2003 Honda Accord EX-L V6 OR 2003 Acura TL Type S

Old 07-21-2010, 09:28 PM
  #81  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
LOL

The whole bottom half of the dash is hard as anything in the industry. The buttons, trimmings, accents, etc., it's all worse. Doesn't even come close to comparing.

Interiors are subjective but this is like saying a 2G TL's interior is better than the 3-4G. I mean you can SAY it, but....
How is the 1st gen TL worse in the interior than the 2 gen TL? Because in terms of materials, it is actually better. Styling is subjective so whatever floats your boat.

Considering the fact that I've owned a '97, '03 and '05 TL, I would venture to say i'm the closest thing to an 'expert' when it comes to comparing the 3 models.

And before you bother retorting, keep in mind that the 2nd gen TL dropped in price by over $5,000 between 1998 and 1999 models. It wasn't just the fact that it switched from being built in Japan to Ohio, there are noticeable cost cutting measures.
Old 07-21-2010, 09:44 PM
  #82  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
How is the 1st gen TL worse in the interior than the 2 gen TL? Because in terms of materials, it is actually better. Styling is subjective so whatever floats your boat.

Considering the fact that I've owned a '97, '03 and '05 TL, I would venture to say i'm the closest thing to an 'expert' when it comes to comparing the 3 models.

And before you bother retorting, keep in mind that the 2nd gen TL dropped in price by over $5,000 between 1998 and 1999 models. It wasn't just the fact that it switched from being built in Japan to Ohio, there are noticeable cost cutting measures.
I drove a 2.5TL before decided against a new vehicle at that time. In addition I spent much time behind the wheel and in the passenger seat of two other persons' 1Gs so I'm but a wee bet less an "expert" on this matter.

The entire dash buttons and plastics and switchgear, for example, are cheaper. That same getup shows elsewhere. Impressive by its own standards but certainly not in the league of any succeeding TL or the 7G+ Accord.
Old 07-21-2010, 09:57 PM
  #83  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Which switchgear? Which buttons? Be specific.

Because they are for the most part carried over to the 2nd gen TL.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:01 PM
  #84  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Which switchgear? Which buttons? Be specific.

Because they are for the most part carried over to the 2nd gen TL.
The entire audio region, for one. There are pictures of both interiors on the last page.

If we're not going to agree, we might as well put this to rest before it overwhelms what is a thread not about the 1G at all, much less the 1G vs 2G.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:15 PM
  #85  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
The entire audio region, for one. There are pictures of both interiors on the last page.

If we're not going to agree, we might as well put this to rest before it overwhelms what is a thread not about the 1G at all, much less the 1G vs 2G.
The audio headunit plastic is lower quality, I will give you that. The number (8 vs. 5) and quality of speakers are however better in the 1st gen TL. All the 1st gen TL needed was an amp.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:19 PM
  #86  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OP, are you considering the Infiniti I? The I30 and I35 are nice. I had an I30 for less than a year before it was totaled. I liked it, but can't really vouch for its reliability based on how short a period I owned it.

Heated rear seats!
Old 07-21-2010, 10:21 PM
  #87  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,427
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,048 Posts
From what I hear, the turning circle is bigger than the Accord's, which is already pretty damn big. Lord knows I already have a hard time parking that thing.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:35 PM
  #88  
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Eoanou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
Age: 37
Posts: 4,779
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
The 2G interior looks better than any Accord Interior even the current model.

2G TL Interior



vs last model accord and current accord interior.



Current



3G TL



4G TL

With the exception of the shift knob/assembly and the steering wheel the prior generation Accord had a nicer looking interior.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:37 PM
  #89  
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Eoanou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
Age: 37
Posts: 4,779
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Someone hinted to the 02-03 RL on the first page, and I would have to agree that should be the car of choice. 3.5L V6 motor which felt like it had a good amount of torque. The car accelerates to 80 rather quickly and then acceleration is dimished thereafter.

