What do you make of this video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2006, 03:54 PM
  #1  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
What do you make of this video

Z06 vs F430 (hope its not a repost)

Co-worker sent me this link claiming how the F430 can't keep up with a Z06. I don't nessessaraly doubt it but I don't thnk this particular F430 was pushing very hard? The video also makes it seem like the F430 is simply no match.

Thoughts?

Its long BTW

http://www.fastdrive.org/1/p/car-vid...view.1013.0.25
Old 11-22-2006, 04:08 PM
  #2  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Old 11-22-2006, 04:10 PM
  #3  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
It all depends on the drivers....and yea, it does not seem that the F430 driver was pushing his car hard.

<----Would take the F430 over the Z06 any day of the week.
Old 11-22-2006, 04:54 PM
  #4  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
i'm not buying it...looks staged
Old 11-22-2006, 05:11 PM
  #5  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh come ON

the F430 driver was NOT driving hard. Look dont get me wrong, the Z06 is an INCREDIBLE car for the price and I absolutely love it, but stock vs. stock it would never break down like that.
Old 11-22-2006, 05:33 PM
  #6  
mmmmmm....
 
S14 n Tsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 20,524
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts
he wasnt trying...
Old 11-22-2006, 05:36 PM
  #7  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
good lord I hate these vids hating on other cars and drivers.
Old 11-22-2006, 06:04 PM
  #8  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
it does not seem that the F430 driver was pushing his car hard.
The driver in the F430 seems to have coasted through many of the corners.
Old 11-22-2006, 06:53 PM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
daemonicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1/4 Vette = 11.7 @ 123 mph
1/4 F430 = 12.5 @ 116

Vette 0-150 mph = 17.7 s
F430 0-150 = 23.8 s

Vette 1.6-mile road course, lap time/mph = 1:15.85 / 75.9
F430 1.6-mile road course, lap time/mph = 1:18.20 / 73.7

Clearly the Vette is a faster car, shit, it gets to 150 mph an entire 6 seconds quicker! but...the driver in the F430 in that vid seemed like he was holding back.

Also, even though the Vette starts at $65, 690 and the Ferrari comes in at $174,535...I'd rather save up my entire life and spend 3 times the money and get an AMAZING supercar, than settle for a mediocre Chevy product.
Old 11-22-2006, 09:38 PM
  #10  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by daemonicus
1/4 Vette = 11.7 @ 123 mph
1/4 F430 = 12.5 @ 116

Vette 0-150 mph = 17.7 s
F430 0-150 = 23.8 s

Vette 1.6-mile road course, lap time/mph = 1:15.85 / 75.9
F430 1.6-mile road course, lap time/mph = 1:18.20 / 73.7

Clearly the Vette is a faster car, shit, it gets to 150 mph an entire 6 seconds quicker! but...the driver in the F430 in that vid seemed like he was holding back.

Also, even though the Vette starts at $65, 690 and the Ferrari comes in at $174,535...I'd rather save up my entire life and spend 3 times the money and get an AMAZING supercar, than settle for a mediocre Chevy product.

First off, I'd forget about the straight line numbers. I dont think the F430 is a dragster.

The lap times are more important though, and are the interesting stats. Where did you get those numbers? Source?
Old 11-22-2006, 10:10 PM
  #11  
F1 cart racer
 
AS3.0CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Age: 36
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the F430 wasn't even being pushed. practically no throttle imput on all the corners going through them. wasn't on it until he was going strait out of the corner, never really touched any rumble stripps, and to me never really breaked hard into the corner. i think that driver sucks to, some rich guy that thinks he knows how to drive and really sucks.

i agree with fdl bout how the ferrari isn't all about the strait line. but those stats seem off and i'm wondering who did the testing.

