New Acl Clan Rules
#1
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New ACL Clan Rules
We need to all agree on these, but these are my thoughts and thoughts of others that were brought to my attention.
1. you TEAM KILL on purpose when the round is still ACTIVE... YOUR GONE... no questions asked... VOTED OUT of GAME!!
2-A. If we have multi players on to start the war... FIRST COME FIRST SERVE... if your late.. YOU SIT OUT!!
2-B. LOWEST score when we have multiple players online waiting to play... YOU SIT... NO questions asked
3. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE to be in a CLAN game on this message board before the OFFICIAL CLAN GAME begins the game... YOU DO NOT PLAY if we have multiple players on..
discuss below
1. you TEAM KILL on purpose when the round is still ACTIVE... YOUR GONE... no questions asked... VOTED OUT of GAME!!
2-A. If we have multi players on to start the war... FIRST COME FIRST SERVE... if your late.. YOU SIT OUT!!
2-B. LOWEST score when we have multiple players online waiting to play... YOU SIT... NO questions asked
3. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE to be in a CLAN game on this message board before the OFFICIAL CLAN GAME begins the game... YOU DO NOT PLAY if we have multiple players on..
discuss below
#2
still a Masshole
Re: New ACL Clan Rules
Smitty, I agree with all except the last one. I propose the following amended version:
3. IF YOU VOTE to be in a CLAN game on this message board before the OFFICIAL CLAN GAME begins then YOU MUST SHOW UP TO PLAY.
The reason I say this is that in some cases people might not know (or be available) to play until game time. On the other hand if you say you are in I think you are responsible for showing up.
Good list by the way.
3. IF YOU VOTE to be in a CLAN game on this message board before the OFFICIAL CLAN GAME begins then YOU MUST SHOW UP TO PLAY.
The reason I say this is that in some cases people might not know (or be available) to play until game time. On the other hand if you say you are in I think you are responsible for showing up.
Originally posted by Smitty
3. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE to be in a CLAN game on this message board before the OFFICIAL CLAN GAME begins the game... YOU DO NOT PLAY if we have multiple players on..
3. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE to be in a CLAN game on this message board before the OFFICIAL CLAN GAME begins the game... YOU DO NOT PLAY if we have multiple players on..
#3
Senior Moderator
I agree 90%... Everything except the voting part..
And to add to 2B-it should go in this order for this rule
1) Least amount of kills sits...
2) Most deaths sits - for tiebreaker
And to add to 2B-it should go in this order for this rule
1) Least amount of kills sits...
2) Most deaths sits - for tiebreaker
#4
still a Masshole
Originally posted by Jonesi
I agree 90%... Everything except the voting part..
And to add to 2B-it should go in this order for this rule
1) Least amount of kills sits...
2) Most deaths sits - for tiebreaker
I agree 90%... Everything except the voting part..
And to add to 2B-it should go in this order for this rule
1) Least amount of kills sits...
2) Most deaths sits - for tiebreaker
#5
Senior Moderator
I thought about that, and the least amount of kills makes more sense.. Otherwise people could point whore and it wouldn't solve anything except the person that point whored the least would have to leave..
Edit - And that would not encourage better play..
Edit - And that would not encourage better play..
#6
still a Masshole
Originally posted by Jonesi
I thought about that, and the least amount of kills makes more sense.. Otherwise people could point whore and it wouldn't solve anything except the person that point whored the least would have to leave..
Edit - And that would not encourage better play..
I thought about that, and the least amount of kills makes more sense.. Otherwise people could point whore and it wouldn't solve anything except the person that point whored the least would have to leave..
Edit - And that would not encourage better play..
#7
Senior Moderator
It is known and it should be a rule that we ALWAYS stat and/or roll in atleast groups of 2.. No one is to do their own thing. Exception to the rule would be snipers or someone covering the base..
Trending Topics
#8
The Creator
Originally posted by Jonesi
It is known and it should be a rule that we ALWAYS stat and/or roll in atleast groups of 2.. No one is to do their own thing. Exception to the rule would be snipers or someone covering the base..
It is known and it should be a rule that we ALWAYS stat and/or roll in atleast groups of 2.. No one is to do their own thing. Exception to the rule would be snipers or someone covering the base..
