Volkswagen: Jetta News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2010, 12:43 PM
  #321  
Intermediate
 
speedyd718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Age: 41
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i actually think that the styling direction vw is taking is pretty good, just wish they'd bring that scirocco r over.
Old 06-17-2010, 01:04 PM
  #322  
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
princelybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 22,454
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
The styling is improving.
Old 06-17-2010, 10:44 PM
  #323  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
design is squre so it will look much better in real life.







Old 06-17-2010, 11:36 PM
  #324  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
You are missing the point.

An 8 second car that gets incredible MPG numbers.

How many of those are out there?
Yeah, but I don't give a crap about mileage. I need a car that goes a damn sight faster than 8.7 seconds to sixty.

How about a Jetta with a 270 hp turbo-four like the upcoming Sonata turbo???????
Old 06-18-2010, 11:16 AM
  #325  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
^^ Just get the 2.0T motor and flash to stage 1 for 500 bucks....done!
Old 06-18-2010, 11:26 AM
  #326  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
The Jetta isn't a Sonata competitor either. They have a mid size on the way.
Old 06-18-2010, 11:39 AM
  #327  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Considering Hyundai can get a midsize sedan up to 34 mpg highway on regular fuel with a turbo 2L making 274 hp I'd expect VW should be able to do better.

Of course what we expect and they do are two different things, and I hold little faith in VW here.
Old 06-18-2010, 01:24 PM
  #328  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,305
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Considering Hyundai can get a midsize sedan up to 34 mpg highway on regular fuel with a turbo 2L making 274 hp I'd expect VW should be able to do better.

Of course what we expect and they do are two different things, and I hold little faith in VW here.
I thought the 34 rating was for the DI 2.4 engine?
Old 06-18-2010, 02:06 PM
  #329  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
The Jetta isn't a Sonata competitor either. They have a mid size on the way.
This thing already has greater rear leg room than Sonata. and most probably greater rear head room and trunk. It is full size car relative to mid size Sonata.
Old 06-18-2010, 02:26 PM
  #330  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,305
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
cause Biker knows a reply is coming.
Old 06-18-2010, 05:11 PM
  #331  
Burning Brakes
 
knavinusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Richmond, BC
Age: 35
Posts: 1,067
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
You guys are missing the point if you're looking at their TDI engines for performance. If Hyundai can make a very fuel-efficient turbo 4-banger that makes gobs of power, then good for them. But 34 mpg highway doesn't mean much when these diesels are getting 40+ mpg combined.
Old 06-18-2010, 11:34 PM
  #332  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
I thought the 34 rating was for the DI 2.4 engine?
That one's rated 35 mpg.
Old 06-18-2010, 11:34 PM
  #333  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by knavinusa
You guys are missing the point if you're looking at their TDI engines for performance. If Hyundai can make a very fuel-efficient turbo 4-banger that makes gobs of power, then good for them. But 34 mpg highway doesn't mean much when these diesels are getting 40+ mpg combined.
Actually we were talking about 34 mpg compared to VW's gas 2.5, not the 2.0 (TDI).
Old 06-18-2010, 11:42 PM
  #334  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by knavinusa
You guys are missing the point if you're looking at their TDI engines for performance. If Hyundai can make a very fuel-efficient turbo 4-banger that makes gobs of power, then good for them. But 34 mpg highway doesn't mean much when these diesels are getting 40+ mpg combined.
Yeah, but that article I quoted said the TDI had, "...the power of a sports car". I call complete BS on that. Everybody acts as though 236 ft/lb is such a big deal but torque gets you nothing when your hp peak is 115. If all you care about is mpg, by all means get a wimpy TDI. Just don't make it out to be a sports car.....
Old 06-19-2010, 05:03 PM
  #335  
Burning Brakes
 
knavinusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Richmond, BC
Age: 35
Posts: 1,067
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
Actually we were talking about 34 mpg compared to VW's gas 2.5, not the 2.0 (TDI).
Ahh, I see. My bad. They haven't updated that engine in years.

Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Yeah, but that article I quoted said the TDI had, "...the power of a sports car". I call complete BS on that. Everybody acts as though 236 ft/lb is such a big deal but torque gets you nothing when your hp peak is 115. If all you care about is mpg, by all means get a wimpy TDI. Just don't make it out to be a sports car.....
Agreed. But 8.- something seconds isn't too shabby for an economy car, considering that the current Civic runs 8-9s 0-60.
Old 06-19-2010, 06:44 PM
  #336  
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
princelybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 22,454
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
Originally Posted by knavinusa
Agreed. But 8.- something seconds isn't too shabby for an economy car, considering that the current Civic runs 8-9s 0-60.
Current generation Civic Si's run ~ 6.7 seconds, 0-60.
Old 06-19-2010, 07:10 PM
  #337  
Burning Brakes
 
knavinusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Richmond, BC
Age: 35
Posts: 1,067
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by princelybug
Current generation Civic Si's run ~ 6.7 seconds, 0-60.
I'm talking about the regular civic with the 1.8
Old 06-30-2010, 07:20 PM
  #338  
I'm a llama :(
 
Motohip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Fixed.

My wife averages about 26-27 in mixed driving with her 09 Rabbit. My biggest complaint with the engine is its coarseness and its somewhat loud.
Get the underhood sound deadener from a Jetta. It will quiet it down a LOT!
Old 06-30-2010, 07:23 PM
  #339  
I'm a llama :(
 
Motohip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Additional engines include a 2.0, 2.5 R5, and 2.0 TSI. These are all gasoline offerings, with the new base engine giving 113hp and a combined fuel economy of 28mpg. The 138hp 2.5-liter engine will remain as a middle offering...
Are they detuning the 2.5?
Old 07-25-2010, 07:36 PM
  #340  
Banned
 
Walmart Gangsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Clemson
Age: 36
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 Jetta











Old 07-25-2010, 07:38 PM
  #341  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must say I'm underwhelmed by the new Jetta, in multiple ways.

