Originally Posted by Saintor
(Post 15547482)
Welll if you didn't get a "M4, C63 S, S3", you weren't ready for them. Once there, no return.
|
Originally Posted by Saintor
(Post 15547482)
Welll if you didn't get a "M4, C63 S, S3", you weren't ready for them. Once there, no return.
|
<p>
Originally Posted by Saintor
(Post 15547482)
Welll if you didn't get a "M4, C63 S, S3", you weren't ready for them. Once there, no return.
|
Originally Posted by Saintor
(Post 15547482)
Welll if you didn't get a "M4, C63 S, S3", you weren't ready for them. Once there, no return.
|
Originally Posted by mattg
(Post 15548033)
choke on poutine
|
Originally Posted by Saintor
(Post 15547482)
Welll if you didn't get a "M4, C63 S, S3", you weren't ready for them. Once there, no return.
A 323i. |
His 323i would destroy the Mustang.
|
OP should have bought a 323 instead
|
323 > 350
|
Well this derailed quickly :popcorn:
|
Mods should delete the posts after Saintor's post.
While at it, delete Saintor's account too. |
<p>I'm here to see a sexy ass Accord.</p><p> </p><p>But all serious, I'm excited about the car and I'm not even the owner.</p>
|
Originally Posted by Flipster23
(Post 15548245)
<p>I'm here to see a sexy ass Accord.</p><p> </p><p>But all serious, I'm excited about the car and I'm not even the owner.</p>
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/acurazi...0d21a824b4.jpg |
Oh WTF, you do own a regular Accord too!?
|
:rofl:
|
I bet it's a 350 too (3.5L) :O
|
<p>
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15548487)
FWIW, it has been the best car I've owned yet (mine in he back, only difference is the tint incl the windshield)
|
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15548487)
FWIW, it has been the best car I've owned yet (mine in he back, only difference is the tint incl the windshield)
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/acurazi...0d21a824b4.jpg |
Originally Posted by JS + BRZ
(Post 15548491)
Oh WTF, you do own a regular Accord too!?
He'll never be able to tell them apart!! :run: |
now this is really going to get confusing. So you like the Accord more or the Mustang? or the Mustang or the Accord? or the Mustang or the Mustang? the Accord or the Accord?
|
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
(Post 15548763)
now this is really going to get confusing. So you like the Accord more or the Mustang? or the Mustang or the Accord? or the Mustang or the Mustang? the Accord or the Accord?
I've had the Accord almost two years, I'm excited about the Mustang but for now the Accord is the best I've had. Ideally I'd daily drive an Accord Sport and drive the Mustang on weekends, but I doubt that would happen.. one would sit and collect dust and it'd likely be the Honda. |
that was the most confusing reply i have ever read. I have no idea what car you have.
Yumcha fucked everything up. |
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
(Post 15548769)
that was the most confusing reply i have ever read. I have no idea what car you have.
Yumcha fucked everything up. |
looks sick. and it's so cool that you own an Accord and a Mustang. :) :thumbsup:
|
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
(Post 15548769)
that was the most confusing reply i have ever read. I have no idea what car you have.
Yumcha fucked everything up. |
I was surrounded by Mustang growing up and always imagined I'd own one. It never happened and honestly after the last gen I lost all interest in them, but I find myself drooling over the new gens, especially the GT350s, so I will live vicariously through you lol. Can't wait to see some photos once you get that beast!
|
Congrats on the purchase. I agree about the Merc's - Love the cars but lacking a pedal that is necessary.
Didn't think there was anyone around who has been on the forums and lurks as much as I do without posting. Can't wait to see the pics. |
Sub'd for pics
|
Sounds so good!
|
I love to intro. put me to shame.... a turbo automatic owner.
Love the Colombian coffee and he knows the dyno # doesn't mean anything... Surprisingly good video. |
I'm pretty excited about it, mine is scheduled to be built on Nov 9th.. so going by the timelines on current deliveries I should have it by the end of this month. I did add the Track Pack instead of going with a base. I'm anxious to see what aftermarket options come in a year or so.. by then it should be no problem finding one for or below MSRP if someone else is interested.
|
Man, I'll watch that vid tomorrow morning!!
|
That intro was awesome.
|
:popcorn: :popcorn: :drool: :popcorn: :popcorn: :thud:
|
I'm not sure I'd ever get that sucker into 4th gear :rofl:
|
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15600303)
I'm pretty excited about it, mine is scheduled to be built on Nov 9th.. so going by the timelines on current deliveries I should have it by the end of this month. I did add the Track Pack instead of going with a base. I'm anxious to see what aftermarket options come in a year or so.. by then it should be no problem finding one for or below MSRP if someone else is interested.
|
That was one exciting video. :love: it. Congrats again OP.
|
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
(Post 15600910)
what is the MSRP one those things? any markups?
