BMW M3 Dynos (models: 1988-2002, modded and stock)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2003, 05:43 PM
  #1  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
BMW M3 Dynos (models: 1988-2002, modded and stock)

1988 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 2.3Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 120000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 154.0 @ 7027 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 130.2 @ 4957 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 183 @ 7027 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 155 @ 4957 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 65.6
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.998 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.998 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 8 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 8
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
throttle body
headers
284/276cams
chip



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1988 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 2.3Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 120000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 157.0 @ 7003 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 129.8 @ 5019 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 187 @ 7003 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 155 @ 5019 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 63.6
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.996 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.996 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 8 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 8
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
throttle body
headers
284/276cams
chip



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1995 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 3.0Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 82000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 189.7 @ 5781 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 198.0 @ 4422 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 226 @ 5781 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 236 @ 4422 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 59.9
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.992 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.992 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
chip
cam





-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1995 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 74000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 201.2 @ 5568 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 210.2 @ 4324 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 240 @ 5568 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 250 @ 4324 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 60.4
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.993 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.993 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction
Modifications: light weight fly wheel




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1995 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 3.0Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 82000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 188.9 @ 5929 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 198.7 @ 4442 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 225 @ 5929 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 237 @ 4442 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 59.9
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.992 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.992 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
chip
cam




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1995 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 74000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 203.5 @ 5737 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 210.8 @ 4269 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 242 @ 5737 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 251 @ 4269 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 60.2
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.993 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.993 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
light weight fly wheel





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2000 bmw m3
User Notes:
Max hp and Max tq are low because this dyno run was not performed to redline.

Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 26000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 193.6 @ 5299 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 218.5 @ 3998 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 230 @ 5299 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 260 @ 3998 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 54.1
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.987 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.987 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 10 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 10
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2000 bmw m3
Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 26000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 5M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 199.3 @ 5412 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 218.0 @ 4010 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 237 @ 5412 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 260 @ 4010 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 54.1
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.987 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.987 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 10 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 10
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2002 bmw m3
User Notes:
Max hp and Max tq are low because this dyno run was not performed to redline.

Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 18000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 228.4 @ 5845 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 225.7 @ 4050 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 272 @ 5845 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 269 @ 4050 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 62.6
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.995 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.995 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2002 bmw m3
User Notes:
Max hp and Max tq are low because this dyno run was not performed to redline.

Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 18000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 225.0 @ 6218 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 226.2 @ 4269 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 268 @ 6218 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 269 @ 4269 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 62.6
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.995 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.995 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2002 bmw m3
User Notes:
Max hp and Max tq are low because this dyno run was not performed to redline.

Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 8000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 236.8 @ 6069 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 238.4 @ 4236 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 282 @ 6069 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 284 @ 4236 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 59.9
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.992 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.992 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2002 bmw m3
User Notes:
Max hp and Max tq are low because this dyno run was not performed to redline.

Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 8000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 257.5 @ 6352 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 245.9 @ 5205 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 307 @ 6352 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 293 @ 5205 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 59.9
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.992 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.992 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2002 bmw m3
User Notes:
Max hp and Max tq are low because this dyno run was not performed to redline.

Engine Specs: 3.2Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 8000 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 240.3 @ 6249 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 237.2 @ 4213 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 286 @ 6249 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 282 @ 4213 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 68.0 / 58.2
Pressure (kPa): 101.3
Humidity (%): 60.0
Condition Details: ATC Corr = +0.991 Atmos. Corr = +1.000 K factor = +0.991 User/Dyno Inertia: 1.000 5.841 A Gear Ratio = 1.371 Vacuum Ref =+101.17 TachoSelect = 3 Ramp Up = 9 Ramp Down = 0 Ramp Command = 9
Fan:
Date and Time: 2002-12-21 - 00:00:00
Dyno Correction Factor No Correction

Modifications
This vehicle is stock
Old 10-25-2003, 05:48 PM
  #2  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
So there is a special trick dyno testers have to do with the latest M3's computer to get it to redline while dynoying. In this above cases, none of the latest gen. M3s were tested to redline....but it give us a good estimation of what happens up to about 6K rpm.
Old 10-25-2003, 05:53 PM
  #3  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Unbelievable how torquey the previous gen. M3's engine was (USA Spec).
Old 10-25-2003, 05:55 PM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
if anyone cares, my 330 dynoed at 197hp and 201lbs of torque stock

Just to compare.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:01 PM
  #5  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Here is the trick.
-----------------------------------

How to get around the 6500rpm limiter issue in an 03 E46 M3 SMG:

Some people talk about pushing DSC for 10 seconds -- I tried this to no avail. All that happened was my dash lit up like a Christmas tree but I still couldn't get past 6500rpms.

I know some people talked about fuse 34 -- I never tried that. I just tried the various "hold DSC for x seconds" trick and it never worked for me.

The Solution:

Before you turn the car on pull fuses 33, 56, and 61, which can be found in the glove compartment.

Now begin your dyno run. Your car instrument panel will light up like a Christmas tree (i.e. ABS light, etc etc). However, you can now dyno to redline! Once the dyno run is completed, put the fuses back in. All the lights will shut off once you start driving.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:02 PM
  #6  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Crazy Sellout
if anyone cares, my 330 dynoed at 197hp and 201lbs of torque stock

Just to compare.
And it's a 2003?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:03 PM
  #7  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Crazy Sellout
if anyone cares, my 330 dynoed at 197hp and 201lbs of torque stock

Just to compare.

So that's about 229HP at the crank, at 16% drivetrain loss. BMWs are always underrated from the factory. It's been proven many times.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:03 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
 
GreenMonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Swansea, MA
Age: 58
Posts: 35,218
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Got to love a motor that puts out more peak tq then hp.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:03 PM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
my 330 was a 2002 5-speed
Old 10-25-2003, 06:03 PM
  #10  
Powered By HONDA
 
Type S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere
Age: 49
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for sharing these precious info and date
E36 M3 is always my dream car..
although E46 is already avaliable on the market
Old 10-25-2003, 06:06 PM
  #11  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Type S
thanks for sharing these precious info and date
E36 M3 is always my dream car..
although E46 is already avaliable on the market
No problem.

You'll find a ton more of such interesting stuff here:

http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/forum...s=&forumid=142
Old 10-25-2003, 06:11 PM
  #12  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wtf? 272 trq-282trq at the FLYWHEEL? BMW underrating the engine a tad??
Old 10-25-2003, 06:15 PM
  #13  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
wtf? 272 trq-282trq at the FLYWHEEL? BMW underrating the engine a tad??
don't you mean overrating? I thought an 01-03 m3 made 330 at the crank?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:17 PM
  #14  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by zeroday
don't you mean overrating? I thought an 01-03 m3 made 330 at the crank?

Zero, please look at my comment about redlining a current M3 while dynoing.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:20 PM
  #15  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
doesnt the 01-03 M3 have a high reving engine and thats how it gets the power? Well if they didnt redline the car then that means all the power wasnt layed down, rite?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:21 PM
  #16  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
Zero, please look at my comment about redlining a current M3 while dynoing.
yeah but dynos should be looking at real world performance...not what the engine would do if you pulled fuses etc?? If the ecu RESTRICTS rpm's then that's how the car should be tested. Shit if I gutted my Z's interior and removed my rear hatch i'd be in the low 13's...
Old 10-25-2003, 06:23 PM
  #17  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
TRQ not HP...... i'm talkin TRQ is 262 at the FLYWHEEL
Old 10-25-2003, 06:23 PM
  #18  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
So what we know from the above is that a current generation M3 makes about 307 @ 6352 rpm at the crank. BMW claims peak HP of 333HP at 7900 rpm. Totally doable and I can even say it's underrated from the factory. Would not be surprised to see 350HP at the crank from a stock M3.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:23 PM
  #19  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by zeroday
yeah but dynos should be looking at real world performance...not what the engine would do if you pulled fuses etc?? If the ecu RESTRICTS rpm's then that's how the car should be tested. Shit if I gutted my Z's interior and removed my rear hatch i'd be in the low 13's...

:ghey:



ECU needs to pulled because the TCS and DSC kick off to the best of my understanding....
Old 10-25-2003, 06:25 PM
  #20  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
"CAPABLE" is alot different than what the car is tuned for. just pointing that out.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:25 PM
  #21  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
:ghey:



ECU needs to pulled because the TCS and DSC kick off to the best of my understanding....
care to elaborate?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:27 PM
  #22  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by zeroday
care to elaborate?

not sure what you mean buy capability....m3 will run low 13's all day. Pulling the ECU is only so you can dyno it....it's not unleashing any additional power.

somebody with a bmw will elaborate.....
Old 10-25-2003, 06:27 PM
  #23  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
:ghey:



ECU needs to pulled because the TCS and DSC kick off to the best of my understanding....
my car and the CLS both have a button for this...you're saying the M3 doesn't?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:29 PM
  #24  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
not sure what you mean buy capability....m3 will run low 13's all day. Pulling the ECU is only so you can dyno it....it's not unleashing any additional power.

somebody with a bmw will elaborate.....
this is where i'm unclear. why again do you have to pull the ecu to dyno the car? from gav's posts it looked like it was to rev past the stock limiter.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:29 PM
  #25  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by zeroday
my car and the CLS both have a button for this...you're saying the M3 doesn't?
nah it does but the ECU overides it or something....
Old 10-25-2003, 06:31 PM
  #26  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by zeroday
yeah but dynos should be looking at real world performance...not what the engine would do if you pulled fuses etc?? If the ecu RESTRICTS rpm's then that's how the car should be tested. Shit if I gutted my Z's interior and removed my rear hatch i'd be in the low 13's...
Wait a minute. You make it sound that if I pulled fuses to fool the ECU to let me redline the car while dynoying, I am cheating. Is that what you're implying? If yes, I disagree.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:32 PM
  #27  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
Wait a minute. You make it sound that if I pulled fuses to fool the ECU to let me redline the car while dynoying, I am cheating. Is that what you're implying? If yes, I disagree.
That was a question Gavrill...if that's not why you have to pull fuses to dyno the car, please explain again to me. I am thick sometimes lol.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:36 PM
  #28  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by zeroday
this is where i'm unclear. why again do you have to pull the ecu to dyno the car? from gav's posts it looked like it was to rev past the stock limiter.

