GX470 or QX56?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2005, 02:18 PM
  #81  
Racer
 
AcuraGT-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beltfed
GX470 all day.........you can buy right now a $56,500 2005 Sport for under $50k (heavy discounts).

The QX56 is a piece of shit, the door handles are big enough to beat someone with and the interior borders on nasty.

I personally wouldn't get either, but its your wallet.
Hit the nail in the head. The QX is a giant POS, the car is a quality nightmare. WHy the HELL would i buy an unreliable Japanese car? Might as well get the Escalade. The QX is built in MISSISSIPPI!!! The GX in JAPAN, nuff said.

The QX has had issues galore, rattles, bad brakes etc. The GX was a 2 time 4x4 of the year!! THe QX is BRAND NEW and finishes behind the Navigator, LX 470 and RR in Motor Trend.

The interior is horrible for the price as the creaks and fit and finish.But its big and has a very good engiine.
Old 07-10-2005, 02:22 PM
  #82  
Racer
 
AcuraGT-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
What? The Lx is on par with every other 2001 suv, not 2005 class leading luxury suvs. If I wasn't mistaken these pics would be of the limited edition tundra with nav, not some 70k super star...
























In the end of opinions, you're right, to each his own version of luxury....

When you compare the NEW cars how about comparing the NEW LX interior



Every auto magazine RAVES over the LX interior.
Old 07-10-2005, 05:07 PM
  #83  
has been here awhile
 
SPUDMTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraGT-3
When you compare the NEW cars how about comparing the NEW LX interior



Every auto magazine RAVES over the LX interior.
Thanks for backin me up with more pictures Just what I was looking for. Where'd you get all of those interior shots? I did a google search and could only find one or two good shots.

Heck, I felt that our '99 LX470's interior was just as nice as the new Range Rover (in terms of feel). The competition can make some very attractive cabins, but Lexus' quality is unbeatable.
Old 07-10-2005, 05:29 PM
  #84  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by SPUDMTN
Thanks for backin me up with more pictures Just what I was looking for. Where'd you get all of those interior shots? I did a google search and could only find one or two good shots.

Heck, I felt that our '99 LX470's interior was just as nice as the new Range Rover (in terms of feel). The competition can make some very attractive cabins, but Lexus' quality is unbeatable.
Reliability? Agree.
Quality? There are others that I consider to be better.
Old 07-10-2005, 07:06 PM
  #85  
Racer
 
AcuraGT-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cob3683
Reliability? Agree.
Quality? There are others that I consider to be better.
Who on earth has better quality? lol

All it takes is sitting in a QX56 for 1 minute and closing the door and doing the same in the LX. Its NIGHT and DAY difference. Maybe for those that have no idea, go to a local auto show and sit in both. The QX feels like a Kia, its ridiculous.

Originally Posted by SPUDMTN
Thanks for backin me up with more pictures Just what I was looking for. Where'd you get all of those interior shots? I did a google search and could only find one or two good shots.

Heck, I felt that our '99 LX470's interior was just as nice as the new Range Rover (in terms of feel). The competition can make some very attractive cabins, but Lexus' quality is unbeatable.
Google and the Lexus site.
Old 07-10-2005, 07:11 PM
  #86  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraGT-3
Who on earth has better quality? lol

All it takes is sitting in a QX56 for 1 minute and closing the door and doing the same in the LX. Its NIGHT and DAY difference. Maybe for those that have no idea, go to a local auto show and sit in both. The QX feels like a Kia, its ridiculous.
I agree 100% with the Lexus vs. QX statement.

I just don't agree with Lexus quality is unbeatable statement.
Old 07-10-2005, 07:58 PM
  #87  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by cob3683

I just don't agree with Lexus quality is unbeatable statement.
...particularly when a number of higher end domestics are actually starting to catch up.

F23A4, who thinks there's some confusion between perceived quality and actual quality.
Old 07-10-2005, 08:04 PM
  #88  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
well, i own a 2004 4runner which is what the gx is based on and I haven't had a single problem. not a squeek/rattle/thunk. i've never owned a vehicle that hasn't had at least one problem by now (13k miles). it just feels solid. i cant say this for the 350z it replaced. i can tell this truck is going to last far longer than i'm willing to drive it...
Old 07-10-2005, 08:12 PM
  #89  
has been here awhile
 
SPUDMTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
...particularly when a number of higher end domestics are actually starting to catch up.