Like I said, wait a year and these will be on the lot. I think some are jumping in thinking it will be this monster, so when they find out it's a high revving relatively low tq sports car that focuses on balance instead of 1/4 mile times.. all markups will disappear. |
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15601169)
Like I said, wait a year and these will be on the lot. I think some are jumping in thinking it will be this monster, so when they find out it's a high revving relatively low tq sports car that focuses on balance instead of 1/4 mile times.. all markups will disappear.
|
Originally Posted by TacoBello
(Post 15601185)
It's still putting down 429lbft @ 4700rpm, from a 5.2L engine. I dunno how much more you would expect to get from a NA engine...
|
Meanwhile the Audi RS5 V8 makes 319lb-ft :)
|
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15601192)
Thats why I said relatively. I've been active on Mustang forums and those guys have been disappointed and already looking for mods including forced induction. 429lbft is more than I need.. for some of them its trivial versus a GT500.
It's a track car. Gutting it out for the weight reduction would make the car so much more balanced and faster overall instead of adding a blower for more power. :whyme: You do NOT need more power for that car. Maybe you can dial in the suspension and aero down the road, but don't even touch the engine. It's perfect. |
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15601192)
Thats why I said relatively. I've been active on Mustang forums and those guys have been disappointed and already looking for mods including forced induction. 429lbft is more than I need.. for some of them its trivial versus a GT500.
The power this car puts down, as you stated, is more than sufficient. I'd take one of these in stock form, over one of their SC'd v8s, putting down 650lbft of torque, and within one corner I bet they'd be eating dust. Pisses me off when people always ramble on about needing more power BEFORE they even know how to drive properly. Nothing teaches a person how to corner better than an underpowered car. Learn on a 150hp car first- The smallest mistake ends up costing the driver big time, causing them to putter out of a corner, instead of fly. And I'm not saying the 350 is underpowered by any means- but before those fools need boost, they should learn to handle the beast they're driving. |
Originally Posted by TacoBello
(Post 15601334)
That's sad to hear. It disappoints me to think someone is buying this car just for 1/4 mile purposes. What a waste.
The power this car puts down, as you stated, is more than sufficient. I'd take one of these in stock form, over one of their SC'd v8s, putting down 650lbft of torque, and within one corner I bet they'd be eating dust. Pisses me off when people always ramble on about needing more power BEFORE they even know how to drive properly. Nothing teaches a person how to corner better than an underpowered car. Learn on a 150hp car first- The smallest mistake ends up costing the driver big time, causing them to putter out of a corner, instead of fly. And I'm not saying the 350 is underpowered by any means- but before those fools need boost, they should learn to handle the beast they're driving. |
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15601339)
I kid you not I've seen a couple of people that have orders and are on the verge of cancelling because of motor trends's 12.4 1/4 mile time. (117.8mph trap)
|
Originally Posted by tonio
(Post 15601339)
I kid you not I've seen a couple of people that have orders and are on the verge of cancelling because of motor trends's 12.4 1/4 mile time. (117.8mph trap)
I'd love an 8200rpm, screaming V8. Now THAT'S a rarity. I bet you that car will eventually climb in value if kept stock, or close to. It'll take 2 decades or so to get there, but it'll happen. |
:explode: :explode:
Can you hear that? These idiots already blowing up that beautiful engines with the blowers on it, screaming at 8200rpm. |
I like this car because it reminds me of s2000 except much heavier and faster.
So 60k is a realistic # for a GT350.... pretty much the same price as my car now.... shit I dont need the R. 530hp is more than enough to kill me already. |
^post some pics of your 435i, just for comparison! Lol! :thumbsup:
Would Love to see it anyway! :toocool: |
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
(Post 15601364)
I dont need the R. 530hp is more than enough to kill me already.
:spanky: |
What's with the butthurt about wanting more out of it? You guys don't get butthurt over 1800hp twin turbo gallardos. Just because it's charged doesn't mean it turns into a coal rolling redneckmobile that can't take a turn. :shakehead:
|
Originally Posted by Majofo
(Post 15601588)
What's with the butthurt about wanting more out of it? You guys don't get butthurt over 1800hp twin turbo gallardos. Just because it's charged doesn't mean it turns into a coal rolling redneckmobile that can't take a turn. :shakehead:
Domestic = :turd: BMLexBenz = :fap: Honda/Acura (HoMoCo) = :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: :turd: |
Oh Honda,
Had you only given us a quad cam V8 coupled to SH-AWD in 4 door and coupe. You just couldn't just let Acura be what we all know it could. Great choice by the way. That engine is going to bring you much joy. |
Originally Posted by Majofo
(Post 15601588)
What's with the butthurt about wanting more out of it? You guys don't get butthurt over 1800hp twin turbo gallardos. Just because it's charged doesn't mean it turns into a coal rolling redneckmobile that can't take a turn. :shakehead:
These fools are taking a purpose built track car and turning it into a drag car. What a waste. |
Originally Posted by Majofo
(Post 15601588)
What's with the butthurt about wanting more out of it? You guys don't get butthurt over 1800hp twin turbo gallardos. Just because it's charged doesn't mean it turns into a coal rolling redneckmobile that can't take a turn. :shakehead:
Originally Posted by TacoBello
(Post 15602085)
You missed the whole point of my argument. Getting more out of it is fine, assuming one knows how to drive with that much power. Many of these dummies want more out of it, just to go in a straight line. Get a hellcat for that purpose.
These fools are taking a purpose built track car and turning it into a drag car. What a waste. There's absolutely nothing wrong with wanting for more. It's just that these idiots who are "disappointed" with the 1/4mile time are not getting the point of this car. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands