Chicago GTR Shoot **WARNING: NWS**
#46
Alright, you schmucks- get your flamethrowers ready....
1) The GT-R is NOT a good-looking car.
2) The young lady has an incredible body, and her face would be attractive if she were posing with a smile or a laugh instead of the photographer's retarded request for a snarl or other constipated expression.
Or, as Yummy would say, "eggzackry!"
1) The GT-R is NOT a good-looking car.
2) The young lady has an incredible body, and her face would be attractive if she were posing with a smile or a laugh instead of the photographer's retarded request for a snarl or other constipated expression.
Or, as Yummy would say, "eggzackry!"
Last edited by Will Y.; 09-29-2008 at 12:25 PM.
#48
I think either way... if either were in front of you (chick naked in your bed, or the key to the GT-R) I think it's safe to say we'd be ALL OVER IT IN A HEARTBEAT (well, maybe involving a brown bag for some)
#54
#55
#60
#61
Since when does the model own the pictures?
Obviously the photographer has the rights to them. Which it seems he was ok with chicagoz.com (synth19) being trademarked on the pics as well.
#62
If you look at the source file, you'll see that I'm not even hosting the pics. I was under the impression that she asked the photographer to take these pics down after negative comments started surfacing. She should email the photographer about this. If the comments were ALL positive, I doubt these would be requested to be taken down.
#70
Guy who lives down the street from me got a sliver one about a month or so ago... he also works in the building across the street from mine near the beltway... I always see it parked...at his house or a the office... quess that means we both work tooooooo much...
#72
If you look at the source file, you'll see that I'm not even hosting the pics. I was under the impression that she asked the photographer to take these pics down after negative comments started surfacing. She should email the photographer about this. If the comments were ALL positive, I doubt these would be requested to be taken down.
#73
^ I know the photographer personally, and I doubt he asked the girl to make any sort of facial expressions (But, I could be wrong). The ironic thing is that this thread was long gone and forgotten in September until Astro received an email. I figured she just googled the image names or something and found them here. She should have just asked the photographer to rename/delete the folder or something since who knows where else they are linked.
#74
^ I know the photographer personally, and I doubt he asked the girl to make any sort of facial expressions (But, I could be wrong). The ironic thing is that this thread was long gone and forgotten in September until Astro received an email. I figured she just googled the image names or something and found them here. She should have just asked the photographer to rename/delete the folder or something since who knows where else they are linked.
Still cant believe you wont let us chop
#76
^ I know the photographer personally, and I doubt he asked the girl to make any sort of facial expressions (But, I could be wrong). The ironic thing is that this thread was long gone and forgotten in September until Astro received an email. I figured she just googled the image names or something and found them here. She should have just asked the photographer to rename/delete the folder or something since who knows where else they are linked.