2006 Civic Si performance
05-05-2006, 03:34 PM
#41
Instructor
Originally Posted by dom
6.3 may be a tad optimistic. MT and C&D correct their times for temp etc. Methinks they miscalculated here or got a ringer.
R&T's numbers are reliable in the sense that the publish what they get. There are no corrections involved. Which explains their sometimes slower numbers.
R&T's numbers are reliable in the sense that the publish what they get. There are no corrections involved. Which explains their sometimes slower numbers.
05-05-2006, 05:50 PM
#42
Originally Posted by jnumata
I have also heard that R&T's numbers are slower because they test the cars as daily drivers - making full shifts for example versus full gas clutch only shifts. They basically want to show what performance you would get if you actually owned the car. I don't think most people on this board are powershifting everytime they are racing.
05-05-2006, 06:57 PM
#43
Safety Car
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
The only dyno I've seen so far (at TOV) the Si put down considerably more power than an 05 RSX-S.
06 Si put down 197.
06 Si put down 197.
197hp my ass for sure, this must have all been before my 20 McNugget order from McDonalds and then picking up my fatass friend on route for the 1/4 mile run. The car is no damn faster than an rsx, AND IT HAS AN LSD, yet it dynos out the ass, SURE.
05-05-2006, 07:10 PM
#44
Safety Car
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
6.3 may be a tad optimistic. MT and C&D correct their times for temp etc. Methinks they miscalculated here or got a ringer.
R&T's numbers are reliable in the sense that the publish what they get. There are no corrections involved. Which explains their sometimes slower numbers.
R&T's numbers are reliable in the sense that the publish what they get. There are no corrections involved. Which explains their sometimes slower numbers.
05-05-2006, 09:11 PM
#45
The Boss
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Jack City
Age: 46
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jnumata
It may sound like BS. But Monday I ran a new Mustang GT Convertible from 80 to 110 and lost by only 1 car (My nose was at the rear bumper). The chick driving stopped at a rest stop so I stopped to talk. It was an Auto. This is a pretty good zone for the Si. 80 mph puts the Si at the low end of vtec in 4th.
Here is a few Si clips I found, they're pretty nice little cars
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...02E64F5679.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...F069C3DD8B.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...93CC369B05.htm
05-05-2006, 11:56 PM
#46
Master Graphic Artist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't dig the back of the Si's and the spoiler is a little awkward for my taste. Though thr front looks nice, esp with HID's
05-06-2006, 01:35 AM
#48
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
Originally Posted by AcuraDriver2006
The new 2006 Si has HID? R-E-A-L-L-Y, wow! That's impressive!
05-06-2006, 11:42 AM
#49
Instructor
Originally Posted by 65 Fury Convert
What the hell are you talking bout Willis? "I heard". Heard from who? Some guy your brothers friends sisters uncles brother knows? They test using the optimal launch just like every other mag.
05-06-2006, 11:52 AM
#50
Instructor
Originally Posted by 65 Fury Convert
What the hell are you talking bout Willis? "I heard". Heard from who? Some guy your brothers friends sisters uncles brother knows? They test using the optimal launch just like every other mag.
Sorry man, but you just got
05-06-2006, 11:55 AM
#51
Pro
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Francisco
Age: 41
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by o2cls
i think he meant aftermarktet.....but if they do come with it(i didnt see them on the website) thats yet another civic first that is awesome. Seriously...22,xxx (+/-) for a fully loaded civic?...not bad.
They dont come with HID. Only Honda that has HID is the s2000.
Keep in mind that Civic SIs are hard to come by. Most dealers add a markup so it may be difficult to get one at MSRP, unless you are willing to wait a while.
05-06-2006, 01:24 PM
#52
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by jnumata
Actually, I found the article. Here is the quote, "Our philosophy in acceleration testing for the past 58 years is to reach results that an above-average driver/owner can also duplicate; it is not our goal to record the absolute quickest time while abusing the car....Chevrolet reports its acceleration figures using the speed-shifting technigue (no-lift throttle during upshifts), which can turn in faster times but is not conducive to powertrain longevity."
Sorry man, but you just got
Sorry man, but you just got
SpeedyV6: An S2k puts down around 210-215 at the wheels. Regardless, its considerably quicker than an Si.
05-06-2006, 01:27 PM
#53
05-06-2006, 02:29 PM
#54
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chapel Hill / Raleigh, NC
Age: 36
Posts: 1,157
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jnumata do u have an si? I have a galaxy grey one. It is a sweet car. It isn't insanely fast but it handles great and is a blast to drive/ very practicle and imho the best blend of a car for me.
A stock si is rated at 197 hp. It isn't going to put down 197 on a dyno. here is one that put down 197 with I/H/E
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1569592
dyno's on a stock si have been put out up to 188 hp, not to bad.
IMHO it is a great car for the money, but it clearly isn't an s2000 etc.
A stock si is rated at 197 hp. It isn't going to put down 197 on a dyno. here is one that put down 197 with I/H/E
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1569592
dyno's on a stock si have been put out up to 188 hp, not to bad.
IMHO it is a great car for the money, but it clearly isn't an s2000 etc.