F23A4, who thinks there's some confusion between perceived quality and actual quality.
Ahhh, screw it. I'm done arguing about this. It is now blatantly obvious that it is all a matter of taste. I'll just state it like this: given my experience with this particular vehicle, I believe that the LX has the best overall quality out there. That's me. For me, it's the shear silkiness of the vehicle that has me sold. From the rich, buttery leather that drapes the seats, door panels, and steering wheel, to the incredibly smooth and solid ride, to the subdued growl of the 4.7 liter engine, to the solid "thud" of the doors. For me, these are the qualities that put it above the rest. Many would agree with me. But many would also disagree. That's alright. I'm glad not everyone drives an LX470. I absolutely love the look of Range Rovers and Touaregs...they're beautiful vehicles and definitely worthy of lusting after. But FOR ME, I think the LX is the best package.

I'm all for conversing back and forth and having a good "debate" with thorough explanations, but I feel that discussing "perceived quality" will just run us around in circles. It's simply a matter of opinion, for perceived quality, more or less, is just a matter of how good the materials feel to a specific person. It's not a science. It's an art.

---

But to get back on topic, go with the Lexus. They build an incredibly smooth SUV...or is it LUV (Luxury Utility Vehicle)?
Old 07-10-2005, 10:37 PM
  #90  
Drifting
 
DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraGT-3
Hit the nail in the head. The QX is a giant POS, the car is a quality nightmare. WHy the HELL would i buy an unreliable Japanese car? Might as well get the Escalade. The QX is built in MISSISSIPPI!!! The GX in JAPAN, nuff said.

The QX has had issues galore, rattles, bad brakes etc. The GX was a 2 time 4x4 of the year!! THe QX is BRAND NEW and finishes behind the Navigator, LX 470 and RR in Motor Trend.

The interior is horrible for the price as the creaks and fit and finish.But its big and has a very good engiine.
The QX is reliable. The 2004 models have had a couple of issues like the infamous brake warping, but you make it sound like it falls apart or something. The 2005 models have been trouble free and I know some with a '05 QX and hasn’t problems with it.

And the GX also has had issues like steering vibration problems, driveline drone, rattles coming from the sunroof, clunking sounds coming from the drive shafts etc. And the GX already had two minor recalls while the QX has none.
Old 07-11-2005, 06:17 AM
  #91  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DownUnder
The QX is reliable. The 2004 models have had a couple of issues like the infamous brake warping, but you make it sound like it falls apart or something. The 2005 models have been trouble free and I know some with a '05 QX and hasn’t problems with it.

And the GX also has had issues like steering vibration problems, driveline drone, rattles coming from the sunroof, clunking sounds coming from the drive shafts etc. And the GX already had two minor recalls while the QX has none.
recalls are a GOOD thing...some manufacturers wont issue a recall unless the NHTSA steps in and makes them.


JD Power survey for both vehicles (note that the lexus recieved an award):

Last edited by zeroday; 07-11-2005 at 06:19 AM.
Old 07-11-2005, 06:29 AM
  #92  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
from epinions.com:

50% of the reviews were negative here for the QX:
http://www.epinions.com/2004_Infinit...splay_~reviews
http://www.epinions.com/pr-Cars-2005...splay_~reviews

Only one bad review here for the GX (a dubious one at that):
http://www.epinions.com/auto_Make-20...splay_~reviews
http://www.epinions.com/auto_Make-20...splay_~reviews
Old 07-11-2005, 06:35 AM
  #93  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
only a few reviews here, but you can still see a trend here:

QX scored an 83 on Autoweb; most vehicles scored 88:
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...Action/Reviews

GX scored 100 so far:
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...Action/Reviews
Old 07-11-2005, 02:43 PM
  #94  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
I wonder which one would be better in hauling the Bayliner 285 I'm considering to purchase.
Old 07-11-2005, 02:46 PM
  #95  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
I wonder which one would be better in hauling the Bayliner 285 I'm considering to purchase.
have bayliners improved? i remember a long time ago they didnt have much of a rep...thin fiberglass hulls or something...
Old 07-11-2005, 03:30 PM
  #96  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
have bayliners improved? i remember a long time ago they didnt have much of a rep...thin fiberglass hulls or something...
....kinda like Hyundai huh??
Old 07-11-2005, 04:32 PM
  #97  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
....kinda like Hyundai huh??
so it has? it was a serious question; not trying to rain on your parade or anything just figured you'd done some research etc.
Old 07-11-2005, 05:28 PM
  #98  
Suzuka Master
 
mclarenf3387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 8,620
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
have bayliners improved? i remember a long time ago they didnt have much of a rep...thin fiberglass hulls or something...
Not really, they are better then they were, but they are still not up to par with others like Sea Ray or even Rinker has come up the ranks.

