News Flash: 04 TL has only 270 HP!
#1
News Flash: 04 TL has only 270 HP!
As reported by Vtec.net: http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=122631
Apparently, it will have the same Type-S engine with a some tweaks to gain 10 HP more.
Disappointed? maybe! This leads me to believe that there will be a type-s in 2004 as a 2005 model! This is just to give sometime for the RL to catch-up!
Remeber in 2000-2001 there was no TL-Type-s? then in mid 2001 they came up with the 2002 TL Type-S!
Apparently, it will have the same Type-S engine with a some tweaks to gain 10 HP more.
Disappointed? maybe! This leads me to believe that there will be a type-s in 2004 as a 2005 model! This is just to give sometime for the RL to catch-up!
Remeber in 2000-2001 there was no TL-Type-s? then in mid 2001 they came up with the 2002 TL Type-S!
#5
Originally posted by Bobbydoedoe
hmm, i hope taht 270hp is unrated. Cause it isn't a big jump from 260
hmm, i hope taht 270hp is unrated. Cause it isn't a big jump from 260
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by Bobbydoedoe
hmm, i hope taht 270hp is unrated. Cause it isn't a big jump from 260
hmm, i hope taht 270hp is unrated. Cause it isn't a big jump from 260
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
#9
Originally posted by juniorbean
Actually it's a HUGE jump. Right now the base, or premium TL puts out 225hp. So the jump is going from 225hp to 270hp. Sounds like a big gain to me.
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
Actually it's a HUGE jump. Right now the base, or premium TL puts out 225hp. So the jump is going from 225hp to 270hp. Sounds like a big gain to me.
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
well said
#11
Does anyone care about torque anymore???
Jeezus... it's like some people only consider hp as the end all stat that determines how a car 1) gets outta the hole, 2) accerates on the highway, 3) pulls out of a turn .. etc..
would it make a difference if it was 270hp and 260lb-ft of torque>.... um YEAH...
i'd take that 270/260 engine ANYDAY over the 270/232 engine ...
let's not forget cars like the E36 M3, and the audi S4 that were both under 260 hp but can still hang w/ the CL-S from a roll.. if not beat it at times...
Jeezus... it's like some people only consider hp as the end all stat that determines how a car 1) gets outta the hole, 2) accerates on the highway, 3) pulls out of a turn .. etc..
would it make a difference if it was 270hp and 260lb-ft of torque>.... um YEAH...
i'd take that 270/260 engine ANYDAY over the 270/232 engine ...
let's not forget cars like the E36 M3, and the audi S4 that were both under 260 hp but can still hang w/ the CL-S from a roll.. if not beat it at times...
#14
Originally posted by juniorbean
Actually it's a HUGE jump. Right now the base, or premium TL puts out 225hp. So the jump is going from 225hp to 270hp. Sounds like a big gain to me.
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
Actually it's a HUGE jump. Right now the base, or premium TL puts out 225hp. So the jump is going from 225hp to 270hp. Sounds like a big gain to me.
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
The price jump plus redesign should have been better than the last model. If not that much better they should be pricing it like the TL-P
#18
OK, can you people give up on the AWD talk.
AWD WILL NOT HAPPEN IN THE TL UNTIL THE REDESIGN, PERIOD!
In order for Acura to keep their prices down they do not do huge variations on their platforms. Thus the AWD will not happen on a TL base FWD platform.
The RL will be the litmus test for AWD. It should come out with an electric motor that will drive the rear wheels giving it a semi-hybrid setup. If this system works will in the RL then you will see it trickle down to the TL and maybe even the TSX/RSX.
AWD WILL NOT HAPPEN IN THE TL UNTIL THE REDESIGN, PERIOD!
In order for Acura to keep their prices down they do not do huge variations on their platforms. Thus the AWD will not happen on a TL base FWD platform.
