (03-01-2014)
Old 03-01-2014, 01:51 PM
  #62  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
DWB gives more precise camber control over the travel of the suspension which provides a better contact patch with the tire to the road.

DWB is also used on all Ferrari, Lamborghini, and Porsches. They use a coil over damper arrangement that are technically not struts since they only provide structural support in the tube dimension. A strut provides additionally lateral support in place of the upper arm.
Not true, Porsche 911 uses Macpherson struts up front...




And people really need to stop thinking of Strut tech like it was in the 80s as if you will have shit for handling. A lot has been done recently in design to make them much better. (ie the Revo knuckle and the super strut design like gm use on the buick. Many publications have stated that the Focus ST is one of the best if not the best handling FWD cars made, and it has Macpherson struts up front. (that said though, i too would rather have DWB)

The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (03-01-2014)
Old 03-01-2014, 02:20 PM
  #63  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
, you're right. I should have also know since I changed my brother's brake pads on his 996 last month.

The Cayenne and Pamamera uses DBW, but with the exception of the GT2/3 the 911's and Cayman/Boxster use front struts.

http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/91...nd-rear-axles/

997 GT2





Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Not true, Porsche 911 uses Macpherson struts up front...




And people really need to stop thinking of Strut tech like it was in the 80s as if you will have shit for handling. A lot has been done recently in design to make them much better. (ie the Revo knuckle and the super strut design like gm use on the buick. Many publications have stated that the Focus ST is one of the best if not the best handling FWD cars made, and it has Macpherson struts up front. (that said though, i too would rather have DWB)


Last edited by Legend2TL; 03-01-2014 at 02:26 PM.
Old 03-04-2014, 11:14 PM
  #64  
Intermediate
 
IrvineAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Irvine, Ca
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's with the 6s?

2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4

http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
Old 03-05-2014, 07:01 AM
  #65  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by IrvineAcura
What's with the 6s?

2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4

http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
We are talking about the 4 cyl model, NOT the V6
Old 03-05-2014, 10:31 PM
  #66  
Burning Brakes
 
WheelMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 764
Received 151 Likes on 115 Posts
Wish for double wishbones

Originally Posted by Colin
From my point of view, some of the answer is the same as the above answer to the leather question. For some customers, knowing they have a suspension modeled after race cars is enough, for others, they might actually exploit the difference. From a sales perspective, I welcome the opportunity to explain something "new" to customers.
The old becomes the new new.

I agree. DWB is appropriate for a premium car, regardless whether a driver makes full use of it or not.

Along with fsttyms1's excellent diagram, I understand that McPherson struts, being more vertical, allow for more interior passenger space. This is important for small cars like the Porsche Boxter, but the TLX is big enough to have DWB. Struts are also are less complex, cheaper, and lighter than DWB.

In contrast, DWB allows for a lower hood line (but pedestrian safety regs probably limit how low a design can go). And compared to struts, DWB keeps more of a tire's contact patch on the road... especially the outer tire on a curve.

So while McPherson struts can be tuned well and made quite capable, DWB are a better fit for the premium, luxury, and performance market. I'd certainly trade PAWS for DWB.
Old 03-31-2014, 12:51 PM
  #67  
Instructor
 
sparky57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 67
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by George Knighton
I'm afraid that without that electric system the 8 DCT is going to feel more like a Porsche PDK...
If it shifted like wifey's '13 Boxster with launch control that would be sweet!

Along with the "vroom-blah" Formula One shift sounds.
Old 04-02-2014, 04:40 AM
  #68  
Pro
 
robocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 558
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts
I'd love to know how you're getting 27mpg in your TL. I've averaged 17.41mpg over the last 24797 miles in my 06 MT. What kind of tires are you running? I must be having too much fun.

Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Our 86 Integra 5MT 113HP would average ~28-29 in mixed driving. My 05 TL 6MT 258HP gets ~27. ~1000 pounds more and 2X+ the power with only slightly less fuel usage. Modern engines are pretty good for efficiency.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tonio
Car Talk
252
02-05-2019 05:43 PM
divac
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
16
08-29-2018 10:13 AM
BC01191980
5G TLX (2015-2020)
8
09-07-2015 08:14 PM
cammy5
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
2
09-04-2015 11:26 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
08-30-2015 02:39 PM



Quick Reply: Accord Sport 6mt 0-60 in 6.6 - TLX 4cyl 8 Dct 0-60 in ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.