View Poll Results: Accord/Stinger/Other
Accord Touring 2.0T
16
40.00%
Kia Stinger Premium RWD
14
35.00%
Other - Explain
10
25.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll
Accord Touring, Stinger Premium, or ?
03-20-2018, 02:58 PM
#121
Moderator
Thread Starter
Been out of town for over a week & have peeked in as time allowed, but haven't been able to respond until now.
The Stinger is definitely the more fun car between it & the Accord.
Not sure how big of a difference there is, but I did drive a 3.7 Q50a at a Carmax while having the F150 appraised. Wasn't a fan of the dual screen interface & the 3.7 was far from peppy, IMO.
New is not a requirement, but coming from a 2016, the newer tech would be nice. Ideally, 2014+ I think.
Stinger GT would likely still exceed the $40k cap, even with the lease/buyout scheme.
You can likely find a 2012 with 50k miles or so (maybe a little more) in the $40k range. Maybe not now as the market is picking up... but definitely after summer ends.
If it has to be new/newer... what about a Charger Scat Pack or something? Should be able to pick up a 2017 left over or demo for $35k or so...
Will have to look at the Charger, hadn't even had it on the radar.
G70 not on dealer lots yet, that I'm aware of, still not listed on the Genesis site.
The Stinger is definitely the more fun car between it & the Accord.
Not sure how big of a difference there is, but I did drive a 3.7 Q50a at a Carmax while having the F150 appraised. Wasn't a fan of the dual screen interface & the 3.7 was far from peppy, IMO.
New is not a requirement, but coming from a 2016, the newer tech would be nice. Ideally, 2014+ I think.
It may stretch your budget a little bit, but you may be able to get the V6 Stinger for a lot cheaper than you think. They had (still have?) an incentive running where if you leased it you got almost 7k off from the manufacturer. You figure you can negotiate at least another 2k off and that should put you at the low 40's for a GT2 V6. After one year they would allow you to refinance and buy the car (roughly 1k in fees here).
I don't know how much you drive, but the Stinger also comes with a 10 year/100k powertrain warranty on top of the 5 year/60k bumper-to-bumper.
You live in Texas, you deserve to have a RWD car!
I don't know how much you drive, but the Stinger also comes with a 10 year/100k powertrain warranty on top of the 5 year/60k bumper-to-bumper.
You live in Texas, you deserve to have a RWD car!
You can likely find a 2012 with 50k miles or so (maybe a little more) in the $40k range. Maybe not now as the market is picking up... but definitely after summer ends.
If it has to be new/newer... what about a Charger Scat Pack or something? Should be able to pick up a 2017 left over or demo for $35k or so...
G70 not on dealer lots yet, that I'm aware of, still not listed on the Genesis site.
03-20-2018, 03:05 PM
#122
Moderator
Thread Starter
I prefer the Stinger exterior.
I prefer the Accord interior.
I prefer the RWD layout of the Stinger.
I prefer a fully optioned out car, over a lower trim car (even if they're equally equipped... it's just nice knowing you've got the most badass version of said car). For that, the Accord gets the nod over the Stinger.
If it is a car OP wants to keep for many years, depreciation shouldn't be as much of a concern. Or... just wait under a year from now and buy used. I dunno. I can't really buy a car and worry about what it's worth when I want to get rid of it and no longer care for it. While it is nice to retain as much value as possible, I wouldn't be one to lose sleep over a 5k difference, five years down the line. Especially if the car was really good during that ownership period.
To to be honest, I'd have a hard time objectively choosing one over the other. Where one suffers, the other shines. It would really come down to how each one of them drives... and for that, only OP can decide which he prefers.
I prefer the Accord interior.
I prefer the RWD layout of the Stinger.
I prefer a fully optioned out car, over a lower trim car (even if they're equally equipped... it's just nice knowing you've got the most badass version of said car). For that, the Accord gets the nod over the Stinger.
If it is a car OP wants to keep for many years, depreciation shouldn't be as much of a concern. Or... just wait under a year from now and buy used. I dunno. I can't really buy a car and worry about what it's worth when I want to get rid of it and no longer care for it. While it is nice to retain as much value as possible, I wouldn't be one to lose sleep over a 5k difference, five years down the line. Especially if the car was really good during that ownership period.
To to be honest, I'd have a hard time objectively choosing one over the other. Where one suffers, the other shines. It would really come down to how each one of them drives... and for that, only OP can decide which he prefers.
<<looks up new accord interior photos
first thought. Holy fuck, thats an accord!? Second thought. That’s wayyy too nice for Uber drivers.
IDK. Personally I would much rather have an F150 over the two. Or a new Ranger when it comes out.
but between the two, if this were your commuter car / daily, you may get tired driving an accord amongst so many other accord owners. And you may also regret getting the stinger without the better engine. Wasn’t that the whole point of the stinger? Either way, you’re fucked
i do really like that whole back door lease scam that someone else mentioned regarding the stinger gt2. Lol. Just the whole idea of beating the system would have me stretching for the GT2. Besides, if it seems like a lemon or reliability is suspect, then don’t buy it out of the lease.
first thought. Holy fuck, thats an accord!? Second thought. That’s wayyy too nice for Uber drivers.
