C/D review of the RL 56K = teh noes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2004, 11:43 AM
  #41  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl


You gotta be kidding
They do. It's the TIRES!
Old 11-03-2004, 11:47 AM
  #42  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
They do. It's the TIRES!
If anything its a combo of the two, but the TSX brakes are not good enough for such a heavy car. I noticed this right from the first time I ever used them.
Old 11-03-2004, 11:48 AM
  #43  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Conventional wisdom in the engine community is that 0.5L is perfect for one cylinder. Which means that a 4L engine "should" have 8 cylinders. Therefore, 4L is "big" for a V6.

Ok, maybe its a big V6 but the RL is a big car.

The only other 4.0L V6's I can think of off the top of my head is the new Nissan 4.0L, the 4.0L 210HP V6 in the Mustang and the 4.2L in the Ford Freestar. Besides that GM has the 3.8, 3.9 and a 4.3 for their truck line.

So a 4.0literish V6 is not uncommon.
Old 11-03-2004, 11:49 AM
  #44  
Registered AssHat
 
Lung Fu Mo Shi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Age: 46
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Conventional wisdom in the engine community is that 0.5L is perfect for one cylinder. Which means that a 4L engine "should" have 8 cylinders. Therefore, 4L is "big" for a V6.
It's probably just a stoked version of the VQ3.5 to generate more low-end torque for the trucks. You wouldn't want it in a car...you lose the top end.
Old 11-03-2004, 11:50 AM
  #45  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lung Fu Mo Shi
It's probably just a stoked version of the VQ3.5 to generate more low-end torque for the trucks. You wouldn't want it in a car...you lose the top end.

kinda like the TSX?
Old 11-03-2004, 11:51 AM
  #46  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Lung Fu Mo Shi
It's probably just a stoked version of the VQ3.5 to generate more low-end torque for the trucks. You wouldn't want it in a car...you lose the top end.

It is. Its tuned for more TQ than the 3.5 and earlier like you mentioned. But I'm sure a 4.0L can be tuned for the top end as well.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:04 PM
  #47  
OG
 
justinjsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Have any of you driven the car yet??? If no...why not go drive it first...then come back and say what you think it may or may not need.

I think alot of you keep looking at the RL as this E500/545I killer...its not.
There will be another version...just like there will be another version of the TL.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:15 PM
  #48  
Drifting
 
sipark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: D.C. area
Age: 46
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Conventional wisdom in the engine community is that 0.5L is perfect for one cylinder. Which means that a 4L engine "should" have 8 cylinders. Therefore, 4L is "big" for a V6.
I agree.. But, I can't stop laughing at 6.0 litre V8 corvette engine even though it's a good engine.. That's really staying within the convention .
Old 11-03-2004, 01:19 PM
  #49  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by justinjsw

I think alot of you keep looking at the RL as this E500/545I killer...its not.
There will be another version...just like there will be another version of the TL.
Do you mean like a type-s?
Old 11-03-2004, 01:27 PM
  #50  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Lung Fu Mo Shi
It's probably just a stoked version of the VQ3.5 to generate more low-end torque for the trucks. You wouldn't want it in a car...you lose the top end.

So how is Honda new Ridgeline Pickup going to be tuned? It also uses the 3.5
Old 11-03-2004, 02:32 PM
  #51  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sipark
I agree.. But, I can't stop laughing at 6.0 litre V8 corvette engine even though it's a good engine.. That's really staying within the convention .
Yeah, that is kinda funny, but there's no replacement for displacement. And I doubt that GM wants to make a V-12 anytime soon.

A perfect example, though, is BMW's new 5L V-10. Mmmmmm... perfection.....
Old 11-03-2004, 02:33 PM
  #52  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Received 191 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw

I think alot of you keep looking at the RL as this E500/545I killer...its not.
There will be another version...just like there will be another version of the TL.
Hmm...another version, like the A-specs or something completely different?
Old 11-03-2004, 03:06 PM
  #53  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
Hmm...another version, like the A-specs or something completely different?
My guess is that the TL will get AWD and IMA and the RL will eventually get the V8 that Honda is working on.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:58 PM
  #54  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
Have any of you driven the car yet??? If no...why not go drive it first...then come back and say what you think it may or may not need.

