2003 Honda Accord EX-L V6 OR 2003 Acura TL Type S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2010, 12:19 PM
  #41  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
It's not as prevalent in the Accord as it is in the TL.
im going to have to ask for proof. i know for a FACT that the 6th generation accords and 2nd generation TL's shared the same transmissions. down to the part numbers
Old 07-21-2010, 12:20 PM
  #42  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
i vote for an infinity i30. solid acceleration, more interior space and no recalls on drivetrain components
Old 07-21-2010, 12:30 PM
  #43  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
im going to have to ask for proof. i know for a FACT that the 6th generation accords and 2nd generation TL's shared the same transmissions. down to the part numbers
Maybe the 4-speeds? The 7G Accord was the one that moved to the 5-speed automatic, though I do know the 1998 Accord was referred to as The Year of the Bad Transmission by my local dealer's service department.
Old 07-21-2010, 12:44 PM
  #44  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,895
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Not faster than a 2G TL, if you mean that. But I maintain my position that the 7G Accord is a much better choice.

If the OP could manage to stretch his budget for the Hybrid (which would pay itself back a little), that's the Accord I'd go for.
Then I'd have to get the 7.5G version as a power sunroof is a must have for the wife and that would really stretch my budget. Not to mention, I've driven an 06 AV6h and the handling was simply terrible. So off the cuff, getting one would necessitate an upgraded wheel package at a minimum. (I do like the fact that it's made in Japan...but surprisingly, the one that I test drove was actually a rattlebox unlike my Ohio built AV6).

Good suggestion nonetheless.
Old 07-21-2010, 12:55 PM
  #45  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
im going to have to ask for proof. i know for a FACT that the 6th generation accords and 2nd generation TL's shared the same transmissions. down to the part numbers
OK.

Apparently over 1 million vehicles were affected by the transmission issue, but I don't know the number of Accords vs. the number of TLs that were recalled. I would be willing to bet that there were more TLs recalled for the five-speed transmission issues than the five speed Accords based on percentage.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:02 PM
  #46  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Why not just get a 4-cylinder Accord?

Pretty much exactly like my car. In all honesty, the V6 isn't a great deal faster in normal driving, and highway mileage in the 4-cylinder Accord is pretty damn good. High 30s are very common on road trips. I was able to make a 1100 km trip with 4 adults and luggage to the beach and back. 70-85 mph solidly the entire way. I had plenty of fuel when I got back, I'd say about 1/8 to 1/4. From what I hear, the A/Ts are bulletproof as well.

Give it a thought, or a test drive.

It's worth noting that the TL-S is a good bit cheaper than the Accords. However the Accord's interior (IMO) blows the TL-S and pretty much every other family sedan of its time out of the water.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:05 PM
  #47  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
OK.

Apparently over 1 million vehicles were affected by the transmission issue, but I don't know the number of Accords vs. the number of TLs that were recalled. I would be willing to bet that there were more TLs recalled for the five-speed transmission issues than the five speed Accords based on percentage.
The Honda Odyssey also had the same issues. It had the 5spd autotragic as well.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:06 PM
  #48  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by AMAN1
Why not just get a 4-cylinder Accord?

Pretty much exactly like my car. In all honesty, the V6 isn't a great deal faster in normal driving, and highway mileage in the 4-cylinder Accord is pretty damn good. High 30s are very common on road trips. I was able to make a 1100 km trip with 4 adults and luggage to the beach and back. 70-85 mph solidly the entire way. I had plenty of fuel when I got back, I'd say about 1/8 to 1/4. From what I hear, the A/Ts are bulletproof as well.

Give it a thought, or a test drive.

It's worth noting that the TL-S is a good bit cheaper than the Accords. However the Accord's interior (IMO) blows the TL-S and pretty much every other family sedan of its time out of the water.
Huh? The TL-S has a much nicer interior over the Accords even as of today. It always has and always will.

We looked at the Accords and personally I didn't like their interiors.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:20 PM
  #49  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
Then I'd have to get the 7.5G version as a power sunroof is a must have for the wife and that would really stretch my budget. Not to mention, I've driven an 06 AV6h and the handling was simply terrible. So off the cuff, getting one would necessitate an upgraded wheel package at a minimum. (I do like the fact that it's made in Japan...but surprisingly, the one that I test drove was actually a rattlebox unlike my Ohio built AV6).

Good suggestion nonetheless.
I guess I never pushed it in the handling department. In regular driving and a little push in the corner it seemed as tight as normal Accords.

I still think the Accord will be so much cheaper on multiple levels to own that it's worth any extra performance you get in the Acura or few extra features.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:23 PM
  #50  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Huh? The TL-S has a much nicer interior over the Accords even as of today. It always has and always will.

We looked at the Accords and personally I didn't like their interiors.
Compared to the TL of its respective generation (ie- 2003-2007 Accord and 2004-2008 TL), you're right. But having spent time in both the 2G TL and the 6-8G Accords, I can say the 7G has at the very minimum as good an interior as the 2G TL, but it wins compared to the Acura in my playbook based on its more modern design. And I still don't think the 8G has gotten to 3G TL levels of the interior either.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:33 PM
  #51  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Huh? The TL-S has a much nicer interior over the Accords even as of today. It always has and always will.

We looked at the Accords and personally I didn't like their interiors.
Of course, that's your opinion and it's subjective. Some people will like the TL's interior better, and others will like the Accord.

To simply say "always will" is ludicrous.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:40 PM
  #52  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,895
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by AMAN1
Why not just get a 4-cylinder Accord?

Pretty much exactly like my car. In all honesty, the V6 isn't a great deal faster in normal driving, and highway mileage in the 4-cylinder Accord is pretty damn good. High 30s are very common on road trips. I was able to make a 1100 km trip with 4 adults and luggage to the beach and back. 70-85 mph solidly the entire way. I had plenty of fuel when I got back, I'd say about 1/8 to 1/4. From what I hear, the A/Ts are bulletproof as well.

Give it a thought, or a test drive.
with regard to normal driving and I've driven each sedan version; test driving the K24 5AT and AV6h while leasing the AV6 5AT for three years. The 4 cyl did feel a little quicker off the line than the other two and would be a bit marginally cheaper to acquire and maintain. My caveat: I have a penchant for dwelling in the triple digits occasionally and have found the AV6 (while not overly) more suited for said fetish of mine than the K24 which runs out of steam just as the J30A5 is about to make itself heard.

Though far removed from being the quickest, sportiest or most fuel efficient midsize sedan, I was able to average 30mpg between central NJ and Va Beach last year while hauling me, wife, wife's aunt, my adult daughter, toddler daughter (w/car seat) and trunk packed with luggage and baby stuff in my 07 AV6. So, I definitely view the 7G AV6 as the ultimate in compromise.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:46 PM
  #53  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by AMAN1
Why not just get a 4-cylinder Accord?

Pretty much exactly like my car. In all honesty, the V6 isn't a great deal faster in normal driving, and highway mileage in the 4-cylinder Accord is pretty damn good. High 30s are very common on road trips. I was able to make a 1100 km trip with 4 adults and luggage to the beach and back. 70-85 mph solidly the entire way. I had plenty of fuel when I got back, I'd say about 1/8 to 1/4. From what I hear, the A/Ts are bulletproof as well.

Give it a thought, or a test drive.

It's worth noting that the TL-S is a good bit cheaper than the Accords. However the Accord's interior (IMO) blows the TL-S and pretty much every other family sedan of its time out of the water.
I think the V6 is a great deal faster in normal driving. I have driven my friends 03 accord coupe K24 and let me tell you its night and day against the V6. Turn on the A/C and load the car with passsengers and its even more drastic.

I do agree though that the interior of the 03-07 accord EX-L V6 is nicer than the 2nd gen TL IMO.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:53 PM
  #54  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
Of course, that's your opinion and it's subjective. Some people will like the TL's interior better, and others will like the Accord.

To simply say "always will" is ludicrous.
Why on earth would Honda put a better interior in their non-luxury brand vs their luxury brand? They won't and NEVER WILL. So to think the Accord will have a better interior over a Acura ever is just dumb.
Old 07-21-2010, 01:57 PM
  #55  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
wait wait wait... apologies. i thought we were discussing the 6th gen accord.

if its the 7G then i would get it

get the 7g. the interior is way nicer than the 2g tl. just get black because the beige stains. and the tranny issues are less in that generation
Old 07-21-2010, 02:01 PM
  #56  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Why on earth would Honda put a better interior in their non-luxury brand vs their luxury brand? They won't and NEVER WILL. So to think the Accord will have a better interior over a Acura ever is just dumb.
Progression. The Accord will never beat out its comparable generation Acura sibling, but it certainly could be better (and is) than some or all prior models.

Do you honestly think that the 1G TL still has a better interior than any Accord up to today?



Last edited by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName; 07-21-2010 at 02:04 PM.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:04 PM
  #57  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Why on earth would Honda put a better interior in their non-luxury brand vs their luxury brand? They won't and NEVER WILL. So to think the Accord will have a better interior over a Acura ever is just dumb.
Like I said, better is in the eye of the beholder. Think about it. Some people will say they love a certain car's interior, and others will say they hate it. It's human nature.

Honda put a "better" interior in the TL because that's what they perceived at the time to be better. That's it.

Some people hate sportshift. Some people like the more interior room of the Accord than the TL (at least of the 7th-gen Accord vs. the 2nd gen TL). It's all a matter of perception. So to simply say a blanket statement like that is, well,

To get back on subject, FA23A4, I would get the Accord.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:04 PM
  #58  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Why on earth would Honda put a better interior in their non-luxury brand vs their luxury brand? They won't and NEVER WILL. So to think the Accord will have a better interior over a Acura ever is just dumb.
This only applies to the newer honda gens vs the older acura gens. It has happened and it isn't dumb.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:08 PM
  #59  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
wait wait wait... apologies. i thought we were discussing the 6th gen accord.

if its the 7G then i would get it

get the 7g. the interior is way nicer than the 2g tl. just get black because the beige stains. and the tranny issues are less in that generation
Or get the grey interior.

and on the last sentence!
Old 07-21-2010, 02:10 PM
  #60  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
And so it is heard, I would kill for a 3rd-gen TL interior. They are still the best, IMO.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:25 PM
  #61  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Huh? The TL-S has a much nicer interior over the Accords even as of today. It always has and always will.

We looked at the Accords and personally I didn't like their interiors.
03 Accord vs. 2G TL? I guess personal taste, but I like the Accord's better. Remember, 7G Accord and 3G TL have the same platform, 6G Accord platform is same as 2G TL platform.

Originally Posted by F23A4
with regard to normal driving and I've driven each sedan version; test driving the K24 5AT and AV6h while leasing the AV6 5AT for three years. The 4 cyl did feel a little quicker off the line than the other two and would be a bit marginally cheaper to acquire and maintain. My caveat: I have a penchant for dwelling in the triple digits occasionally and have found the AV6 (while not overly) more suited for said fetish of mine than the K24 which runs out of steam just as the J30A5 is about to make itself heard.

Though far removed from being the quickest, sportiest or most fuel efficient midsize sedan, I was able to average 30mpg between central NJ and Va Beach last year while hauling me, wife, wife's aunt, my adult daughter, toddler daughter (w/car seat) and trunk packed with luggage and baby stuff in my 07 AV6. So, I definitely view the 7G AV6 as the ultimate in compromise.
I know what you mean. My only drivetrain problem with the K24 AT is that it bogs down if you're not below 2300 in fifth. I wasn't insinuating that the J was a fuel hog at all, evidently. But hey, if you want more power, more power it is

Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
I think the V6 is a great deal faster in normal driving. I have driven my friends 03 accord coupe K24 and let me tell you its night and day against the V6. Turn on the A/C and load the car with passsengers and its even more drastic.

I do agree though that the interior of the 03-07 accord EX-L V6 is nicer than the 2nd gen TL IMO.
I do a lot of all city driving, and the K24 has enough pep for low speed driving. But I hear you on A/C and passengers. On my fuel record trip, there wasn't any power at all. Luckily, I don't use A/C much so it doesn't bother me. I think it's a case of different strokes for different folks.

Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
And so it is heard, I would kill for a 3rd-gen TL interior. They are still the best, IMO.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:28 PM
  #62  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
The 2G interior looks better than any Accord Interior even the current model.

2G TL Interior



vs last model accord and current accord interior.



Current



3G TL



4G TL

Old 07-21-2010, 02:29 PM
  #63  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
My interior (from a mini meet at my house):







Another members' interior:





It's in the eye of the beholder.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:31 PM
  #64  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
The 2G interior looks better than any Accord Interior even the current model.
Well, that's your personal opinion.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:33 PM
  #65  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Judging from the pictures posted above:

1. 3G TL
2. 7G Accord
3. 4G TL
5. 8G Accord
6. 2G TL

Personal preference, but 7G Accord is much better than 2G TL's interior, especially the centre console.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:33 PM
  #66  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
haha pimpin-tl is really pleading his case. Luckily Honda is Acura and the honda/acura corp. has always done a great job with the interior. IMO honda and acura have the class leading interiors. Very luxurious for what you pay for. The 7th and 8th gen accord though have nicer interiors than the 2nd gen TL IMO. We could argue that fact all day long though haha
Old 07-21-2010, 02:34 PM
  #67  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Well coming from someone is isn't biased since I don't own a 2G or a Accord and the 2G is better. My friend has a new Accord and just bought a 2G TL-S because he likes it better and they drive it more often because it's more comfortable, and has a nicer interior.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:36 PM
  #68  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Like I said, eye of the beholder.

F23A4, what is your budget?

Last edited by gatrhumpy; 07-21-2010 at 02:46 PM.
Old 07-21-2010, 02:40 PM
  #69  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
That's driving me nuts for some reason.

IT'S F23A4 G**DAMMIT! F23A4!