IDK. Personally I would much rather have an F150 over the two. Or a new Ranger when it comes out.
but between the two, if this were your commuter car / daily, you may get tired driving an accord amongst so many other accord owners. And you may also regret getting the stinger without the better engine. Wasn’t that the whole point of the stinger? Either way, you’re fucked
i do really like that whole back door lease scam that someone else mentioned regarding the stinger gt2. Lol. Just the whole idea of beating the system would have me stretching for the GT2. Besides, if it seems like a lemon or reliability is suspect, then don’t buy it out of the lease.
IMO, that may make it worse. Since you’re passing by many accords daily that are 10k less and will feel that you have overpaid to be part of the herd, and most people will think your car is significantly less that what you bought it for. Obviously that may be meaningless to many, but for such a common car such as accord, it’s got to get under your skin every now and then. Although we just got a loaded outback, so I’m not one to say, although it’s not a daily.
Lots of great points and suggestions proffered above.
RWD and fun driving seem important to you. But is a brand new Stinger really the (only) way to go?
I like the idea of checking out the G70 or looking for a used Vagon.
Have you considered a (lightly) used Lexus IS350 F-Sport? 2014-16 models w/about 35-50k on the ODO can be had for $30-35k. (Admittedly, might be too small inside, and the driving dynamics can be a little numb.)
RWD and fun driving seem important to you. But is a brand new Stinger really the (only) way to go?
I like the idea of checking out the G70 or looking for a used Vagon.
Have you considered a (lightly) used Lexus IS350 F-Sport? 2014-16 models w/about 35-50k on the ODO can be had for $30-35k. (Admittedly, might be too small inside, and the driving dynamics can be a little numb.)
I would get a Civic Type R over both. I did put my car seat in one at the dealership. It has a plenty of room in the back for it.
The Stinger should be a lot more fun to drive being RWD than Accord. But it is a first year for that model so wouldn't touch it. Should let others blow up the engine and have Kia address the issue.
I'm a big fan of the new Accord though! The 2.0T Sport version. Wouldn't go up to the top trim because almost $40k opens up too many good options.
CTR>Stinger>Accord 2.0T
The Stinger should be a lot more fun to drive being RWD than Accord. But it is a first year for that model so wouldn't touch it. Should let others blow up the engine and have Kia address the issue.
I'm a big fan of the new Accord though! The 2.0T Sport version. Wouldn't go up to the top trim because almost $40k opens up too many good options.
CTR>Stinger>Accord 2.0T
Sigh... as much as I love the CTR and everything it stands for, being in my 30s, I could never daily drive one. It's just waaaay too much. The faux carbon fibre kit, paired with the excessive body vents/lines and red accents.... it's like Honda stopped off at Pep Boys prior to putting the car on the market. I get the feeling that 00TL, being a family man, likely is in a similar boat. Also, coming from an F150, the Civic will feel cramped.
I could be wrong, but, I get the feeling he's looking for an auto and not a manual transmission, also. Maybe for the wife to drive also? I dunno. 00TL, clarify!!!
I could be wrong, but, I get the feeling he's looking for an auto and not a manual transmission, also. Maybe for the wife to drive also? I dunno. 00TL, clarify!!!
Nope, TLX doesn't really do much for me. The A-Spec is an improvement, but didn't even pop onto my radar.
03-20-2018, 03:13 PM
#123
Moderator
Thread Starter
I voted for other and here is why. As much as Honda wants to call the new Accord sporty, it’s still an Accord and to me isn’t that attractive. The stinger is more attractive however the resale value is going to plummet like a meteor that has entered the atmosphere. Not to mention I would not want to be in a base model Kia. While on that note, I owned a Sorento for a few months and loved it but got tired of needing to explain to people why I bought it....I paid less than half the original asking price too and I still felt like I needed to justify it. Kept getting something along the lines of “wow this is really nice for a Kia and would be amazing if it never had the Kia badge”.
Pushing that aside, both are brand new and I DO NOT trust ANY Honda with a new transmission let alone something as ambitious as 10 speeds. At least with the Kia the platform and transmission are tried and true, so is the 2.0T (but not so much the 3.3T).
My vote is to go look at a CPO 2015+ Hyundai Genesis sedan (the new bodystyle). It’s a Hyundai so resale has fallen like a ton of bricks (it was 70k in 2015 and now I see fairly loaded Genesis sedans with low miles in the 20’s). It has the same transmission as the stinger, you could go with the 3.8 vs 5.0 for fuel economy (not sure what it’s rated at to be honest, but for the savings in initial cost I’d think it evens out if it’s bad) but the build quality is better not to mention it still looks absolutely amazing and fresh whereas the stinger is not going to age very well IMHO. The Genesis is all around a much nicer car and while I think the stinger handles better (probably), I am certain the Genesis handles better than an accord and if you’re willing to get an Accord the Genesis would be a good compromise. Oh also rear seat leg room is ridiculous, I’m 6’2 and easily fit back there!! We’ve rented a Genesis numerous times and it continues to impress the hell out of me.