And I wouldn't buy new F23A4, you will lose too much money. Buy a 1-2 year old boat, and keep it in great shape, and it will hardly drop in value.



If you hav questions though about boat purchasing and stuff, PM me. My family has bought a few over the years

Oh, and you would need a deisel pickup to tow that. THere is more to the weight than just the dry weight.
Old 07-11-2005, 10:51 PM
  #99  
Racer
 
AcuraGT-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
Exactly. Go to Autoweek or the Nissan forums, the QX is just horrible in quality. Hell, EVERY Nissan product out that new Canton plant is horrendous, that is why they sent a team of engineers from Japan to try to help.

There is no way I'm paying for a shoddy built, American made Japanese car with a luxury badge. I will just by a Navigator or Escalade.

The QX is kind of the new "it" SUV, ANY large SUV sells no matter how good or bad it is (except dumbass Isuzu). You can get them for 5k easy off list and if you look, resale is horrendous already.
I credit Nissan for giving INfiniti another SUV, since that is WHAT people want but they should have gotten it RIGHT, like with th eG35 or even M35/45.
Old 07-12-2005, 05:32 AM
  #100  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by mclarenf3387
Not really, they are better then they were, but they are still not up to par with others like Sea Ray or even Rinker has come up the ranks.
True. Then again my 02 Maxima is not up to par with the 02 Accords & Camrys but, I havent had any major problems with it yet. But the B285 is just one we're looking at. (Zero: It's kinda like focusing on the Altima with some ancillary looks at the Accord and Camry. )

Originally Posted by mclarenf3387
And I wouldn't buy new F23A4, you will lose too much money. Buy a 1-2 year old boat, and keep it in great shape, and it will hardly drop in value.
We're looking 3-4 years out, so we're looking now for later. Also, I'm not planning to haul it regularly rather very sporadically.

Old 07-12-2005, 05:47 AM
  #101  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Forbes on the QX56

Forbes on the GX470
Old 07-12-2005, 07:03 AM
  #102  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
that article is on th 03' gx. the 05 gx has a new 270hp v8 engine.
Old 07-12-2005, 11:05 AM
  #103  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
...still doesnt come close the the VK56DE when it comes to output but, I posted those links as a reference to other attributes of both.
Old 07-12-2005, 11:15 AM
  #104  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
...still doesnt come close the the VK56DE when it comes to output but, I posted those links as a reference to other attributes of both.
it does when you put it in a vehicle that is over 500lbs lighter.
Old 07-12-2005, 11:20 AM
  #105  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
That avatar is hilarious
Old 07-12-2005, 11:23 AM
  #106  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
it does when you put it in a vehicle that is over 500lbs lighter.
I'm talking towing capacity NOT, 0-60 or 1/4 mile times --> These are full size SUVs. 8900lbs (QX) vs 6500lbs (GX)*. That add'l 2400lbs should be good for a bag or two more groceriesJUST thinking aloud though. I'm guessing engines may have a little something to do with that though.


* Courtesy of Edmunds
Old 07-12-2005, 11:28 AM
  #107  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
I'm talking towing capacity NOT, 0-60 or 1/4 mile times --> These are full size SUVs. 8900lbs (QX) vs 6500lbs (GX)*. That add'l 2400lbs should be good for a bag or two more groceriesJUST thinking aloud though. I'm guessing engines may have a little something to do with that though.


* Courtesy of Edmunds
oh yeah forgot, you're the boat guy
Old 07-12-2005, 11:35 AM
  #108  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
oh yeah forgot, you're the boat guy

....just call me Popeye!!!
Old 07-12-2005, 03:02 PM
  #109  
Drifting
 
DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
recalls are a GOOD thing...some manufacturers wont issue a recall unless the NHTSA steps in and makes them.


JD Power survey for both vehicles (note that the lexus recieved an award):
The Lexus should have a higher rating since it's on it's third year in production which they've worked out most of the first and second year "all new car bugs". And I take those ratings as a grain of salt cause supposedly the '98 LX470 is rated high by them, but mine hasn't been exactly great.


Originally Posted by zeroday
Originally Posted by zeroday
only a few reviews here, but you can still see a trend here:

QX scored an 83 on Autoweb; most vehicles scored 88:
http://www.autoweb.com/content/rese.../Action/Reviews

GX scored 100 so far:
http://www.autoweb.com/content/rese.../Action/Reviews
Those QX ratings each only have two reviews so that's not a good representation on the overall QX's out there. And people that have problems have a tendency to voice there negative experience then people with good experiences especially on those sites.
Old 07-12-2005, 03:17 PM
  #110  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by DownUnder
And people that have problems have a tendency to voice there negative experience then people with good experiences especially on those sites.
VERY good point. Just browsing through the 3G TL forum substantiates your point.
Old 07-12-2005, 06:02 PM
  #111  
Registered Big Dog
 
BC2G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 40
Posts: 5,909
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
FX45 all the way buddy!!!!!!!
Old 07-12-2005, 09:33 PM
  #112  
drop em like its hot
Thread Starter
 
rezurex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Harlem, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the input guys... i test drove the X5 today, was fairly impressed but goddamn the price just doesnt seem justifiable.

i will go back to the lexus dealer on monday and go for another test drive... if i can get a good deal i might as well sign then...

25k down too much? maybe i should put like 15 down and save some cash just in case some shit happens right.... i hate car payments like hell

hopefully i can get my godamn suv before i leave for asia. thanks for your input guys

-rez
Old 07-13-2005, 06:38 AM
  #113  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DownUnder
The Lexus should have a higher rating since it's on it's third year in production which they've worked out most of the first and second year "all new car bugs". And I take those ratings as a grain of salt cause supposedly the '98 LX470 is rated high by them, but mine hasn't been exactly great.





Those QX ratings each only have two reviews so that's not a good representation on the overall QX's out there. And people that have problems have a tendency to voice there negative experience then people with good experiences especially on those sites.
Seems like the gx owners voiced their satisfaction to jdpower though huh?

well since you won't take statistical proof into account, and won't provide proof of your own to support your assertions that QX customers are as happy as gx owners then i really don't see what the point of continuing this interaction is. I think it's obvious to everyone which vehicle will be more reliable now so I'm done here.
Old 07-13-2005, 03:02 PM
  #114  
mio
Police
 
mio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SecretBase N/A
Age: 52
Posts: 1,175
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
love both of GX and QX,

I will go QX, coz QX is new and fashionable.

GX is cool, but it is too old, it really needs to be re-designed...
Old 07-13-2005, 03:35 PM
  #115  
Banned
 
Jaydef03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westchester
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I CANT BELIEVE THIS THREAD IS 5 PAGES.

ever consider the new Hemi Jeep Grand Cherokee? just a suggestion. but the quality falls wayyy short of a Lex. i was just bringing it up so you could consider the speed of the Hemi.
Old 07-13-2005, 03:44 PM
  #116  
Drifting
 
DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jaydef03
I CANT BELIEVE THIS THREAD IS 5 PAGES.

ever consider the new Hemi Jeep Grand Cherokee? just a suggestion. but the quality falls wayyy short of a Lex. i was just bringing it up so you could consider the speed of the Hemi.
Also the SRT-8 Grand Cherokee is another SUV I'd consider, 0-60 in under 5s and be able to haul stuff at the same time.
Old 07-13-2005, 03:55 PM
  #117  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jaydef03
ever consider the new Hemi Jeep Grand Cherokee? just a suggestion. but the quality falls wayyy short of a Lex. i was just bringing it up so you could consider the speed of the Hemi.
The new WK GC is much better than the previous model, in every way. The 05 GC's to date have not had "that" many issues.

No, its not a $55k Lexus.......but it a great rig for the $.

For 06, you have the return of the Overland with the 5.7L standard and Nav (available around Sept) or wait until the SRT-8 arrives (around Feb). Remains to be seen if the SRT-8 sells for over MSRP.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
edadams3
3G MDX (2014-2020)
18
07-13-2015 10:00 AM
tftimm
Car Talk
12
05-13-2009 07:06 PM
Mokos23
Car Talk
2
03-22-2007 09:02 PM
gocubsgo55
1G TSX (2004-2008)
18
04-26-2004 09:20 PM



Quick Reply: GX470 or QX56?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.