Fastest N/A Time for 3.2 CLS 6 Speed
06-26-2007, 10:30 AM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fastest N/A Time for 3.2 CLS 6 Speed
Who on here has the faster track time for a N/A 3.2 CLS-6, and what was the time?
when I say 3.2 N/A, i mean all mods are bolt ons, NO 3.5 build. NO Nitrous, NO turbo.
I want to know what time I should be shooting to get to and beat to have the fastest track time for a CLS-6
spare me the negative comments about our cars not being track cars blah blah blah when the truth is if half of you all would learn how to drive your car or even invest in some better street tires you would all be running good times. Hense im cutting consistant 2.0 to 2.1 60fts because i know to run my car and i dont have the cheap tires that came wit the car, but i have Yokohama AS430s on my wheels that I dont know how good they are but seem to be doing better than what others have.
when I say 3.2 N/A, i mean all mods are bolt ons, NO 3.5 build. NO Nitrous, NO turbo.
I want to know what time I should be shooting to get to and beat to have the fastest track time for a CLS-6
spare me the negative comments about our cars not being track cars blah blah blah when the truth is if half of you all would learn how to drive your car or even invest in some better street tires you would all be running good times. Hense im cutting consistant 2.0 to 2.1 60fts because i know to run my car and i dont have the cheap tires that came wit the car, but i have Yokohama AS430s on my wheels that I dont know how good they are but seem to be doing better than what others have.
06-26-2007, 11:25 AM
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by All Mine
The one I know of so far is Joe5.0, he hit 13.9 and his car is stock. I'm sure there's a couple others that I'm forgetting about.
06-26-2007, 11:43 AM
#5
Drifting
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
his car is not stock, he has an ice box and though you will think its not much but its the only reason he ran 13.9 along with his good tires
Trending Topics
06-26-2007, 12:33 PM
#8
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
allmotor_2000
'03 CL-S 6spd (NA), 13.572 @ 102.65
'03 CL-S 6spd (NA), 13.572 @ 102.65
06-26-2007, 12:35 PM
#9
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
ummmmmmm I said NO 3.5...STOCK block 3.2 motors only. I knew someone was going to through a 3.5 in here even though my original post clearly says NO 3.5
seriously though, who are you? you are annoying.
06-26-2007, 01:08 PM
#11
Originally Posted by blk2001tlon19s
all motor isn't a 3.5. He was a j32a2 that was NA but had something done to his intake manifold but I can't recall what it was.
06-26-2007, 01:11 PM
#12
I'm a Vagiterian.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home of FreakNick.
Age: 39
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
his car is not stock, he has an ice box and though you will think its not much but its the only reason he ran 13.9 along with his good tires
Ice Box doesn't do that much. Sure, it does gain a little power, but you also said NA, you didn't say completely stock.
06-26-2007, 01:13 PM
#13
318whp/289wtq @ 6psi
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Accokeek, Maryland
Age: 44
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
he had an extrude honed intake manifold which he hand ported the intake port, and he had a custom throttle body.
Yeah, I couldn't remember what it was exactly(disappeared from the forums for a while)
06-26-2007, 02:06 PM
#15
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by All Mine
Also the fact that he's a good driver as well.. I'm sure that didn't help much either. Ice Box doesn't do that much. Sure, it does gain a little power, but you also said NA, you didn't say completely stock.
Ice Box doesn't do that much. Sure, it does gain a little power, but you also said NA, you didn't say completely stock.STOCK is STOCK, NOT..."JUST AN INTAKE"
06-26-2007, 02:09 PM
#16
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
his car is not stock, he has an ice box and though you will think its not much but its the only reason he ran 13.9 along with his good tires
to date with with my conversion ive run a 13.9 (all motor) with snow tires
06-26-2007, 02:11 PM
#17
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
STOCK is STOCK, NOT..."JUST AN INTAKE"
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
Who on here has the faster track time for a N/A 3.2 CLS-6, and what was the time?
when I say 3.2 N/A, i mean all mods are bolt ons, NO 3.5 build. NO Nitrous, NO turbo.
I want to know what time I should be shooting to get to and beat to have the fastest track time for a CLS-6
spare me the negative comments about our cars not being track cars blah blah blah when the truth is if half of you all would learn how to drive your car or even invest in some better street tires you would all be running good times. Hense im cutting consistant 2.0 to 2.1 60fts because i know to run my car and i dont have the cheap tires that came wit the car, but i have Yokohama AS430s on my wheels that I dont know how good they are but seem to be doing better than what others have.
when I say 3.2 N/A, i mean all mods are bolt ons, NO 3.5 build. NO Nitrous, NO turbo.
I want to know what time I should be shooting to get to and beat to have the fastest track time for a CLS-6
spare me the negative comments about our cars not being track cars blah blah blah when the truth is if half of you all would learn how to drive your car or even invest in some better street tires you would all be running good times. Hense im cutting consistant 2.0 to 2.1 60fts because i know to run my car and i dont have the cheap tires that came wit the car, but i have Yokohama AS430s on my wheels that I dont know how good they are but seem to be doing better than what others have.
06-26-2007, 02:14 PM
#18
TQ > MPG
Like stated in the thread earlier I ran 13.9 @ 98.5 mph with CT intake, lightweight 17's up front with 225 BFG DR's, no spare/jack, and no pass seat. IIRC i had like a 1/2 tank of gas tho, which hurt me, and I couldnt do a burnout because they didnt have water for FWD's, you have to back in the water box. I did have my 19's out back since I had sold the stock 17's, so I'm sure that hurt me a little also.