Pushing that aside, both are brand new and I DO NOT trust ANY Honda with a new transmission let alone something as ambitious as 10 speeds. At least with the Kia the platform and transmission are tried and true, so is the 2.0T (but not so much the 3.3T).
My vote is to go look at a CPO 2015+ Hyundai Genesis sedan (the new bodystyle). It’s a Hyundai so resale has fallen like a ton of bricks (it was 70k in 2015 and now I see fairly loaded Genesis sedans with low miles in the 20’s). It has the same transmission as the stinger, you could go with the 3.8 vs 5.0 for fuel economy (not sure what it’s rated at to be honest, but for the savings in initial cost I’d think it evens out if it’s bad) but the build quality is better not to mention it still looks absolutely amazing and fresh whereas the stinger is not going to age very well IMHO. The Genesis is all around a much nicer car and while I think the stinger handles better (probably), I am certain the Genesis handles better than an accord and if you’re willing to get an Accord the Genesis would be a good compromise. Oh also rear seat leg room is ridiculous, I’m 6’2 and easily fit back there!! We’ve rented a Genesis numerous times and it continues to impress the hell out of me.
Will have to look at the Genesis, it is quite the good looking car, can't say that I've even looked at any aside from the Coupe when they first came out.
It is quite good but it's not all that lively if you know what I mean. If you're going in looking for BMW or Audi driving dynamics, you'll be disappointed. If you're going in looking for Camry driving dynamics, you'll be thrilled.
OP, what I'd do is if you want a new zero mile car get the Accord. If you don't like it, you can sell without a ton of loss in value. If you are ok with used, getting a used Genny sedan is not a bad idea at all. Just make sure it's the most recent body style. If you don't like the Kia it'll be hard to sell without a massive loss in resale.
OP, what I'd do is if you want a new zero mile car get the Accord. If you don't like it, you can sell without a ton of loss in value. If you are ok with used, getting a used Genny sedan is not a bad idea at all. Just make sure it's the most recent body style. If you don't like the Kia it'll be hard to sell without a massive loss in resale.
Don't think the OP is looking for BMW or Audi driving dynamics. Simply saying that the newer Accord Sports are actually very nice cars even for driving in the canyons and tracks. The new engine is VERY responsive for the tunes too.
And I don't know which generation of BMW or Audi you are referring to but the new BMW and Audis are actually much less fun to drive than the older models. But let's not get there in this thread. Don't want to hijack it here.
And I don't know which generation of BMW or Audi you are referring to but the new BMW and Audis are actually much less fun to drive than the older models. But let's not get there in this thread. Don't want to hijack it here.
I know what to expect, and compared to the F150, they're both like a 4 door Lotus moreso than a floaty land yacht.
Thanks.
In all seriousness, I'd buy the Accord Sport 2.0T manual in a heartbeat if dealers were willing to do better on price. The dealer I went to for a test drive, as I was seriously interested, basically told me MSRP or pound sand...so I left. Why would I spend that kind of money on an Accord when I could get a lightly used, still under warranty BMW for a tiny bit more? If they start coming down in price, and get better lease options, I'd seriously consider one.
In other news...
https://www.autoblog.com/2018/03/12/...rd-slow-sales/
In all seriousness, I'd buy the Accord Sport 2.0T manual in a heartbeat if dealers were willing to do better on price. The dealer I went to for a test drive, as I was seriously interested, basically told me MSRP or pound sand...so I left. Why would I spend that kind of money on an Accord when I could get a lightly used, still under warranty BMW for a tiny bit more? If they start coming down in price, and get better lease options, I'd seriously consider one.
In other news...
https://www.autoblog.com/2018/03/12/...rd-slow-sales/
03-20-2018, 03:18 PM
#124
Moderator
Thread Starter
So to that question- is a 750i fun to drive? What about an s550? I have zero time behind the wheel of such big luxo cars, but how do they stack up? Granted, I expect the genesis to be on the shittier side, compared to the other two... but I still can't see them being fun. More so, designed to be comfortable first and foremost, above anything else.
Depends on your definition of fun to drive. If you want a canyon carver then no. If you want a rocketship, then yes. The big luxury cars are pretty quick in a straight line and can hold high speeds on the freeway without breaking a sweat because that's what they are designed for but they aren't going to compete at your next track day.
Any time you have that many gears, it's going to hunt for the right one. The question of what gear to be in given the spot in the rev range vs road speed vs throttle input just has too many answers because it can't predict what the driver is going to do/want next. The ZF9 in my Jeep does hunt a little but overall it's fine. I'll deal with a little hunting in exchange for nearly 30mpg on the highway.