The RL will be the litmus test for AWD. It should come out with an electric motor that will drive the rear wheels giving it a semi-hybrid setup. If this system works will in the RL then you will see it trickle down to the TL and maybe even the TSX/RSX.
#19
bl^5....
just when I thought you were the voice of reason, you spit out that RL electric motor babble... yeah yeah, i've heard those rumors too... but those rumors were and still are JUST as suspect as the TL AWD rumors WERE.
I'll believe the RL "dual" motor concept when I am test driving it at the dealership... until then, you're on crack. (no offense, pls. don't mistake my sarcasm for offensive language).
just when I thought you were the voice of reason, you spit out that RL electric motor babble... yeah yeah, i've heard those rumors too... but those rumors were and still are JUST as suspect as the TL AWD rumors WERE.
I'll believe the RL "dual" motor concept when I am test driving it at the dealership... until then, you're on crack. (no offense, pls. don't mistake my sarcasm for offensive language).
#20
Originally posted by juniorbean
Actually it's a HUGE jump. Right now the base, or premium TL puts out 225hp. So the jump is going from 225hp to 270hp. Sounds like a big gain to me.
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
Actually it's a HUGE jump. Right now the base, or premium TL puts out 225hp. So the jump is going from 225hp to 270hp. Sounds like a big gain to me.
You can't compare the Type-S' hp numbers to the new TL.. b/c right now there is no 2004 Type-S. If and when that comes out, then you can use the 260hp figure as a baseline.
I look at it this way-- the top HP rating on the current generation TL is 260 (regardless of a "Type S" badge or not) and the top HP rating of the new generation TL is 270 (if that's even correct...who knows yet?)
I just don't see what a Type-S badge has to do with it
If it were a known fact that Acura will be making a Type-S version again in the future, then I could see your point-- wait and see what the new HP rating will be. But since it's unconfirmed, I think it's more than fair to compare HP ratings with the old and new cars....
#21
Fearless prediction:
Acura will not have a Type-S version of the "new" TL at all.
Think about it- if the base version has 270 or 280 HP, it would take quite a bit more power to even warrant putting a Type-S badge on it, not to mention the "other" stuff that would make it a Type-S.
What would it take to make the "new" Type-S (power-wise)? Prolly at least 300 HP minimum, right? Does anyone honestly see Acura doing this? I sure don't. I hope people don't hold their breath for the new 300+ HP TL Type-S
Acura will not have a Type-S version of the "new" TL at all.
Think about it- if the base version has 270 or 280 HP, it would take quite a bit more power to even warrant putting a Type-S badge on it, not to mention the "other" stuff that would make it a Type-S.
What would it take to make the "new" Type-S (power-wise)? Prolly at least 300 HP minimum, right? Does anyone honestly see Acura doing this? I sure don't. I hope people don't hold their breath for the new 300+ HP TL Type-S
#22
Originally posted by Zapata
no biggie......as long as the fit/finish quality improves that's the key.
no biggie......as long as the fit/finish quality improves that's the key.
#23
fit n finish of a tl built in the us today is better than 10+ years ago in japan.
i also have a feeling that there won't be a typeS, i hope i'm wrong, but there were a lot of models listed for it just to be a base model, looks like enough choices to cover the whole range. if there were going to be a tls i think the would have made this model have ~255hp(less than the current tls) and then bump up to ~285 for the s.
i also have a feeling that there won't be a typeS, i hope i'm wrong, but there were a lot of models listed for it just to be a base model, looks like enough choices to cover the whole range. if there were going to be a tls i think the would have made this model have ~255hp(less than the current tls) and then bump up to ~285 for the s.
#25
I agree, I think that this is a cost cutting move by Acura. By eliminating the Type S, Acura can make all their cars the same. This is the same concept that Acura had with eliminating option packages.
#26
Originally posted by TL_Type_S
Does anyone care about torque anymore???