And to be anal there's already a 2011 Jetta thread.
Old 07-25-2010, 08:03 PM
  #342  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,427
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,048 Posts
The most boring exterior of any car on sale today.

And from what I hear, interior isn't really the best either, part of VW's downpricing. Odd, they were trying to position themselves as more upmarket a few years ago, weren't they?

Put that along with no new engines, and you have a destined loser.
Old 07-25-2010, 08:17 PM
  #343  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
I think it looks great
Old 07-25-2010, 08:27 PM
  #344  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Points I'd offer up ->

*Styling*
I think it's pretty dreary with the 2010 Mazda3, 2011 Focus, and even the 2006 Civic all considered, possibly even the new Cruze and Forte though both of those are somewhat bland too. Bland styling doesn't hurt sales (just ask Honda and Toyota about their Accords and Camrys), so this is more of a subjective point anyway.

*Engines*
Disappointingly, they're all pretty much carried over. The TDI was great, but the 2.5L I-5 should've died out in favor of a 2.0L I-4 (or comparable) in the S and SE, with the SE offering a 2.0T option and the SEL making that engine standard. Or some getup like that. The GLI needs a huge increase in power, the 265 hp 2.0T if we're honest.

As a result of its sheer lack of forward thinking, this car is probably destined to be outsold by the new Focus, Mazda3, and next generation Civic and Avante/Elantra, Corolla, maybe even the Forte. But if they can get quality control in check, maybe that will help.
Old 07-25-2010, 08:33 PM
  #345  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
i think it looks better than the MKV (corolla lookalike). i bet it will sell more too.
Old 07-25-2010, 09:26 PM
  #346  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,427
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,048 Posts
It'll sell a ton more, but I think that's because of its price.

Is there a GLI version coming soon? Hopefully that'll put a bit of excitement in the bland styling IMO
Old 07-26-2010, 08:40 AM
  #347  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
To continue the closed 2011 Jetta thread ... The Jetta is going more mass-market. So yes, they are trying to find ways to lower the entry-point to the Jetta. But the Passat replacement will cover some of the old price range of the Jetta ...

From VWVortex:


I think the GLI will be a decent looking car.
Old 07-26-2010, 10:01 AM
  #348  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
glad they went back to more euro styling for the jetta
Old 07-26-2010, 10:20 AM
  #349  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
They need to build that Jetta coupe concept and ditch the idiotic hybrid engine...
Old 07-26-2010, 10:30 AM
  #350  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Threads merged. (Forgot to do that last night, sorry)

I like the simple styling. Some nice wheels will go a long way. But it does need more HP in base form. They should just drop the 2.0L. Its woefully underpowered.
Old 07-26-2010, 10:37 AM
  #351  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll take the rumored Focus ST.
Old 07-26-2010, 11:06 AM
  #352  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
I'll take the rumored Focus ST.
If it looks like the Focus I saw at the car show, then yes, I would too.

The car looked great, had a better interior than the Jetta, had MyFord, and would have 220hp.

Done deal ...

Except I want another Audi
Old 07-26-2010, 11:24 AM
  #353  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
if it looks like the focus i saw at the car show, then yes, i would too.

The car looked great, had a better interior than the jetta, had myford, and would have 220hp.

Done deal ...

Except i want another audi
rs3?

Last edited by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName; 07-26-2010 at 11:27 AM.
Old 07-26-2010, 11:26 AM
  #354  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
If it looks like the Focus I saw at the car show, then yes, I would too.

The car looked great, had a better interior than the Jetta, had MyFord, and would have 220hp.
Probably more than 220
Old 07-26-2010, 03:19 PM
  #355  
Intermediate
 
xoneatom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you know, at first i liked it a lot.. but im starting to agree with a few of you guys; it looks really boring.
Old 07-26-2010, 03:41 PM
  #356  
Safety Car
 
yohan81718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose
Age: 42
Posts: 4,444
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
front end is good.. rear end is bad.. interior is okay..

overall.. meh
Old 07-26-2010, 03:57 PM
  #357  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
rs3?
I'd happily take a 2008 B7 S4 at this point but I think by the time I'm able to get one again, it'll be a B8 A5 that's a few years old.
Old 07-26-2010, 11:16 PM
  #358  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
I'd happily take a 2008 B7 S4 at this point but I think by the time I'm able to get one again, it'll be a B8 A5 that's a few years old.
Might be able to swing a few years old S5 by then...
Old 12-14-2010, 01:36 PM
  #359  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
2011 Volkswagen Jettas to be sold for $5,995 each--really

Volkswagen is selling three 2011 Jettas through Gilt Groupe for $5,995--slashing the “1” from the usual $15,995 starting price.

One car will be sold at noon Eastern time for three days starting on Dec. 15 in the flash sale. The sale will only be accessible on the first day through Gilt mobile applications on the iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and Android devices. It will extend to Gilt.com on Dec. 16 and 17.

The redesigned 2011 Jetta launched in October. It gets fuel economy of 24 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway. The car comes with a folding rear seat, electronic stability control, a tire-pressure-monitoring system, heated side mirrors and a four-speaker sound system.

Volkswagen is the first automotive brand to be sold on Gilt, a flash-sale site that offers high-end products to its members.

http://www.autoweek.com/article/2010...#ixzz187HpzaVX
Old 12-14-2010, 04:33 PM
  #360  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
^ Still overpriced for the base model


Quick Reply: Volkswagen: Jetta News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.