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-20-2018)
03-20-2018, 03:20 PM
#125
Moderator
Thread Starter
Talked to him. It's like you said. They want sticker for the 2.0T 6spd. He said they can't keep them on the lot and have a list of people waiting for them to come in. He said DO NOT pay MSRP for one. He also mentioned if you can wait until the 2019s hit the lot, do that.
Which TX dealer? Hook a Texan up, any deals on a 2.0T Touring?How about a 2018 Mazda 6 Grand Touring with 2.5T
https://acurazine.com/forums/automot.../#post16201927
https://acurazine.com/forums/automot.../#post16201927
03-20-2018, 03:27 PM
#126
Let me ask what Dealer he is at in Texas. I think he is in the DFW area, but will have to confirm.
So what's wrong with the F-150, kind of curious as in a couple years I need to decide if I want to get a truck (because family) or get a Scat Pack. I'm torn between the two.
So what's wrong with the F-150, kind of curious as in a couple years I need to decide if I want to get a truck (because family) or get a Scat Pack. I'm torn between the two.
03-20-2018, 03:43 PM
#127
Moderator
Thread Starter
DFW is only 3-4 hours drive, so definitely an option. PM me if/when you find something out.
Nothing really wrong with the F150, I've always had cars & was all set to keep the Civic & buy an ND Miata before we needed a trailer for my wife's business, as it was hell having to load/unload the Flex with her inventory.
Now that we've changed gears business-wise, I'd like to get back into a car. I'd have no problem recommending the F150 to anyone, it's a fantastic truck, roomy & quiet with good MPG; though I would steer a buyer away from the pano roof. So far, mine's quiet & working properly again, but we'll see if the squeaks/rattles return.
The 2.7EcoBoost is a great little engine for someone that uses the truck primarily as a commuter & less for towing. I'm averaging between 18-22mpg depending on traffic & driving conditions.
Nothing really wrong with the F150, I've always had cars & was all set to keep the Civic & buy an ND Miata before we needed a trailer for my wife's business, as it was hell having to load/unload the Flex with her inventory.
Now that we've changed gears business-wise, I'd like to get back into a car. I'd have no problem recommending the F150 to anyone, it's a fantastic truck, roomy & quiet with good MPG; though I would steer a buyer away from the pano roof. So far, mine's quiet & working properly again, but we'll see if the squeaks/rattles return.
The 2.7EcoBoost is a great little engine for someone that uses the truck primarily as a commuter & less for towing. I'm averaging between 18-22mpg depending on traffic & driving conditions.
03-21-2018, 08:44 AM
#128
I actually got a chance to check one out up close this past weekend. Sat in it, etc. We had a car show this weekend and one of our vendors brought one. I have to say... wow... I was pretty impressed. I hate to say this, but it actually reminded me almost of a domestic E63. Very similar feel to the interior. The rear seats fold down as well so it adds versatility to the cargo space (if needed), seats were comfy... just all around nice car...
03-21-2018, 09:20 AM
#129
I actually got a chance to check one out up close this past weekend. Sat in it, etc. We had a car show this weekend and one of our vendors brought one. I have to say... wow... I was pretty impressed. I hate to say this, but it actually reminded me almost of a domestic E63. Very similar feel to the interior. The rear seats fold down as well so it adds versatility to the cargo space (if needed), seats were comfy... just all around nice car...
03-21-2018, 09:23 AM
#130
Moderator
Thread Starter
Looks like an R/T would be as high as I could likely go on a new Charger, unless there's deep discounts on a SP. Haven't looked around at local CPOs.
Will have to go drive one & see how it is.
Any complaints on a 2015 GS350 FSport? Local CPO in white on red/black.
Will have to go drive one & see how it is.
Any complaints on a 2015 GS350 FSport? Local CPO in white on red/black.
03-21-2018, 09:33 AM
#132
Race Director
The following 2 users liked this post by nanxun:
Shadow2056 (03-21-2018),
TacoBello (03-21-2018)
03-21-2018, 09:56 AM
#133
Burning Brakes
Chrysler/Dodge normally have DEEP rebates on their cars. $10k+. Some, or all, of which you have to qualify for. Credit score, if you're getting it financed thru Chrysler Cap, part of AARP, and stuff of that sort. But they normally have a bunch of rebates without even being in those as well.
03-21-2018, 10:16 AM
#134
Chrysler/Dodge normally have DEEP rebates on their cars. $10k+. Some, or all, of which you have to qualify for. Credit score, if you're getting it financed thru Chrysler Cap, part of AARP, and stuff of that sort. But they normally have a bunch of rebates without even being in those as well.
03-21-2018, 11:13 AM
#135
Burning Brakes
I'm buying my wife a van this year and thought about the Pacifica. I'd lease the damn thing because I don't know about the reliability on it. But they where giving some nice discounts. I think I was able to snag a Limited for just over 31k a couple months back when I looked at them.
That's the thing on domestics. They have all kinds of money built into the price already. That's why you can get one with $10k+ off. They give you that much off. Pocket $4k. You think you got a deal. They call it a day. Then when that new model comes out or the other vehicle you want comes out, you're stuck in the vehicle you got from them because the resale on it plummeted while you were driving it. You might still owe $21k on it three years later but it's worth $14k trade in. Unless you put down a substantial amount of cash down or a nice paid for trade, or a trade with no negative equity, you get into a domestic, you're stuck in it until you either pay it off or make more than the usual payments.
Don't get me wrong. There are a lot of them that are really nice. Like the Fusion with the self parking thing. I've yet to see anyone else with that other than Mercedes and BMW get it. It's a nice feature. It's just their value doesn't hold too well. Another reason I like selling Hondas. Lol.
Last edited by Shadow2056; 03-21-2018 at 11:16 AM.
03-21-2018, 12:03 PM
#136
Chrysler/Dodge normally have DEEP rebates on their cars. $10k+. Some, or all, of which you have to qualify for. Credit score, if you're getting it financed thru Chrysler Cap, part of AARP, and stuff of that sort. But they normally have a bunch of rebates without even being in those as well.
03-21-2018, 01:40 PM
#137
Moderator
Thread Starter
Found a 6MT Accord Sport 2.0 at a dealer I didn't even know existed about 10 miles from my office
Just ran up at lunch & gave it a test drive. Definitely a nice drive. The 6MT is much better than the one in the HR-V that I drove a couple years ago & there was no noticeable rev hang. Will have to get another (better) drive again in a Touring just to be sure.
Just ran up at lunch & gave it a test drive. Definitely a nice drive. The 6MT is much better than the one in the HR-V that I drove a couple years ago & there was no noticeable rev hang. Will have to get another (better) drive again in a Touring just to be sure.
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-21-2018)
03-21-2018, 02:56 PM
#138
Ex-OEM King
Chrysler/Dodge normally have DEEP rebates on their cars. $10k+. Some, or all, of which you have to qualify for. Credit score, if you're getting it financed thru Chrysler Cap, part of AARP, and stuff of that sort. But they normally have a bunch of rebates without even being in those as well.
Hmm...may have to go check one out.
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-21-2018)
03-21-2018, 03:08 PM
#140
Ex-OEM King
The only problem I can think of is what to get after that lease is over? Nothing else, short of AMG or BMW M, would be anywhere close to the right ballpark.
03-21-2018, 03:28 PM
#141
Moderator
Thread Starter
I think the Charger would lead to financial turmoil for me. About the same economy as the F150, but the potential for a lot worse. 
Honestly, the Accord Sport/Touring is at the top of the list, followed by the Stinger, but need to decide if I want to wait for the Mazda6T to arrive before making a decision.
Found a couple 2015+ Genesis sedans & 1 G80 in my budget, but they are ringing any bells for me.
May go look at the CPO GS350 FSport & may look at an IS to see how the back seat room is.
Honestly, the Accord Sport/Touring is at the top of the list, followed by the Stinger, but need to decide if I want to wait for the Mazda6T to arrive before making a decision.
Found a couple 2015+ Genesis sedans & 1 G80 in my budget, but they are ringing any bells for me.
May go look at the CPO GS350 FSport & may look at an IS to see how the back seat room is.
The following users liked this post:
nist7 (03-21-2018)
The following 2 users liked this post by Flipster23:
00TL-P3.2 (03-22-2018),
Shadow2056 (03-21-2018)
03-21-2018, 03:41 PM
#143
Ex-OEM King
03-21-2018, 03:42 PM
#144
Team Owner
Plus, it's not like it is a handling monster. It's still a big ass, heavy sedan. You might not be able to get the same power, but you can definitely get better handling, I'm sure.
03-21-2018, 05:13 PM
#146
Banned
I suspect that you still want more than a pedestrian ride, so no to the Accord.
Possibly a slighly used Maxima.
03-21-2018, 06:47 PM
#147
Burning Brakes
Another reason why I didn't get an 08 IS350 like I wanted to. No trunk space. Hardly any actual space in the vehicle. Nice feature. Good power. No space.
03-21-2018, 08:18 PM
#148
Team Owner
Yeah, I don't get why people are even suggesting that homer-mobile here. BTW, I'll remove the TLX suggestion because as a family car, rear space is worse than a Civic.
I suspect that you still want more than a pedestrian ride, so no to the Accord.
Possibly a slighly used Maxima.
I suspect that you still want more than a pedestrian ride, so no to the Accord.
Possibly a slighly used Maxima.
I can point to at least 25 members on AZ who would choose the so called homer mobile, over the TLX it is one hella good looking car. 2. Yes, suggest the Maxima with an absolute shit CVT transmission. So much sport. While he did mention fuel economy, he's no where near as concerned about it as you.
03-22-2018, 08:29 AM
#149
Senior Moderator
Low mileage Genesis/G80s with full factory warranties can be had for really good deals. My dads new Genesis is beautiful inside and out and thus far rock solid. Tons of room for kids/car seats in the rear, big trunk, great mileage. While its no mountain carver it does handle very well and can do spirited. Have you test drove one yet?
