Thinking about a Roadster

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-23-2006, 04:25 PM

#41

oonowindoo

Team Owner

Join Date: Feb 2001

Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 23,362

Likes: 1,160

Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by DownUnder

No, they're not. The 350ZR is a tick slower to 60MPH then the S2000 with a high clutch drop after that the 350ZR starts to pull away from it after 100MPH. And without a clutch drop on the S2000, the 350ZR has more torque for effortless acceleration in the city.

_________________________________________

That is what i said..... 350z/r/g35 have enough torque for effortless acceleration.

i have had more experience with the VQ than most of the people ... (3 G35C)..

BACK TO TOPIC !

Reply Like

05-23-2006, 04:51 PM

#42

BEETROOT

Yeehaw

Join Date: Aug 2003

Location: Chandler, Arizona

Age: 44

Posts: 20,972

Likes: 1

Received 26 Likes on 5 Posts

Reply Like

05-23-2006, 05:06 PM

#43

FightingTL

Banned

Thread Starter

Join Date: Feb 2006

Age: 43

Posts: 133

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by oonowindoo

_____________________________________________

LOL which magazine did u find that time from?

In reality that is not even close to the real time.

14.0-14.4 is average for 350Z COUPE .. there are few exceptional fast stock 350z.. but they are rare.

average s2k is right around 14.4 too but the difference is 350z has more high end power (100mph+)

i have had 3 G35C ... 350ZR weighs just as much as a G35C.... and it is a known fact that has been proven many times that s2k is faster than G35C.

It was a car and driver roadster shoot out, dont have it in front me right now.

14.1@99 I think the Z roadster was.

FYI, I only know a handful of people with 350z hardtops, the ones with manual all ran in the 13's at about 102. The autos ran in the lower 14's, not sure of their traps. (Didnt really care about the auto times because I wouldnt buy an auto)