Forbes: Worst Made Cars on the Road

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:23 AM
  #1  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
TSX69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 4,789
Received 1,400 Likes on 704 Posts
Wink Forbes: Worst Made Cars on the Road



If you want to drive something dependable and long-lasting, steer clear of these vehicles.

With a 22% improvement in sales last month, and despite the six-month, $4.3 billion loss it announced Wednesday, General Motors is likely to have its strongest spring and summer in years. Plus, the automaker had critically acclaimed new products at the recent New York Auto Show and the much-anticipated Chevrolet Volt is due out this fall.

Year-over-year sales of GM's Cadillac division alone are up almost 76%; sales in the Buick, Chevrolet and GMC divisions were each up more than 40% for March. The industry as a whole was up 24.3%.

Unfortunately just because GM's cars are selling well now doesn't mean they're the best bet for durability or value -- yet. It'll take awhile before GM's new direction shows up in tangible new products at the dealership.

Four of the seven vehicles on our list of the worst-made cars on the road come from GM brands. And all of the cars on the list -- including Chrysler's Dodge Nitro and Jeep Wrangler -- are made by Detroit's Big Three. Only one car on the list is made by Ford Motor (NYSE: F).
Cadillac Escalade
Segment: Luxury SUV
CR Predicted Reliability Score: Fair
CR Value Score: Rated among the worst in value
CR Safety Score: Rated among the worst in safety.
CR Overall Score: 61 out of 100
J.D. Power Dependability Score: 2 out of 5 Power Circles
MSRP: $62,495

Chevrolet Aveo
Segment: Compact Car
CR Predicted Reliability Score: Poor
CR Value Score: Not rated among the worst in overall value
CR Safety Score: Not rated among the worst in overall safety.
CR Overall Score: 36 out of 100
J.D. Power Dependability Score: 2 out of 5 Power Circles
MSRP: $11,965

Chevrolet Colorado

Segment: Pickup Truck
CR Predicted Reliability Score: Poor
CR Value Score: Not rated among the worst in value
CR Safety Score: Rated among the worst in overall safety.
CR Overall Score: 41 out of 100
J.D. Power Dependability Score: 2 out of 5 Power Circles
MSRP: $16,985

Dodge Nitro
Segment: SUV
CR Predicted Reliability Score: Poor
CR Value Score: Rated among the worst in overall value
CR Safety Score: Not rated among the worst in safety.
CR Overall Score: 33 out of 100
J.D. Power Dependability Score: 2 out of 5 Power Circles
MSRP: $22,335

Ford F-250

Segment: Pickup Truck
CR Predicted Reliability Score: Poor
CR Value Score: Rated among the worst in overall value
CR Safety Score: Rated among the worst in overall safety.
CR Overall Score: 37 out of 100
J.D. Power Dependability Score: 3 out of 5 Power Circles
MSRP: $28,020
Behind the Numbers

To determine our list of the worst-made cars on the road, we started with the lowest-rated vehicles from four reliability and performance studies conducted this year. Those studies are all from Consumer Reports: The Most Reliable Cars Report; Best and Worst Values Report; Best and Worst Safety Performance Survey; and the CR overall scores for 2010 vehicles.

We then added to the list any vehicles that received fewer than three out of five power circles in this year's Vehicle Dependability Study from J.D. Power and Associates. Any car, truck or SUV named among the worst in at least three of those five total studies made the final cut to be on the "Worst-Made" list.

The biggest surprise on the list, given recent automotive news: It includes no Toyota (NYSE: TM) made vehicles. In fact, Toyota reported a 40.7% gain in sales last month over March 2009; its Lexus division was up 42%. (Generous buyer incentives greatly contributed to those numbers.) And although Consumer Reports has removed its "recommended pick" distinction from Toyota vehicles involved in the current recall, many analysts are standing by their previous assessments of Toyota's well-made products.

"Toyota and Lexus both were fairly steady on their quality" in the dependability report released last month, says Dave Sargent, J.D. Power's vice president of global vehicle research. "Toyota has both good quality and a high consumer perception of their quality -- so Toyota is very much in line."

GM's Chevrolet hasn't fared as well. Overall sales at Chevrolet are up, but sales of the $16,985 Chevrolet Colorado were down 21.9% year-over-year. Sales of the truck are down 32.2% for the year to date.

