Official Lens Discussion Thread
#401
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
Originally Posted by moeronn
How do you like it? Did the extra stop and IS help out?
B+H is still showing the lens as back-ordered.
B+H is still showing the lens as back-ordered.
#402
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Heard that it is three weeks or so back ordered. Maybe it's not coming back.
Next week Canon should be talking about NEW things.
![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
#403
Some have speculated that an upgraded version may be coming??
#404
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
ohh.. wonder what they will change with it.
probably better prevention for the dust issue and a better more reliable version of IS?
probably better prevention for the dust issue and a better more reliable version of IS?
#406
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
ohh and maybe better flare prevention?
#407
Photography Nerd
I haven't had any issues with flare or dust in the last 10,000 frames with my 17-55. ![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
I think it's just back ordered because of demand like Mizouse mentioned. Canon actually doesn't make the same lens all year long, they do them in batches. If one model sells better than predicted, there can be a couple week shortage + shipping time to refill shelves here.
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
I think it's just back ordered because of demand like Mizouse mentioned. Canon actually doesn't make the same lens all year long, they do them in batches. If one model sells better than predicted, there can be a couple week shortage + shipping time to refill shelves here.
#408
Senior Moderator
I need to rent a lens for a week or so. Can someone recommend which one to get for my canon XT?
Im trying to get a macro lens that would be able to take close up pictures of circuit boards. Mainly the black flim thats in this pictures
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2019/...91630165_b.jpg
I need a shot like that but it being much more detailed and closer. Any advice?
Im trying to get a macro lens that would be able to take close up pictures of circuit boards. Mainly the black flim thats in this pictures
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2019/...91630165_b.jpg
I need a shot like that but it being much more detailed and closer. Any advice?
#409
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
EF-S 60mm macro?
EF 100mm macro?
EF 100mm macro?
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#411
Earth-bound misfit
I've used lensrentals.com. I was very happy with their service.
#412
You also might want to use an extension tube with the macro to get even closer. The size just depends on how close you'll need to get.
#413
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
You also might want to use an extension tube with the macro to get even closer. The size just depends on how close you'll need to get.
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
#414
Senior Moderator
Thanks guys.
So something like this should work...?
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro http://www.lensrentals.com/item/canon-100mm-f2.8-macro
with
Canon 1.4X teleconverter http://www.lensrentals.com/item/cano...-teleconverter
Total: $60.00 to rent for 3 days.
So something like this should work...?
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro http://www.lensrentals.com/item/canon-100mm-f2.8-macro
with
Canon 1.4X teleconverter http://www.lensrentals.com/item/cano...-teleconverter
Total: $60.00 to rent for 3 days.
#415
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Thanks guys.
So something like this should work...?
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro http://www.lensrentals.com/item/canon-100mm-f2.8-macro
with
Canon 1.4X teleconverter http://www.lensrentals.com/item/cano...-teleconverter
Total: $60.00 to rent for 3 days.
So something like this should work...?
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro http://www.lensrentals.com/item/canon-100mm-f2.8-macro
with
Canon 1.4X teleconverter http://www.lensrentals.com/item/cano...-teleconverter
Total: $60.00 to rent for 3 days.
The 100mm macro is a good choice though and should meet your needs without any other extras.
#418
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
#419
Photography Nerd
The real trick you're going to run into is trying to keep the subject parallel to the focal plane, then trying to get enough light on it. What I would suggest is to get a little tabletop tripod for your camera, then get a little vice clamp for your circuit boards. Flip the boards so they're standing vertically, and use a nice bright lamp to light the surface.
#421
Photography Nerd
No problem. You're going to have a little bit of a learning curve trying to get used to macro photography. ![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
To start, try turning the lens to it's closest focus point, then move the camera forward or backwards to bring your subject into focus. Then, if the subject still doesn't fill enough of the frame, try adding the 12mm ring. If that doesn't work keep adding rings until the subject is big enough.
The rings will cause some light loss, so the more extension you use, the longer your exposure times will be. That shouldn't be a problem if your camera is on a tripod and your subject isn't moving though. The macro world is a cool one, so I'm looking forward to your shots!
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
To start, try turning the lens to it's closest focus point, then move the camera forward or backwards to bring your subject into focus. Then, if the subject still doesn't fill enough of the frame, try adding the 12mm ring. If that doesn't work keep adding rings until the subject is big enough.
The rings will cause some light loss, so the more extension you use, the longer your exposure times will be. That shouldn't be a problem if your camera is on a tripod and your subject isn't moving though. The macro world is a cool one, so I'm looking forward to your shots!
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#424
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
Originally Posted by moeronn
The 17-55 EF-S is back in stock at B+H.... what to do, what to do?
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#426
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by The Dougler
EF 50 f/1.8 has arrived
with $41 in additional UPS fees
I think I'm done buying shit online for awhile.
![Woot](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
![Owned](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/owned.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Next time, go with UPS Expedited because it includes brokerage and it gets here faster. Typically it's only $15 to $20 more than standard.
#427
Unofficial Goat
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
![Owned](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/owned.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Next time, go with UPS Expedited because it includes brokerage and it gets here faster. Typically it's only $15 to $20 more than standard.
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
New policy, I'm not ordering shit till they confirm method.
#428
I'd contact the seller/shipper and let the know what happened, this time as well as last. Let them know this inhibits your chances of buying from the again. Maybe they'll pushed back some money your way.
#429
Drifting
ok so it's tax season..i'm looking to replace my kit lens on my 40D...
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
#430
Unofficial Goat
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
I'd contact the seller/shipper and let the know what happened, this time as well as last. Let them know this inhibits your chances of buying from the again. Maybe they'll pushed back some money your way.
#431
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
Originally Posted by drigo
ok so it's tax season..i'm looking to replace my kit lens on my 40D...
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
personally i went with the 17-55 because i tend to shoot wide angle quite a bit. now if you arn't the type to shoot wide angle then go with 24-70
#432
Originally Posted by drigo
ok so it's tax season..i'm looking to replace my kit lens on my 40D...
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
On a 40D the 24-70 is 38-112, what do you want to do. Get a faster lens or lengthen your reach? If you want to lengthen your reach go with 70-200, if you want to spend the same $$$ go with the 4.0 IS.
#433
Drifting
Originally Posted by Mizouse
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
personally i went with the 17-55 because i tend to shoot wide angle quite a bit. now if you arn't the type to shoot wide angle then go with 24-70
#434
Drifting
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
On a 40D the 24-70 is 38-112, what do you want to do. Get a faster lens or lengthen your reach? If you want to lengthen your reach go with 70-200, if you want to spend the same $$$ go with the 4.0 IS.
#435
Safety Car
Originally Posted by drigo
ok so it's tax season..i'm looking to replace my kit lens on my 40D...
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?
Its no coincidence that 17-55 comes out to around the same range as the 24-70 on a cropped body. The 24-70 was the walkaround lens of choice for film cameras back in the day.
If you're looking for a general all-around lens, I would recommend the 17-55. Either way, welcome to fast glass.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#436
Drifting
thanks guys...i am looking for a general walk-arounds lens...
iv'e read/seen nothing but great things about both lenses...so i know i can't go wrong with either...i just can't decide..oh well..i have a few weeks to decide
iv'e read/seen nothing but great things about both lenses...so i know i can't go wrong with either...i just can't decide..oh well..i have a few weeks to decide
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#439
Senior Moderator
Thanks Dan for the help. This is harder than i thought it would be but im slowly getting the hang of it.
Heres a couple test shots...
![](https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2398/2221277951_22ab9018a4_b.jpg)
![](https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2034/2216659339_d285a97ca6_b.jpg)
![](https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/2216647769_f57047fa1e_b.jpg)
Any tips are always welcomed.
Heres a couple test shots...
![](https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2398/2221277951_22ab9018a4_b.jpg)
![](https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2034/2216659339_d285a97ca6_b.jpg)
![](https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/2216647769_f57047fa1e_b.jpg)
Any tips are always welcomed.
Last edited by Crazy Bimmer; 01-26-2008 at 07:07 PM.
#440
Photography Nerd
The last one looks really cool!
The trick to capturing flat surfaces is to keep them completely parallel to the front of the lens. The depth of field is so shallow with a macro at this distance that even a couple degrees out of parallel will make a big difference.
A simple white or black background also helps to isolate the subject. Try this: put a sheet of white paper down (or use a white table) , then put your subject on a piece of glass. Lift the glass a few inches above the white background, shine some light on the white paper or table. The backlight will give some really nice definition to your subject, but you'll also need a light in front to expose properly.
Did you rent extension tubes with the macro too?
The trick to capturing flat surfaces is to keep them completely parallel to the front of the lens. The depth of field is so shallow with a macro at this distance that even a couple degrees out of parallel will make a big difference.
A simple white or black background also helps to isolate the subject. Try this: put a sheet of white paper down (or use a white table) , then put your subject on a piece of glass. Lift the glass a few inches above the white background, shine some light on the white paper or table. The backlight will give some really nice definition to your subject, but you'll also need a light in front to expose properly.
Did you rent extension tubes with the macro too?