Jeezus... it's like some people only consider hp as the end all stat that determines how a car 1) gets outta the hole, 2) accerates on the highway, 3) pulls out of a turn .. etc..
would it make a difference if it was 270hp and 260lb-ft of torque>.... um YEAH...
i'd take that 270/260 engine ANYDAY over the 270/232 engine ...
let's not forget cars like the E36 M3, and the audi S4 that were both under 260 hp but can still hang w/ the CL-S from a roll.. if not beat it at times...
Does anyone care about torque anymore???
Jeezus... it's like some people only consider hp as the end all stat that determines how a car 1) gets outta the hole, 2) accerates on the highway, 3) pulls out of a turn .. etc..
would it make a difference if it was 270hp and 260lb-ft of torque>.... um YEAH...
i'd take that 270/260 engine ANYDAY over the 270/232 engine ...
let's not forget cars like the E36 M3, and the audi S4 that were both under 260 hp but can still hang w/ the CL-S from a roll.. if not beat it at times...
#28
Originally posted by Tom2
Fearless prediction:
Acura will not have a Type-S version of the "new" TL at all....
Fearless prediction:
Acura will not have a Type-S version of the "new" TL at all....
#29
Well, I'm getting a new TL, be it Type-S or not. That thing is bad ass to an insane degree. I'd love to see totally complete specs on the features.
Fully loaded out the door should be no more than 40k (inc. TTT).
Nice ass graduation present for myself if you ask me
Fully loaded out the door should be no more than 40k (inc. TTT).
Nice ass graduation present for myself if you ask me
#31
Man!! Ya'll are all over the place on this topic. I have talked with Acura rep's and have squeezed a little info from them. Here is what i have gathered from multiple sources.
1) If there is a type-s, it wont be out until after the new AWD RL hits the ground sometime after Oct 2004 (as a 2005 model). The AWD system that will be in the RL will be a option for the type-s, the HP tire pkg will be standard along with nav and XM radio. No word on the engine specs. Rumor has it at 285-290 HP.
2) There are talks going on about a TL coupe, no one knows when or how but its being talked about. Acura wants to be able to compete with BMW, Infinity and Mercedes. With acura having two different car names, the sales numbers looked pitiful against brands that have a coupe and sedan under the same name.
3) The VTM-4 system was originally made for a car (the MDX is actually on a old honda accord platform). So it wont be a problem to put it on the RL or TL. From what i hear (dont hold me to this!) Acura only wants to put AWD on cars that have 280 HP or more to combat the torque steer problem.
Thats all i have for now. Im sure i'll get fussed at for this info but what the hell!
1) If there is a type-s, it wont be out until after the new AWD RL hits the ground sometime after Oct 2004 (as a 2005 model). The AWD system that will be in the RL will be a option for the type-s, the HP tire pkg will be standard along with nav and XM radio. No word on the engine specs. Rumor has it at 285-290 HP.
2) There are talks going on about a TL coupe, no one knows when or how but its being talked about. Acura wants to be able to compete with BMW, Infinity and Mercedes. With acura having two different car names, the sales numbers looked pitiful against brands that have a coupe and sedan under the same name.
3) The VTM-4 system was originally made for a car (the MDX is actually on a old honda accord platform). So it wont be a problem to put it on the RL or TL. From what i hear (dont hold me to this!) Acura only wants to put AWD on cars that have 280 HP or more to combat the torque steer problem.
Thats all i have for now. Im sure i'll get fussed at for this info but what the hell!
#32
this is what i think
there will be no type-s model (acura held off the current tl-s so that they could get a good jump in sales for the cl-s)
look at the trend
01 cl-p and cl-s both offered at the same time
02 rsx and rsx-s both offered at the same time
because they have not released a type-s model for the TSX I highly doubt there will be one. Why? There is absolutely nothing in their current automotive line up that would negatively affect their sales. Think about it, if the TL-S came out the same time as the CL-S would we still have the same amount of cl-s drivers!?!?
also you have to look at the way acura priced the TSX. IF they considered releasing a type-s model they would have to price the TSX-p around $23k and type s model around $26k but NO the TSX is priced around $26k which means a type-s model would be around the vicinity of $29k!!!!!
The new TL is rumored to be priced around 35k which means a type-s model would be around the $40k area because of AWD! Why? because if the tl-p is running 270 hp then the type-s model should be around 300 hp which=no fuckin way for a FWD car!
it is clear to me what acura is doing
I think acura has made the line clear. Most people who can afford a type-s model should be able to afford a 34k car. so now instead of offering two models of the same car they have 2 distinctive cars, TSX and TL. the best way to look at it is like this
Suppose acura allowed us to do an even trade of our existing acuras with the new line up (04's) but it had to be in the same price range or came close to the original MSRPs. so that means everyone with a type-s model should get the new TL and everyone with a cl-p or tl-p should get a TSX. Now with the new TSX and TL it is clear. you either can or can't afford a TL. if you can you purchase one and if you cant then you purchase the TSX.
with our current tl and cl everything seems a little fuzzy. i think some people with a cl-p/tl-p could actually afford the type-s model but they choose not to because the car is WAY TOO SIMILAR and the extra $2k just for more HP is not needed or justified. So now acura has made the customers decesion easy. Either you can or can not afford it. Thats why they designed the new TL to resemble the TSX so much. pretty much if you can afford the TL there is no way in hell you are going to get a TSX because the TL is much refined in every way. There is now a $8k-10k price gap between the TSX and 04 TL but what about the people who are in between the price range, $28k-32k? well acura is not stupid and they probably have done enough research to know that 1) its not a huge percentage with todays market 2) the have faith people will purchase the TSX and 3) this will give them a better image.
I've been complaining a lot about the TSX. I dont like it because its nothing exciting for me. I kept saying how if acura wants to keep me they need to offer me something better than my cl-s and i think it will be the RL. the RL should be close to the $50k price range. and AWD and lots of power with luxery should keep me in the acura family!
sidemarker
there will be no type-s model (acura held off the current tl-s so that they could get a good jump in sales for the cl-s)
look at the trend
01 cl-p and cl-s both offered at the same time
02 rsx and rsx-s both offered at the same time
because they have not released a type-s model for the TSX I highly doubt there will be one. Why? There is absolutely nothing in their current automotive line up that would negatively affect their sales. Think about it, if the TL-S came out the same time as the CL-S would we still have the same amount of cl-s drivers!?!?
also you have to look at the way acura priced the TSX. IF they considered releasing a type-s model they would have to price the TSX-p around $23k and type s model around $26k but NO the TSX is priced around $26k which means a type-s model would be around the vicinity of $29k!!!!!
The new TL is rumored to be priced around 35k which means a type-s model would be around the $40k area because of AWD! Why? because if the tl-p is running 270 hp then the type-s model should be around 300 hp which=no fuckin way for a FWD car!
it is clear to me what acura is doing
I think acura has made the line clear. Most people who can afford a type-s model should be able to afford a 34k car. so now instead of offering two models of the same car they have 2 distinctive cars, TSX and TL. the best way to look at it is like this
Suppose acura allowed us to do an even trade of our existing acuras with the new line up (04's) but it had to be in the same price range or came close to the original MSRPs. so that means everyone with a type-s model should get the new TL and everyone with a cl-p or tl-p should get a TSX. Now with the new TSX and TL it is clear. you either can or can't afford a TL. if you can you purchase one and if you cant then you purchase the TSX.
with our current tl and cl everything seems a little fuzzy. i think some people with a cl-p/tl-p could actually afford the type-s model but they choose not to because the car is WAY TOO SIMILAR and the extra $2k just for more HP is not needed or justified. So now acura has made the customers decesion easy. Either you can or can not afford it. Thats why they designed the new TL to resemble the TSX so much. pretty much if you can afford the TL there is no way in hell you are going to get a TSX because the TL is much refined in every way. There is now a $8k-10k price gap between the TSX and 04 TL but what about the people who are in between the price range, $28k-32k? well acura is not stupid and they probably have done enough research to know that 1) its not a huge percentage with todays market 2) the have faith people will purchase the TSX and 3) this will give them a better image.
I've been complaining a lot about the TSX. I dont like it because its nothing exciting for me. I kept saying how if acura wants to keep me they need to offer me something better than my cl-s and i think it will be the RL. the RL should be close to the $50k price range. and AWD and lots of power with luxery should keep me in the acura family!
sidemarker
#33
Originally posted by sidemarker
this is what i think
there will be no type-s model (acura held off the current tl-s so that they could get a good jump in sales for the cl-s)
look at the trend
01 cl-p and cl-s both offered at the same time
02 rsx and rsx-s both offered at the same time
because they have not released a type-s model for the TSX I highly doubt there will be one. Why? There is absolutely nothing in their current automotive line up that would negatively affect their sales. Think about it, if the TL-S came out the same time as the CL-S would we still have the same amount of cl-s drivers!?!?
also you have to look at the way acura priced the TSX. IF they considered releasing a type-s model they would have to price the TSX-p around $23k and type s model around $26k but NO the TSX is priced around $26k which means a type-s model would be around the vicinity of $29k!!!!!
The new TL is rumored to be priced around 35k which means a type-s model would be around the $40k area because of AWD! Why? because if the tl-p is running 270 hp then the type-s model should be around 300 hp which=no fuckin way for a FWD car!
it is clear to me what acura is doing
I think acura has made the line clear. Most people who can afford a type-s model should be able to afford a 34k car. so now instead of offering two models of the same car they have 2 distinctive cars, TSX and TL. the best way to look at it is like this
Suppose acura allowed us to do an even trade of our existing acuras with the new line up (04's) but it had to be in the same price range or came close to the original MSRPs. so that means everyone with a type-s model should get the new TL and everyone with a cl-p or tl-p should get a TSX. Now with the new TSX and TL it is clear. you either can or can't afford a TL. if you can you purchase one and if you cant then you purchase the TSX.
with our current tl and cl everything seems a little fuzzy. i think some people with a cl-p/tl-p could actually afford the type-s model but they choose not to because the car is WAY TOO SIMILAR and the extra $2k just for more HP is not needed or justified. So now acura has made the customers decesion easy. Either you can or can not afford it. Thats why they designed the new TL to resemble the TSX so much. pretty much if you can afford the TL there is no way in hell you are going to get a TSX because the TL is much refined in every way. There is now a $8k-10k price gap between the TSX and 04 TL but what about the people who are in between the price range, $28k-32k? well acura is not stupid and they probably have done enough research to know that 1) its not a huge percentage with todays market 2) the have faith people will purchase the TSX and 3) this will give them a better image.
I've been complaining a lot about the TSX. I dont like it because its nothing exciting for me. I kept saying how if acura wants to keep me they need to offer me something better than my cl-s and i think it will be the RL. the RL should be close to the $50k price range. and AWD and lots of power with luxery should keep me in the acura family!
sidemarker
this is what i think
there will be no type-s model (acura held off the current tl-s so that they could get a good jump in sales for the cl-s)
look at the trend
01 cl-p and cl-s both offered at the same time
02 rsx and rsx-s both offered at the same time
because they have not released a type-s model for the TSX I highly doubt there will be one. Why? There is absolutely nothing in their current automotive line up that would negatively affect their sales. Think about it, if the TL-S came out the same time as the CL-S would we still have the same amount of cl-s drivers!?!?
also you have to look at the way acura priced the TSX. IF they considered releasing a type-s model they would have to price the TSX-p around $23k and type s model around $26k but NO the TSX is priced around $26k which means a type-s model would be around the vicinity of $29k!!!!!
