2015 TLX is official!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2014, 07:51 PM
  #761  
Racer
 
kevTL888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: san gabriel, ca
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
any speculation on the pricing? i hope they go from 30k (fwd 2.4 I4 base) to 42k (SH-AWD V6 Tech)
Old 01-16-2014, 07:56 PM
  #762  
Burning Brakes
 
a35tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,091
Received 383 Likes on 239 Posts
Originally Posted by kevTL888
any speculation on the pricing? i hope they go from 30k (fwd 2.4 I4 base) to 42k (SH-AWD V6 Tech)


I'm guessing it would start around $31k (2.4 base) and progress to ~ $47k (SH-awd V6 Advance). If they can keep it in this price range or better, I predict it will be a HUGE sales success for Acura! It's definitely time for Acura to have a bona fide hit on their hands! GO TLX!!!!

Last edited by a35tl; 01-16-2014 at 07:59 PM.
Old 01-16-2014, 08:03 PM
  #763  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by KeithL
I actually think a loaded SH-AWD will be $50K-ish and think the low end will start closer to $35K and would hope a 2.4 will work into the ILX so they can justify possibly pushing it up a little on top end. Would really be a wise move for Acura to release Type-S ILX and RLX.
IMO, the upper limit will depend on what Advance features they include. Currently, Advance Package TLs are not equal to MDX and RLX in that they exclude the CMBS and LKAS. If the TLX gets these, then it could edge towards your estimate. Frankly, I'd rather it not get that high. One last word on the 'beak' discussion. At least it's functional in that the CMBS sensor is hidden inside vs. behind a clear plastic piece in earlier applications.

As for the 2.4. I'm hoping it receives VTEC on the exhaust side and if it does, I could see 210hp and maybe even 220. IMO, the ILX doesn't really need a lot more than 200ish, but I wouldn't mind seeing get there with the 1.5 liter turbo 4 (vs. 2.4). I think it would be nice to debut that engine in the ILX. Offer a lower power 180 hp version for the automatics with a CVT and 200 hp version with 6MT. If they really want to uncork something, the 280 HP 2.0 Turbo could work in a Type-S. The unfortunate reality is that this might have to wait till the next gen ILX.
The following users liked this post:
Acura_Dude (01-16-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 08:35 PM
  #764  
Instructor
 
07wdptl-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Age: 52
Posts: 225
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
IMO, the upper limit will depend on what Advance features they include. Currently, Advance Package TLs are not equal to MDX and RLX in that they exclude the CMBS and LKAS. If the TLX gets these, then it could edge towards your estimate. Frankly, I'd rather it not get that high. One last word on the 'beak' discussion. At least it's functional in that the CMBS sensor is hidden inside vs. behind a clear plastic piece in earlier applications.

As for the 2.4. I'm hoping it receives VTEC on the exhaust side and if it does, I could see 210hp and maybe even 220. IMO, the ILX doesn't really need a lot more than 200ish, but I wouldn't mind seeing get there with the 1.5 liter turbo 4 (vs. 2.4). I think it would be nice to debut that engine in the ILX. Offer a lower power 180 hp version for the automatics with a CVT and 200 hp version with 6MT. If they really want to uncork something, the 280 HP 2.0 Turbo could work in a Type-S. The unfortunate reality is that this might have to wait till the next gen ILX.
I will take the tlx beak grill over the lexus predator grill and the q50 whatever grill or mouth that thing is anyday.
The following users liked this post:
TeamAcura (01-17-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 08:49 PM
  #765  
Drifting
 
Rocketsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,606
Received 535 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocket_man
To make it worse, unless you are an early adopter and paying full MSRP it is not going to be this calendar year. If I buy this car it will be in its first model year and Acura has had a few glitches lately on that. Nothing compared to the Q50, or MKZ, but things that would annoy me. I'd expect those minor things to be worked out in the first year but I honestly can't wait that long.


