2017 Ford Explorer Sport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2017, 08:14 AM
  #81  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 41
Posts: 15,510
Received 1,090 Likes on 767 Posts
is there much rear cargo with the 3rd row up?

my friend just brought his Tahoe over on Saturday and whilst its a big truck and spacious 3rd row, the cargo space with the 3rd row up is a joke...

my next SUV with a 3rd row will have captains chairs for the 2nd row... we only have two kids to worry about but with the car seats in on a bench, access to the back is nonexistent...
Old 06-26-2017, 08:30 AM
  #82  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by KaMLuNg
is there much rear cargo with the 3rd row up?

my friend just brought his Tahoe over on Saturday and whilst its a big truck and spacious 3rd row, the cargo space with the 3rd row up is a joke...

my next SUV with a 3rd row will have captains chairs for the 2nd row... we only have two kids to worry about but with the car seats in on a bench, access to the back is nonexistent...
That's the exact reason we passed on the Tahoe. The Tahoe's rear storage is just a flat shelf and has no depth. The Chevy dealer said people buy the Tahoe for hauling people and the Suburban if they want to haul cargo too. The Suburban is a beast and not something I saw my wife driving. It's 2 feet longer than the Tahoe.

The Explorer has ~20 cuft of storage in back. That's more than the Tahoe and more than any other SUV we looked at. It has a well to put stuff in since that's where the seats go in when you fold them. Remnded me of the Sienna. And to the bench seat. They suck. We have 3 kids, what a PITA to have to fold the seat down each time one of them needed to get into the third row. Granted we lost a seat going to 2nd row bucket but just try to have someone sit in the center row middle seat. My 10 yr old daughter who is stick skinny sat in it and the seat belts dug into her back.

My kids can easily walk in the middle of the bucket to get to the 3rd row. Also our 2nd and 3rd rows are both power folding so if we need to fold them it's pretty simple.
Old 06-26-2017, 11:14 AM
  #83  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Congrats, wish I could sell the wife on the ExSport, but she's Flex for life now. So it'll be an EcoBoost Flex for her next one.
Old 06-26-2017, 01:29 PM
  #84  
Safety Car
 
wackjum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 41
Posts: 4,388
Received 486 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
That's the exact reason we passed on the Tahoe. The Tahoe's rear storage is just a flat shelf and has no depth.

The Explorer has ~20 cuft of storage in back. That's more than the Tahoe and more than any other SUV we looked at. It has a well to put stuff in since that's where the seats go in when you fold them.
Body-on-frame vs unibody. If you're not planning on towing or going off-road, there's no reason for a body-on-frame construction. Unibody is better in every way for most passenger vehicles needs.
Old 06-26-2017, 03:18 PM
  #85  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 37,109
Received 598 Likes on 416 Posts
Nice new ride.

Can we at least change your name to NSX-ONEDAY?
The following users liked this post:
KaMLuNg (06-27-2017)
Old 06-26-2017, 03:24 PM
  #86  
JT4
CTSV,TL, Audi Q7 & A5SB
 
JT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC / LI
Age: 57
Posts: 2,082
Received 599 Likes on 454 Posts
Congrats, very nice.. My brother in-law returned his 2014 a couple of months ago and picked up a 2017 and loves it..
Old 06-26-2017, 03:59 PM
  #87  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by KaMLuNg
fatty sims strikes again...
The following users liked this post:
KaMLuNg (06-27-2017)
Old 06-26-2017, 04:01 PM
  #88  
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
 
CCColtsicehockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 37
Posts: 43,461
Received 3,656 Likes on 2,490 Posts
Originally Posted by RaviNJCLs
Nice new ride.