I think alot of you keep looking at the RL as this E500/545I killer...its not.
There will be another version...just like there will be another version of the TL.
I did drive the car and I thought it was great, except the steering could use a little more feel. For the money, there really isn't a better car on the market.
Old 11-03-2004, 04:01 PM
  #55  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Received 191 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
My guess is that the TL will get AWD and IMA and the RL will eventually get the V8 that Honda is working on.
I think the TL will get that as well (considering that the Accord will soon have the hybrid version); not sure about the RL and the V8...
Old 11-03-2004, 04:40 PM
  #56  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
I think the TL will get that as well (considering that the Accord will soon have the hybrid version); not sure about the RL and the V8...
Well it sounds like a V8 is in the works: https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...&postcount=122

I don't know if it's going to fit in the RL though. If not then we can safely assume that IMA will be added at somepoint down the road.
Old 11-03-2004, 05:55 PM
  #57  
OG
 
justinjsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Here we go again. IMA, SHAWD, V8 its all coming in due time. Honda is an infant compared to the big boys in the business. Next vehicle due for showrm floors the RDX...codename CUV.

And with all infants, there will be growing pains.
Old 11-03-2004, 05:56 PM
  #58  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
Here we go again. IMA, SHAWD, V8 its all coming in due time. Honda is an infant compared to the big boys in the business. Next vehicle due for showrm floors the RDX...codename CUV.
Most intriguing...
Old 11-04-2004, 11:49 AM
  #59  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
....V8....coming in due time.....
I'll believe it when I see it.
Old 11-04-2004, 11:53 AM
  #60  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
I'll believe it when I see it.

+ 1
Old 11-04-2004, 05:56 PM
  #61  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
V8 + IMA + SHAWD = Me
Old 11-04-2004, 06:09 PM
  #62  
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
mg7726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,913
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sauceman
V8 + IMA + SHAWD = Me
stop drooling on the next NSX
Old 11-04-2004, 06:19 PM
  #63  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Yes.
and

Oh and as for the V8, SH-AWD stuff, and IMA, I believe all 3, just a matter of time. I hope Honda gets the early SH-AWD jitters out of the way and is able to put it onto the TL. The TSX needs IMA in terms of an alternative, no v6 please (that's what a TL is for). And that V8, let's have 2; 1 4.3L rated at 350 Hp and 310 Lb./Ft. of Torque...

and a 4.4L V8 with 400 Hp @ 8,400 RPM and 330 Lb./ft. of Torque @ 4,000 RPM
>Redline of 8,600
>i-VTEC
>Midship design with the best 6MT the world has EVER seen
>Plenty of Carbon Fiber
>Please, no SH-AWD, weighs too much and gets the true sportiness out of the car.
Old 11-04-2004, 07:14 PM
  #64  
Burning Brakes
 
iNteGraz92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: El Monte, CA
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by justinjsw
Have any of you driven the car yet??? If no...why not go drive it first...then come back and say what you think it may or may not need.

I think alot of you keep looking at the RL as this E500/545I killer...its not.
There will be another version...just like there will be another version of the TL.
i don't know who said it's a e500/545 killer, but it the RL wedges quite nicely between the german sixes and v8s.
Old 11-05-2004, 09:26 AM
  #65  
Racer
 
members78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i want the new bmw m5. who do i have to kill to own that beast?
Old 11-05-2004, 09:27 AM
  #66  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by members78
i want the new bmw m5. who do i have to kill to own that beast?
Me! I saw it first!!!
Old 11-05-2004, 09:33 AM
  #67  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Or you could try a dealer rep as he's showing you the car.
Old 11-05-2004, 09:47 AM
  #68  
Racer
 
members78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Me! I saw it first!!!
you just moved to the top of the list of people i need to kill. watch ur back!
Old 11-05-2004, 09:47 AM
  #69  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
and

Oh and as for the V8, SH-AWD stuff, and IMA, I believe all 3, just a matter of time. I hope Honda gets the early SH-AWD jitters out of the way and is able to put it onto the TL. The TSX needs IMA in terms of an alternative, no v6 please (that's what a TL is for). And that V8, let's have 2; 1 4.3L rated at 350 Hp and 310 Lb./Ft. of Torque...

and a 4.4L V8 with 400 Hp @ 8,400 RPM and 330 Lb./ft. of Torque @ 4,000 RPM
>Redline of 8,600
>i-VTEC
>Midship design with the best 6MT the world has EVER seen
>Plenty of Carbon Fiber
>Please, no SH-AWD, weighs too much and gets the true sportiness out of the car.

Someone's dreaming in techna color.