Ya.
I also think people need to stick to their rolls.
Every team needs a sniper... we always think we have one with one of the steve's.......... but then they stop randomly.
#10
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had this gut feeling that if we did not resolve this we would of had a hard time getting 8 people for a war..
I agree with Feriz... points should play a role in it... If I have the bomb, I try to avoid the action and go plant it... so if I know there heat on the left I run to the right with the bomb... So why should I sit because I have 60 points 2 kills and 6 deaths and won the game for the team at the time?....
I agree with Feriz... points should play a role in it... If I have the bomb, I try to avoid the action and go plant it... so if I know there heat on the left I run to the right with the bomb... So why should I sit because I have 60 points 2 kills and 6 deaths and won the game for the team at the time?....
#11
The Creator
Whatever. theres no concrete rule and nothing up for debate...
eveeyrone knows who played the poorest.
if someone has 2 kills, 10 deaths..... but they won 3 rounds. youll know because they wont have a low ass score.
if someone has 2 kills 10 deaths and 12 points........ you know they sux0red.
this really isnt rocket science here folks!
eveeyrone knows who played the poorest.
if someone has 2 kills, 10 deaths..... but they won 3 rounds. youll know because they wont have a low ass score.
if someone has 2 kills 10 deaths and 12 points........ you know they sux0red.
this really isnt rocket science here folks!
#12
Senior Moderator
That is a different case scenario.. Sure we'll take that into account..
In that case IMO it should be left up to the leader/co-leader to make the call. Along with each round the L/CL needs to look at the stats and say "Jonesi, you're sitting this round, you had the worst score.."
In that case IMO it should be left up to the leader/co-leader to make the call. Along with each round the L/CL needs to look at the stats and say "Jonesi, you're sitting this round, you had the worst score.."
#14
still a Masshole
Originally posted by Jonesi
In that case IMO it should be left up to the leader/co-leader to make the call. Along with each round the L/CL needs to look at the stats and say "Jonesi, you're sitting this round, you had the worst score.."
In that case IMO it should be left up to the leader/co-leader to make the call. Along with each round the L/CL needs to look at the stats and say "Jonesi, you're sitting this round, you had the worst score.."
I think Smitty and I agree and you and soopa agree. I just don't think its as clear cut. Maybe we should have a vote or a poll.
#15
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jonesi
In that case IMO it should be left up to the leader/co-leader to make the call.
In that case IMO it should be left up to the leader/co-leader to make the call.
#16
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by ferizzo
Jonesi I have to disagree only because thats not entirely fair either (sorry to disagree so much). Because at some point lets say I have 40 points (5 kills 6 deaths) and you have 35 (7 kills, 5 deaths) but I planted the bomb twice (or whatever) then we have a dilemna. In my scenario I should play, in yours you....but knowing/admitting you are a better player than me the leaders will choose you to stay (to help us win the next game)....not necessarily a bad thing but is it fair that I should leave? I guess no matter which of the three we pick its unfair one way or another. In my eyes I am rarily at the bottom or the top point wise but I never get the huge number of kills (but every once in a while I help win a game or two).
I think Smitty and I agree and you and soopa agree. I just don't think its as clear cut. Maybe we should have a vote or a poll.
Jonesi I have to disagree only because thats not entirely fair either (sorry to disagree so much). Because at some point lets say I have 40 points (5 kills 6 deaths) and you have 35 (7 kills, 5 deaths) but I planted the bomb twice (or whatever) then we have a dilemna. In my scenario I should play, in yours you....but knowing/admitting you are a better player than me the leaders will choose you to stay (to help us win the next game)....not necessarily a bad thing but is it fair that I should leave? I guess no matter which of the three we pick its unfair one way or another. In my eyes I am rarily at the bottom or the top point wise but I never get the huge number of kills (but every once in a while I help win a game or two).
I think Smitty and I agree and you and soopa agree. I just don't think its as clear cut. Maybe we should have a vote or a poll.
If you are in the top for points, other then breach whoring, you won't be left out.. If anyone wins us 2 rounds I can garuntee you won't be gone.. Don't worry it will be more clear cut than you're anticipating..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
5
09-28-2015 06:51 PM
bshotts
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
0
08-30-2015 02:08 PM