CL-S Back From The Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2007, 06:50 PM
  #1  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL-S Back From The Track

A bit dissapointed, best run of the day was 14.485 @ 98.30 with a 2.300 60ft

Mods at the time are AEM CAI, XS Header, UR SS Pulleys, 2.5in Catback and a AFC tune with the NEO.

I think my 60ft is messing my times up, is 2.3 about right?

Track veterans please chime in, im brake torquing at 2k with practically no spin just grabbing, gateshifting at 7000rpm.
Old 11-01-2007, 06:54 PM
  #2  
Your mom is in
iTrader: (2)
 
thevikas87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 36
Posts: 1,762
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
hmmm
Old 11-01-2007, 06:58 PM
  #3  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thevikas87
hmmm
is that it? LOL hmmmmm
Old 11-01-2007, 07:19 PM
  #4  
Don't Mess With Texas
 
cltypeSLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: austin tx
Age: 38
Posts: 4,600
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
try no brake torqueing. i always felt that worked better in my few runs at the track.
Old 11-01-2007, 07:42 PM
  #5  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you don't brake torque you dont get that big of a jump... btw my trap is 98.3mph, I should be running 14.1-14.2 with a trap that high right?
Old 11-01-2007, 07:46 PM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
2.3 is bad. Lower that 60 & your times will improve. Your exhaust may also be robbing the car of low end power.
Old 11-01-2007, 07:52 PM
  #7  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know they will improve but I have no idea how to get a better 60ft, my launches were perfect? I stalled at 2k and barely spun at the launch, 1st gear felt so long even though I had it to the floor.... like my car has no torque AT ALL!

Another thing that is bugging the shit out of me is my transmission, the previous owner said it was replaced by one of his friends at the Acura dealership so I assume that I have the new PCM that is less aggressive and that was robbing me of my power but I called the local Acura dealership and they said it has never been changed before...... I WANT MY OLD PCM BACK! even my dyno numbers seem low hinting that my car isn't making the power that it should from the factory... what to do...
Old 11-01-2007, 08:42 PM
  #8  
Three Wheelin'
 
AARONSredTYPE-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: S.W. FLORIDA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,315
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
maybe the rims are slowing you down? you still ran decent though having an auto, and basic boltons. definately wouldnt torque brake your car though. it makes the tranny go crrrrazy...lol...try just gunning it with the vsa off and sport shift and see what happens
Old 11-01-2007, 08:46 PM
  #9  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
meh torque breaking seems the most efficient though... gunning it at a stop with VSA off = 3 second 60ft times.
Old 11-01-2007, 09:12 PM
  #10  
Don't Mess With Texas
 
cltypeSLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: austin tx
Age: 38
Posts: 4,600
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gc86
meh torque breaking seems the most efficient though... gunning it at a stop with VSA off = 3 second 60ft times.
exactly.
dont gun it.
Old 11-01-2007, 09:16 PM
  #11  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
i always stalled it to 3K... BTW zero wheel spin is required for the optimal run... ive done 1.9 60's on street tires
Old 11-01-2007, 09:27 PM
  #12  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6spd typeR? what mods 1.9 is crazy, my buddies evo8 gets 1.8

And I wasn't gunning it at the launch until I knew that the tires grabbed.
Old 11-01-2007, 09:59 PM
  #13  
Racer
 
cl8trr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Laguna , So-cal
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
try to re-tune,maybe they did not do their job right?
Old 11-01-2007, 10:04 PM
  #14  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah they did, dyno sheets prove it. Theres not very much they can do tuning with a AFC.
Old 11-01-2007, 10:11 PM
  #15  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
Track & weather come into play as well. What pressure were your tires at? & what size/brand are they? Those 18's may be slowing you down if they weigh a lot. Just cause they are SSR copies don't mean they have the same SSR weight(light)
Old 11-01-2007, 11:07 PM
  #16  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im running Bridgestone S0-3 Pole Positions 225/40/18 and the tire pressure was lowered after a few runs resulting in a .3 drop in time. Im not quite sure of the weight on these 18s, they are made by Exel though.
Old 11-01-2007, 11:33 PM
  #17  
4drs just wanna have fun!
iTrader: (1)
 
Accord_V6_400m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,268
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well how do you think I feel running 14.3's with a 102.X trap Traction kills

Part of your problem is the sidewall stiffness and lack of flex. Those 40 sidewall tires wont get you down the track quicker, trya thicker sidewall on a smaller rim. Ther have been times on the street when I managed to launch well on 205 tires on 16" steelies, back when the tires were new
Old 11-01-2007, 11:52 PM
  #18  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about some 225/45/17s with some lighter rims? what do you guys think... im prepping for next season.
Old 11-01-2007, 11:58 PM
  #19  
Moderator Alumnus
 
BigLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,125
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by gc86
6spd typeR? what mods 1.9 is crazy, my buddies evo8 gets 1.8

And I wasn't gunning it at the launch until I knew that the tires grabbed.
he's auto goofy...

He has a built 3.5L...check his sig in his profile.
Old 11-02-2007, 12:02 AM
  #20  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how the hell can you get a 1.9 60ft with street tires... what tires exactly? tips please typeR
Old 11-02-2007, 12:34 AM
  #21  
SOLD
 
NightRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakehood, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gc86
6spd typeR? what mods 1.9 is crazy, my buddies evo8 gets 1.8

And I wasn't gunning it at the launch until I knew that the tires grabbed.
Originally Posted by BigLizard
he's auto goofy...

He has a built 3.5L...check his sig in his profile.


Yeah definitely don't do the VSA off and gun, that way is guaranteed suck. When I had the 3G TL, a couple times having fun with other people at stoplights I left the VSA on, gunned it, and as soon as I felt no hop or spin turned it off. That seemed to produce fairly quick and full traction launches...could be worth a try? In my opinion torque-braking seems to bog things down whether VSA is on or not.
Old 11-02-2007, 12:42 AM
  #22  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
typeR do you torque brake the 3.5L beast?
Old 11-02-2007, 08:49 AM
  #23  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
You really should be running 235-40-18 or 235-45-17 to keep your stock rolling diameter.
Those tires may be messing with your gearing a little.
Old 11-02-2007, 12:26 PM
  #24  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow you're right I totally forgot about that, what about 225/50/17 or 225/45/18? thats still the stock rolling diameter right? 235 might not fit
Old 11-02-2007, 02:04 PM
  #25  
Well...it's kinda fast...
 
2CLean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Loovull, KY
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock diameter for 215/50/17 = 25.46in
Closest to stock in a 18" wheel is 235/40/18 = 25.40in

or

225/45/18 = 25.97in

or

225/40/18 = 25.08in

Anything larger than stock (within 0.5in) is gonna throw your speedo off by about 1-1.5mph (larger diameter = speedo reading < actual speed)
Old 11-02-2007, 02:15 PM
  #26  
Well...it's kinda fast...
 
2CLean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Loovull, KY
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI, the actual formula is:

[(cross section width x 0.aspect ratio) x 2 divided by 25.4] + wheel diameter = overall tire diameter in inches
Old 11-02-2007, 02:31 PM
  #27  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
Remember real word may differ since not all tires are the same.
Old 11-02-2007, 04:37 PM
  #28  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by gc86
typeR do you torque brake the 3.5L beast?
235/45/17 toyo T1-S on the SSR comp 17/8 +48 flash stalled to 3K
Old 11-02-2007, 07:42 PM
  #29  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
God I miss those T1S tires
Stupid toyo
Old 11-02-2007, 07:51 PM
  #30  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
God I miss those T1S tires
Stupid toyo
anyone try the T1-R
Old 11-02-2007, 10:37 PM
  #31  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
koni shocks and comptech springs will help w/the short times. ask steve or mattg for some driving lessons
Old 11-02-2007, 10:39 PM
  #32  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
weigh one of your tires. i'll bet they're pretty heavy.
Old 11-02-2007, 11:46 PM
  #33  
4drs just wanna have fun!
iTrader: (1)
 
Accord_V6_400m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,268
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Just get Nitto 555's or BF Goodrich KDW's
Old 11-03-2007, 01:38 AM
  #34  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think its time to add light weight tires/rims to the winter mod list.
Old 11-03-2007, 03:30 AM
  #35  
THE J35A2...
 
SIRSIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: L.A. SoCal
Age: 38
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gc86
Think its time to add light weight tires/rims to the winter mod list.
use them only on track, NOT on street. lighter rims make your car unstable on turns during wet/winter season...

try brake torqueing around 3k. when you hear your tire peeling a bit, gently let go off the gas. Once you gain traction push the gas pedal to the metal...

street tires psi should be 28-32 at the F and 40psi at the back. depend how sticky. if you have coilovers, put the F&R on stiff and raise the back a tad.
Old 11-03-2007, 08:30 AM
  #36  
i am so smart S M R T
 
01clsstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Age: 42
Posts: 630
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
so if this guy has a good launch with a good suspension what do you think he could run?
Old 11-03-2007, 04:02 PM
  #37  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I could get a 2.0 i'd be running a 13.9 easy, my trap is 98 mph
Old 11-03-2007, 10:19 PM
  #38  
Lead Footed
 
RUF87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Plano - Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 3,415
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
2.3 is bad. Lower that 60 & your times will improve. Your exhaust may also be robbing the car of low end power.
Most people don't know that you can end up with less HP/TQ on the lowend with headers. And adding even more exhaust capacity with a higher flow CAT and or backend exhaust system will hurt even more.

As far as power braking goes, every car is different, so you will have to play around with it. Sometimes you can end up loading up the plugs. When you power brake you are putting more fuel in to the cylinder that you would otherwise. Meaning for the same throttle position you have when power braking at 2000rpm, the engine rpms might actually be closer to 3000 or better.

I know this is how it worked when I built engines and raced years ago, so I don't know how much it applies to these engines.

Ruf
Old 11-04-2007, 12:06 AM
  #39  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
doubtful that you'll be running 2.0 60 foots w/o suspension mods.
Old 11-04-2007, 12:02 PM
  #40  
Advance
Thread Starter
 
gc86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike
doubtful that you'll be running 2.0 60 foots w/o suspension mods.
When you say suspension mods do you bean a coilover setup on the stiffest setting? Im on S-Techs with stock shocks and my cars front end lifts up a decent amount on WOT.


Quick Reply: CL-S Back From The Track



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.