I bought my 3G the month after it was released, I think and paid MSRP for it. I can't hold off until next year, so I'm pretty much going to pay full price, I think. The sad thing is, I waited to see if the ATS and Q50 would have issues before decided whether to buy them or not. I'm glad I did. Hopefully Acura doesn't let me down if I decide to be an early adopter. My 3G had a recall a few months after it was released for the transmission, and I thought I had screwed up buying it so quick. Especially after the transmission issues Honda had just had. But, it's been a pretty uneventful ride since then, so I guess I'm willing to take a shot on them again.
The following 3 users liked this post by Rocketsfan:
Acura_Dude (01-16-2014), BlueAc (01-17-2014), Rocket_man (01-16-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 09:09 PM
  #766  
Drifting
 
Rocketsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,606
Received 535 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by maharajamd
Amazing the things one finds on Live Leak... :P


I'm scared to open Acurazine at work because of your avatar. LOL.
The following users liked this post:
614Banker (01-16-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 09:19 PM
  #767  
Pro
 
SinCityTLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 563
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by NorCalJay
Acura had a chance to really change the shield or mimic the NSX grille, but didn't...ok then.

So I would just paint match the trim, drop it & flush out the wheels like the concept.


This exactly what I had in mind when I replied in another thread entitled "will TLX be your next car"

That i would buy it gladly and paint match everything, lower and flush the OEM wheels.

This will sell more TLXs
Old 01-16-2014, 09:24 PM
  #768  
Burning Brakes
 
Timmy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mebane, North Carolina
Posts: 1,103
Received 463 Likes on 197 Posts
Wheel base extension and recolor











White wasn't turning out pretty so Silver is as close I can get you.
The following 9 users liked this post by Timmy18:
a35tl (01-16-2014), Acura_Dude (01-16-2014), BlueAc (01-17-2014), FoxTL (01-17-2014), Glashub (01-16-2014), jwong77 (01-16-2014), ostrich (01-16-2014), Rocketsfan (01-16-2014), Rocket_man (01-16-2014) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 01-16-2014, 09:35 PM
  #769  
Midnight Marauder
 
jwong77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 741
Received 54 Likes on 40 Posts
^^ Oh what could have been if they had used a true RWD platform with the right proportions. Thanks for the photoshops,
The following users liked this post:
Timmy18 (01-16-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 09:55 PM
  #770  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by Timmy18
Wheel base extension and recolor











White wasn't turning out pretty so Silver is as close I can get you.
Ooooh! I like these colours!!! Especially that bluish grey, the bronzy colour (the 6th one) and the green.... I can imagine how this TLX would look especially hot in some highly reflective metallic colours with lots of depth. These colours show off the lines very well indeed. Of course the red is just perfect!!!

Please pardon me but that brownish colour is almost like the poopy colour that the last generation Lexus ES and Subaru Outback have.... I always wondered why people were so brave as to picking a car in a colour that has personal sanitation associations.... LOL But I have to say that yours is much better!
The following users liked this post:
Timmy18 (01-16-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 10:08 PM
  #771  
Drifting
 
Rocketsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,606
Received 535 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by Steven Bell
It doesn't look too much like the '09 beak anymore....

I'm still not a fan of the Acura "corporate grille", but I'm also not a fan of calling it "the beak" anymore. The original 4G beak was the beak. I needed a hug after seeing that thing the first time. The re-designed grille on the TL, was way more palatable. I still don't know if I like the 3D effect of it, and I think it's probably the weakest design element on the TLX, but at least it doesn't scare me.
Old 01-16-2014, 10:31 PM
  #772  
Burning Brakes
 
Timmy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mebane, North Carolina
Posts: 1,103
Received 463 Likes on 197 Posts
^^I got you!! lol


Narrow the grill opening, give the beak more curvature, keep the two ends of the beak level with the headlights to create the 'flow' to the other. There should also be a slight 'V' crease in the upper portion of the grill trim to help keep the front end looking hunkered down and translates the middle vertical crease in the bumper, through the grill and up into the hood.