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-22-2018)
03-22-2018, 09:10 AM
#150
Ex-OEM King
Yep. There's a reason why the lease on them is so low. Because their resale is so low. Look at it's value after the 3 year lease with 36k miles. Good if you plan to keep it. Bad if you're buying it and might trade it in 3 years. That's why you can find the R/Ts, Scat Packs, and even some Hellcats for dirt cheap.
Lol. Yep! When you're driving a 500hp+ monster around for 3 years, unless you really need to settle down or just want a quick daily, you'd be hard pressed to find anything you actually like.
Lol. Yep! When you're driving a 500hp+ monster around for 3 years, unless you really need to settle down or just want a quick daily, you'd be hard pressed to find anything you actually like.
Also, RWD only and I don't want to buy an expensive set of snow tires/rims for a leased car.
Low mileage Genesis/G80s with full factory warranties can be had for really good deals. My dads new Genesis is beautiful inside and out and thus far rock solid. Tons of room for kids/car seats in the rear, big trunk, great mileage. While its no mountain carver it does handle very well and can do spirited. Have you test drove one yet?
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-22-2018)
03-22-2018, 09:40 AM
#151
Redneck mobile.
I don't think it's that.
I saw a HellCat sitting on the GMC lot this morning when I went to pick something up. I was like damn.
My ford dealer had a Scat pack on their lot a couple months back, they wanted 39k. 2016 4k miles (I believe) I told the salesmen you guys are tripping, I can walk across the street and get a brand new one for that price. Usually my Ford dealer used car prices are unbeatable. The previous owner had kids, and traded it in for a FoST.
:scratchhead:
I don't think it's that.
I saw a HellCat sitting on the GMC lot this morning when I went to pick something up. I was like damn.
My ford dealer had a Scat pack on their lot a couple months back, they wanted 39k. 2016 4k miles (I believe) I told the salesmen you guys are tripping, I can walk across the street and get a brand new one for that price. Usually my Ford dealer used car prices are unbeatable. The previous owner had kids, and traded it in for a FoST.
:scratchhead:
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-22-2018)
03-22-2018, 10:13 AM
#152
Burning Brakes
The lease residuals are actually really good for the high end SRT models though. The SRT 392 has a 60% residual which is the same as the Accord and a much lower MF. And yeah, I don't think the Charger is going to be for me. The wife called it a redneck mobile which, while it's a really awesome and aggressive looking car, it kind of still is.
Also, RWD only and I don't want to buy an expensive set of snow tires/rims for a leased car.
Not going to lie, the new G80 Sport really speaks to me...
Also, RWD only and I don't want to buy an expensive set of snow tires/rims for a leased car.
Not going to lie, the new G80 Sport really speaks to me...
Lol@ red neck mobile. Hahahahah!
The Charger does look nice indeed. Loved the design when they changed the front end in 2016. Glad they did. And yes. It would be a summer/fall only type car. Lol. Garage it for the winter. Take it out every once in a while just to keep the flat spots out of the tires and keep the battery charged too.
The G80 Sport looks nice too. I need them to do something with that dash though. All the buttons and even the "Infotainment" Looks Hyundai still. I know Hyundai wanted the Genesis brand to break off onto its own...luxury brand. But they need to move away from the cheap Hyundai look for the interior. IMO.
03-22-2018, 10:21 AM
#153
Ex-OEM King
Lol@ red neck mobile. Hahahahah!
The Charger does look nice indeed. Loved the design when they changed the front end in 2016. Glad they did. And yes. It would be a summer/fall only type car. Lol. Garage it for the winter. Take it out every once in a while just to keep the flat spots out of the tires and keep the battery charged too.
The G80 Sport looks nice too. I need them to do something with that dash though. All the buttons and even the "Infotainment" Looks Hyundai still. I know Hyundai wanted the Genesis brand to break off onto its own...luxury brand. But they need to move away from the cheap Hyundai look for the interior. IMO.
The Charger does look nice indeed. Loved the design when they changed the front end in 2016. Glad they did. And yes. It would be a summer/fall only type car. Lol. Garage it for the winter. Take it out every once in a while just to keep the flat spots out of the tires and keep the battery charged too.
The G80 Sport looks nice too. I need them to do something with that dash though. All the buttons and even the "Infotainment" Looks Hyundai still. I know Hyundai wanted the Genesis brand to break off onto its own...luxury brand. But they need to move away from the cheap Hyundai look for the interior. IMO.
Agreed on the Genesis needing a few more updates.
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-22-2018)
03-22-2018, 10:34 AM
#154
Moderator
Thread Starter
Yeah, I don't get why people are even suggesting that homer-mobile here. BTW, I'll remove the TLX suggestion because as a family car, rear space is worse than a Civic.
I suspect that you still want more than a pedestrian ride, so no to the Accord.