It has the four speed automatic transmission with no sport shift, it was a reliable transmission. My family has gone through 3 of those each with 100K+ miles of that generation without any issues. I think that would be a very worthwhile purchase.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:44 PM
  #90  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,427
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,048 Posts
Just my opinion but I think those RLs are kind of dated. They're hard to tell apart from a 1G TL at a glance, and those things went out in 98.
Old 07-21-2010, 10:51 PM
  #91  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 30
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
I've only read the first page but I personally think you'd be much better off not searching high and low for a car with navi. The interface will be stale and slow compared to what you can get today. Just get a TomTom or Garmin and it'll work MUCH better. As for choice, I'd go with the Type-S.
Old 07-22-2010, 05:06 AM
  #92  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I vote for Mazda 6/ Ford Fusion.(they are likely to be more reliable than the TL and maybe even the Accord)

If your picking between Accord V6, TL, Altima V6 and Maxima....then I vote 5.5 Gen MAxima!
Old 07-22-2010, 06:50 AM
  #93  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,884
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
OP, are you considering the Infiniti I? The I30 and I35 are nice. I had an I30 for less than a year before it was totaled. I liked it, but can't really vouch for its reliability based on how short a period I owned it.

Heated rear seats!
The I35 is on my radar, as is the 5.5G Maxima. I'm leaning away from the I30 mainly because my wife's cousin (who lives nearby) just picked up a 2000 I30....besides, I'd have to go back to the VQ35 fold if I do Nissan/Infiniti.

Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
I vote for Mazda 6/ Ford Fusion.(they are likely to be more reliable than the TL and maybe even the Accord)

If your picking between Accord V6, TL, Altima V6 and Maxima....then I vote 5.5 Gen MAxima!
Good suggestions but the wife (and maybe me to a much lesser degree) feel as though the former would be a step down from the latter.
Old 07-22-2010, 06:55 AM
  #94  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,884
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
I've only read the first page but I personally think you'd be much better off not searching high and low for a car with navi. The interface will be stale and slow compared to what you can get today. Just get a TomTom or Garmin and it'll work MUCH better. As for choice, I'd go with the Type-S.
LINK
Old 07-22-2010, 07:33 AM
  #95  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (3)
 
Waltah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: conus
Age: 38
Posts: 1,106
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
th eonly thing bad with the 03 TL is the transmission being a ticking time bomb and there is no fix for it. even a rebuild is a ticking time bomb. thats why we got rid of our 02 TL-S. id say go for the accord with a manual trans if you are worried about that. but IMO.....id rather be driving the 02-03 TL-S then any accord. we owned our 02 TL-S from 70k miles to 130k miles.....not a single issue. nada. so it was a great car for us.
Old 07-22-2010, 07:33 AM
  #96  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Hmm, we have had I30s too, but heated rear seats was not a option on them. So I don't get how you got heated rear seats.
Old 07-22-2010, 07:34 AM
  #97  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (3)
 
Waltah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: conus
Age: 38
Posts: 1,106
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
rear heated seats? why
Old 07-22-2010, 07:38 AM
  #98  
Oh Hullow
 
03bl AC k CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Freehold, NJ
Age: 35
Posts: 1,990
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
i would vote for the v6 accord in 6 speed manual. The 03-05 accords had the same transmission issues the the tl had. ( i apologize if that was discussed on a previous page, i didnt read through the whole thread )
Old 07-22-2010, 08:17 AM
  #99  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by cjTL
I've only read the first page but I personally think you'd be much better off not searching high and low for a car with navi. The interface will be stale and slow compared to what you can get today. Just get a TomTom or Garmin and it'll work MUCH better. As for choice, I'd go with the Type-S.
As proven by the link F23A4 provided you, plus your choice of a car with a glass tranny... you may want to read the entire topic before replying


Originally Posted by F23A4
LINK

We have a Tom Tom one, which my son routinely runs off with many times without asking. (When I had the 07 AV6, the indash Navi feature made it a non-issue....though he asked to borrow that car several times.)
Old 07-22-2010, 09:22 AM
  #100  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Hmm, we have had I30s too, but heated rear seats was not a option on them. So I don't get how you got heated rear seats.
It might've been available on the updated 2002 I35 variation. I know at least from 2003-2004 they offered it.