Old 11-05-2004, 09:48 AM
  #70  
I'm back, biatch.
 
teg_to_bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
I'll believe it when I see it.
...and when I see it, I probably still won't believe it! I figure with IMA, Honda has a good enough excuse to never build a V8. RL's 3.5 V6 + IMA = 350ish hp? 300ish ft/lb torque? That should get the 0-60 time around 6.0.

I've noticed Clutch has been using a lot.
Old 11-05-2004, 07:52 PM
  #71  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by teg_to_TSX
...and when I see it, I probably still won't believe it! I figure with IMA, Honda has a good enough excuse to never build a V8. RL's 3.5 V6 + IMA = 350ish hp? 300ish ft/lb torque? That should get the 0-60 time around 6.0.

I've noticed Clutch has been using a lot.
I agree. Ima plus v6 already should push any v8 power Honda would ever need for a sedan and thats the reason I think Honda developing a V8 now, so damn late in the game (should have had one in 1990) would be a complete waste of money.

When I see, I'll laugh at Honda for building it. Powertrains are changing, Toyota is already moving fast towards their goal of all hybrids by 2012, Honda should too.
Old 11-05-2004, 07:53 PM
  #72  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by iNteGraz92
i don't know who said it's a e500/545 killer, but it the RL wedges quite nicely between the german sixes and v8s.
So who does that market to? People who can't make up their minds?
Old 11-05-2004, 07:58 PM
  #73  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Received 191 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
So who does that market to? People who can't make up their minds?
You get, for the time being, a 3.2L V6 for the E Class, a 3.0L for the 530i, a 3.2L for the A6...meanwhile, the V8 engines are larger and much more powerful. The RL's 3.5L does indeed fit nicely in that medium, until the Mercedes gets the 3.5L, and the Infiniti comes out.
Old 11-05-2004, 08:23 PM
  #74  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
You get, for the time being, a 3.2L V6 for the E Class, a 3.0L for the 530i, a 3.2L for the A6...meanwhile, the V8 engines are larger and much more powerful. The RL's 3.5L does indeed fit nicely in that medium, until the Mercedes gets the 3.5L, and the Infiniti comes out.

Doesn't sound like a safe place, mercedes will be there, with the new 3 series showing a powerful v6 engine I'd definately expect the 5-series to be there, infiniti will be there and they don't care who shows up, lexus with not be there, haha, and cadillac will be there. 300 on the surface sounds great, but thats paper, these other rwd only cars are lighter and can put out greater times with less hp.
Old 11-05-2004, 10:54 PM
  #75  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Received 191 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
Doesn't sound like a safe place, mercedes will be there, with the new 3 series showing a powerful v6 engine I'd definately expect the 5-series to be there, infiniti will be there and they don't care who shows up, lexus with not be there, haha, and cadillac will be there. 300 on the surface sounds great, but thats paper, these other rwd only cars are lighter and can put out greater times with less hp.
Well, that is another branch of discussion; I was merely answering your inquiry. The other automakers will indeed up the ante, and indeed I expect them to be faster...but in reality, they sell cars that are much power expensive. I don't expect them to beat the RL's 0-60 time by a whopping 2 seconds or more, but mere fractions of a second. They'll reserve those incredible 0-60 times for the S-Class and others, not for the E-Class, etc. Not for this price range.
Old 11-05-2004, 10:58 PM
  #76  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Received 191 Likes on 118 Posts
Just saw the RL commercial on NBC. I must say, seeing it in motion, it has road presence, moreso than what the online pictures can suggest. I didn't recognize it when the commercial started, kinda caught me off guard (having heard about it, but never seeing it, I had completely forgotten the RL has a commercial).

I have yet to see one in real life, though.
Old 11-06-2004, 03:16 AM
  #77  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,072
Received 753 Likes on 453 Posts
The same C&D where the RL review was in also had a review of the new A6 4.2. The 4.2 V8 has 330 hp, but Audi expect that 90% of sales will be the V6, which as I recall was about 270 hp.

So the RL already beats 90% of the new A6's, I'd say that's pretty damn good.
Old 11-07-2004, 04:13 PM
  #78  
Racer
 
SirWaWa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
braking doesn't look so good
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pham Alvan
2G CL (2001-2003)
35
05-18-2021 06:48 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
105
08-18-2019 10:38 PM
ITSJESTER
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
17
12-06-2018 02:29 AM
saturno_v
5G TLX (2015-2020)
21
09-27-2015 08:13 AM
flyromeo3
3G TL (2004-2008)
3
09-24-2015 11:24 PM



Quick Reply: C/D review of the RL 56K = teh noes.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.