Poor economy takes toll on Acura!
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Poor economy takes toll on Acura!
Interesting read. Check out the linkys in the article too!
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...-product-plans
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...-product-plans
#2
Moderator Alumnus
Acura is currently considering a compact car replacement for its RSX
Trying to be "tier 1 luxury" selling tiny non luxury performance economy cars. The RSX should have never been an Acura to start with and had a lot to do with the brands tainted non-luxury image.
Why doesn't Acura just try and make one luxury car to start with?
The definition of Acura is "A Honda with plastic upgrades". Someone should submit it to the Merriam Webster website...
Trending Topics
#8
Wow, this just shows how lost/clueless Acura is.
Trying to be "tier 1 luxury" selling tiny non luxury performance economy cars. The RSX should have never been an Acura to start with and had a lot to do with the brands tainted non-luxury image.
Why doesn't Acura just try and make one luxury car to start with?
The definition of Acura is "A Honda with plastic upgrades". Someone should submit it to the Merriam Webster website...
Trying to be "tier 1 luxury" selling tiny non luxury performance economy cars. The RSX should have never been an Acura to start with and had a lot to do with the brands tainted non-luxury image.
Why doesn't Acura just try and make one luxury car to start with?
The definition of Acura is "A Honda with plastic upgrades". Someone should submit it to the Merriam Webster website...
#10
Racer
Thread Starter
I usually visit motorauthority daily and so far they have been spot on about everything I read there so I have no doubt this is legit but I can't verify if its official or not.
Siggy--Everything you said is so true but that last comment about "A honda with plastic upgrade" is the part most Acura enthusiasts are in denial about. This is exactly what keeps Acura apart from their Japan counterpart Lexus/Toyota.
Siggy--Everything you said is so true but that last comment about "A honda with plastic upgrade" is the part most Acura enthusiasts are in denial about. This is exactly what keeps Acura apart from their Japan counterpart Lexus/Toyota.
#11
Poor design takes toll on Acura.
#12
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
Has anyone tried contact any higher ups at Honda or Acura....i mean this forum is nothing but complaints for the past 2 years and no one is listening.
Were all here because we've owned and LOVED our Acuras, now they've turned to shit either from horrible designs or being FWD or just flat out being boring when ALL the competition blows them out of the water.
Ill stick with what I've always said. The 03-04 model year is Acuras last stand. Acura use to be good at simple, affordable, technology laden, timeless vehicles. Now they have over the top, horrid Buick looking things with massive grills.
Im ashamed.
Were all here because we've owned and LOVED our Acuras, now they've turned to shit either from horrible designs or being FWD or just flat out being boring when ALL the competition blows them out of the water.
Ill stick with what I've always said. The 03-04 model year is Acuras last stand. Acura use to be good at simple, affordable, technology laden, timeless vehicles. Now they have over the top, horrid Buick looking things with massive grills.
Im ashamed.
Last edited by MarbleGT; 09-02-2009 at 01:41 AM.
#13
Evil Mazda Driver
Has anyone tried contact any higher ups at Honda or Acura....i mean this forum is nothing but complaints for the past 2 years and no one is listening.
Were all here because we've owned and LOVED our Acuras, now they've turned to shit either from horrible designs or being FWD or just flat out being boring when ALL the competition blows them out of the water.
Ill stick with what I've always said. The 03-04 model year is Acuras last stand. Acura use to be good at simple, affordable, technology laden, timeless vehicles. Now they have over the top, horrid Buick looking things with massive grills.
Im ashamed.
Were all here because we've owned and LOVED our Acuras, now they've turned to shit either from horrible designs or being FWD or just flat out being boring when ALL the competition blows them out of the water.
Ill stick with what I've always said. The 03-04 model year is Acuras last stand. Acura use to be good at simple, affordable, technology laden, timeless vehicles. Now they have over the top, horrid Buick looking things with massive grills.
Im ashamed.
From where I'm standing, it appears that Honda is attempting to lure the ricer crowd (now getting older) to these downright atrocious-looking vehicles that Acura is currently cranking out. Apparently their specialty is ricers now. Nothing else.
The last decent Acura in my opinion? '05-'08 RL. Not that I'm biased or anything...
#14
Moderator Alumnus
Name another luxury car manufacturer that sold non-luxury economy boxes like the RSX...
The RSX was the root of Acura's problems; RSX has nothing about it that's luxurious and it brought in a younger demographic. Only kids liked the RSX.
The last thing most people want when they purchase a $50k luxury car is to be in a shop with a bunch of 16-21 year old kids with huge fart can exhaust systems and wings on their 4cyl cars.
Sure the RSX-S was a spirited car, but it should have been sold as a Honda. Just as the S2000 was.
The RSX does nothing but lower Acura's image to the public as a "Tier 1 Luxury" manufacturer. This was a HUGE mistake they made last time.
#15
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
If Acura continues on the path it is on with poor styling and reduction in performance, then there is a good chance that they may have to consider shutting down. In a down economy, I feel that they need to offer some price conscious options, but they seem to forget that they are a HIGHER-END, PREMIUM brand and they need to act like one.
#16
AZ Community Team
Interesting read. Check out the linkys in the article too!
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...-product-plans
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...-product-plans
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...385112&page=10
Thought it looked familar
#17
Seriously? I don't think you've thought this out completely.
Name another luxury car manufacturer that sold non-luxury economy boxes like the RSX...
The RSX was the root of Acura's problems; RSX has nothing about it that's luxurious and it brought in a younger demographic. Only kids liked the RSX.
The last thing most people want when they purchase a $50k luxury car is to be in a shop with a bunch of 16-21 year old kids with huge fart can exhaust systems and wings on their 4cyl cars.
Sure the RSX-S was a spirited car, but it should have been sold as a Honda. Just as the S2000 was.
The RSX does nothing but lower Acura's image to the public as a "Tier 1 Luxury" manufacturer. This was a HUGE mistake they made last time.
Name another luxury car manufacturer that sold non-luxury economy boxes like the RSX...
The RSX was the root of Acura's problems; RSX has nothing about it that's luxurious and it brought in a younger demographic. Only kids liked the RSX.
The last thing most people want when they purchase a $50k luxury car is to be in a shop with a bunch of 16-21 year old kids with huge fart can exhaust systems and wings on their 4cyl cars.
Sure the RSX-S was a spirited car, but it should have been sold as a Honda. Just as the S2000 was.
The RSX does nothing but lower Acura's image to the public as a "Tier 1 Luxury" manufacturer. This was a HUGE mistake they made last time.
#18
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
rename the thread request !!!!
Poor economy takes toll ONLY on Acura!
Poor economy takes toll ONLY on Acura!
#19
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
To be fair, this current line up isn't really the so called "tier 1" line up. I believe this won't appear until 2015 or so, and I believe this has been stated in several sources before. IMO, all these models coming out now from Acura are just "in-between" models. Like I've said before, I'd just sit back and relax. Heck, I'm only 22 and just graduated, it's not like I have the money to purchase a $40k+ car now. I have the time and patience to wait. I guess this can't be said with the older folks here.
#20
Exactly. And MB is making the same mistake with their A/B Class. So is BMW with the Mini. I can't figure out why they think its a good idea to have the unwashed, undesirables drag their dirty feet through their Tier 1 showrooms.
#21
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
To be fair, this current line up isn't really the so called "tier 1" line up. I believe this won't appear until 2015 or so, and I believe this has been stated in several sources before. IMO, all these models coming out now from Acura are just "in-between" models. Like I've said before, I'd just sit back and relax. Heck, I'm only 22 and just graduated, it's not like I have the money to purchase a $40k+ car now. I have the time and patience to wait. I guess this can't be said with the older folks here.
#22
My only car is a Bus
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I sent Dickey Do Nothing an email when he had a job there and he told me to pound sand and to wait great things were coming. Ha ha.
Has anyone tried contact any higher ups at Honda or Acura....i mean this forum is nothing but complaints for the past 2 years and no one is listening.
Were all here because we've owned and LOVED our Acuras, now they've turned to shit either from horrible designs or being FWD or just flat out being boring when ALL the competition blows them out of the water.
Ill stick with what I've always said. The 03-04 model year is Acuras last stand. Acura use to be good at simple, affordable, technology laden, timeless vehicles. Now they have over the top, horrid Buick looking things with massive grills.
Im ashamed.
Were all here because we've owned and LOVED our Acuras, now they've turned to shit either from horrible designs or being FWD or just flat out being boring when ALL the competition blows them out of the water.
Ill stick with what I've always said. The 03-04 model year is Acuras last stand. Acura use to be good at simple, affordable, technology laden, timeless vehicles. Now they have over the top, horrid Buick looking things with massive grills.
Im ashamed.
#25
#26
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
IMO, if Acura sat down and decided that they are going to half ass it until 2015, then they are the reason that their sales are down. As a consumer, I'm not going to let them off the hook for 6-7 years until they do put out a "tier 1" line up. If the economy continues to be an issue, then we will eventually have a thread titled "Remember Acura?"
So, saying nothing isn't an option. What else could they have done then? Coupe? But how? They don't have any suitable RWD platform to make people here happy. As a consumer, all you really have to do is stop buying from them if you don't like what they are offering. However, it seems like Acura is just doing fine at this moment. I mean, the drop in sale is in line with others mainly due to the economy. Something interesting, the TL has been bombarded by most people here. However, it's still selling rather well. I mean, looking at the May 2008 sales numbers, Acura sold about 4200 3g TL's, while Audi sold about 4800 last gen A4's. Fast forward to recent months, the TL has been consistent at 3000-3300 units per month. The new A4 on the other hand, is between 3300-3800. In terms of % drop, they are about the same. If the 4G TL redesign is a failure, then one could argue that the A4 redesign is also a failure. But I'm sure most people here will say the new A4 is awesome and stuff.
#27
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
^^^^
I don't disagree with your fact, but I don't think they are comparing apples to apples.
Even though the A4 and TL can be compared in some cases, the fact is that Audi also has the A6 and A8 models above the A4. Acura has the RL. That's it. Audi has also spent considerable money in developing more models that Acura. They cater to more than just the people looking for an imported performance sedan.
In fact I think just by starting the comparison between these manufacturers, you may have made my point that Acura needs to think long and hard about waiting 6 years before releasing any new innovations. Heated seats and sun-roofs will only take you so far.
I don't disagree with your fact, but I don't think they are comparing apples to apples.
Even though the A4 and TL can be compared in some cases, the fact is that Audi also has the A6 and A8 models above the A4. Acura has the RL. That's it. Audi has also spent considerable money in developing more models that Acura. They cater to more than just the people looking for an imported performance sedan.
In fact I think just by starting the comparison between these manufacturers, you may have made my point that Acura needs to think long and hard about waiting 6 years before releasing any new innovations. Heated seats and sun-roofs will only take you so far.
#28
Moderator Alumnus
CL couple in the future? That'll be the fucking day...
I loved my last one but if the next one is just as ugly as the TL/TSX forget it.
They're killing me...Acura is absolutely killing me.
I loved my last one but if the next one is just as ugly as the TL/TSX forget it.
They're killing me...Acura is absolutely killing me.
#31
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
Seriously? I don't think you've thought this out completely.
Name another luxury car manufacturer that sold non-luxury economy boxes like the RSX...
The RSX was the root of Acura's problems; RSX has nothing about it that's luxurious and it brought in a younger demographic. Only kids liked the RSX.
The last thing most people want when they purchase a $50k luxury car is to be in a shop with a bunch of 16-21 year old kids with huge fart can exhaust systems and wings on their 4cyl cars.
Sure the RSX-S was a spirited car, but it should have been sold as a Honda. Just as the S2000 was.
The RSX does nothing but lower Acura's image to the public as a "Tier 1 Luxury" manufacturer. This was a HUGE mistake they made last time.
Name another luxury car manufacturer that sold non-luxury economy boxes like the RSX...
The RSX was the root of Acura's problems; RSX has nothing about it that's luxurious and it brought in a younger demographic. Only kids liked the RSX.
The last thing most people want when they purchase a $50k luxury car is to be in a shop with a bunch of 16-21 year old kids with huge fart can exhaust systems and wings on their 4cyl cars.
Sure the RSX-S was a spirited car, but it should have been sold as a Honda. Just as the S2000 was.
The RSX does nothing but lower Acura's image to the public as a "Tier 1 Luxury" manufacturer. This was a HUGE mistake they made last time.
#32
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
^^^^
I don't disagree with your fact, but I don't think they are comparing apples to apples.
Even though the A4 and TL can be compared in some cases, the fact is that Audi also has the A6 and A8 models above the A4. Acura has the RL. That's it. Audi has also spent considerable money in developing more models that Acura. They cater to more than just the people looking for an imported performance sedan.
In fact I think just by starting the comparison between these manufacturers, you may have made my point that Acura needs to think long and hard about waiting 6 years before releasing any new innovations. Heated seats and sun-roofs will only take you so far.
I don't disagree with your fact, but I don't think they are comparing apples to apples.
Even though the A4 and TL can be compared in some cases, the fact is that Audi also has the A6 and A8 models above the A4. Acura has the RL. That's it. Audi has also spent considerable money in developing more models that Acura. They cater to more than just the people looking for an imported performance sedan.
In fact I think just by starting the comparison between these manufacturers, you may have made my point that Acura needs to think long and hard about waiting 6 years before releasing any new innovations. Heated seats and sun-roofs will only take you so far.
At this moment, I don't think they can be compared directly against Audi and other tier-1 brands. They just don't have enough models.
#33
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
The thing about looking at number of units sold as an indicator is that we have little idea of what a car cost to make and what the actual profits from a single unit really is. Maybe Acura makes more per unit than Audi, maybe not.
#34
Senior Moderator
Acura is all but a lost cause. They have the worst looking cars, they refuse to do what it takes to be Tier 1 like they want. They have Zero options for the few cars they do have. Might as well pull the plug on them while they can.
#35
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes
on
518 Posts
Ya, we have no clue how much money they are actually making per unit sold. I guess may be they are making some good money from each unit they sell...that's why they are so reluctant to build new platforms...lol...
#36
Moderator Alumnus
Sig, you have to remember that it was the Integra that started this party. It did well, despite the fact that it was no 3 Series Bimmer. The only problem (well 2 actually) I saw with the RSX is that (1) the Integra was a better looking car imo and (2) Honda decided to make a Civic Si coupe that looked a helluva lot better than the RSX.
Nothing wrong IMO with the RSX or the Integra; both were great cars. But they shouldn't be sold under Honda's Luxury brand name. There's nothing luxury about them.
In my opinion I think the Legend and the NSX is what made Acura.
I don't know anyone but kids who had any connection with the RSX or Integra.
#37
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
ya
Nothing wrong IMO with the RSX or the Integra; both were great cars. But they shouldn't be sold under Honda's Luxury brand name. There's nothing luxury about them.
In my opinion I think the Legend and the NSX is what made Acura.
I don't know anyone but kids who had any connection with the RSX or Integra.
Nothing wrong IMO with the RSX or the Integra; both were great cars. But they shouldn't be sold under Honda's Luxury brand name. There's nothing luxury about them.
In my opinion I think the Legend and the NSX is what made Acura.
I don't know anyone but kids who had any connection with the RSX or Integra.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike from annapolis
2G TL Problems & Fixes
3
05-07-2017 08:21 PM
BobbyGraham388
4G TL (2009-2014)
12
10-22-2015 05:05 PM
Oakes
Wash & Wax
10
10-12-2015 11:17 AM