The $11,965 Chevrolet Aveo made our list too -- but probably won't in the very near future. When the 2012 Aveo comes out next year, it'll feature styling improvements (large vents in the front, 19" wheels, circular headlights) and performance upgrades (likely a 1.4-liter, four-cylinder turbo-boosted engine with 138 horsepower and a six-speed manual transmission). Early photos and speculation from experts like Jake Fisher, the senior automotive engineer at Consumer Reports, indicate it'll hold its own against Nissan's Versa and Honda's Fit -- two reliable, affordable, strong sellers.

Tough Trucks?

Aside from the Aveo, though, most of the worst-made cars on our list aren't cars at all -- they're trucks and SUVs. Besides the Colorado, GMC's $16,985 Canyon and Ford's $28,020 F-250 received some of the lowest scores of any vehicles we considered. The Canyon SLE, for instance, was listed by Consumer Reports as one of the worst values of any 2010 vehicle and as one of the least reliable new vehicles on the market this year. It received just two out of five power circles on J.D. Power's overall dependability rating.

The F-250 Lariat earned both the "worst value" and "worst safety performance" distinctions from Consumer Reports this year. It received an overall score of just 37 out of 100 points for predicted reliability, fuel economy, depreciation, ride, owner costs, accident avoidance, front-seat comfort, acceleration and owner satisfaction.
Copyrighted, Forbes.com. All rights reserved.
Old 04-12-2010, 08:39 AM
  #2  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Lol. Dodge Nitro....
Old 04-12-2010, 08:44 AM
  #3  
The Box
 
vas25tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,680
Received 80 Likes on 59 Posts
Only one I'm surprised at is the Aveo. I didn't think there would be too much to break in there...
Old 04-12-2010, 08:55 AM
  #4  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
All domestic. Imagine that.

I've had an Aveo rental. That thing is worse than a bicycle. Frightening at 55mph.
Old 04-12-2010, 09:03 AM
  #5  
DuDeChEwY
 
dudechewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol not surprised....
Old 04-12-2010, 09:47 AM
  #6  
Not Registered
 
Bdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 5,829
Received 87 Likes on 49 Posts
I think the title of "Worst Made" is a joke. The Escalade is well made 5 star safety, with On-Star emergency response... The only thing bringing it down is resale sucks and it's not a good value buying one new. Other than that, it's a joke to be on this list IMO. A Range Rover cost $20k more, has way more problems and resale is one of the worst of any vehicle made, why is it not on the list?
Old 04-12-2010, 09:58 AM
  #7  
Runs on Dunkin
 
1slo23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: College Station
Age: 36
Posts: 1,810
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
F-250's and Escalades are poorly made? Granted the newer Powerstrokes aren't as reliable as the 7.3 was, but still...theres way worse vehicles on the road

Last edited by 1slo23; 04-12-2010 at 10:01 AM.
Old 04-12-2010, 10:12 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
CocheseUGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Age: 44
Posts: 18,761
Received 960 Likes on 593 Posts
Forbes: Who didn't pay us to talk up their vehicles - a list.
Old 04-12-2010, 10:16 AM
  #9  
Q('.')=O
iTrader: (1)
 
imj0257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DFW, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 23,514
Received 720 Likes on 520 Posts
Also not surprised at all lol.
Old 04-12-2010, 10:56 AM
  #10  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by o2cls
All domestic. Imagine that.

I've had an Aveo rental. That thing is worse than a bicycle. Frightening at 55mph.
Actually the Aveo is Korean.
It's the Daewoo Kalos rebadged.
Old 04-12-2010, 11:08 AM
  #11  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Actually the Aveo is Korean.
It's the Daewoo Kalos rebadged.

...and you'd think GM would have learned after that Daewoo 'thing' they had badged as the Pontiac LeMans (or is it LeMons) back in the late 80s.
Old 04-12-2010, 11:09 AM
  #12  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
Escalade?
Really?

Granted, it wasn't one of the newest generation models so I'm not sure if they've gone downhill, but the 'rents had a 2002 Escalade back in the day and there was only one time that they ever had a problem with it. Something quirky happened with the electrical and the thing wouldn't start. I guess that could be a problem, , but it was a champ for the 4 years or so they did have it. They bought it for just under $50K, then privately sold it and got back $25K for it.

And worst in safety? Not only for the escalade, but the F-250?
Those things are tanks.
Old 04-12-2010, 11:47 AM
  #13  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
OEMAcuraPartsTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 563
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
...and you'd think GM would have learned after that Daewoo 'thing' they had badged as the Pontiac LeMans (or is it LeMons) back in the late 80s.
You know, Daewoos weren't really bad cars, as long as you replaced the timing belt before 40K.

