The Three Most Important Supercars of Our Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2012, 05:01 PM
  #41  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,234
Received 1,194 Likes on 687 Posts
It would help if some did not also just list their favorite/most popular supercars. Why are they important? The 959 & Veyron I could see as they are technical marvels of their era.

The Countach I wouldn't call important because it's outlandish design is really what makes it famous & the ability to design a car like that was soon made difficult. I'd reckon if any Lamborghini was important, it'd be the Miura.
Old 10-31-2012, 05:22 AM
  #42  
Welcome to Olliewood
 
HBaJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT/EU
Posts: 1,322
Received 63 Likes on 48 Posts
Well the thread is 3 Most Important Supercars of Our Time, not of all time. The Countach is the reason why people associate the word "supercar" with an image of a big-engined, mid-engined, low slung, aerodynamic car. You can't say design isn't that important because that's half the lure. Rarely do people put posters of engine blocks on their walls.

Still don't get the Zonda's making the lists though, even the Zonda-R? What did the Zonda-R do that a Mercedes CLK-GTR didn't do over 10 years ago?
The following 2 users liked this post by HBaJ:
nspec_ya4 (10-31-2012), ttribe (10-31-2012)
Old 10-31-2012, 06:57 AM
  #43  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
True, but without more definition of "important", you will never be able to get a majority consensus with just 3 cars. The term is just too subjective. It seems that 5 would get us closer to a majority opinion.

It also seems that "supercar" could use some clarification here. While the NSX is an awesome car and an engineering marvel for its time, should it really be considered a "supercar".
Well now I think we're just splitting hairs. Conversation seems to be flowing smoothly based on the original post.

And based on the last part of the OP:
Originally Posted by knight rider
What do you think the most influential supercars of our times are?
Doesn't look like we're looking for a majority opinion. It's great reading everyone's take on it, then participating in the discussion that follows each list...

.

Last edited by juniorbean; 10-31-2012 at 07:02 AM. Reason: can't spell
Old 10-31-2012, 08:21 AM
  #44  
Rooting for Acura
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,053
Received 1,740 Likes on 800 Posts
Originally Posted by HBaJ
Well the thread is 3 Most Important Supercars of Our Time, not of all time. The Countach is the reason why people associate the word "supercar" with an image of a big-engined, mid-engined, low slung, aerodynamic car. You can't say design isn't that important because that's half the lure. Rarely do people put posters of engine blocks on their walls.

Still don't get the Zonda's making the lists though, even the Zonda-R? What did the Zonda-R do that a Mercedes CLK-GTR didn't do over 10 years ago?
This.
Old 10-31-2012, 08:25 AM
  #45  
Rooting for Acura
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,053
Received 1,740 Likes on 800 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Well now I think we're just splitting hairs. Conversation seems to be flowing smoothly based on the original post.

And based on the last part of the OP:
Doesn't look like we're looking for a majority opinion. It's great reading everyone's take on it, then participating in the discussion that follows each list...

.
You got it junionbean. I wasn't declaring my list, just opening up the discussion. With the exception of a few comments, the thread seems to be going well.
Old 10-31-2012, 09:23 AM
  #46  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,234
Received 1,194 Likes on 687 Posts
Originally Posted by HBaJ
Well the thread is 3 Most Important Supercars of Our Time, not of all time. The Countach is the reason why people associate the word "supercar" with an image of a big-engined, mid-engined, low slung, aerodynamic car. You can't say design isn't that important because that's half the lure. Rarely do people put posters of engine blocks on their walls.

Still don't get the Zonda's making the lists though, even the Zonda-R? What did the Zonda-R do that a Mercedes CLK-GTR didn't do over 10 years ago?
As said, the Miura did that before it as well when it came out, so what makes the Countach any more important? The Countach's design is what gives it's lure, but exotic, outlandish designs hardly make a car important, imo.
Old 10-31-2012, 10:02 AM
  #47  
Rooting for Acura
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,053
Received 1,740 Likes on 800 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
As said, the Miura did that before it as well when it came out, so what makes the Countach any more important? The Countach's design is what gives it's lure, but exotic, outlandish designs hardly make a car important, imo.
I wouldn't call the Countach's design outlandish. Exotic, yes. I think it's design defined what a supercar should look like. Not exactly like, but as exotic as. That design, coupled with a rear mounted V12 in that era is what makes it significant to me. Not to mention that the wing alone costed ~$5000. That was the price of a small car back then. Oh, and the doors...

