Tesla: Model S News

Old 02-15-2014, 11:51 AM
  #321  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,953 Likes on 5,135 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
again I say:



you are so full of shit (and yourself...same thing I guess)
whatever brings you happiness.
Old 02-17-2014, 10:53 PM
  #322  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,953 Likes on 5,135 Posts


http://www.businessinsider.com/what-...r-ended-2014-2
Old 02-19-2014, 03:52 PM
  #323  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
TSLA in After Hours : $217.99 - Up 424.35 (12.57%)

Tesla’s Shares Surge on Upbeat Outlook

Even when priced for perfection, investors still find plenty of reasons to push Tesla Motors Inc.'s stock price sharply higher.

Shares jumped 15% to $223.32 in after-hours trading after the electric car maker reported quarterly results and a 2014 outlook that exceeded analysts’ expectations. The stock had closed down 4.9% Wednesday at $193.64.

Tesla said it delivered 6,900 Model S electric cars globally in the fourth quarter and forecast that its deliveries would rise to 7,400 in the first quarter as it expands deliveries in Europe and China. The company said demand remains strong for the $70,000-and-up sedan.

Investors are jazzed because the Palo Alto, Calif., company said it would deliver 35,000 vehicles in 2014, a 55% increase from 2013. Production should rise to 1,000 cars a week, from 600 a week by the end of the year. Battery cell supply will continue to constrain production in the first half of the year and then free up in the second half, Tesla said.

Shares have surged by more than 400% from a year ago. The company has sold cars in all 50 U.S. states and has officially launched sales in China, an important growth market.

Tesla also trades at 292 times next year’s earnings, according to FactSet, a figure that skeptics worry has gone way too high and ultimately should prompt a pullback in the stock price.

Options traders were pricing in a big move for Tesla prior the company’s earnings report. The options market is pricing in expectations for a 12% move higher or lower for shares through the end of the week following the report, based on the price of an options strategy known as a straddle.

Tesla said its fourth-quarter loss shrank to $16.2 million, compared with $90 million loss a year earlier. Automotive sales rose to $610.9 million, from $294.4 million a year ago.

On an adjusted basis, Tesla earned $46 million, or 33 cents a share. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters projected Tesla would report a fourth-quarter profit of 21 cents a share, on revenue of $683 million.

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/...sharply-higher
Old 02-19-2014, 08:41 PM
  #324  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
This is going to do wonders for me... and the 5 shares I have.
Old 02-20-2014, 01:37 AM
  #325  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,304
Received 623 Likes on 502 Posts
Those sales numbers work out to an avg of $88K per car which means most folks are getting the lower level car without too many options. The sticker on the car in the showroom was over 100K.
Old 02-20-2014, 08:26 AM
  #326  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Those sales numbers work out to an avg of $88K per car which means most folks are getting the lower level car without too many options. The sticker on the car in the showroom was over 100K.

The base model price is $63.5k after tax credit and maxes out at $75k. $87k gets you a "stripped down" performance model.
Old 02-20-2014, 02:07 PM
  #327  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,304
Received 623 Likes on 502 Posts
The tax credit doesn't make it into Tesla's numbers.
Old 02-20-2014, 02:27 PM
  #328  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
The tax credit doesn't make it into Tesla's numbers.

That makes more sense.
Old 03-05-2014, 12:07 PM
  #329  
Safety Car
 
TSX69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 4,780
Received 1,394 Likes on 699 Posts
Unhappy Been Considering a Tesla but This Does Not Help


When we last left our 2013 Tesla Model S, it was on the back of a flat-bed tow truck, having died on my colleague, Matt Jones. It spent the night in a tow yard and was delivered to the Tesla service department in West Los Angeles the following morning.

Vince, our service advisor, was great about giving me updates throughout the course of the day. "We're getting a bunch of faults from the drive unit and main battery pack," said Vince. "Our technicians are taking a look at it now. I'll call you when I have more information."

It sounded serious.

He called back about an hour later and said they would be replacing the drive unit and the high-voltage battery assembly. I asked Vince what caused the problems, but he said they don't open up the batteries at the service center. Like most warranty issues on new cars, the parts are replaced at the dealer and the old ones are sent to corporate headquarters for the engineers to study and see what went wrong. The service invoice didn't give me much more to go on, "During vehicle logs review, found fault related to internal drive unit failure. Replaced complete drive unit assembly per TDS case #9571."

If you're keeping score, our Model S is now on its 3rd drive unit: the one that came with the car, the 1 that was replaced in November, and this latest 1. And that wasn't the only thing that was replaced on this service visit.

After the power unit was replaced, the Model S needed a 4-wheel alignment. That's because the rear subframe must be removed to extract the power unit.

The service center also replaced the 12-volt battery, along with providing new battery terminals and a battery clamp strap.

The Tesla dealer also took care of 4 service bulletins under warranty:
Concern: Front lower control arm washer installation
Correction: Inspect knuckle/ball joint surfaces, install four front lower control arm washers.

Concern: Firmware update for automatic charge current reduction
Correction: Update firmware to version 5.8.4

Concern: Front bumper carrier bolt replacement
Correction: Replace front bumper carrier bolts and washers

Concern: New bolt for rear camber correction
Correction: Installed rear upper camber adjustment bolts per proactive repair.
Tesla also performed a "courtesy vehicle inspection," where it noted that the right rear tire has 3/32" of tread remaining. For reference, the other tires are at 8/32" (LF), 7/32" (RF) and 8/32" (LR). The worn tire is closer to its treadwear indicator on the inside of the tire, and given our past with prematurely worn tires, it's worth keeping a close eye on. Also, I wonder if the service bulletin regarding the new bolt for rear camber correction has something to do with this wear. Dan Edmunds will take a closer look at the tire soon.

Finally, the dealer found that the lug nuts were beginning to swell and were hard to remove, so they replaced all 20 of them.

All repairs were performed under warranty and Tesla delivered the car to us the following morning. Tesla didn't note the cost of the parts in its paperwork, but I have to think this repair cost Tesla at least the $5,000. Big 85KwH batteries and electric drive units don't come cheap.

When I 1st sat down to write this post, I was all fired up, as I tried to picture myself in an owner's shoes. If I had to replace the engine on my car twice — hell, even once — I would swear off the brand forever. But after talking it over with some colleagues, I was reminded that the people who buy Teslas aren't just buying basic transportation. They are early adopters and willing beta testers of a shiny new piece of tech.

In that context, I remembered my experience with my Xbox 360. Early models had high failure rates, which led to the infamous "Red Ring of Death." At the end the console generation, I had gone through 3 system failures. Not once did I think about ditching the Xbox and gaming exclusively on a Sony PlayStation 3. The Xbox was my preferred piece of tech, and when it broke, I just got it fixed, warranty or not.

Obviously the costs are different and no 1 relies on an Xbox 360 to get them to work, but the mindset is the same. For those Tesla owners who still love their cars, even in the face of major repairs, I get it.
Old 03-05-2014, 01:02 PM
  #330  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Well, nobody ever claimed Tesla vehicles to be reliable.
Old 03-05-2014, 01:19 PM
  #331  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Not surprising that a small volume manufacturer that is new to making cars would have some teething problems. I am also guessing that the vehicle that Edmunds has for testing is likely an earlier build where many of these issues may not have been sorted out.

That said, it is still disconcerting to see their vehicle suffer this many maladies in such a short period of time.
Old 03-28-2014, 02:01 PM
  #332  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Tesla adds titanium underbody shield plates to Model S

After denying any inherent fire risk in its vehicles, Tesla Motors has announced plans to add a triple underbody shield to the Model S.

The battery pack -- placed on the underside of the car -- is currently protected by a quarter inch of aluminum armor plating. New builds will also integrate a hollow aluminum bar in front of the battery housing, forcing hard objects to deflect up and pierce the plastic aeroshield and front trunk liner instead of damaging the battery.

The aluminum bar is followed by a titanium plate that is designed to prevent front underbody components from being damaged. Compared to aluminum, the titanium plate is expected to "neutralize" road debris rather than allowing it to deform the battery plate. Any surviving objects then face a third shield placed at a shallow angle to cause the car to lift and pass over the object.

The company insists that the cars are still the safest on the road without the new additions, with a 1-in-8,000 fire risk that is claimed to be five times lower than an average gasoline car.

"Nonetheless, we felt it was important to bring this risk down to virtually zero to give Model S owners complete peace of mind," said CEO Elon Musk in a blog post. "With a track record of zero deaths or serious, permanent injuries since our vehicles went into production six years ago, there is no safer car on the road than a Tesla. The addition of the underbody shields simply takes it a step further."

The executive suggests such technology would help prevent fires in extreme scenarios, such as the crash in Mexico that was widely reported. Musk suggests the vehicle was going approximately 110 mph when it impacted a roundabout and sheared off 15 feet of concrete, tore off a front wheel, smashed through another wall and crashed into a tree.

"The driver stepped out and walked away with no permanent injuries and a fire, again limited to the front section of the vehicle, started several minutes later," Musk said. "The underbody shields will help prevent a fire even in such a scenario."

The additional components are said to reduce range by just 0.1 percent and have no negative effect on handling or ride quality.

Tesla also promises to retrofit any existing Model S sedans at no charge if customers would like to have the additional safety features.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/tesla-ad...#ixzz2xHlMOfdZ

Sometimes you can talk all you want, but reality will prove you otherwise.

Tesla clearly had an issue with an "Achilles Heal" on the underside of the body where the batteries are.

Good to see they owned up to this.
Old 03-28-2014, 06:01 PM
  #333  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Titanium? Sounds cheap...
Old 04-01-2014, 04:52 PM
  #334  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Simple to hack?

Researchers have raised new concerns that vehicle security systems may be vulnerable to hackers. Tesla's Model S sedan was singled out as being particular susceptible to security attacks.

Nitesh Dhanjani, a security researcher, revealed at a recent hacker conference in Singapore that most vehicle security systems can be compromised by using basic computer hacking techniques.

Dhanjani specifically cited the Tesla Model S, which only requires a six-character password to gain access to an online account that can lock and unlock the vehicle's doors remotely, among other things. Moreover, Dhanjani discovered that Tesla's online interface didn't have a cap for incorrect passwords, making it vulnerable to so-called "brute-force attacks," which enter thousands of passwords per second until the correct code is discovered.

Since Dhanjani's speech, Tesla has implemented a new system that locks a user out after five incorrect passwords are entered.

"We can't attempt to secure our vehicles the way we have attempted to secure our workstations at home," Dhanjani, who advises companies on computer security, wrote in a blog post. "The implications to physical security and privacy in this context have raised stakes to the next level."

Although Dhanjani's work has focused on Tesla (he owns a Model S), a number of other modern vehicles also suffer from the same pitfalls. Mainstream automakers like Ford and Toyota now offer apps to control vehicle functions, which could open the door, quite literally, for a new era of crime.

"We now have ways of accessing our cars we never did before, and consumers aren't quite aware of that. Hackers will try to take advantage of that lack of awareness," Erik Cabetas, managing partner at the consulting firm Include Security, told CNNMoney.

Some are also concerned that hackers could gain access to steering and throttle controls, which are also operated via computers in modern vehicles.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/hacking-...#ixzz2xfqHlE5q
Old 10-10-2014, 10:37 AM
  #335  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
So what's the D stand for? Deep pockets?

That P85D seems awfully quick 0-60 @ 3.2 1/4 mile @ 11.8
Old 10-10-2014, 10:38 AM
  #336  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
So what's the D stand for? Deep pockets?

That P85D seems awfully quick 0-60 @ 3.2 1/4 mile @ 11.8
Old 10-10-2014, 10:41 AM
  #337  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,953 Likes on 5,135 Posts
damn nobody posted about it? that's some serious hate.... lol

yeah 11.8 for a 5000 lb vehicle holy chit.
Old 10-10-2014, 10:46 AM
  #338  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,204
Received 22,632 Likes on 13,881 Posts
Post Tesla Model S Gets 691-HP Dual-Motor Option

From here: Tesla Model S Gets 691-HP Dual-Motor Option, Autopilot Tech

Tesla Motors [NSDQ:TSLA] CEO Elon Musk’s big announcement regarding the “D” has, as we suspected, turned out to be a new dual-motor option for the Model S that provides it with the extra traction of all-wheel drive. And the “something else” Musk also hinted at previously is a new semi-autonomous system dubbed an Autopilot. The system offers a few basic functions at present but it’s upgradable—via software updates—and will offer greater functionality in the future.

But getting back to the dual-motor option, it essentially adds a second electric motor to power the front wheels of the Model S and is being offered across the lineup, meaning a 60D, 85D and high-performance P85D. The 60D and 85D feature identical motors front and rear to give a combined output of 376 horsepower. The P85D’s rear motor is rated at 470 hp and the front at 221 hp, giving the car a combined output of 691 hp!

Incredibly, the P85D is claimed to accelerate from 0-60 mph in just 3.2 seconds, rivaling the times of many supercars and outmatching virtually all sedans on the market—including perhaps the world's most powerful sedan, the 707-hp 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat.

The dual-motor option also increases the driving range of the Model S by about 10 miles versus the current single-motor, rear-wheel-drive models, allowing the 60D to travel about 225 miles at an average 65 mph, the 85D about 295 miles and the P85D about 275 miles. This is due to efficiencies designed into the new system, according to Tesla.

Deliveries of the dual-motor, all-wheel-drive Model S sedans will begin in February, 2015. The cost of the dual-motor option for the 60D and 85D is just $4,000 but for the P85D you’re looking at $14,600, bringing the price tag up to $120,170. Of course, you’re getting supercar performance in a sedan that can seat up to seven.

As for the Autopilot system, it relies on a forward looking camera, radar, and 360-degree ultrasonic sensors that have recently been added to the Model S and actively monitor the surrounding roadway (they can’t be fitted to older models, unfortunately). Progressive software updates over time will enable sophisticated convenience and safety features that use these sensors to respond to real world conditions. These features will ultimately give Model S self-driving capability on the highway from on-ramp to off-ramp, though there’s been no mention of a timeframe for this. It should be noted that rival automaker Mercedes-Benz already offers such technology.

What the Autopilot system can do at present is read speed-limit signs and adjust the car to the speed on the sign. It can also change lanes when the driver uses the turn signal. Yes, when highway driving, all you have to do is select left or right and the Model S with Autopilot will check for a free spot and slide over. We also hear that the system will be able to automatically park the Model S.

The Autopilot system is included with a Tech Package that costs $4,250.
Old 10-10-2014, 11:04 AM
  #339  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
damn nobody posted about it? that's some serious hate.... lol

yeah 11.8 for a 5000 lb vehicle holy chit.
I was surprised too I was the first to bump it
Old 10-10-2014, 02:01 PM
  #340  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Sweet
Old 10-11-2014, 12:50 AM
  #341  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Elon Must brought the real D to the market.

He's the game changer.
Old 10-14-2014, 12:43 PM
  #342  
Pro
 
Devil Dog 21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Overland Park, KS
Age: 41
Posts: 651
Received 82 Likes on 65 Posts
The real game changer will be if the Model 3 has a similar performance option. I'd buy a $60k Model 3 that drove itself, got 250 miles per charge, and has impressive HP.
Old 10-14-2014, 03:49 PM
  #343  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
I don't care if it can do 0-60 in 0.3 secs.. if it could not take me to Vegas with 1 charge comfortably (NOT at 60 mph). Then I am not interested.

I don't think Tesla cares If i am interested anyways.

<---E-Car Hater.
Old 10-16-2014, 10:10 AM
  #344  
Pro
 
Devil Dog 21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Overland Park, KS
Age: 41
Posts: 651
Received 82 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I don't care if it can do 0-60 in 0.3 secs.. if it could not take me to Vegas with 1 charge comfortably (NOT at 60 mph). Then I am not interested.

I don't think Tesla cares If i am interested anyways.

<---E-Car Hater.
Nothing wrong with that at all. I understand that a large part of the market will want a car that travel across the country and never worry about plugging it in. Personally I drive about 250 miles a week and when I leave the city I'll still have my "old trusty" gas fed TL. My interest in Tesla isn't purely driven by their electric powered cars, but more by their technology, styling, and innovation. Just so happens that some of the perks of having an E car are attractive to me as well.
Old 12-09-2014, 08:41 AM
  #345  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,776
Received 4,019 Likes on 2,497 Posts
How Its Made Dream Cars: Tesla Model S


Pretty good video on a Tesla Model S is made, they make their own motors and electronics.
Old 07-20-2015, 04:35 AM
  #346  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,304
Received 623 Likes on 502 Posts
Tesla upgrades from Insane to Ludicrous | Autoweek

Tesla’s Insane Mode apparently wasn’t crazy enough.

The electric-vehicle maker, channeling one of the more absurd moments of the Mel Brooks comedy “Spaceballs,” announced an upgrade to its high-performance Model S P85D that cuts its zero-to-60 time to a face-stretching 2.8 seconds -- an option Tesla is calling “Ludicrous Mode.”

That compares with the now-seemingly leisurely time of 3.2 seconds for the current model’s "Insane Mode" setting.

“Nobody was asking for Ludicrous Mode because it was too ludicrous,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk told reporters on a conference call today. “Insane Mode has been incredibly well-received. We figured out from an engineering standpoint how to go beyond Insane so we figured we should release that.”

Zero to 60 mph in 2.8 seconds puts the Model S, a large sedan, in the realm of some of the fastest sports cars on the road today: It’s faster than Porsche’s top-end 911 Turbo S, which needs 2.9 seconds to hit the same speed.

Tesla also announced two additional Model S variants: a new rear-wheel-drive base model called the 70, which will start at $70,000 before any incentives, and a longer-range 90 model that uses a 90 kWh battery for about 300 miles of highway range on a single charge. For current owners, the upgrade from the 85 kWh battery pack would cost $3,000.
Old 07-20-2015, 12:52 PM
  #347  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,204
Received 22,632 Likes on 13,881 Posts
I thought it was some mode where the rapper Ludacris blings up the car with spinners and etc.
Old 07-20-2015, 12:56 PM
  #348  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,171
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Hmmm starting at 70k...
7500 fed tax credit
2500 Ca rebate

So 60k.... Still cannot afford
Old 07-20-2015, 01:46 PM
  #349  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Old 07-20-2015, 02:07 PM
  #350  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,204
Received 22,632 Likes on 13,881 Posts
Old 07-20-2015, 04:10 PM
  #351  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,158 Likes on 1,386 Posts
This is all cute and everything, but Tesla isn't a car company until the Model 3 launches and is under $40k. Until then, this is all relatively meaningless.
Old 07-21-2015, 12:14 PM
  #352  
old school
Thread Starter
 
elessar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,311
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Tesla: Model S News-mna4dm.jpg
Old 07-26-2015, 01:08 PM
  #353  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,204
Received 22,632 Likes on 13,881 Posts
Old 07-26-2015, 02:45 PM
  #354  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,304
Received 623 Likes on 502 Posts
It looked impressive until it got passed by a Mini.
Old 07-30-2015, 03:10 AM
  #355  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,304
Received 623 Likes on 502 Posts
http://www.autonews.com/article/2015...ive-on-model-s

SAN FRANCISCO -- Tesla Motors Inc., testing the power of viral marketing to sell its electric cars, said today that it will offer a word-of-mouth discount on the Model S sedan through the end of October, with both referrer and buyer getting $1,000.

The timing of the discount program, which will begin as Tesla prepares to start up an assembly line for its new Model X crossover, also suggests a desire to maintain the sales pace for the Model S. Palo Alto, Calif.-based Tesla has set a goal of delivering 55,000 units combined of the Model S and Model X in 2015.

Speaking to reporters today, Tesla CEO Elon Musk characterized the referral program as a test of an approach that could ultimately cut the cost of opening retail stores around the country. He said it currently costs Tesla about $2,000 to sell a car through one of its showrooms, but word of mouth could lower that.

“This is a short-term experiment,” Musk said during the conference call. “We’re trying to inform a long-term strategic decision here.”


Elon Musk: "This is a guerrilla tactic against car dealers in certain states. I don't want to characterize that as the main reason, but it could be something that helps us."

Under the program, customers will be able to buy a new Model S online by clicking a link from a current Tesla owner. The buyer will get a $1,000 discount, while the Tesla owner who provided the link will get a $1,000 credit toward vehicle service, Tesla gear or the purchase of another vehicle in the future.

Tesla said the owners whose links are used the most will win prizes, including a tour of the company’s new battery “gigafactory” in Nevada and the opportunity to buy a limited-edition “Founder Series” of the Model X at a $25,000 discount.

Tesla plans to begin delivery of the Model X this fall.

Musk said the referral program may also prove useful at helping Tesla with word of mouth in states where a requirement for franchised dealers has prevented the company from opening showrooms.

“Tesla representatives are not allowed to sell in certain states,” he said. “Customers, who are not salespeople, can refer their friends -- there’s no rule against that. And so, this is a guerrilla tactic against car dealers in certain states. I don’t want to characterize that as the main reason, but it could be something that helps us.”
Old 08-28-2015, 10:47 AM
  #356  
Q('.')=O
iTrader: (1)
 
imj0257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DFW, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 23,506
Received 720 Likes on 520 Posts
Tesla Model S P85D Breaks Consumer Reports? Ratings System ? Consumerist

The all-wheel-drive Tesla Model S P85D sedan performed better in our tests than any other car ever has, breaking the Consumer Reports Ratings system.

The P85D is brutally quick, with instant acceleration. The car’s thrust is forceful and immediate. Its near-instant g-forces can otherwise be achieved only by leaping off a building—literally.

That this electric car accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds without an engine’s roar makes it frighteningly eerie in its silent velocity. It’s so explosively quick that Tesla has created an “insane” driving mode.

With a six-figure price tag, the P85D is expensive, meaning its virtues will be experienced by a rare few. But its significance as a breakthrough model that is pushing the boundaries of both performance and fuel-efficiency is dramatic (even more so because it is coming from the factory of an American startup company). The Model S precedes additional electric cars coming from Tesla Motors. The Model X crossover is due to arrive in 2016, followed in 2018 by a more attainable compact sedan, named Model 3, targeted to start at about $35,000.

The P85D also has better braking and handling than our top-scoring standard Model S. And yet it’s more energy-efficient, getting the equivalent of 87 mpg.

Despite its sharper focus on performance, the P85D also maintains its practicality and luxury.

In rating it, however, we faced a quandary: The Tesla initially scored 103 in the Consumer Reports‘ Ratings system, which by definition doesn’t go past 100. The car set a new benchmark, so we had to make changes to our scoring to account for it. Those changes didn’t affect the scores of other cars.

To be clear, the Tesla’s 100 score doesn’t make the P85D a perfect car—even at $127,820. It has imperfections. The interior materials aren’t as opulent as other high-ticket automobiles, and its ride is firmer and louder than our base Model S.

What’s more, a lengthy road trip in an electric car with a 200-plus mile range can be a logistical hurdle if a quick-charging station isn’t along your route.

It’s also important to note that our Rating doesn’t include the Tesla’s reliability. The Model S has average reliability, according to our owner-survey responses.

That said, the Tesla Model S P85D is an automotive milepost. It’s a remarkable car that paves a new, unorthodox course, and it’s a powerful statement of American startup ingenuity.
Old 10-10-2015, 12:07 AM
  #357  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
Old 10-16-2015, 10:43 AM
  #358  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
Old 10-20-2015, 12:21 PM
  #359  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
TSLA: $205.83 - Down $22.27 (-9.76%)




Reliability problems push Consumer Reports to pull Tesla recommendation - LA Times

Consumer Reports yanks recommendation for Tesla Model S

October 20, 2015

Consumer Reports withdrew its recommendation for the Tesla Model S – a car the magazine has previously raved about – because of poor reliability for the sporty electric sedan.

The turnabout comes after the influential consumer magazine handed the luxury car a “worse-than-average” rating in its annual report on the predicted reliability of new vehicles issued Tuesday.

Consumer Reports surveyed 1,400 Model S owners “who chronicled an array of detailed and complicated maladies” with the drivetrain, power equipment, charging equipment and giant iPad-like center console. They also complained about body and sunroof squeaks, rattles and leaks.

“As the older vehicles are getting up on miles we are seeing some where the electric motor needs to be replaced and the onboard charging system won’t charge the battery,” said Jake Fisher, Consumer Reports’ director of automotive testing. “On the newer vehicles we are seeing problems such as the sunroof not operating properly. Door handles continue to be an issue.”

Fisher said the flaws could signal future problems for the brand, which plans to roughly double production next year. It has just begun deliveries of a second vehicle, the Model X electric crossover, and intends to introduce the Model 3, a smaller, less expensive electric car, in 2017.

“Going forward this poses the question whether they will be able to keep quality up as they increase volume and add models to the mix,” he said.

The risk is significant because the vehicles are becoming more complex, he said. For example, a signature feature of the Model X are “Falcon Wing” doors that swing out and fold up. Fisher asked how reliable those will be if Tesla is already having trouble with door handles.

Tesla spokesman Ricardo Reyes said the Palo Alto automaker keeps in close communication with its customers to “proactively address issues, and quickly fix problems.”

He noted that over-the-air software updates allow Tesla to diagnose and fix most bugs without the need to come in for service.

“In instances when hardware needs to be fixed, we strive to make it painless,” Reyes said. “Consumer Reports also found that customers rate Tesla service as the best in the world.”

Consumer Reports slammed Tesla’s Model S on reliability even though it loves the way the car drives.

Just last month the magazine awarded one version of the car – the all-wheel-drive Tesla Model S P85D – 103 points, a tally so high it broke the Consumer Reports road test ratings system. Its driving performance was better than any other car vehicle the magazine has evaluated.

But Fisher said road-test scores are based on the performance, comfort and road manners of the cars Consumer Reports buys and evaluates.

They are separate from CR's new-car predicted-reliability scores. A great-performing vehicle still might be a service nightmare while an uninspiring, appliance-like model could be trouble-free.

While Consumer Reports graded the Model S, it didn’t officially include Tesla in its annual ranking of 28 auto brands because until last month the car company had only one vehicle in the market.

But if it were scored as a brand, the automaker would have placed 19th between Acura and GMC, Consumer Reports said.

Lexus was the top brand for reliability. The rankings of the other brands with better-than-average reliability are second-place Toyota followed by Audi, Mazda, Subaru, Kia and Buick.

Brands with average reliability are Honda followed by Hyundai, Mini, BMW, Volvo, Volkswagen, Porsche and Nissan.

Those that were least reliable are Lincoln followed by Ford, Acura, GMC, Chevrolet, Mercedes-Benz, Chrysler, Dodge, Infiniti and Cadillac.

The worst of the bunch were Ram followed by Jeep and Fiat.

The 2015 Annual Auto Reliability Survey relied on data from more than 740,000 vehicles.

“We’ve seen a number of brands struggle with new transmission technology,” Fisher said, including systems such as a dual-clutch gearbox, a continuously variable transmission and transmissions with eight or nine speeds.

But some manufacturers are getting it right. Audi and BMW have reliable dual-clutch transmissions, while the CVTs in Honda and Toyota hybrids have been strong performers.

Lexus collected top reliability marks for all seven vehicle lines scored in the Consumer Reports survey. Buick was the only domestic brand in the top 10 coming in seventh place. Fiat-Chrysler products were the worst, taking five of the seven bottom spots.

Last edited by AZuser; 10-20-2015 at 12:28 PM.
Old 10-20-2015, 12:28 PM
  #360  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,869
Received 8,575 Likes on 6,626 Posts
my poor portfolio



it will come back though..

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tesla: Model S News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.