Can we at least change your name to NSX-ONEDAY?
Old 06-26-2017, 04:01 PM
  #89  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoBello
Fully loaded and it comes with black door handles? Is this 1992?
YES as it should. The Sport should NOT come with anything chrome, especially when the Grille, and rear tailgate piece come Black to point out its a SPORT. Who in their right mind would want gaudy chrome door handles!!
Old 06-26-2017, 04:02 PM
  #90  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
We were all set on a Tahoe/Yukon and Kris said go test-drive the Sport. There is definitely more seat room in the Tahoe but rear storage is a huge disappointment in the Tahoe.
And hopefully in a year or so I can sneak in some mods from https://www.livernoismotorsports.com/

Only thing I wish was the bench option in the Explorer could actually fit 3 kids. My daughter sat in the middle and was in pain from the seatbelts digging into her back.
Would have made long weekend trips to the mountain house easier when we had a ton of stuff to bring up. Hey Kris maybe I'll have to take the Genesis and the Explorer up.
: THENNNNNNNN you woke up.....
Old 06-26-2017, 04:10 PM
  #91  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
We were all set on a Tahoe/Yukon and Kris said go test-drive the Sport. There is definitely more seat room in the Tahoe but rear storage is a huge disappointment in the Tahoe.
And hopefully in a year or so I can sneak in some mods from https://www.livernoismotorsports.com/

Only thing I wish was the bench option in the Explorer could actually fit 3 kids. My daughter sat in the middle and was in pain from the seatbelts digging into her back.
Would have made long weekend trips to the mountain house easier when we had a ton of stuff to bring up. Hey Kris maybe I'll have to take the Genesis and the Explorer up.
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
That's the exact reason we passed on the Tahoe. The Tahoe's rear storage is just a flat shelf and has no depth. The Chevy dealer said people buy the Tahoe for hauling people and the Suburban if they want to haul cargo too. The Suburban is a beast and not something I saw my wife driving. It's 2 feet longer than the Tahoe.

The Explorer has ~20 cuft of storage in back. That's more than the Tahoe and more than any other SUV we looked at. It has a well to put stuff in since that's where the seats go in when you fold them. Remnded me of the Sienna. And to the bench seat. They suck. We have 3 kids, what a PITA to have to fold the seat down each time one of them needed to get into the third row. Granted we lost a seat going to 2nd row bucket but just try to have someone sit in the center row middle seat. My 10 yr old daughter who is stick skinny sat in it and the seat belts dug into her back.

My kids can easily walk in the middle of the bucket to get to the 3rd row. Also our 2nd and 3rd rows are both power folding so if we need to fold them it's pretty simple.
Your welcome.

The Tahoe is just like my Expedition was. With the 3rd row up there was room for 2 duffle bags behind it, and some small little things on top of it and thats it! The Explorer is HUGE in comparison behind the 3rd row. We fit 4-5 peoples luggage behind it every weekend when we go to our cottage. Worse case scenario get a rear aluminum trailer hitch cargo tray from Harbor Freight for a hundred bucks and a weather tight cargo bag for it and have all the room you need.
Old 06-26-2017, 04:11 PM
  #92  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
YES as it should. The Sport should NOT come with anything chrome, especially when the Grille, and rear tailgate piece come Black to point out its a SPORT. Who in their right mind would want gaudy chrome door handles!!
Agreed, there should be no chrome, but I'd prefer PTM over black; one of the big reasons I got an F150 Sport (no chrome on the exterior, aside from badging). One of the reasons I wouldn't get a white ExSport. I actually really like the Smoked Quartz.
Old 06-26-2017, 04:17 PM
  #93  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by wackjum
Body-on-frame vs unibody. If you're not planning on towing or going off-road, there's no reason for a body-on-frame construction. Unibody is better in every way for most passenger vehicles needs.
I will say, this thing (explorer sport) tows my ski boat (close to 5k with trailer) 100x better than my Expedition ever could. WAY more power and torque for towing, it never knows its back there, and ride compliance with the trailer is the same. You never feel it back there. Gas mileage no comparison either. If im not exploring the power of the tune, its easily getting mid 25-27mpg hwy, around 18 -20 with the boat compared to 16-18 and 11 for my expedition. The Sport isnt the best thing to compare for off road as it sits nearly 2 inches lower than the standard explorer
Old 06-26-2017, 04:17 PM
  #94  
Suzuka Master
 
RDX10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,345
Received 869 Likes on 665 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Congrats, wish I could sell the wife on the ExSport, but she's Flex for life now. So it'll be an EcoBoost Flex for her next one.
I thought they discontinued the flex didn't they?

Originally Posted by fsttyms1
YES as it should. The Sport should NOT come with anything chrome, especially when the Grille, and rear tailgate piece come Black to point out its a SPORT. Who in their right mind would want gaudy chrome door handles!!
I think he might have thought they were black unpainted handles like how they sometimes still do on base models.
Old 06-26-2017, 04:18 PM
  #95  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Agreed, there should be no chrome, but I'd prefer PTM over black; one of the big reasons I got an F150 Sport (no chrome on the exterior, aside from badging). One of the reasons I wouldn't get a white ExSport. I actually really like the Smoked Quartz.
Can always get the handles in body color now to match.
Old 06-26-2017, 08:48 PM
  #96  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 30
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
Congrats on the Explorer. You really can’t go wrong with this generation, they are great looking trucks (er...CUVs) and are a great bang for the buck. 3.5 is a solid engine too, lots of aftermarket support if you’re interested in that.


Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I will say, this thing (explorer sport) tows my ski boat (close to 5k with trailer) 100x better than my Expedition ever could. WAY more power and torque for towing, it never knows its back there, and ride compliance with the trailer is the same. You never feel it back there. Gas mileage no comparison either. If im not exploring the power of the tune, its easily getting mid 25-27mpg hwy, around 18 -20 with the boat compared to 16-18 and 11 for my expedition. The Sport isnt the best thing to compare for off road as it sits nearly 2 inches lower than the standard explorer
The fuel economy (not that I really care) I get in my Edge (2.7tt, Livernois 93 aggressive tune) is shocking to me. For something with 400+ hp, how it averages 25 combined and can do 30 on the highway is beyond me. This weekend I hit 33mpg for a few miles...weird.

Somedays I wish I would’ve gone Explorer though. Big big.
Old 06-26-2017, 10:12 PM
  #97  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by wackjum
The Ford Explorer looks so good, especially the Sport. It is second only to the Land Rover Range Rover in appearance.
But first (by far) in reliability to the Range Rover. Honestly the RR Sport was on our list for a short bit. My wife loved the look but then I showed her the reliability rankings for it. It was crossed off the list very quickly. I also just can't justify pulling out that much cash for an SUV, even pre-owned.
Old 06-27-2017, 07:51 AM
  #98  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 41
Posts: 15,510
Received 1,090 Likes on 767 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I will say, this thing (explorer sport) tows my ski boat (close to 5k with trailer) 100x better than my Expedition ever could. WAY more power and torque for towing, it never knows its back there, and ride compliance with the trailer is the same. You never feel it back there. Gas mileage no comparison either. If im not exploring the power of the tune, its easily getting mid 25-27mpg hwy, around 18 -20 with the boat compared to 16-18 and 11 for my expedition. The Sport isnt the best thing to compare for off road as it sits nearly 2 inches lower than the standard explorer
what's the tow capacity on it?
Old 06-27-2017, 08:16 AM
  #99  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
But first (by far) in reliability to the Range Rover. Honestly the RR Sport was on our list for a short bit. My wife loved the look but then I showed her the reliability rankings for it. It was crossed off the list very quickly. I also just can't justify pulling out that much cash for an SUV, even pre-owned.
This has always been my concern with the RR. My wife loves it, but those rankings scare me.