I know it's all subjective, but that's my rationale.
Old 10-31-2012, 10:06 AM
  #48  
Regional Coordinator (Texas)
iTrader: (38)
 
nspec_ya4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston
Age: 38
Posts: 4,041
Received 607 Likes on 308 Posts
I love Miura more than the Countach but Miura could easily blend into other cars and there was nothing that looked like a Countach. I agree on the post that most of us will always remember inspiring it the first time we saw one. I think Countach deserves to be in first place. Unless they come out with another supercar that will have a similar impact on the crowd.
Old 10-31-2012, 10:10 AM
  #49  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,231
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
Originally Posted by HBaJ
Well the thread is 3 Most Important Supercars of Our Time, not of all time. The Countach is the reason why people associate the word "supercar" with an image of a big-engined, mid-engined, low slung, aerodynamic car. You can't say design isn't that important because that's half the lure. Rarely do people put posters of engine blocks on their walls.

Still don't get the Zonda's making the lists though, even the Zonda-R? What did the Zonda-R do that a Mercedes CLK-GTR didn't do over 10 years ago?
Well, for starters, the Zonda did not do a triple flip mid-air. CLK-GTR sure did.


Well, hmm...I suppose a car that is able to flip like that in mid-air is special. FINE. You can have the CLK-GTR.
Old 10-31-2012, 10:18 AM
  #50  
Rooting for Acura
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,053
Received 1,740 Likes on 800 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Well, for starters, the Zonda did not do a triple flip mid-air. CLK-GTR sure did.


Well, hmm...I suppose a car that is able to flip like that in mid-air is special. FINE. You can have the CLK-GTR.
Old 10-31-2012, 10:35 AM
  #51  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,231
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
So, seriously...this car is not most-important?





Sorry, I know I'm unreasonably biased...but, you can't talk me outta having it in my Top 3. It's actually #1 for me.
Old 10-31-2012, 10:36 AM
  #52  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,231
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
Old 10-31-2012, 11:24 AM
  #53  
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte
Age: 35
Posts: 36,657
Received 9,495 Likes on 6,167 Posts
It's important but it wasn't a car that helped shape what a "supercar" is today.

And while the design may be considered bland compared to today's supercars, I think the Miura is one of the biggest contributions to the outrageous styling category. From that point forward I think auto manufacturers knew they needed to design a car that made people's jaws drop from both beauty and disbelief.
Old 10-31-2012, 12:20 PM
  #54  
WAS HONDATAFIED IN
 
NightHawk CL9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago
Age: 38
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by knight rider
The F1 is a great supercar but it's importance eludes me.
The reason I would include the F1 and take out the Veyron is that the F1 was created for one purpose only, to be the best. It was an exercise of function over form, everything to that car had a purpose. What is the best view of the road? Put the seat in the middle. Gold as the best dissipation of heat? Line the engine bay in 24K gold. It was a car that did not hide its intentions. In my opinion it had a great deal of technology in it, but the development of that technology was to get it to its goal, be the best. It wasn't about what made the driver better (abs, tsc, vsa. etc) but about what made the car better.
Old 10-31-2012, 02:22 PM
  #55  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,244 Likes on 4,855 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Well now I think we're just splitting hairs. Conversation seems to be flowing smoothly based on the original post.

And based on the last part of the OP:
Doesn't look like we're looking for a majority opinion. It's great reading everyone's take on it, then participating in the discussion that follows each list...
Originally Posted by knight rider
You got it junionbean. I wasn't declaring my list, just opening up the discussion. With the exception of a few comments, the thread seems to be going well.
Fair enough. I stand by my comment that the OP did well, and I am glad we didn't let a certain poster throw the convo off-course.
Old 11-01-2012, 01:52 AM
  #56  
Welcome to Olliewood
 
HBaJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CT/EU
Posts: 1,322
Received 63 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
So, seriously...this car is not most-important?

http://youtu.be/jL2B_wN4XW0




Sorry, I know I'm unreasonably biased...but, you can't talk me outta having it in my Top 3. It's actually #1 for me.
most IMPORTANT? C'mon Yummy, even you know better. Well atleast you didnt throw a One-77 out here
Old 11-01-2012, 09:03 AM
  #57  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 46
Posts: 10,783
Received 2,095 Likes on 1,086 Posts
I guess it depends on how old you are to say "our time", but if you were around from the begining I'd say these:







For my time:





Old 11-01-2012, 09:13 AM
  #58  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,231
Received 22,652 Likes on 13,891 Posts
Originally Posted by HBaJ
most IMPORTANT? C'mon Yummy, even you know better. Well atleast you didnt throw a One-77 out here
It is uber-important.
Old 11-01-2012, 09:52 AM
  #59  
Rooting for Acura
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,053
Received 1,740 Likes on 800 Posts
Grab some
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
notfast
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
9
03-28-2023 08:10 AM
forrie
2G RDX (2013-2018)
12
09-15-2015 09:57 AM
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
09-14-2015 12:01 PM
RK_AcuraTL
3G TL (2004-2008)
3
09-05-2015 02:26 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
09-04-2015 08:03 AM



Quick Reply: The Three Most Important Supercars of Our Times



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.