Overall design should mimic the Vmoda logo.
Old 01-16-2014, 10:47 PM
  #773  
Burning Brakes
 
Timmy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mebane, North Carolina
Posts: 1,103
Received 463 Likes on 197 Posts
Originally Posted by ostrich
Please pardon me but that brownish colour is almost like the poopy colour that the last generation Lexus ES and Subaru Outback have.... I always wondered why people were so brave as to picking a car in a colour that has personal sanitation associations.... LOL But I have to say that yours is much better!
Pardoned!

And I think I honestly should have made it a tad bit less saturated to give it a more silverish bronze rather than poopy bronze. I was trying to bring back DMM and CBP (Carbon Bronze Pearl) in a 'deep modern way'.. but left it a bit too saturated. My fault, should have double checked the color resemblance.
Old 01-16-2014, 11:33 PM
  #774  
Summer is Coming
 
Rocket_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,857
Received 647 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocketsfan
I'm still not a fan of the Acura "corporate grille", but I'm also not a fan of calling it "the beak" anymore. The original 4G beak was the beak. I needed a hug after seeing that thing the first time. The re-designed grille on the TL, was way more palatable. I still don't know if I like the 3D effect of it, and I think it's probably the weakest design element on the TLX, but at least it doesn't scare me.
I was going to say the same thing, but you said it better. I agree 100%. The 09 TL grill for me is the only 'beak.' Just take a look from the side and the hook from the top reminds me of a bird of prey's beak. But after the re-design it is no longer the beak to me. I don't find it offensive one bit. I think some like to pile on the beak fiasco, but the beak is no more. Move on.
The following 2 users liked this post by Rocket_man:
a35tl (01-17-2014), TeamAcura (01-17-2014)
Old 01-16-2014, 11:36 PM
  #775  
Summer is Coming
 
Rocket_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,857
Received 647 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by photog
Not the easiest thing to do with that grill being such a mess, but here's a quick attempt
Nice job. I'd love to see this version with the Acura logo centered top to bottom. Maybe a little larger too.
Old 01-16-2014, 11:48 PM
  #776  
David_Dude
 
Acura_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 13,283
Received 581 Likes on 515 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocketsfan
I'm still not a fan of the Acura "corporate grille", but I'm also not a fan of calling it "the beak" anymore. The original 4G beak was the beak. I needed a hug after seeing that thing the first time. The re-designed grille on the TL, was way more palatable. I still don't know if I like the 3D effect of it, and I think it's probably the weakest design element on the TLX, but at least it doesn't scare me.
Old 01-17-2014, 12:00 AM
  #777  
an adult perspective
 
Six Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: York, Pa
Age: 71
Posts: 1,784
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Timmy18
Wheel base extension and recolor.
how about one without the rear doors?
Old 01-17-2014, 12:44 AM
  #778  
Banned
 
Tommy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
A lot of Lexus IS and BMW 3 Series forum users saying this could be a legitimate threat to them.
Old 01-17-2014, 12:46 AM
  #779  
Banned
 
Tommy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
This could boost Acura back to the days of the 3G in terms of sales.
I really do see this car finishing top 2 against it's segment of Q/S60/3/IS/A4/ATS.
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (01-17-2014)
Old 01-17-2014, 12:49 AM
  #780  
Burning Brakes
 
boe_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southern, CA
Age: 57
Posts: 892
Received 105 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by Steven Bell
It doesn't look too much like the '09 beak anymore....
Yeah - it is a whole new kind of ugly. JK. I think if you dislike the beak as so many of us do, it wouldn't matter if it had pink ribbons on it - it is still be beak no matter how much some people think cutting a half inch off the top changes everything.
Old 01-17-2014, 12:54 AM
  #781  
Banned
 
Tommy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
This is an amazing car. I'm going to convince everybody in my Frat to sell their G37's and get into a TLX instead of Q50.
Old 01-17-2014, 12:56 AM
  #782  
2G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
Originally Posted by Tommy8888
This could boost Acura back to the days of the 3G in terms of sales.
I really do see this car finishing top 2 against it's segment of Q/S60/3/IS/A4/ATS.