Your mph is good enough to run 13.6's if you really hook and can drive. Those are the variables that will make your car fast in the 1/4.
Your mph is good enough to run 13.6's if you really hook and can drive. Those are the variables that will make your car fast in the 1/4.
06-26-2007, 02:21 PM
#19
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by All Mine
The one I know of so far is Joe5.0, he hit 13.9 and his car is stock. I'm sure there's a couple others that I'm forgetting about.
when im saying STOCK, im responding to this post because he says Joe5.0 ran 13.9 stock but he he wasnt. I am still asking to know the fastest N/A full 3.2 motor 6 Speed, just was responding to that particular post.
06-26-2007, 02:32 PM
#20
TQ > MPG
What does it really matter? Just run your car and see how it does. Just because someone on here is the fastest mod for mod doesnt mean its the fastest in the nation. Plus theres too many variables like weather, track prep, track accuracy, and altitude to say anything definitive about 1/4 times, unless you are racing side by side.
06-26-2007, 02:43 PM
#21
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe5.0
What does it really matter? Just run your car and see how it does. Just because someone on here is the fastest mod for mod doesnt mean its the fastest in the nation. Plus theres too many variables like weather, track prep, track accuracy, and altitude to say anything definitive about 1/4 times, unless you are racing side by side.
06-26-2007, 02:54 PM
#22
TQ > MPG
You know I didnt mean a full 1 second difference, that should be obvious.
It just seems you're trying to have some title, that IMO doesnt mean a whole lot since the times are so close.
If you run 13.6 @ 101, then you'll have without a doubt the fastest bolt-on 6 speed on the forum, but if its within like a tenth or less for all purposes its the same time. Plus, more important is being able to back up your times with very similar times. Running a 13.6 then never being able to replicate it doesnt really prove a whole lot either.
I understand wanting to have a great 1/4 time, and the fun associated in trying to improve your driving skills and car performance. But just remember that someone will ALWAYS be faster than you, and that at the end of the day you drive a glorified Accord with some power.
It just seems you're trying to have some title, that IMO doesnt mean a whole lot since the times are so close.
If you run 13.6 @ 101, then you'll have without a doubt the fastest bolt-on 6 speed on the forum, but if its within like a tenth or less for all purposes its the same time. Plus, more important is being able to back up your times with very similar times. Running a 13.6 then never being able to replicate it doesnt really prove a whole lot either.
I understand wanting to have a great 1/4 time, and the fun associated in trying to improve your driving skills and car performance. But just remember that someone will ALWAYS be faster than you, and that at the end of the day you drive a glorified Accord with some power.
06-26-2007, 07:28 PM
#25
TQ > MPG
Originally Posted by SIRSIG
<---- glorified Accord w/ some power 
i agree on what Joe5.0 said...
i agree on what Joe5.0 said...
Heck I pretty much have a 1979 Fairlane with 500hp and a slightly improved interior. I still like it though.
06-27-2007, 02:21 AM
#27
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thevikas87
LOL thanks, somone had to say it 
seriously, who are you??? some little 19 year old thats still wet behind the ears. Get outta here.
06-27-2007, 02:43 AM
#28
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
he had an extrude honed intake manifold which he hand ported the intake port, and he had a custom throttle body.
He was also running 16" slicks and open exhaust.
06-27-2007, 02:47 AM
#29
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by CLS6SpeedNupe
seriously, who are you??? some little 19 year old thats still wet behind the ears. Get outta here.
You're very abrasive around here lately which I'm sure is why multiple members have called you out on it.
If you have to resort to picking on the guy because of his age then you really have no business responding to him at all... You (and I) are only 5 years older than him; it's not as if you have decades of knowledge and experience which would some how validate you referring to him as "wet behind the ears."
06-27-2007, 07:24 AM
#31
Originally Posted by thevikas87
LOL thanks, somone had to say it
06-27-2007, 09:50 AM
#33
The Case Worker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why ask a question when you're just going to make some sharp-tongued remark to everyone? People aren't going to give you any responses if you're doing that.
So why don't you just let people make their responses and use the ones that are good and just not respond to the ones you don't like, or respond in an appropriate manner. You're being obnoxious when no one here is out to get you, we're just trying to help answer your question.
So why don't you just let people make their responses and use the ones that are good and just not respond to the ones you don't like, or respond in an appropriate manner. You're being obnoxious when no one here is out to get you, we're just trying to help answer your question.
06-27-2007, 10:55 AM
#34
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3.2CLS
Why ask a question when you're just going to make some sharp-tongued remark to everyone? People aren't going to give you any responses if you're doing that.
So why don't you just let people make their responses and use the ones that are good and just not respond to the ones you don't like, or respond in an appropriate manner. You're being obnoxious when no one here is out to get you, we're just trying to help answer your question.
So why don't you just let people make their responses and use the ones that are good and just not respond to the ones you don't like, or respond in an appropriate manner. You're being obnoxious when no one here is out to get you, we're just trying to help answer your question.
and you are?
06-27-2007, 01:29 PM
#35
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
i thought he also had 15x9.5 drag wheels or something ridiculous like that, or did that not work out?
I don't think 15's will clear our brakes. His slicks were definitely 16"s
06-27-2007, 05:51 PM
#38
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by JBlueCLS6
I agree... This guy is just as annoying as acuraCLtypeS09 (Whatever that ugly kid was that stole pictures of other peoples cars and claimed it was his.)
06-27-2007, 05:54 PM
#39
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by JBlueCLS6
I agree... This guy is just as annoying as acuraCLtypeS09 (Whatever that ugly kid was that stole pictures of other peoples cars and claimed it was his.)