EDIT: I Googled it briefly and turned up many links of both owners discussing it as well as professional writeups or whatever terminology you prefer. A sample:

http://www.topspeed.com/cars/infinit...35-ar1670.html

http://forums.maxima.org/infiniti-i3...ted-seats.html

Still didn't find what year that feature was added to the Cold Weather Package.
Originally Posted by Waltah
rear heated seats? why
Why not? It was meant to be somewhat light hearted, but why ask why? Did you WANT the power in your TL? The sportier suspension? WHY? See....

Last edited by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName; 07-22-2010 at 09:29 AM.
Old 07-22-2010, 09:23 AM
  #101  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
The I35 is on my radar, as is the 5.5G Maxima. I'm leaning away from the I30 mainly because my wife's cousin (who lives nearby) just picked up a 2000 I30....besides, I'd have to go back to the VQ35 fold if I do Nissan/Infiniti.



Good suggestions but the wife (and maybe me to a much lesser degree) feel as though the former would be a step down from the latter.
Personally I don't think the 6 or Fusion were remarkable until their redos recently, thus out of the price range in discussion.
Old 07-22-2010, 01:16 PM
  #102  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,427
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,048 Posts
You could probably get a 6G Max, or even a 1G G35 in your price range. I find Nissan/Infiniti products depreciate a fair bit quicker than Toyota and Honda.
Old 07-22-2010, 04:28 PM
  #103  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,884
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Personally I don't think the 6 or Fusion were remarkable until their redos recently, thus out of the price range in discussion.
Old 07-22-2010, 04:46 PM
  #104  
8th Gear
 
WannabeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Minnesota
Age: 33
Posts: 8
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I35. They are bullet proof. Solid motors and trans, and probably one of the best bang for the buck cars you can buy.

Luxury, Power, and Comfort on a car that can be had for sub 10k with less than 100k miles.


Old 07-22-2010, 06:07 PM
  #105  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Personally I don't think the 6 or Fusion were remarkable until their redos recently, thus out of the price range in discussion.
I would still take those over an 02-04 Altima.

One thing I want to mention about the 5.5G Max or I35 is that they have horrible gas mileage and they have a Huge turning radius and also torsion beam rear suspension.
Old 07-22-2010, 07:10 PM
  #106  
Intermediate
iTrader: (1)
 
STRAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 47
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Accord.
Old 07-22-2010, 07:24 PM
  #107  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,884
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
I would still take those over an 02-04 Altima.

One thing I want to mention about the 5.5G Max or I35 is that they have horrible gas mileage and they have a Huge turning radius and also torsion beam rear suspension.
Having owned a 5.5G for four years, I wont say it has horrible gas mileage; it just wont go anywhere near the 30mpg that the AV6 is capable of. It does have the turning radius of a cargo ship though but, that's not a deal breaking attribute.
Old 07-22-2010, 07:32 PM
  #108  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
I would still take those over an 02-04 Altima.

One thing I want to mention about the 5.5G Max or I35 is that they have horrible gas mileage and they have a Huge turning radius and also torsion beam rear suspension.
If you wanted something like the 1G 6, it's small enough that I'd personally just get into a VW Jetta VR6 of that time.

Having driven a loaded one of those at the time (GLX or GLI or something, don't remember), I was stunned at how good a car at that price range could be. It felt basically as nice as the then-fresh A4 for a lot less coin.

VW electrical systems are spotty at best though.
Old 07-22-2010, 08:22 PM
  #109  
Pro
 
JD23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
If you wanted something like the 1G 6, it's small enough that I'd personally just get into a VW Jetta VR6 of that time.

Having driven a loaded one of those at the time (GLX or GLI or something, don't remember), I was stunned at how good a car at that price range could be. It felt basically as nice as the then-fresh A4 for a lot less coin.

