05 Clk55......
#2
Senior Moderator
hottness
Trending Topics
#8
Race Director
Quad tips do add a real nice touch. Loving that two tone interior as well.
All that being said as a whole i liked the previous gen better as far as looks good.
All that being said as a whole i liked the previous gen better as far as looks good.
#9
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chaptorial
All that being said as a whole i liked the previous gen better as far as looks good.
The 208 just looks old and dated compared to the 209, the small updates for 05 put it over the fence imho (the frameless windows alone are a huge advantage over the 208).
#10
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
Looks nice, but I much prefer the E-55.. Doesn't this only come with the NA 5.5L engine vs. the SC'ed 5.5 in the E55?
The E55 is faster though, but the smaller and lighter CLK is more fun to drive.
#12
Originally Posted by Shawn S
Nice car, but as long as they insist on only having a Tranny with P-R-N-D-1-2 on it, I’ll never consider buying one.
Shawn S
Shawn S
heh
#13
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes
on
661 Posts
Originally Posted by Shawn S
Nice car, but as long as they insist on only having a Tranny with P-R-N-D-1-2 on it, I’ll never consider buying one.
Shawn S
Shawn S
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
It's too blah except for the rear.
#15
on to the next one...
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
most cars come with xenons stardard these days, or the most a $500 option. Only MB can charge $990 for them ![:O](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/embarrassment.gif)
![:O](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/embarrassment.gif)
![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
#17
no stock navi... fucking benzes man...
the car looks very cheap for a AMG benz. the only really nice parts i like about it are the tails and the frameless windows. but then again the red taillights are also a VERY dull red, making it look super cheap. and the reason behind this is due the the signaling peice of the taillights bc the plastic is thin and dull so it can appear red, but shine yellow when signaling.
the car looks very cheap for a AMG benz. the only really nice parts i like about it are the tails and the frameless windows. but then again the red taillights are also a VERY dull red, making it look super cheap. and the reason behind this is due the the signaling peice of the taillights bc the plastic is thin and dull so it can appear red, but shine yellow when signaling.
#20
that car needed quad exhaust, it looked too plain otherwise. also, i too liked the wider and lower looking previous gen. it just looked so smooth and classy, this new gen is too bubbly, too previous gen cl imo.
#22
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unsure
but wtf is up with blank/unmarked buttons on a $70K car? WTF??!!!
And it’s probably something that can’t be removed.
#27
Pit Stop?
Originally Posted by pimpscls
its nice but nothing to aggresive for the price tag. But I am feeling the rear lip spoiler and the qaud exhaust
#28
Burn some dust here
Originally Posted by Minch00
You don't think 369hp is aggressive?
That car needed the new 18's and exhaust bad but it looks better than ever since they have added these.
#29
We dont love these hoes
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 38
Posts: 3,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all the new benz's look really good with the quad exhausts. that interior looks alot different than the ones that came out last year, or am i just high?
#32
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,217
Received 7,180 Likes
on
3,649 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
i dunno im on the fence here...love the engine/interior...but the exterior just doesn't look aggressive at all to me. i'd prefer a last gen.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#35
Originally Posted by Minch00
You don't think 369hp is aggressive?
honestly tho, why isnt the beast in this? i mean, the slk and c will be shitting all over this car, why so conservative with the clk55 unless theyre moving it down market.
#36
Originally Posted by ItalianStallion
....why so conservative with the clk55 unless theyre moving it down market.
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#37
Burn some dust here
Originally Posted by ItalianStallion
unacceptable.
honestly tho, why isnt the beast in this? i mean, the slk and c will be shitting all over this car, why so conservative with the clk55 unless theyre moving it down market.
honestly tho, why isnt the beast in this? i mean, the slk and c will be shitting all over this car, why so conservative with the clk55 unless theyre moving it down market.
#38
Pit Stop?
Originally Posted by cob3683
In the next 2 years, the SLK55, C55, and CLK55 will all have new 408hp engines. This will supposedly move the C and CLK class ahead of the next M3/M4 in terms of power.
#39
Burn some dust here
Originally Posted by Minch00
DO you know when this was happening? I'll wait until then if it's for sure.......
#40
Pit Stop?
Originally Posted by cob3683
Supposedly by 2006 MY. The C55 has been approved to go this route and the last I heard the CLK was still in waiting.
![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)