Sales will be dictated by how Acura decides to price the TLX's.

The RLX is also a very good car, except that Acura decides to give it an unreasonably high MSRP. So the RLX flops.

Similarly, factory pricing will make or break the TLX.
Old 01-17-2014, 01:14 AM
  #783  
Banned
 
Tommy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Sales will be dictated by how Acura decides to price the TLX's.

The RLX is also a very good car, except that Acura decides to give it an unreasonably high MSRP. So the RLX flops.

Similarly, factory pricing will make or break the TLX.
But that's a bit different. The RLX is against competition which is brutal.
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...ry-Large-Cars/
Look at this segment..it's usually pitted against. The RLX have little to no chance.

The TL/TLX meanwhile is in a segment that includes:
Q50/3/ATS/IS/A4/S60 etc.......... This makes it much easier.

http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/audi_a4_2014

You look at the 'other choices' +the A4.. That is a segment the TLX did very well in with the 3G.. and could do very well in again.
Old 01-17-2014, 01:45 AM
  #784  
2G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
However, if Acura decides to go crazy like for the RLX, and starts pricing the TLX to be way above the Q50/3/ATS/IS/A4/S60 etc..., then the TLX will NOT be doing well again.
Old 01-17-2014, 02:18 AM
  #785  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
jbond2099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Age: 38
Posts: 178
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts
i want to see the inside
Old 01-17-2014, 02:44 AM
  #786  
Banned
 
Tommy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
However, if Acura decides to go crazy like for the RLX, and starts pricing the TLX to be way above the Q50/3/ATS/IS/A4/S60 etc..., then the TLX will NOT be doing well again.
I don't think they will. (History has proven they will stay around that range).

I'm curious because I don't know the RLX that well.
But isn't the RLX made to compete against the GS/5 Series?(Obviously failing but isn't that the purpose)

Anyways I just think that Acura/Infiniti will not have success in the 5 series bracket(Price wise) regardless of how great the cars are.

SUVs/Lexus ES/LS Price Bracket is where they could be big threats.

You are of course 100% right. If the TLX goes above the A4/Q50 Bracket in price.. it will fail. I'm actually hoping the TLX lowers itself into the S60 Bracket. I think 32k Starting-40kish.
But I don't know if Acura will go down to 32k for the TLX.
I think for 31-32k Starting Price.. that will create a huge number of lease/buys. Sounds a bit too low though for it to be legitimate.
Old 01-17-2014, 02:45 AM
  #787  
Banned
 
Tommy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
(Lexus ES/IS)
Old 01-17-2014, 04:04 AM
  #788  
Intermediate
 
121traffic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Tommy8888
This is an amazing car. I'm going to convince everybody in my Frat to sell their G37's and get into a TLX instead of Q50.
Old 01-17-2014, 05:33 AM
  #789  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
All it means that way is the advertised horsepower is exactly that pure advertising with little relation to reality. Its a major league in this area for "sports sedans" what ever they are. 3L BMW is rated at 300HP generally runs at 275WHP on a Dynojet. My 335is N54 version stock is rated at 320HP generally runs at 319/321WHP on a dynojet.

My other one a 135is with an N55 engine is also rated at 320HP but runs around 295WHP on a dynojet.

Just some more random numbers G37 = 305whp & Genesis coupe = 280whp. M3 V8 414HP = 365WHP. The Mustang 414HP Coyote does about 394WHP. I have a Ford Racing Crate 420HP Coyote for the Cobra, will be interesting to see what it actually has.

Common thread is across the board the Earth Dreams 3.5 is not yet putting out much power compared to its contemporaries, actually the G-37 & Hyundai numbers are older versions I had in my file from 2009..