VW electrical systems are spotty at best though.
The 1G 6 arguably handles better than the Jetta and will have lower maintenance costs. For an older, high mileage car, that is a major consideration.
Old 07-22-2010, 09:12 PM
  #110  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JD23
The 1G 6 arguably handles better than the Jetta and will have lower maintenance costs. For an older, high mileage car, that is a major consideration.
That's why it's down to opinion, as I eluded to. For some (like me), the VW's significant NVH and interior advantage is worth the maintenance premium. For others, it is not.
Old 07-23-2010, 06:52 AM
  #111  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,884
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
While shopping a car for my daughter, we came across a low mileage Jetta 1.8T (MkIV). Although I've always held major concerns about the electrical problems that seem endemic in German cars, I figured I'd go for a test drive. FATE: It broke down during the test drive due to electrical problems. That said, I'd consider a 6 WELL BEFORE I would ever consider any VW OR Audi.
Old 07-23-2010, 08:42 AM
  #112  
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area
Age: 42
Posts: 12,434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Buy my '03 TL-S.



In all seriousness, I would go for the TL out of those two choices. But I'm biased because I've had my '03 TL-S for 7.5 years now. Still love it.
Old 07-23-2010, 12:20 PM
  #113  
The Box
 
vas25tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,680
Received 80 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by AMAN1
Just my opinion but I think those RLs are kind of dated. They're hard to tell apart from a 1G TL at a glance, and those things went out in 98.
Dated > tranny problems IMO.

I had a tough time choosing a car back in January and ended up buying a 02 RL with 127K miles on it - all maintenance records up to date. Haven't looked back - no better car for the $ IMHO.
Old 07-23-2010, 12:22 PM
  #114  
The Box
 
vas25tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,680
Received 80 Likes on 59 Posts
I30/I35/Maxima's are nice but the turning radius on those things

I had an 02 I35 for a month and I hated driving that car. It was bumpy, seats were uncomfortable and you can barely turn anywhere.
Old 07-23-2010, 03:24 PM
  #115  
Three Wheelin'
 
silver3.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: WISCONSIN
Age: 49
Posts: 1,299
Received 51 Likes on 41 Posts
given the 2nd gen. TL-S transmission problems, i would still own one over a comparable generation V6 accord or maxima/i30/i35. to me, the best looking accord generation was from 1994-1995; everything else after that is just plain ugly. maximas/i30/i35 are nice cars but nissan cars in general are just cheap. the quality of the leather, dash, door panels, metal, etc...always seem a step behind honda and toyota.
Old 07-23-2010, 09:37 PM
  #116  
SixSpeedDreamin'
 
Willie3.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gawja!
Age: 39
Posts: 494
Received 35 Likes on 33 Posts
Accord all the way. I love my 2G, but the accord is a better choice.
Old 07-27-2010, 03:04 AM
  #117  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
They are different trannies. The TL has a four speed and the Accord a five speed.

I said that the Accord's don't have the same tranny issues, and that was probably not right. But overall, the trannies in the Accord will be much better than the TL.
2003 accord and 03 TLS use the same basic POS transmission. Both are prone to failure

Last edited by YeuEmMaiMai; 07-27-2010 at 03:07 AM.
Old 07-27-2010, 03:13 AM
  #118  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
im going to have to ask for proof. i know for a FACT that the 6th generation accords and 2nd generation TL's shared the same transmissions. down to the part numbers
the 2nd gen TL got the 5at for 2000 and up as it was only the 1999 that had the 4at. Those things were crap until they were updated by honda with new differental bearings, relocation of the cooler to be external, and 2nd/3rd gear increased clutchpack lubrication, and the 2nd gear fix, The 5at used afterwards is just a design disaster and even though it has been updated, it's still not good.
Old 02-20-2012, 05:57 PM
  #119  
Intermediate
 
UA5runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado springs,CO
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HBaJ
2G TL all day. We have two, a 2001 with 230k and an 03 Type-S at 120k..both problem free.
glad to hear that, my 03 tl type is 5,000 away from 200,000 still runs like a champ. any certain problems you encountered with yours after 200,000
Old 02-21-2012, 10:03 PM
  #120  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
VQ35 burns too much oil. Try 04 RL





Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L V6 OR 2003 Acura TL Type S



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.