The Nubiras were horrendous for front end problems, we were gonna propose that the lower control arms and sway bar links were changed every 15K, because that's when they failed....but the Lanos and Leganza were pretty bulletproof.

One funny sidebar, at a Daewoo factory training course that I attended, they told us that the one most important piece of info to bring back to our dealerships was that the oil filters had to be cranked on when installed. The threads were poorly made, and that they'd been having instances of the filter falling off the car after an oil change, despite using proper torque.

Now that's confidence in a car brand
Old 04-12-2010, 11:54 AM
  #14  
Disinformation Terminator
 
TheMirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NorCal
Age: 55
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdog
i think the title of "worst made" is a joke. The escalade is well made 5 star safety, with on-star emergency response... The only thing bringing it down is resale sucks and it's not a good value buying one new. Other than that, it's a joke to be on this list imo. A range rover cost $20k more, has way more problems and resale is one of the worst of any vehicle made, why is it not on the list?
x2
Old 04-12-2010, 12:04 PM
  #15  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by OEMAcuraPartsTim
You know, Daewoos weren't really bad cars, as long as you replaced the timing belt before 40K.

The Nubiras were horrendous for front end problems, we were gonna propose that the lower control arms and sway bar links were changed every 15K, because that's when they failed....but the Lanos and Leganza were pretty bulletproof.

One funny sidebar, at a Daewoo factory training course that I attended, they told us that the one most important piece of info to bring back to our dealerships was that the oil filters had to be cranked on when installed. The threads were poorly made, and that they'd been having instances of the filter falling off the car after an oil change, despite using proper torque.

Now that's confidence in a car brand
My best friend wakes up with cold sweats, recalling his LeMans ownership.
Old 04-12-2010, 12:20 PM
  #16  
registered pw
 
dallison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,821
Received 354 Likes on 252 Posts
Meh
Old 04-12-2010, 12:42 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
CocheseUGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Age: 44
Posts: 18,761
Received 960 Likes on 593 Posts
Originally Posted by OEMAcuraPartsTim
You know, Daewoos weren't really bad cars, as long as you replaced the timing belt before 40K.

The Nubiras were horrendous for front end problems, we were gonna propose that the lower control arms and sway bar links were changed every 15K, because that's when they failed....but the Lanos and Leganza were pretty bulletproof.

One funny sidebar, at a Daewoo factory training course that I attended, they told us that the one most important piece of info to bring back to our dealerships was that the oil filters had to be cranked on when installed. The threads were poorly made, and that they'd been having instances of the filter falling off the car after an oil change, despite using proper torque.

Now that's confidence in a car brand
Funny thing is, it was the Vauxhall Astra and it sold like hotcakes.

Pontiac badge = kiss of death.
Old 04-12-2010, 01:43 PM
  #18  
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Rockstar21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,810
Received 373 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by vas25tl
Only one I'm surprised at is the Aveo. I didn't think there would be too much to break in there...
same here.

we had a rental aveo and put mcdonalds trays under the rear tires with the E-Brake engaged and went driving in an abandoned parking lot. <-- funny shit

that little car help up just fine to our abuse back then.
Old 04-12-2010, 02:00 PM
  #19  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
F-250 and the Escalade?

The Aveo is terrible though.
Old 04-12-2010, 02:21 PM
  #20  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
That Escalade is a badly made Chevy and the Nitro is a badly made Liberty.
Old 04-12-2010, 02:28 PM
  #21  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm so glad Obama sank billions of our dollars into GM!
Old 04-12-2010, 02:43 PM
  #22  
Evil Mazda Driver
 
PortlandRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 37
Posts: 11,212
Received 174 Likes on 89 Posts
Take Consumer Reports with a grain of salt. They really got caught with their pants down when they decided to automatically recommend the redesigned Camry when it came out in '06 (as an '07). They even awarded it an 'excellent' reliability score before the car hit showrooms, something they said they don't do.

Well six months or so went by and isn't life grand? The Camry wasn't as great as they said it was...V6 engines having problems, transmissions going out, and all sorts of nefarious evil. The eating of words began; the recommended badge was removed and the reliability score went from excellent to average. Then they went about trying to cover up the fact they'd gushed over the car before it had even been offered for sale. I didn't like CR before that but since, I don't trust a single word they say because they seem to be too easily influenced by outside sources.
Old 04-12-2010, 09:23 PM
  #23  
Racer
 
Johnny_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
Age: 38
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Isn't this Forbes?
Old 04-12-2010, 10:01 PM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by Johnny_b
Isn't this Forbes?
Yeah, but Consumer Reports rated the vehicles, and even then they've been questionable. Portland already covered the part about CR.

The Forbes writer probably hasn't even spent more than a day with the aforementioned vehicles; they probably just scoured the net for vehicle ratings and found a popular name (CR) and used CR's ratings as a reference. No anecdotal experience whatsoever, and without any real time with the car, they predict that the Aveo may not be on this list in the near future simply because of some new features
Old 04-12-2010, 10:22 PM
  #25  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Bdog
A Range Rover cost $20k more, has way more problems and resale is one of the worst of any vehicle made, why is it not on the list?


80% of the Forbes execs own one.
Old 04-12-2010, 10:28 PM
  #26  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Responses from the Big 3....

From Chrysler Group LLC:

Consumer Reports' and J.D. Power and Associates' assessments of new vehicles are based on the previous three years of reliability and durability, respectively. Chrysler Group has taken aggressive actions to improve the quality and reliability of our vehicles over the past three years, and those efforts have shown significant progress. Internal data shows that warranty claim rate per 1,000 vehicles sold is cut in half from 3 years ago. Additionally, more than 75% of our product line will be refreshed by the end of the year. We look forward to demonstrating the numerous quality advancements we've integrated into the design, development and building of all Chrysler Group vehicles.

***

From Brian Rathsburg, Super Duty marketing manager, Ford Motor:

We appreciate the opportunity to respond. F-250 is part of our Super Duty lineup--that is our heavy-duty F-Series truck--and that is probably the most complicated vehicle line in the entire Ford Motor Company.

The theme that we are seeing with Super Duty in general and F-250 specifically is that we are seeing very marked improvement in terms of durability and reliability over the last couple of years. We always start with the customer point of view, and they vote with their purchase decision and with their pocket book. We've been the best-selling truck for 33 straight years, and Super Duty's a big part of that. If our sales position and our market position continues to dominate the segment, and if reliability and durability are at the forefront of the customer's mind, that tells us that at least in the near term, the last couple of years, the track record we see of reliability improvement is certainly ringing true with the customer as well, otherwise they wouldn't be buying our truck.

From Jamie Hresko, vice president of global quality, General Motors:

We put a lot of value in these surveys, because they in many cases do line up with reality. And that's why we have put forth a very aggressive customer-focused quality initiative over the past three years. Since 2007, the volume of dealer claims on a per-vehicle basis has dropped 45% across our portfolio. We have seen literally hundreds of thousands fewer claims in the U.S. market, so we're not saying we're perfect and we've got a lot of work to do, but we have substantially cut our warranty claims.

Now the Aveo has been a very low performing scorer in Consumer Reports, but we have a new one coming. It's going to start being built next year at our Orion Township plant in Michigan and it has the same type of engineering capability as the Equinox, Camaro, the Malibu--all of our fresh products. So expect that to be a knockout from a performance perspective.

The Escalade is a tough one because that is one of our lowest warranty vehicles that we have today, and it's a pretty good vehicle. The Colorado and Canyon are cars that are going to have to be refreshed at some point. They're not the premium vehicles like you see launched today, but we've got a plan for that as well.

We got past the debate three years ago in the company about whether or not we were going to listen to this survey or that survey, whether it was Consumer Reports or J.D. Power. And we decided we better win them all. We won't rest until absolutely every product is at the top.

When we build our cars today, we actually take Consumer Reports test procedures and we integrate them into our vehicles as we build them, so we've changed our whole philosophy on how we design and build cars over the past few years, which I think is one of the reasons that we're selling them. Because we've listened to [the test reports], and now it's starting to pay off.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/07/wor...responses.html
Old 04-12-2010, 10:30 PM
  #27  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
80% of the Forbes execs own one.
Old 04-12-2010, 10:50 PM
  #28  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
I dont buy that list, especially the Escalade and F250
Old 04-13-2010, 06:27 PM
  #29  
One on the right for me
 
subinf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 27,913
Received 271 Likes on 173 Posts
pretty weak
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
peti1212
ILX
22
01-05-2022 05:14 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
02-25-2020 09:57 AM
5 Acuras
2G RDX (2013-2018)
42
09-10-2015 12:33 PM
ptbarnett
3G RLX (2013+)
4
08-30-2015 12:39 PM



Quick Reply: Forbes: Worst Made Cars on the Road



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.