The new TL is rumored to be priced around 35k which means a type-s model would be around the $40k area because of AWD! Why? because if the tl-p is running 270 hp then the type-s model should be around 300 hp which=no fuckin way for a FWD car!
it is clear to me what acura is doing
I think acura has made the line clear. Most people who can afford a type-s model should be able to afford a 34k car. so now instead of offering two models of the same car they have 2 distinctive cars, TSX and TL. the best way to look at it is like this
Suppose acura allowed us to do an even trade of our existing acuras with the new line up (04's) but it had to be in the same price range or came close to the original MSRPs. so that means everyone with a type-s model should get the new TL and everyone with a cl-p or tl-p should get a TSX. Now with the new TSX and TL it is clear. you either can or can't afford a TL. if you can you purchase one and if you cant then you purchase the TSX.
with our current tl and cl everything seems a little fuzzy. i think some people with a cl-p/tl-p could actually afford the type-s model but they choose not to because the car is WAY TOO SIMILAR and the extra $2k just for more HP is not needed or justified. So now acura has made the customers decesion easy. Either you can or can not afford it. Thats why they designed the new TL to resemble the TSX so much. pretty much if you can afford the TL there is no way in hell you are going to get a TSX because the TL is much refined in every way. There is now a $8k-10k price gap between the TSX and 04 TL but what about the people who are in between the price range, $28k-32k? well acura is not stupid and they probably have done enough research to know that 1) its not a huge percentage with todays market 2) the have faith people will purchase the TSX and 3) this will give them a better image.
I've been complaining a lot about the TSX. I dont like it because its nothing exciting for me. I kept saying how if acura wants to keep me they need to offer me something better than my cl-s and i think it will be the RL. the RL should be close to the $50k price range. and AWD and lots of power with luxery should keep me in the acura family!
sidemarker
#35
I doubt there will be a Type-S model.. At least for the next few years. The TL-S only came out after the CLS was released and people started clammoring for the same engine in their TL. A 270hp TL will sell plenty and the majority of people that will buy the car will feel that is plenty of HP. I don't see a rush to sell a Type-S model.
I could be wrong, but I doubt we will see it until the 2006 model year if ever
I could be wrong, but I doubt we will see it until the 2006 model year if ever
#36
Some of you sound silly. 260hp is HELLA horsepower already. What did u expect, another 100hp? Be serious. 270hp is HELLA horsepower, heck it is CLASS LEADING. Not sure of torque numbers but if your complaining of 270hp, you need to sell your car and just buy a Vette with "only" 345 hp.
#38
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
270 HP that should be about 210-215 to the wheels. The auto version should run mid to high 14s all day.
270 HP that should be about 210-215 to the wheels. The auto version should run mid to high 14s all day.
I am pretty sure that the new TL is not lighter than the 03 model.
Nashua.
#39
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
Sorry, you are wrong!.. my CLS dynoed at 226 SAE WHP and I run a best of 14.61 on 18" wheels and tires.
I am pretty sure that the new TL is not lighter than the 03 model.
Nashua.
Sorry, you are wrong!.. my CLS dynoed at 226 SAE WHP and I run a best of 14.61 on 18" wheels and tires.
I am pretty sure that the new TL is not lighter than the 03 model.
Nashua.
J/k, but seriously, my car is totally stock, and I have a hard time keeping it at or within 10 mph of the speed limit...so I'm quite satisfied. I'm even thinking of getting a TSX (6-speed this time though )
#40
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 5
From: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
Sorry, you are wrong!.. my CLS dynoed at 226 SAE WHP and I run a best of 14.61 on 18" wheels and tires.
I am pretty sure that the new TL is not lighter than the 03 model.
Nashua.
Sorry, you are wrong!.. my CLS dynoed at 226 SAE WHP and I run a best of 14.61 on 18" wheels and tires.
I am pretty sure that the new TL is not lighter than the 03 model.
Nashua.