atleast the ferrari will hold it's value. and dam i'm a ferrari fan boy but that driver wasn't pusing it at all and a chevy is a chevy
Old 11-22-2006, 10:13 PM
  #12  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
The Z06 is a faster car overall than the F430. I believe every thing i saw.
the Z06 ran a 7:42 on the ring.
the F430 ran a 7:55 at the ring

http://wheeltalk.fancal.net/?p=476
http://forums.streetfire.net/showthread.php?t=12129
Old 11-22-2006, 10:14 PM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by AS3.0CL
the F430 wasn't even being pushed. practically no throttle imput on all the corners going through them. wasn't on it until he was going strait out of the corner, never really touched any rumble stripps, and to me never really breaked hard into the corner. i think that driver sucks to, some rich guy that thinks he knows how to drive and really sucks.
And to play Devils advocate we dont know that the Z06 was pushing it either. (and im a ferrary fan boy too)
Old 11-22-2006, 11:50 PM
  #14  
Does anyone read this
 
Donte99TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Peace
Age: 52
Posts: 2,589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Everyone who knows a little about these 2 cars, knows that the F-430 is clearly slower...If you want to be the fast on the track you buy the Z06. If you want to look cool on the streets you buy the F430.
Old 11-23-2006, 01:10 AM
  #15  
Three Wheelin'
 
vishnus11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lexington
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Depending on the conditions, the F430 will be faster on some occasions and the Z06 may be faster round a track on others. The rags have compared both and the F430 has beat out the Z06 a few times and vice versa (with regard to lap times).

Who gives to shits about objective measurements when your talking about an F430 - its the subjective driving experience that really reveals the magic of that calibre of car.
Old 11-23-2006, 07:59 AM
  #16  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Donte99TL
Everyone who knows a little about these 2 cars, knows that the F-430 is clearly slower...
I'd probly agree. But as vishnus11 just said, depends on the track. Rag times differ. What bothers me about this vid is how one sided they make it seem. And how one sided my Vette loving co-worked believes it to be. Its pure propaganda.

Both cars are in my top 3 BTW.
Old 11-23-2006, 08:12 AM
  #17  
Advanced
 
starsh0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 39
Posts: 78
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The magic of F430 isn't in the numbers while z06 depends entirely on it.
Old 11-23-2006, 01:42 PM
  #18  
Does anyone read this
 
Donte99TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Peace
Age: 52
Posts: 2,589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Well when the F430 cost 4 times as much I would hope it wouldn't depend on just one thing.
Old 11-23-2006, 01:43 PM
  #19  
Does anyone read this
 
Donte99TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Peace
Age: 52
Posts: 2,589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by vishnus11
Depending on the conditions, the F430 will be faster on some occasions and the Z06 may be faster round a track on others. The rags have compared both and the F430 has beat out the Z06 a few times and vice versa (with regard to lap times).

Who gives to shits about objective measurements when your talking about an F430 - its the subjective driving experience that really reveals the magic of that calibre of car.
I have never seen a review where the F430 was faster. Which review was it? I would like to read it.

Oh and if I could have either one of them it would be F430 any day. But if I had to pay for it well then I would have to go for the Z06.

Last edited by Donte99TL; 11-23-2006 at 01:46 PM.
Old 11-23-2006, 02:17 PM
  #20  
Burning Brakes
 
daemonicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
First off, I'd forget about the straight line numbers. I dont think the F430 is a dragster.

The lap times are more important though, and are the interesting stats. Where did you get those numbers? Source?
The September '06 issue of Car and Driver. They also tested the 911 in that article.
Old 11-23-2006, 02:22 PM
  #21  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Reading this banter just makes me realize how much Honda needs to get the next gen NSX built NOW!!! And they'd better not fuck it up!
Old 11-23-2006, 02:37 PM
  #22  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Donte99TL
I have never seen a review where the F430 was faster. Which review was it? I would like to read it.

Oh and if I could have either one of them it would be F430 any day. But if I had to pay for it well then I would have to go for the Z06.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3768

Click the "View the Track Map" at the top of the page in the yellow box.

0-60:
ZO6 - 4.1
F430 - 3.8

1/4 Mile:
ZO6 - 12.2@118.7
F430 - 11.9@123

0-100-0:
ZO6 - 13.1
F430 - 12.5

Lap Times:
ZO6 - 1:19.5
F430 - 1:17.4

It should be noted that this F430 had the benefit of European launch control. R&T also seems to test the Z06 alot slower than any other mag for some reason. But I think its safe to say these cars should be alot closer that that vid made it seem.

We also talked about it here.

https://acurazine.com/forums/automotive-news-6/sept-road-track-car-driver-usa-vs-europe-345277/
Old 11-23-2006, 02:41 PM
  #23  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Lap Times (1.6 mile)
Z06 - 1:15.85/75.9(mph)
911 - 1:17.55/74.3
F430 - 1:18.20/73.7

A C&D test. Its a toss up. Depends on track and driver.
Old 11-23-2006, 02:44 PM
  #24  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Drivers race. Bottom line, vid =
Old 11-23-2006, 02:57 PM
  #25  
Does anyone read this
 
Donte99TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Peace
Age: 52
Posts: 2,589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I think the average Joe would go a lot faster in the F430. I do recall reading that the Z06 is a handful to drive fast.

I wonder how fast the supercharged corvette will go when it comes out. Man that thing is going to be a hand full.
Old 11-23-2006, 03:34 PM
  #26  
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
 
CCColtsicehockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 43,552
Received 3,750 Likes on 2,534 Posts
Originally Posted by Fibonacci
Reading this banter just makes me realize how much Honda needs to get the next gen NSX built NOW!!! And they'd better not fuck it up!
Old 11-23-2006, 03:40 PM
  #27  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,396
Received 22,772 Likes on 13,966 Posts
Tell you what, if I had had to choose which car's life to save if both were about to fall off a mountain, I'd still save the F430...don't really care how much faster the Corvette may be fictionally or literally.





Old 11-23-2006, 03:44 PM
  #28  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
So I mentioned my thoughts to the guy at work and he claims he knows the F430 was at its limit cause he cousin has one. I explained his cousin in fact owns a 360, potent yes but no F430. Anyhow he says he could hear how the F430 was redlining every gear and pushing as hard as he could.

I just don't see that being the case.
Old 11-23-2006, 04:50 PM
  #29  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I'd probly agree. But as vishnus11 just said, depends on the track. Rag times differ. What bothers me about this vid is how one sided they make it seem. And how one sided my Vette loving co-worked believes it to be. Its pure propaganda.

Both cars are in my top 3 BTW.

the only mag times i've seen differ are european mags where the 430 is equipped w/ R-compound tires; again those are the only tests i've seen where the 430 is as quick or quicker then the Z06 (in a straight line and on the track)
Old 11-23-2006, 04:51 PM
  #30  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,090
Received 957 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
Tell you what, if I had had to choose which car's life to save if both were about to fall off a mountain, I'd still save the F430...don't really care how much faster the Corvette may be fictionally or literally.







Old 11-23-2006, 07:00 PM
  #31  
The Boss
 
BustedJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Jack City
Age: 46
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd take the zo6 over the F430 anyday
Old 11-23-2006, 07:25 PM
  #32  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dom
So I mentioned my thoughts to the guy at work and he claims he knows the F430 was at its limit cause he cousin has one. I explained his cousin in fact owns a 360, potent yes but no F430. Anyhow he says he could hear how the F430 was redlining every gear and pushing as hard as he could.

I just don't see that being the case.

Hardly seems like a solid opinion.

By the way, could an extra 200 lbs of passenger make a difference? Probably.
Old 11-23-2006, 07:26 PM
  #33  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AcuraDriver2006
I'd take the zo6 over the F430 anyday
Score one more point for the Ferrari
Old 11-24-2006, 08:31 AM
  #34  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
Score one more point for the Ferrari

Old 11-28-2006, 09:36 AM
  #35  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 43
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
First off, I'd forget about the straight line numbers. I dont think the F430 is a dragster.

The lap times are more important though, and are the interesting stats. Where did you get those numbers? Source?
The vette isnt a dragster either. The vette is made for the track just like the ferrari. It is a well documented fact that the Vette is faster in every way than the Ferrari. It's faster in a straight line, from a roll and around the track. I'd rather have a Ferrari any day of the week, but i hear people saying they'd rather have the ferrari because the quality is better. Thats bullshit. The materials, fit, and finish may be better, but supercars like Ferraris and Lambos are always the cars you see in pics on fire. Ferraris are notorious for having problems that a car at that expense shouldnt have. Not to say that the vette doesnt have problems of its own. The thing about the F430 is that it isnt as hard a car to drive as the vette. The vette is more demanding and has less finesse. Seriously though, for the price of the ferrari, i'd rather by myself the vette, do 10 grand in mods, by myself a civic SI sedan, and my wife a Pilot and have some money left over.
Old 11-28-2006, 09:43 AM
  #36  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I wouldn't say its a "fact"
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3768

And the vette is not a dragster, but IMO its more a dragster than a Ferrari. I.E. Rear wheel drive american muscle car. I'm too lazy to do the calculations but I'm guessing the HP and Torque per lb ratio is higher on the vette.

I think most people would take the Ferrari because of its looks, heritage, performance, plus that something something that Ferrari's have.
Old 11-28-2006, 09:56 AM
  #37  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
And the vette is not a dragster, but IMO its more a dragster than a Ferrari. I.E. Rear wheel drive american muscle car. I'm too lazy to do the calculations but I'm guessing the HP and Torque per lb ratio is higher on the vette.
I think that's pretty obvious considering the 'vette weighs in the neighborhood of 3100 pounds while the Ferrari is closer to 3300 pounds.
Old 11-28-2006, 09:59 AM
  #38  
fear and Loathing
 
ShavedH22CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Coventry, RI
Age: 39
Posts: 2,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think its legit. the zo6 is an insane car straight up.
Old 11-28-2006, 11:46 AM
  #39  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 43
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
Well, I wouldn't say its a "fact"
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=3768

And the vette is not a dragster, but IMO its more a dragster than a Ferrari. I.E. Rear wheel drive american muscle car. I'm too lazy to do the calculations but I'm guessing the HP and Torque per lb ratio is higher on the vette.

I think most people would take the Ferrari because of its looks, heritage, performance, plus that something something that Ferrari's have.
I guess different day different driver, but with similar skilled drivers in both cars, i'd say 8 out of 10 times the vette would take the ferrari on the track.
Old 11-28-2006, 01:28 PM
  #40  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
According to Top Gears speed chart, Corvette Z06 did well.

http://www.topgear.com/content/tgonb...times/thestig/

1 Koenigsegg CCX (with TG spoiler) 1.17.6
2 Pagani Zonda F 1.18.4
3 Maserati MC12 1.18.9
4 Ferrari Enzo 1.19.0
5 Ariel Atom 1.19.5
6 Porsche Carrera GT 1.19.8
7 Koenigsegg CCX 1.20.4
8 Ascari KZ1 1.20.7
9 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 1.20.9
10 Ford GT 1.21.9
11 Porsche GT3 RS 1.22.3
12 Ferrari 360 CS 1.22.3
13 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 1.22.4
14 Lamborghini Murcielago 1.23.7
15 Pagani Zonda 1.23.8
16 Noble M15 1.23.9
17 Koenigsegg 1.23.9
18 Prodrive P2 1.24.3
19 TVR Sagaris 1.24.6
20 TVR Tuscan 1.24.8
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
udelslayer
1G RDX Problems & Fixes
12
05-06-2016 12:27 PM
mkster
Wash & Wax
2
08-31-2015 05:22 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
08-30-2015 02:39 PM



Quick Reply: What do you make of this video



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.