That said, we know a few folks with RRs and they've been bullet-proof. I know, I was shocked too. A couple of our friends even purchased new ones this year after trading in the old with like 150k problem-free miles. According to them, once Tata took it over, reliability has been great. I can't verify that for sure since I really don't follow RR, but they all have glowing reviews and zero issues with them.

I know it's all anecdotal, but up until recently, I never knew anyone who had a RR with no problems and now these people have turned everything upside down
Old 06-27-2017, 08:28 AM
  #100  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by KaMLuNg
what's the tow capacity on it?
5k
Old 06-27-2017, 08:30 AM
  #101  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
But first (by far) in reliability to the Range Rover. Honestly the RR Sport was on our list for a short bit. My wife loved the look but then I showed her the reliability rankings for it. It was crossed off the list very quickly. I also just can't justify pulling out that much cash for an SUV, even pre-owned.


Hood letters

Old 06-27-2017, 08:33 AM
  #102  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
Congrats on the Explorer. You really can’t go wrong with this generation, they are great looking trucks (er...CUVs) and are a great bang for the buck. 3.5 is a solid engine too, lots of aftermarket support if you’re interested in that.




The fuel economy (not that I really care) I get in my Edge (2.7tt, Livernois 93 aggressive tune) is shocking to me. For something with 400+ hp, how it averages 25 combined and can do 30 on the highway is beyond me. This weekend I hit 33mpg for a few miles...weird.

Somedays I wish I would’ve gone Explorer though. Big big.
The 2.7tt is a beast engine and very impressive in its own right. You ever try the (what many call the) E-95 tune (3gal of E85 and the rest of the tank 93 for an approximate 95 octane?) my buddy has it on his wifes sport and its pretty noticable over 93 tune. I still need to get the 3bar map installed so i can go with larger tunes.
Old 06-27-2017, 09:07 AM
  #103  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Originally Posted by RDX10
I thought they discontinued the flex didn't they?
I believe 2020 is going to be the final model year for the Flex. But yes, it has been announced that it is going to be discontinued.
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Can always get the handles in body color now to match.
Old 06-27-2017, 02:40 PM
  #104  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
I believe 2020 is going to be the final model year for the Flex. But yes, it has been announced that it is going to be discontinued.

I hope they have a replacement in mind, i like the Flex and still wouldnt mind one some day. Be nice to see the newer 3.0 TT 400hp motor or a higher hp version of the 3.5 in the flex and the upcoming explorer replacement
Old 06-27-2017, 02:52 PM
  #105  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I hope they have a replacement in mind, i like the Flex and still wouldnt mind one some day. Be nice to see the newer 3.0 TT 400hp motor or a higher hp version of the 3.5 in the flex and the upcoming explorer replacement
Raptor 3.5TT in the Flex/Exploder
Old 06-27-2017, 03:52 PM
  #106  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,158 Likes on 1,386 Posts
Nsx-never
Old 06-27-2017, 08:52 PM
  #107  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Raptor 3.5TT in the Flex/Exploder
Even the new 3.0 from lincoln would be nice
Old 07-29-2017, 07:35 AM
  #108  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Have had the Explorer a little over a month. She now has 4200 miles on her.

2 trips to the beach house.
5 trips to the mountain house
Daily schlepps back and forth to drop off/pick up kids at day camps.

At this rate she'll surpass the mileage on the Genesis by years end.
Old 07-29-2017, 10:12 AM
  #109  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
Have had the Explorer a little over a month. She now has 4200 miles on her.

2 trips to the beach house.
5 trips to the mountain house
Daily schlepps back and forth to drop off/pick up kids at day camps.