Possibly a slighly used Maxima.
I suspect that you still want more than a pedestrian ride, so no to the Accord.
Possibly a slighly used Maxima.
At the Maxima, not a fan of the current gen, and generally not much of a Nissan fan outside of the Z & GTR.1. The Charger is a "homer mobile"? I can point to at least 25 members on AZ who would choose the so called homer mobile, over the TLX it is one hella good looking car.
2. Yes, suggest the Maxima with an absolute shit CVT transmission. So much sport. While he did mention fuel economy, he's no where near as concerned about it as you.
I can point to at least 25 members on AZ who would choose the so called homer mobile, over the TLX it is one hella good looking car.2. Yes, suggest the Maxima with an absolute shit CVT transmission. So much sport. While he did mention fuel economy, he's no where near as concerned about it as you.
Economy is a factor, but not a deal breaker. Want to at minimum get the same or better than the F150 is getting; so ~20mpg combined. More is better, but not at the expense of driving a boring car.Low mileage Genesis/G80s with full factory warranties can be had for really good deals. My dads new Genesis is beautiful inside and out and thus far rock solid. Tons of room for kids/car seats in the rear, big trunk, great mileage. While its no mountain carver it does handle very well and can do spirited. Have you test drove one yet?
The lease residuals are actually really good for the high end SRT models though. The SRT 392 has a 60% residual which is the same as the Accord and a much lower MF. And yeah, I don't think the Charger is going to be for me. The wife called it a redneck mobile which, while it's a really awesome and aggressive looking car, it kind of still is.
Also, RWD only and I don't want to buy an expensive set of snow tires/rims for a leased car.
Not going to lie, the new G80 Sport really speaks to me...
Also, RWD only and I don't want to buy an expensive set of snow tires/rims for a leased car.
Not going to lie, the new G80 Sport really speaks to me...
03-22-2018, 11:33 AM
#155
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
Saintor disses all except for the mighty powerful TLX. 
03-22-2018, 01:58 PM
#157
Moderator
Thread Starter
Went at lunch to check out the Genesis & G80.
Took the Genesis for a drive, as it was an Ultimate package car. The G80 lacked a lot of what the Genesis had. And the G80 had the same mileage, being 2 years newer. 40k in 1 year vs 40k in 3 years
I think the Genesis HTRAC had a nice drive, competent & quiet. Decent power from the 3.8, but I think I'd try to find a RWD to compare. I'm also a little too skinny for the bolsters in the seats (Ultimate package gets adjustable side bolsters & thigh extension), even fully extended I had some wiggle room in the seat.
Overall I was pretty impressed, it definitely drives like a smaller car than it is.
Took the Genesis for a drive, as it was an Ultimate package car. The G80 lacked a lot of what the Genesis had. And the G80 had the same mileage, being 2 years newer. 40k in 1 year vs 40k in 3 years
I think the Genesis HTRAC had a nice drive, competent & quiet. Decent power from the 3.8, but I think I'd try to find a RWD to compare. I'm also a little too skinny for the bolsters in the seats (Ultimate package gets adjustable side bolsters & thigh extension), even fully extended I had some wiggle room in the seat.
Overall I was pretty impressed, it definitely drives like a smaller car than it is.
The following users liked this post:
Shadow2056 (03-22-2018)
03-22-2018, 02:46 PM
#158
Went at lunch to check out the Genesis & G80.
Took the Genesis for a drive, as it was an Ultimate package car. The G80 lacked a lot of what the Genesis had. And the G80 had the same mileage, being 2 years newer. 40k in 1 year vs 40k in 3 years
I think the Genesis HTRAC had a nice drive, competent & quiet. Decent power from the 3.8, but I think I'd try to find a RWD to compare. I'm also a little too skinny for the bolsters in the seats (Ultimate package gets adjustable side bolsters & thigh extension), even fully extended I had some wiggle room in the seat.
Overall I was pretty impressed, it definitely drives like a smaller car than it is.
Took the Genesis for a drive, as it was an Ultimate package car. The G80 lacked a lot of what the Genesis had. And the G80 had the same mileage, being 2 years newer. 40k in 1 year vs 40k in 3 years
I think the Genesis HTRAC had a nice drive, competent & quiet. Decent power from the 3.8, but I think I'd try to find a RWD to compare. I'm also a little too skinny for the bolsters in the seats (Ultimate package gets adjustable side bolsters & thigh extension), even fully extended I had some wiggle room in the seat.
Overall I was pretty impressed, it definitely drives like a smaller car than it is.
Otherwise how did you find the quality, drivetrain...etc? As for the seats being too wide, I have wide shoulders but a tapering torso so I also find many seats too wide. My favourite part of the Genesis seating position is that it’s the first car I have ever driven where I can sit comfortably in the seat while keeping both arms on the center console lid/arm rest. In every other car they are too low/only one is at the right height.
I’ve never driven a RWD Genesis so let us know what that’s like, I’m really curious.