There. Now I feel better
Old 07-21-2010, 02:49 PM
  #70  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Well coming from someone is isn't biased since I don't own a 2G or a Accord and the 2G is better. My friend has a new Accord and just bought a 2G TL-S because he likes it better and they drive it more often because it's more comfortable, and has a nicer interior.
ha you own two acuras how is that not biased!
Old 07-21-2010, 03:03 PM
  #71  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Yes but I do not own a 2G or the Accord. We do have a Civic though.
Old 07-21-2010, 03:10 PM
  #72  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Well coming from someone is isn't biased since I don't own a 2G or a Accord and the 2G is better. My friend has a new Accord and just bought a 2G TL-S because he likes it better and they drive it more often because it's more comfortable, and has a nicer interior.
Neither do I (have never owned the 2G TL or 7G Accord). But that wouldn't mean a person isn't biased simply based on the premise that they have not owned one.

I really liked the 2G TL-S and almost bought one, but I defected to Lexus with the new ES300. And then I bit on a 2004 TL.
Old 07-21-2010, 03:21 PM
  #73  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,895
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
As far as the 3G TL interior: be it TL or TL-S, it has the nicest interior of any sedan with a pricepoint < $50k (and better than some north of $50k)....add the SH-AWD powertrain from the 4G TL and it would be the perfect sedan for me.

Back directly on topic: I like the 2G TL-S leather and seat supportiveness far more than what was in my 07 AV6 but the Accord does have a better dashboard layout. However, the cons on the interior of either are not enough to be dealbreakers as far as I'm concerned. Both are comfortable and fairly well laid out in this department.


gatr, I'm shooting for sub-$10k.

Last edited by F23A4; 07-21-2010 at 07:25 PM.
Old 07-21-2010, 03:27 PM
  #74  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
For that, I'd get the latest-model Accord you can.
Old 07-21-2010, 04:53 PM
  #75  
Advanced
 
Tyler-IS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the 1st generation RL and Infiniti I30 suggestions
Old 07-21-2010, 06:33 PM
  #76  
Suzuka Master
 
nokiaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,271
Received 236 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by AMAN1
However the Accord's interior (IMO) blows the TL-S and pretty much every other family sedan of its time out of the water.
+1 Simply because the 7G Accord is on a newer platform than 2GTL.

I have an 04 Coupe 5MT and really wish I would have gotten the 6/6. However it's my DD/beater so it does a fine job.

I vote for the Accord V6. Try, beg so it can be a 6 speed this time.
Old 07-21-2010, 07:31 PM
  #77  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,895
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by nokiaman

I vote for the Accord V6. Try, beg so it can be a 6 speed this time.
I REALLY hear you man. ESPECIALLY with respect to the 7.5G AV6 6MT being a seriously underrated sports sedan, due mainly to its family sedan clothing. But, she'll be the primary driver so that'll be a fat

While she is more than proficient with driving a manual tranny (she taught me stick when we were dating), she has no interest in returning from the dark side!

Her only exception to that rule is if it's a BMW.

Last edited by F23A4; 07-21-2010 at 07:33 PM.
Old 07-21-2010, 07:38 PM
  #78  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,640
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Do you honestly think that the 1G TL still has a better interior than any Accord up to today?
In some ways, yes.

Higher quality trim pieces, every surface in the 1st gen TL is a spongy plastic, not hard for example. The pillars and ceiling have a 'velvet' texture instead of plastic.

The leather is higher quality than ANY Accord as well.
Old 07-21-2010, 07:55 PM
  #79  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
I REALLY hear you man. ESPECIALLY with respect to the 7.5G AV6 6MT being a seriously underrated sports sedan, due mainly to its family sedan clothing. But, she'll be the primary driver so that'll be a fat

While she is more than proficient with driving a manual tranny (she taught me stick when we were dating), she has no interest in returning from the dark side!

Her only exception to that rule is if it's a BMW.
Absolutely no chance you could trade DDs?

On a side note, I bet if you put her into a 7.5 6MT blindfolded and told her it was a BMW she'd believe you immediately. Then crash
Old 07-21-2010, 09:16 PM
  #80  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
In some ways, yes.

Higher quality trim pieces, every surface in the 1st gen TL is a spongy plastic, not hard for example. The pillars and ceiling have a 'velvet' texture instead of plastic.

The leather is higher quality than ANY Accord as well.
LOL

The whole bottom half of the dash is hard as anything in the industry. The buttons, trimmings, accents, etc., it's all worse. Doesn't even come close to comparing.

Interiors are subjective but this is like saying a 2G TL's interior is better than the 3-4G. I mean you can SAY it, but....


Quick Reply: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L V6 OR 2003 Acura TL Type S



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.