Regarding the average 15% loss you are looking for, you are trying to measure two things you can't measure because there is no relationship between them. The 15% average spread is the difference between horsepower measured on an engine dyno vs. horsepower measured on a chassis dyno. Has nothing to do with what is put in the magazine adds or car brochures
So again, if it smells like crap, it is...

Also, underrating power is nothing new... been doing that since at least the 60's for a variety of reasons including Insurance Purposes. I just used those figures because they were stating x whp off of y crank hp so since the Honda numbers are known, you can make an educated guess as to what the others are doing as everyone suffers similar losses with the same basic drivelines.

the only reason I pointed it out in the first place was because a poster was being deceptive about the ratings of other players when comparing claimed 300hp
Old 01-17-2014, 08:15 AM
  #790  
Burning Brakes
 
TeamAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 1,175
Received 231 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocket_man
I was going to say the same thing, but you said it better. I agree 100%. The 09 TL grill for me is the only 'beak.' Just take a look from the side and the hook from the top reminds me of a bird of prey's beak. But after the re-design it is no longer the beak to me. I don't find it offensive one bit. I think some like to pile on the beak fiasco, but the beak is no more. Move on.
I agree! It is now more of a shield personally. But it's here to stay, this is their signature grille and they are sticking with it. If you don't like it, don't buy an Acura. I like this much better than what seems to be trend with other manufacturers; wide/open mouth grilles that extends all the way down to the lower front bumper.
The following users liked this post:
a35tl (01-17-2014)
Old 01-17-2014, 08:27 AM
  #791  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
However, if Acura decides to go crazy like for the RLX, and starts pricing the TLX to be way above ....
The TLX is an American car built in America for Americans. I doubt it would have the RLX's pricing issue. (But what do I know.)

The RLX is an issue because it is imported, and because at the time that the MSRP was being established, the yen was worth more than it is now. If they could manage to suck it up and alter the MSRP of the RLX to reflect more the current dollar/yen ratio, then they might be able to leverage the outstanding value presented by the RLX.

That is to say, by the time you got to December 2013 it was very common to only pay 52,200 for the 2014 RLX Advance before taxes. I doubt they'd drop the MSRP that far down, but a serious address of the MSRP of the RLX would start moving them faster.

That's if they want to move them faster. There's every indication that they do not, necessarily. One of those indicators is a relative lack of production capacity for the RLX.

One of the bigger failures in Honda history is the 2002 (EP3) Civic Si. It ran its model year through 2005 as scheduled, but it was a miserable sales failure because they could never find a way to address the problem the dollar faces against Sterling. The EP3 was built in Swindon, and both labor and currency trade issues made the car MSRP very close to 20,000 when the car's competitors were selling for more like 16,000. At the level of a Civic, 4K is a lot of money for young people to worry about.

They didn't fly off the dealer lots until Honda sucked it up and gave dealers enough money to get the sticker down to 15,995. But Honda took the loss on that one, out of their world wide profits. The value of the pound remained high against the dollar through the model's tenure, and it was simply an operational and strategic mistake on Honda's part.
Old 01-17-2014, 08:59 AM
  #792  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
^ For 60K RLX should have 2 more cylinders... That's IS-F territory pricing...
Old 01-17-2014, 09:11 AM
  #793  
Racer
 
kevTL888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: san gabriel, ca
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by YeuEmMaiMai
^ For 60K RLX should have 2 more cylinders... That's IS-F territory pricing...
yeah, but to be fair, no one's paying sticker for RLX nowadays, you can get one with navigation for around 45k brand new according to carsdirect
Old 01-17-2014, 09:14 AM
  #794  
Burning Brakes
 
012TL-GLM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Not far enough from Chicago
Age: 45
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 190 Likes on 119 Posts
I can guarantee the TLX sales will be strong. I bought my TL back in Oct. 2011 (Its a '12 SH-AWD w/tech). When I told my friends they were less than impressed. Once they saw it in person they thought it was ok...Once they drove it they LOVED it. Then I tinted the windows, and painted the front grill, vastly improving the looks to everyone's agreement.