At this rate she'll surpass the mileage on the Genesis by years end.
By this rate it will pass the Genesis within 2 months.
Old 07-29-2017, 02:41 PM
  #110  
Team Owner
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,327
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,133 Posts
How's the room in the 2nd/3rd rows compared to the Sienna?
Old 07-29-2017, 09:54 PM
  #111  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
How's the room in the 2nd/3rd rows compared to the Sienna?
Very comparable. I definitely miss being able to remove a seat in the middle row to pack stuff. Love the power folding 2nd and 3rd row seats.
Old 07-31-2017, 08:28 AM
  #112  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
^ Haven't been in the 3rd row of an Explorer, but in the Flex, my 6'0" self has sufficient room in the 3rd row. Not sure it's somewhere I'd want to be for a long drive (seats are pretty firm & upright), but it's not cramped.
Old 08-02-2017, 01:21 AM
  #113  
Team Owner
iTrader: (15)
 
Flipster23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,747
Received 2,334 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Congrats!!! White Plat is an amazing color, but I could be biased. I see you got captain chairs? I have bench and wish I got captain because it's so difficult getting the two oldest in the 3rd row since (since they're both under 4) and the newborn is in the 2nd row.
Old 08-02-2017, 08:00 AM
  #114  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by Flipster23
Congrats!!! White Plat is an amazing color, but I could be biased. I see you got captain chairs? I have bench and wish I got captain because it's so difficult getting the two oldest in the 3rd row since (since they're both under 4) and the newborn is in the 2nd row.

We test drove and were almost ready to buy the one with a bench seat.
I would have liked the ability to have all 3 kids in the middle if we needed the room but 2 things stopped me:

1) Access to the rear seats is, like you said, really a PITA
2) Sitting in the center seat on the bench is painful. The seatbelts hit you right in the back. They aren't far enough apart to make it comfortable.
Old 08-02-2017, 08:17 AM
  #115  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
^ Haven't been in the 3rd row of an Explorer, but in the Flex, my 6'0" self has sufficient room in the 3rd row. Not sure it's somewhere I'd want to be for a long drive (seats are pretty firm & upright), but it's not cramped.
Its not something i would want to do for a half day trip but with the 2nd row being able to slide forward a few inches there is enough room for 2 adults in the 3rd row to head out for dinner or a short trip. For kids/teens its more than enough. We often have 5 or 6 passengers in ours on the weekend trip to the lake and never a complaint about room in the 3rd in the 1hr 20min drive. (and all the luggage for the weekend stowed behind them)
Old 08-02-2017, 08:19 AM
  #116  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Flipster23
Congrats!!! White Plat is an amazing color, but I could be biased. I see you got captain chairs? I have bench and wish I got captain because it's so difficult getting the two oldest in the 3rd row since (since they're both under 4) and the newborn is in the 2nd row.
That was the single biggest reason i overruled my wife. She wanted the bench, and with 2 kids in boosters/car seats i knew the captains chairs would make it much easier to get access to the 3rd row.
Old 08-02-2017, 08:42 AM
  #117  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Its not something i would want to do for a half day trip but with the 2nd row being able to slide forward a few inches there is enough room for 2 adults in the 3rd row to head out for dinner or a short trip. For kids/teens its more than enough. We often have 5 or 6 passengers in ours on the weekend trip to the lake and never a complaint about room in the 3rd in the 1hr 20min drive. (and all the luggage for the weekend stowed behind them)
Makes sense, the seats in the Flex don't slide. Our next one will definitely have 2nd row bucket seats.
Old 08-03-2017, 08:07 AM
  #118  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Makes sense, the seats in the Flex don't slide. Our next one will definitely have 2nd row bucket seats.
I dont know if the bench seat in the explorer slides or not or if its only the captains chairs. Something tells me its only the later?
Old 08-03-2017, 08:36 AM
  #119  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Gotcha, haven't been in one without a bench.
Old 08-03-2017, 12:03 PM
  #120  
Advanced
 
ALarsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 95
Received 25 Likes on 11 Posts
Just curious, did you cross shop against the MDX? What were your thoughts?

The Ford website shows the 3.5EB gets 16 city / 22 highway. Is that consistent with your experiences? Does it require premium?


Quick Reply: 2017 Ford Explorer Sport



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.