03-22-2018, 03:22 PM
#159
Moderator
Thread Starter
Not sure if it’s different in the states but you don’t need the Ultimate package to get the adjustable thigh support and bolsters. What does suck though is they don’t offer the same range of motions in the passenger seat as the drivers seat.
Otherwise how did you find the quality, drivetrain...etc? As for the seats being too wide, I have wide shoulders but a tapering torso so I also find many seats too wide. My favourite part of the Genesis seating position is that it’s the first car I have ever driven where I can sit comfortably in the seat while keeping both arms on the center console lid/arm rest. In every other car they are too low/only one is at the right height.
I’ve never driven a RWD Genesis so let us know what that’s like, I’m really curious.
Otherwise how did you find the quality, drivetrain...etc? As for the seats being too wide, I have wide shoulders but a tapering torso so I also find many seats too wide. My favourite part of the Genesis seating position is that it’s the first car I have ever driven where I can sit comfortably in the seat while keeping both arms on the center console lid/arm rest. In every other car they are too low/only one is at the right height.
I’ve never driven a RWD Genesis so let us know what that’s like, I’m really curious.
The Ultimate had a (slightly) larger NAV screen, more seat adjustment (bolsters & thigh) & a HUD, that I immediately noticed. Though, it was the first HUD I've used that completely disappeared with polarized sunglasses, can't say I've had that happen before
As far as how it drove, I was quite impressed. I have very little need for AWD here, so I wouldn't want the (EPA listed) MPG hit that it incurs. 90% of the drive was 60-80mph on the highway, with a couple u-turns, but I'd put it more on the competent cruiser than canyon carver as fsttyms put it. Definitely not a floaty luxo-barge at all.
Since you mentioned it, the armrests do fall just right in the Genny, didn't think about it then, but it does put you just right in the car when you get the seats set just so.
Quality, on a 3 year old car with 40k on it, was good. No excessive wear that I noticed; leather was all in great shape, bit of heel wear on the driver's floormat.
03-22-2018, 04:58 PM
#160
I don't know which packages get what on the Genesis, but the 2 this dealer had were side by side, and were a '15 Ultimate & a '17 Premium (according to the online listings).
The Ultimate had a (slightly) larger NAV screen, more seat adjustment (bolsters & thigh) & a HUD, that I immediately noticed. Though, it was the first HUD I've used that completely disappeared with polarized sunglasses, can't say I've had that happen before
As far as how it drove, I was quite impressed. I have very little need for AWD here, so I wouldn't want the (EPA listed) MPG hit that it incurs. 90% of the drive was 60-80mph on the highway, with a couple u-turns, but I'd put it more on the competent cruiser than canyon carver as fsttyms put it. Definitely not a floaty luxo-barge at all.
Since you mentioned it, the armrests do fall just right in the Genny, didn't think about it then, but it does put you just right in the car when you get the seats set just so.
Quality, on a 3 year old car with 40k on it, was good. No excessive wear that I noticed; leather was all in great shape, bit of heel wear on the driver's floormat.
The Ultimate had a (slightly) larger NAV screen, more seat adjustment (bolsters & thigh) & a HUD, that I immediately noticed. Though, it was the first HUD I've used that completely disappeared with polarized sunglasses, can't say I've had that happen before
As far as how it drove, I was quite impressed. I have very little need for AWD here, so I wouldn't want the (EPA listed) MPG hit that it incurs. 90% of the drive was 60-80mph on the highway, with a couple u-turns, but I'd put it more on the competent cruiser than canyon carver as fsttyms put it. Definitely not a floaty luxo-barge at all.
Since you mentioned it, the armrests do fall just right in the Genny, didn't think about it then, but it does put you just right in the car when you get the seats set just so.
Quality, on a 3 year old car with 40k on it, was good. No excessive wear that I noticed; leather was all in great shape, bit of heel wear on the driver's floormat.
The models we’ve rented were always the second trim from the bottom and that trim brought along with it the adjustable bolsters, cooled seats, and a couple other things. Even the base model is pretty ridiculously loaded. But if you can swing the 3.8 Ultimate I would definitely take that becaus it also adds an adaptive suspension (iirc) and a controller for that larger nav screen.
Not sure about the HUD, the models we rented never had that (maybe an Ultimate package item too). If I lived where you lived I would consider the RWD model as well just because it shaves off 200 pounds and I think the car could use that weight savings. But on the flip side H-Trac is designed by the same company that designed BMW’s X-Drive (I can’t find the link, but I think it was Magna maybe) and it’s a very capable system. Though again if I didn’t need it like you, why wouldn’t I take better gas mileage, acceleration, and fun with the RWD model?
Agreed it’s competent and definitely not floaty, it’s not a canyon carver either for sure. But I found it to be a good balance between acceptable handling and a supple ride. And yeah no totally the arm rest positions are PERFECT. I’ve been in many many cars and not a single one has been able to get it right, I feel like it would be amazing for long highway drives.
Let us know what you decide, you can’t really go wrong here.