After the TLX was shown, they're all loving the new body style. Acura passed the first test, if the aesthetics are good, the rest is easy. I'm not worried about the interior and power. It will be at least what we have now, and most likely a little quicker. The sticker on my car was around $45K, and I think if they stay in that realm they'll move quick. Kudos Acura, I think you're going to keep me out of an Audi for a few more years
Old 01-17-2014, 09:14 AM
  #795  
Racer
 
nothome17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 44
Posts: 424
Received 69 Likes on 40 Posts
It's inconceivable to me that they continue trying to make this derpy chrome V shield thing work. It's been horrible forever. They need a new idea...
Old 01-17-2014, 09:21 AM
  #796  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
the belt is much better looking than the beak imho...
Old 01-17-2014, 09:21 AM
  #797  
David_Dude
 
Acura_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 13,283
Received 581 Likes on 515 Posts
Originally Posted by George Knighton
The TLX is an American car built in America for Americans. I doubt it would have the RLX's pricing issue. (But what do I know.)

The RLX is an issue because it is imported, and because at the time that the MSRP was being established, the yen was worth more than it is now. If they could manage to suck it up and alter the MSRP of the RLX to reflect more the current dollar/yen ratio, then they might be able to leverage the outstanding value presented by the RLX.

That is to say, by the time you got to December 2013 it was very common to only pay 52,200 for the 2014 RLX Advance before taxes. I doubt they'd drop the MSRP that far down, but a serious address of the MSRP of the RLX would start moving them faster.

That's if they want to move them faster. There's every indication that they do not, necessarily. One of those indicators is a relative lack of production capacity for the RLX.

One of the bigger failures in Honda history is the 2002 (EP3) Civic Si. It ran its model year through 2005 as scheduled, but it was a miserable sales failure because they could never find a way to address the problem the dollar faces against Sterling. The EP3 was built in Swindon, and both labor and currency trade issues made the car MSRP very close to 20,000 when the car's competitors were selling for more like 16,000. At the level of a Civic, 4K is a lot of money for young people to worry about.

They didn't fly off the dealer lots until Honda sucked it up and gave dealers enough money to get the sticker down to 15,995. But Honda took the loss on that one, out of their world wide profits. The value of the pound remained high against the dollar through the model's tenure, and it was simply an operational and strategic mistake on Honda's part.
I haven't really looked into it, but isn't the Dollar gaining on the Yen? If so wouldn't that help with profits? I know a few years ago Honda wasn't making much money, if anything on the TSX after importing it to the States because of the Yen was much stronger than the Dollar. I'm no economics major at ALL so I may be way off base here, but it was a thought.
Old 01-17-2014, 09:34 AM
  #798  
Burning Brakes
 
Timmy18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mebane, North Carolina
Posts: 1,103
Received 463 Likes on 197 Posts
Originally Posted by Six Shifter
how about one without the rear doors?
Old 01-17-2014, 09:55 AM
  #799  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
That works a lot better than the attempt an an RLX Coupe, but you still can't shorten the wheelbase. That makes any coupe problematic.
Old 01-17-2014, 09:58 AM
  #800  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
I think there's going to be a huge price spread. Although I keep thinking of it as a TL replacement, it's also got to cover the TSX range as well. I think 32K to 45K usd.
I would think more like $33k to $50k, given the current pricing of the TSX and the TL and accounting for the typical cost increase between model years as well as the increase in equipment.

Am hoping for a 2.4L 8DCT (although would really prefer the 6MT) FWD w/ P-AWS and Tech Package (navi, BLIS, LDW, power folding mirrors, 19-inch wheels) for somewhere around the $38k mark. With at least 220 hp and comparable torque, I think that would be competitive enough against the smaller engines in the class while still undercutting their price by a few thousand dollars.


Quick Reply: 2015 TLX is official!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.