They dont "pull the ECU". They pull 3 fuses to fool the ECU so it lets the engine redline.

I am not clear of why the ECU wont let them redline the engine in the first place, but I dont doubt it does. As you see from the several dynos, no car could go near the redline
Old 10-25-2003, 06:39 PM
  #29  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
They dont "pull the ECU". They pull 3 fuses to fool the ECU so it lets the engine redline.

I am not clear of why the ECU wont let them redline the engine in the first place, but I dont doubt it does. As you see from the several dynos, no car could go near the redline
yeah the car wouldn't run very well without an ecu would it lol. so if I owned an m3, why would i not pull these fuses out permanently....this needs more research...
Old 10-25-2003, 06:40 PM
  #30  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
I still think if you're comparing stock/stock dynos however the car needs to be as it comes from the factory; fuses and all.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:41 PM
  #31  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Zero, they are not pulling fuses to cheat. They are pulling fuses so that they make the ECU LET THEM reach redline. No extra power comes from them pulling fuses. Clear now?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:42 PM
  #32  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
Zero, they are not pulling fuses to cheat. They are pulling fuses so that they make the ECU LET THEM reach redline. No extra power comes from them pulling fuses. Clear now?
far from clear. why would you want to reach redline if no more power is unleashed by reaching it? collect underwear>?>profit...
Old 10-25-2003, 06:48 PM
  #33  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
all i'm saying is a car should be dynoed as stock in it's 'stock' configuration...without pulling fuses. Not doubting the car can dyno what you guys are saying if you yanks a fuse or two.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:50 PM
  #34  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by zeroday
far from clear. why would you want to reach redline if no more power is unleashed by reaching it? collect underwear>?>profit...
So I will pretend you dont know anything about the current M3 (which is probably untrue).

The answer to the above is:

Because the M3's engine makes A LOT MORE power above the 6K rpm area that the ECU lets these folks reach while dynoying.

Is that clearer now?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:52 PM
  #35  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
So I will pretend you dont know anything about the current M3 (which is probably untrue).

The answer to the above is:

Because the M3's engine makes A LOT MORE power above the 6K rpm area that the ECU lets these folks reach while dynoying.

Is that clearer now?
Yes. But I do wonder what you lose by pulling the fuses. Why not leave them out permanently if it produces...sorry...unleashes....such gains?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:55 PM
  #36  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
btw 'stock' to me means how a car comes form the factory; unmodified. If I see a stock vs stock dyno where one of the cars is an m3 I expect no one will be pulling fuses.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:55 PM
  #37  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by zeroday
Yes. But I do wonder what you lose by pulling the fuses. Why not leave them out permanently if it produces...sorry...unleashes....such gains?
The gains dont come from pulling the fuses! The gains come from letting the engine go above 6K rpm where a lot more power is made. As I wrote the M3 makes 333 HP at 7900 rpm according to BMW. If you stop at anything below 7900 rpm, you will see a lower HP result. That's how the engine is tuned.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:56 PM
  #38  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by zeroday
btw 'stock' to me means how a car comes form the factory; unmodified. If I see a stock vs stock dyno where one of the cars is an m3 I expect no one will be pulling fuses.
The M3 wont let you reach redline ONLY WHEN YOU TRY TO DYNO IT in this case! Clearer now?
Old 10-25-2003, 06:57 PM
  #39  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
damn it here. I went searching and this is what i found.

Its a traction problem when you are dynoing. Since the rear wheels are moving that much faster than the front wheels, which are stopped, it cuts it at 6500 rpm.

Heres what else i found....

If this is a man trans car...

1) Tie down to dyno and make all hook-ups
2) Start car and turn "off" DSC (lighted)
3) Turn off Dyno brake and run to 6200 rpm... do not exceed 6500 and do not go lower than 6000.
4) Clutch the car and hit the dyno brake.
5) Once wheels have stopped turn car off to key pos 1 (do not turn off all the way or you are hosed)
6) Turn key to pos 2 (dash lights)
7) Press and hold DSC button for 10 - 12 sec. and release
8) Start car and run happily to 8k...

If for some reason you miss a step the car will not go passed the 6.5k mark. All of your lights will be lit. i.e. DSC, Brake, ABS, Blow-out, etc... you will have to take the car off of the dyno and drive over 15mph to reset all of the lights.
Old 10-25-2003, 06:57 PM
  #40  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
ahh the brains of a nissan owner unleashes


Quick Reply: BMW M3 Dynos (models: 1988-2002, modded and stock)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.