05-06-2006, 03:50 PM
#55
Originally Posted by jnumata
It may sound like BS. But Monday I ran a new Mustang GT Convertible from 80 to 110 and lost by only 1 car (My nose was at the rear bumper). The chick driving stopped at a rest stop so I stopped to talk. It was an Auto. This is a pretty good zone for the Si. 80 mph puts the Si at the low end of vtec in 4th.
Nice car though - I like the SI
THE END
05-06-2006, 06:09 PM
#57
Safety Car
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraDriver2006
hmmmmm..... very interesting topic.
Perhaps some magazines under-rated the Si in 1/4 performance. If the 2006 Civic Si can do 15.2 or even 14.9 (for argument sakes, between 15.2 ~ 14.9) that's damn good for that little car.
I have only seen one on the road and it's sexy. I think the new design of the civic looks the best among the past gens. However, with just intake, exhaust... I don't see cutting down to 14.2. I'll give it at 14.6 for a really experience 1/4 mile driver because many of them are rookie drivers. How many of them really hit the tracks and can really hault down 1/4 that well?...........
Without any kind of F/I, I just don't see the civic doing 13.8.
Perhaps some magazines under-rated the Si in 1/4 performance. If the 2006 Civic Si can do 15.2 or even 14.9 (for argument sakes, between 15.2 ~ 14.9) that's damn good for that little car.
I have only seen one on the road and it's sexy. I think the new design of the civic looks the best among the past gens. However, with just intake, exhaust... I don't see cutting down to 14.2. I'll give it at 14.6 for a really experience 1/4 mile driver because many of them are rookie drivers. How many of them really hit the tracks and can really hault down 1/4 that well?...........
Without any kind of F/I, I just don't see the civic doing 13.8.
Last edited by heyitsme; 05-06-2006 at 06:12 PM.
05-07-2006, 04:25 PM
#58
drewLS6 soon
06 si and 05+ rsx-s in straight line acceleration will depend on the driver. Ive raced a stock Si in my Rsx and beat it badly but i ahve mods. Im gonna go to a 1/4 track sometime soon and try to break into the 13s. not sure if i will becuase im on stock tires.
05-07-2006, 05:54 PM
#59
Duck Fuke!
05-07-2006, 07:43 PM
#60
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chapel Hill / Raleigh, NC
Age: 36
Posts: 1,157
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jts1207
05-07-2006, 07:49 PM
#61
The Boss
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Jack City
Age: 46
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jts1207
"Honda is around two-tenths of a second slower than the VW, posting a 6.53-second time to 60 mph, and a 14.93-second run at 95.7 mph for the quarter-mile.
."
^ Not bad at all for getting 14.93. But realize it's their BEST run, and I assume many runs are well into low 15s. Have that said, at 14.93 isn't a bad number for 197hp vehicle. So as I stated, running low 14s or 13.9 is kind of impossible without any modification.
05-10-2006, 08:46 AM
#63
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Side
Age: 39
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guy on honda tech ran a 14.2 @96.27 with greddy evo catback exhaust and there's a video http://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1610467
05-10-2006, 08:57 AM
#64
Senior Moderator
Pretty impressive. Seems as though the official stock hp is vastly underrrated OR the Si has the most efficient tranny on the market. 
Last edited by F23A4; 05-10-2006 at 09:01 AM.
05-10-2006, 01:50 PM
#66
Drifting
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CedNBHTL
Guy on honda tech ran a 14.2 @96.27 with greddy evo catback exhaust and there's a video http://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1610467
05-10-2006, 02:10 PM
#67
Master Graphic Artist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraDriver2006
The new 2006 Si has HID? R-E-A-L-L-Y, wow! That's impressive!
05-10-2006, 07:02 PM
#68
For whatever reason I just thought of this thread when I saw it.
Vroom vroom...
Vroom vroom...
05-11-2006, 05:10 AM
#72
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Ouch that sucks, but at least it looks like the roof held up very well.
Safety definitely was NOT neglected by Honda in developing the Civic coupe.
05-11-2006, 07:10 AM
#73
That's Racist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego native. UCLA resident. =)
Age: 38
Posts: 5,634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by F900
^^ whats the details ?
Parents buy him a new GTi
05-11-2006, 09:54 AM
#75
Tristate ViP Crew
lol the moron just took it off the lot and decided to try and drift a civic and drifted right into the mountain. Gotta love kids with new cars. When my son gets old enough to drive I'm buying him a 76 Cadillac
05-11-2006, 09:59 AM
#76
Originally Posted by Time For Sleeep
hits a rock of sorts (the fucking mountain)
05-11-2006, 10:17 AM
#78
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
Originally Posted by CL Platano
lol the moron just took it off the lot and decided to try and drift a civic and drifted right into the mountain. Gotta love kids with new cars. When my son gets old enough to drive I'm buying him a 76 Cadillac
05-11-2006, 10:42 AM
#79
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by o2cls
...the mountain would probably flip before the car did.
05-11-2006, 10:44 AM
#80
how handsome I am
Originally Posted by phile
For whatever reason I just thought of this thread when I saw it.
Vroom vroom...
Vroom vroom...
what the fuck. That kids a god damn retard.
the one in the middle with the striped shirt? fuck that kid! He looks like he should be wearing a bib and a bonnet!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM
