Notices
Automotive News
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tesla: Model III News

 
Old 10-18-2018, 07:18 PM
  #441  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,289
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,398 Posts


AZuser is offline  
Old 10-18-2018, 08:16 PM
  #442  
Lucky Enzo!
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,010
Received 1,224 Likes on 859 Posts

Tesla Model 3 dismantled: It's needlessly complicated to build, says analyst


Munro & Associates says it costs $2,000 more to make than BMW i3



ANTTI KAUTONEN
Oct 18th 2018 at 11:30AM
  • 15comments


We're written about car dismantling specialist Munro & Associates before: Manufacturing analyst Sandy Munro takes apart cars to find out whether they print money for their makers or cost them dearly. An earlier analysis of the Tesla Model 3 saw Munro critical of an early car's fit and finish, but appreciative of its electronics. Now, in an article by Bloomberg, Sandy Munro picks apart a black Tesla Model 3, with a few key points to note.

In the article, Munro blames Tesla's inexperience with automaking for squandering away a large portion of the car's profitability margin. The main issue is with body design, said to be engineered by people with no previous experience on car development. Munro says the Model 3's body is needlessly complicated with strengthening done in places where it isn't necessary and some sections crafted of multiple parts when a far simpler design would have sufficed, and that the weld points and rivets of the car's design make it unsuitable for heavy automation. As a result, the Model 3 costs some $2,000 more to build than a similarly priced BMW i3, says Munro.

The bottom of the Model 3 has a steel and aluminum frame, while the car's floor-mounted battery would already add stiffness to the structure by itself — meaning the Model 3 is, in Munro's view, heavier and more expensive without a distinct benefit. Another thing is the trunk well, which is made of many small sections that have been riveted and welded together, while other carmakers use a one-piece or stamped solution. Both of these things take time and money, and stand as testament of Tesla "learning the mistakes everyone else made years ago," as Munro says.

Reportedly, Munro sent Tesla a list of 227 suggested improvements, free of charge. Bloomberg says Tesla's response was that the company has already refined its production processes after this car was built.

Munro says the fully loaded Model 3 has a chance of an overall 30 percent gross profit margin, and that the lower-end cars stand at 10 percent. The particular Model 3 addressed in the Bloomberg article is a $50,000 car, with Munro estimating its total assembly cost at $34,700 — logistics and labor costs not included, and the estimate based on plant efficiency comparable to an average Toyota or GM plant. Munro hasn't been able to visit the Fremont manufacturing facility, so the estimated profitability remains an estimate.

The fact that Tesla employs 10,000 workers at the same factory where Toyota and GM sufficed with 4,400 is also mentioned. "There's no way you need 10,000 people even with three shifts and with a lot of work done in house," Munro says.

Still, he lauds the cars' advanced electric motor design, calling it a "game changer" that everyone should be benchmarking. In Munro's view, consistent profits are not unattainable for Tesla if the right, experienced people are hired to oversee the manufacturing process.
kurtatx is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 09:37 AM
  #443  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 54
Posts: 11,565
Received 111 Likes on 88 Posts
Musk fails to mention that the Model III's fed tax rebate is going away without a legislative fix.
biker is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 09:43 AM
  #444  
Ex-OEM King
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 5,879
Received 1,726 Likes on 1,179 Posts
It still blows my mind how expensive these are and how many of them I see on the road. I don't remember ever regularly seeing so many $100k+ cars on the road.

The Model 3 is a marketing gimmick at its finest. The ones that any reasonable person would actually buy are well into the $50k+ range. Ain't no one buying the cheap one.
SamDoe1 is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 12:09 PM
  #445  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
^ Even at 50K+, they are selling like hot cakes. I seriously dont know where all these ppl come from
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 02:06 PM
  #446  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 54
Posts: 11,565
Received 111 Likes on 88 Posts
The long-promised $35,000 Tesla Model 3 won't appear on the automaker's menu until sometime in 2019, but until then Tesla hopes that a midrange version will satisfy those who don't want to spend on one of the more expensive flavors. Elon Musk announced an all-new $45,000 variant of the Model 3 in a tweet this week, a version that will offer a range of 260 miles.

The midrange model is basically a long-range model with fewer cells in its battery pack, offering slightly slower acceleration and a lower top speed compared to the long-range model: a 0-60 mph sprint takes 5.6 seconds instead of 4.5 seconds, and top speed is 125 mph instead of 145. Not huge losses overall -- the 50-mile drop in range is the main tradeoff.

"As Model 3 production and sales continue to grow rapidly, we’ve achieved a steady volume in manufacturing capacity, allowing us to diversify our product offering to even more customers," Tesla said in a statement. "Our new Mid-Range Battery is being introduced this week in the U.S. and Canada to better meet the varying range needs of the many customers eager to own Model 3, and our delivery estimate for customers who have ordered the Standard Battery is 4-6 months."


The mid-range model is advertised as starting at $31,000 after state and federal tax credits and gas savings, which is an interesting way to display pricing on an ordering site.
The mid-range model is one of three main versions of the Model 3 that the automaker is expected to eventually offer -- short, mid and long; Tesla has favored offering the more expensive versions first for financial reasons.

Aside from adding a new version of the Model 3 to the lineup, Tesla also subtracted one: The long-range, rear-wheel-drive flavor is going away but is still available "for another week or so," according to Elon Musk. This was a $49,000 version of the Model 3, which was paired with the premium package.

The announcement of the midrange model came with no early warning or indication that this model was being added to the lineup, catching Tesla watchers by surprise. It's not clear if this timetable for the debut of the midrange model was originally planned by Tesla, or if the timing was pushed up due to other factors such as gaining orders ahead of the halving of the $7,500 federal tax credit later this year. Tesla announced a few weeks ago that customers had to order cars by Oct. 15 of this year to qualify for the full $7,500 credit.


Read more: https://autoweek.com/article/green-c...#ixzz5UPCa3j4z
biker is offline  
Old 10-19-2018, 02:25 PM
  #447  
Ex-OEM King
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 5,879
Received 1,726 Likes on 1,179 Posts
So $45k for just the car and an additional $20k in options...so $65k? You can buy a lot of really nice cars for $65k...just saying.
SamDoe1 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
nist7 (11-02-2018)
Old 10-19-2018, 02:51 PM
  #448  
Lucky Enzo!
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,010
Received 1,224 Likes on 859 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1 View Post
So $45k for just the car and an additional $20k in options...so $65k? You can buy a lot of really nice cars for $65k...just saying.
And the interior is somewhere between a $30,000 Accord and a $35,000 Audi
kurtatx is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by kurtatx:
Mizouse (10-19-2018), nist7 (11-02-2018)
Old 10-22-2018, 11:08 AM
  #449  
Alright, alright, alright
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 12,187
Received 1,704 Likes on 1,118 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx View Post
And the interior is somewhere between a $30,000 Accord and a $35,000 Audi
Agree on the materials (seats, plastic, panels, fit/finish,...), but the infotainment system on the 3 is far superior to any other manufacturer at that price point and is on par with the high end systems in BMW and MB.

Munro seems to have some grievance with Tesla.

https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-mode...tened-lawsuit/

He does give praise but is also very quick to say how incompetent Tesla is on certain area's of engineering (mostly mechanical).
Legend2TL is offline  
Old 10-22-2018, 12:39 PM
  #450  
Lucky Enzo!
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,010
Received 1,224 Likes on 859 Posts
Teslas will be more reliable and easier to use when they're owned by Volkswagen
kurtatx is offline  
Old 10-30-2018, 12:41 AM
  #451  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,577
Received 71 Likes on 54 Posts
I don't hate the idea of this car (or EV's in general), at least as much as I used to, but the biggest hurdle is still going to be price and range. If I could get a Model 3 for around $30k nicely equipped (and without the tax rebate shenanigans) then I could see myself getting one. But the real cost of these cars is way beyond what I'd even consider spending for what you get. If they really want their EV's to become profitable they are going to have to figure out a way to make them as good as they have been but for significantly less $$$.
majin ssj eric is offline  
Old 10-30-2018, 09:45 AM
  #452  
Registered Member
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 33
Posts: 11,596
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,182 Posts
I'm surprised that there aren't more Volt-style vehicles. The 'generator' system seems like a winner in concept. No range issues & very low fuel usage.
00TL-P3.2 is offline  
Old 11-02-2018, 07:17 PM
  #453  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 51
Posts: 2,905
Received 117 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2 View Post
I'm surprised that there aren't more Volt-style vehicles. The 'generator' system seems like a winner in concept. No range issues & very low fuel usage.
Very costly to build and the demand isn't that big. Meaning; it is a niche market for gadget lovers. And while it is expensive, it doesn't have some expected luxo-cachet at that price.

And they don't deliver, really:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/ca...el-charge.html

BP said that there are 'proved' 50+ years of oil supply. And 2-3 times this of available supply.

Last edited by Saintor; 11-02-2018 at 07:20 PM.
Saintor is offline  
Old 11-02-2018, 07:24 PM
  #454  
2006 RRP TL "The Comrade"
 
nist7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Honolulu
Age: 33
Posts: 3,206
Received 562 Likes on 386 Posts
To me the main issue with current EV is not even the range anxiety...it's fueling time.

Gasoline cars can fuel up in 30 seconds or at most 1-2 minutes and then you're immediately on the way. EV? Takes much much longer to fuel up the batteries. Though supercharging makes it better at 20-30min to get up to 80%, I've read that it is not ideal to frequently use supercharging due to battery longevity issues...
nist7 is offline  
Old 11-02-2018, 08:29 PM
  #455  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 47
Posts: 13,129
Received 1,403 Likes on 871 Posts
The people I know with Teslas say the charging time isn’t that big a deal on trips. But they aren’t doing marathon drives either. EVs are great for local and commuting.

My wife and I did DC to Denver in two days. 900 miles the first day and 800 the second. There’s no way we could have done that with an EV because of the charging time.

The question is if that’s good or bad. If an EV makes us drive less per day and make more stops on a vacation does that make it less ideal? I don’t know.

Im not ready to go pure EV yet for anything used for road trips.

Last edited by charliemike; 11-02-2018 at 08:41 PM.
charliemike is offline  
Old 11-07-2018, 11:43 AM
  #456  
Alright, alright, alright
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 12,187
Received 1,704 Likes on 1,118 Posts
I still see EV primary market to be urban and suburban area's with households still having a ICE vehicle as well.
Long journeys still being mostly ICE vehicles, unless supercaps cap be harnessed to do quick recharge.
Personally I can see getting a EV when I retire in about a decade to replace my 05 TL.
Legend2TL is offline  
Old 11-09-2018, 05:33 PM
  #457  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
EV is good if you have a 2nd car or as the 2nd car.

Imagine if you have an important meeting/Final exam/first date with a hot girl and you only have 20 minutes to get there, then you realized you forgot to charge the car the night before. It would be too late to call Uber cuz it will take time.

That does not sound unlikely at all.
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 02-21-2019, 11:45 AM
  #458  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,289
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,398 Posts
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-...bility-issues/

Tesla Model 3 Loses CR Recommendation Over Reliability Issues

Owners report problems with paint, trim, and electronics in Consumer Reports' survey

February 21, 2019

Consumer Reports can no longer recommend the newest Tesla—the Model 3 electric sedan—because members say they’ve identified a number of problems with their cars, including issues with its body hardware, as well as paint and trim. CR members reported these results in our annual reliability survey, which includes data on about 470,000 vehicles.

The Model 3 is a critical car for Tesla. It’s the automaker’s first attempt at a true mass-market electric vehicle (EV), and its long, bumpy launch into the consumer market starting in late 2017 was greeted by EV enthusiasts with a mixture of anticipation and frustration. The Model 3 rollout was plagued by numerous production delays and extraordinarily long wait times for customers who put down orders more than a year before delivery. Yet the small sports sedan has been received well by its owners, getting top marks in CR’s most recent owner satisfaction survey. It has also largely lived up to its promise as a highly competitive sports sedan, earning a respectable road-test score, which puts it not far behind the Audi A4 and BMW 3 Series.

But reliability has been a weak spot for Tesla. According to our survey results, problems with the suspension, especially with the 2017 model year, have been an issue for the Model S luxury sedan, while hardware problems—especially concerning its unique falcon-wing doors—have plagued the Model X SUV (neither is currently recommended by CR). And now our latest survey data has surfaced numerous problems reported by Model 3 owners as well, which is why CR has removed its recommendation for the vehicle.

“While Teslas perform well in Consumer Reports’ road tests and have excellent owner satisfaction, their reliability has not been consistent, according to our members, which has resulted in changes to their recommended status,” says Jake Fisher, senior director of auto testing at Consumer Reports.

Tesla currently holds the top spot on our list of brands that satisfy owners the most, based on their new vehicle lineup.

“In most cases, reliability issues will undermine satisfaction,” Fisher adds. “But when a vehicle has an enthusiastic following, like with Tesla, owners may overlook some issues. We’ve seen this with other vehicles such as the Jeep Wrangler and Chevrolet Corvette.”


Tesla’s Response

A Tesla spokesperson said the automaker has already made “significant improvements” to correct the issues that Model 3 owners raised with CR. “The vast majority of these issues have already been corrected through design and manufacturing improvements, and we are already seeing a significant improvement in our field data,” the spokesperson wrote in an emailed statement to CR. “We take feedback from our customers very seriously and quickly implement improvements any time we hear about issues.”


How CR Measures Reliability

CR gathers reliability data through an online questionnaire sent out each spring to members. The survey asks about any problems these members may have had within the previous 12 months with 17 aspects of their vehicles, including major systems such as the suspension and electrical system, as well as fit and finish issues such as paint and trim.

For the past few years, CR has been going back to car owners who did not answer the initial survey to gather additional information, and to include a greater number of the newest vehicles. These later responses have been incorporated into the ratings found in our annual April autos issue.

With the new data, CR’s sample size of 2018 Model 3s nearly doubled, bringing the total number of Model 3s involved to more than 500. These latest survey responses contained a relatively high number of reliability complaints.


What the Survey Found

Model 3 owners in our spring survey sample reported some body hardware and in-car electronics problems, such as the screen freezing, which we have seen with other Tesla models. The latest survey data also shows complaints about paint and trim issues. In addition, some members reported that the Model 3’s sole display screen acted strangely.

“The touch screen would intermittently begin acting as if someone was touching it rapidly at many different points,” one member wrote in. “This fault would cause music to play, volume to increase to maximum, and would rescale and pan the map in the navigation system.”

Some owners also complained about glass defects, including cracks in the rear window, in their survey responses.

In fact, CR experienced similar problems with its own Model 3. Earlier this year, our test vehicle developed a large crack in its massive rear window during a cold spell when it was parked outside.

When the Model 3 first came out in 2017, Consumer Reports gave it an average predicted reliability score based on the survey results at the time about the Model S because the two shared much of the same technology. The car maintained its average score for predicted reliability in October 2018 based on the experiences of Model 3 owners who completed our spring survey. The new survey data shows that the car has dropped from average to below-average reliability.

Tesla’s other models have suffered from below-average reliability as well, Fisher said. The Model S sedan has had an inconsistent history, being above average, average, and below average, with each downward move following in the wake of a hardware change made by Tesla. CR members report that they have the most trouble with loose trim, frozen or blank screen display, and suspension in 2017 models.

The Tesla Model S lost CR’s recommendation in October 2018 largely because of suspension problems. Tesla made air suspension and all-wheel drive standard in its 2017 Model S.

The Model X SUV has always had below-average reliability through its lifespan, with CR members reporting problems mostly with its hardware, and with its falcon-wing doors in particular. It has never earned a CR recommendation.

By contrast, CR members have reported few problems with Tesla’s unique electric powertrains, which may be due in part to their relative simplicity when compared with traditional internal-combustion engines.


AZuser is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 04:19 PM
  #459  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,289
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,398 Posts
Originally Posted by biker View Post
The long-promised $35,000 Tesla Model 3 won't appear on the automaker's menu until sometime in 2019, but until then Tesla hopes that a midrange version will satisfy those who don't want to spend on one of the more expensive flavors. Elon Musk announced an all-new $45,000 variant of the Model 3 in a tweet this week, a version that will offer a range of 260 miles.

. . . .

Read more: https://autoweek.com/article/green-c...#ixzz5UPCa3j4z
$35,000 Model 3 available for order today.

Delivery in 2-4 weeks

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/tesl...s-website.html

Tesla launches long-awaited standard Model 3 starting at $35,000

Electric carmaker Tesla is finally launching its long-awaited standard Model 3 starting at $35,000 and shifting all sales online, the company said.

The company’s shares were halted, and Tesla suspended all orders on its website ahead of Thursday’s news. It also redirected users to a page teasing a mystery announcement CEO Elon Musk promised to reveal at 5 p.m. ET.

The base model of the Model 3 will have 220 miles of range, a top speed of 130 miles-per-hour and accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 5.6 seconds, the company said.

“You can now buy a Tesla in North America via your phone in about 1 minute, and that capability will soon be extended worldwide,” the company said, adding that it is also allowing customers to try out the car before buying. It’s offering full refunds if a car is returned within seven days or 1,000 miles.

Tesla has been promising a $35,000 version of the Model 3 ever since the automaker revealed the mid-size sedan in 2016. But it’s prioritized the production of more expensive versions of the car in order to keep profit margins high. Musk has defended the decision by saying that making lower-priced versions was unprofitable and would cause Tesla to “die.”
AZuser is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 05:11 PM
  #460  
Registered Member
 
nanxun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: DMV
Posts: 7,305
Received 1,797 Likes on 1,178 Posts
Just about 3 years ago (April 2016) is when Tesla announced plans for producing the Model 3 at a price-point of $35k (after tax credits?) ...

Now they're delivering what they promised, but with a 2-4 week wait and questionable build quality .....
nanxun is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 05:16 PM
  #461  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
I quickly glanced what is included in the $35k Model 3 ... It seems they tried really hard to meet the $35k MSRP...
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 05:48 PM
  #462  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts
Wtf.. only way to get 35k is for the car to be black and have those horrendous looking 18” aero wheels
Mizouse is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 05:55 PM
  #463  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo View Post
I quickly glanced what is included in the $35k Model 3 ... It seems they tried really hard to meet the $35k MSRP...
lol. Yea. The $2000 upgrade to the 37K “Standard Range Plus” with the Partial Premium interior seems worth it


California offers a $2500 incentive too.
Mizouse is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 06:03 PM
  #464  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse View Post
Wtf.. only way to get 35k is for the car to be black and have those horrendous looking 18” aero wheels
That is actually OK.... the 18" wheels can be converted into a pretty sporty looking wheel just have the plastic piece removed. but supposedly you will lose some range

it is pretty annoying to see the advertised the "after saving" price and monthly payment. It is a $35k car... not a $25k car. Trying too hard.

It seems they dont offer any lease program for the $35k trim.
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 06:15 PM
  #465  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,289
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,398 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo View Post
I quickly glanced what is included in the $35k Model 3 ... It seems they tried really hard to meet the $35k MSRP...
Originally Posted by Mizouse View Post
Wtf.. only way to get 35k is for the car to be black and have those horrendous looking 18” aero wheels

Maybe that's the goal. Make the $35K model so cheap, bare bones, and with very limited available options that very very few people would want to buy it means Tesla gets to sell higher priced and more profitable versions of Model 3 instead.

I wouldn't be surprised if $35K version is break even or a slight loss leader... at least until manufacturing gets more automated and they can cut more costs. They laid off 7% work force last month. Now they're closing their retail stores and laying off those and other workers.

https://www.businessinsider.sg/tesla...loyees-2019-2/

More layoffs expected at Tesla as the company shutters most of its retail stores

February 28, 2019

In a surprise announcement on Thursday, Tesla said it was closing “many” of its 378 retail stores around the world as it shifts to an online-only sales model.

That will mean another round of layoffs at the electric automaker like affected some 7% of its workforce in January in a bid to cut costs following its production ramp for the Model 3.

Tesla did not respond to questions from Business Insider about how many stores will be closing, or how many employees might be affected.

“Shifting all sales online, combined with other ongoing cost efficiencies, will enable us to lower all vehicle prices by about 6% on average, allowing us to achieve the $35,000 Model 3 price point earlier than we expected,” the company said in a blog post.

“Over the next few months, we will be winding down many of our stores, with a small number of stores in high-traffic locations remaining as galleries, showcases and Tesla information centers. The important thing for customers in the United States to understand is that, with online sales, anyone in any state can quickly and easily buy a Tesla.”

On a conference call with reporters and analysts, Musk said the closings were the only way to keep costs down.

“We will be closing some stores and there will be a reduction in head count as a result,” he said. “There’s no other way for us to achieve the savings required.”
AZuser is offline  
Old 02-28-2019, 06:26 PM
  #466  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts

Originally Posted by oonowindoo View Post
That is actually OK.... the 18" wheels can be converted into a pretty sporty looking wheel just have the plastic piece removed. but supposedly you will lose some range
ohh you’re right. Not bad.







Mizouse is offline  
Old 03-01-2019, 01:24 PM
  #467  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser View Post
Maybe that's the goal. Make the $35K model so cheap, bare bones, and with very limited available options that very very few people would want to buy it means Tesla gets to sell higher priced and more profitable versions of Model 3 instead.

I wouldn't be surprised if $35K version is break even or a slight loss leader... at least until manufacturing gets more automated and they can cut more costs. They laid off 7% work force last month. Now they're closing their retail stores and laying off those and other workers.

https://www.businessinsider.sg/tesla...loyees-2019-2/

I hope everyone buys the 35k trim and Tesla will be so pissed
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 10:15 AM
  #468  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,289
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,398 Posts
Originally Posted by biker View Post
Musk fails to mention that the Model III's fed tax rebate is going away without a legislative fix.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-a...-idUSKCN1RM1NG

Exclusive: U.S. lawmakers introduce bill to boost electric car tax credits

April 10, 2019

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers will introduce legislation on Wednesday to expand the electric vehicle tax credit by 400,000 vehicles per manufacturer, a provision that would give a boost to General Motors Co and Tesla Inc before the existing credit comes to an end for them.

The bill is sponsored by Democratic Senators Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters, Republican Senators Lamar Alexander and Susan Collins and Democratic Representative Dan Kildee, the sponsors told Reuters ahead of its official introduction.

The bill could lift electric vehicle sales in a boost for automakers that have committed tens of billions of dollars to meet rising global emissions requirements.

The existing $7,500 EV tax credit, which allows tax payers to deduct part of the cost of buying an electric car, phases out over 15 months once an automaker hits 200,000 cumulative EV sales. GM saw its tax credit cut to $3,750 on April 1. Tesla’s tax credit fell to $3,750 on Jan. 1 and will end entirely at year’s end.

The bill dubbed the “Driving America Forward Act” would grant each automaker a $7,000 tax credit for an additional 400,000 vehicles on top of the existing 200,000 vehicles eligible for $7,500 tax credits. It would shorten the phase-out schedule to nine months.

The bill would also extend the hydrogen fuel cell credit through 2028. The bill is estimated to cost $11.4 billion, with all but $91 million of that tally to extend the EV tax credit.


“We have a cap that’s got to go up,” Stabenow told a group of automakers at a dinner last week. “I want to get this done as soon as possible.”

The proposal has strong backing from automakers, environmental groups and others, but will face opposition.

Last month, the White House proposed immediately eliminating the $7,500 tax credit, a move it said would save the U.S. government $2.5 billion over a decade.

Senator John Barrasso, a Republican who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, in February proposed legislation to end the credit and impose a highway user fee on EVs to pay for road repairs.

The bill is backed by major automakers including GM, Tesla, Toyota Motor Corp, Ford Motor Co, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV, Honda Motor Co, BMW AG, Nissan Motor Co, Volkswagen AG and utilities.

Both GM and Tesla have been lobbying Congress for more than a year to extend or expand the EV tax credit.

GM’s credit drops to $1,875 in October and will completely disappear by April 2020, while Tesla’s credit falls to $1,875 in July and expires at the end of the year.
Senator Debbie Stabenow = Michigan
Senator Gary Peters = Michigan
Senator Lamar Alexander = Tennessee
Senator Susan Collins = Maine
Congressman Dan Kildee = Michigan
AZuser is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 11:16 AM
  #469  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts
So the tax credit will go back up to $7K if approved?
Mizouse is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 12:11 PM
  #470  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,289
Received 2,328 Likes on 1,398 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse View Post
So the tax credit will go back up to $7K if approved?
It's on top of (i.e. in addition to) existing credits

The bill dubbed the “Driving America Forward Act” would grant each automaker a $7,000 tax credit for an additional 400,000 vehicles on top of the existing 200,000 vehicles eligible for $7,500 tax credits. It would shorten the phase-out schedule to nine months.
So if this bill were to go through before Tesla's $3,750 credits expire, it'd be $3,750 + $7,000 = $10,750 in tax credits.

Because rich people who can afford a Tesla need $10K in tax credits to buy one.
AZuser is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 01:49 PM
  #471  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts
I’d get a model 3 if it’s approved before the current one expires.

That would be a lot of savings for CA residents:
$10,750 fed rebate
$2,500 CA rebate

$13,250 savings then.



Standard Range Plus
Pearl White paint
19” sport wheels
Black Interior
Autopilot
Purchase Price = $44,000
Mizouse is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 03:58 PM
  #472  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
I seriously doubt this bill will pass considering how our government think Global warming is fake news and we love big oil companies....
The bill is introduced by mostly democrats and left leaning Republicans... it is as good as DOA.
oonowindoo is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 06:12 PM
  #473  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 27,549
Received 2,211 Likes on 1,314 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse View Post
I’d get a model 3 if it’s approved before the current one expires.

That would be a lot of savings for CA residents:
$10,750 fed rebate
$2,500 CA rebate

$13,250 savings then.



Standard Range Plus
Pearl White paint
19” sport wheels
Black Interior
Autopilot
Purchase Price = $44,000
You won't

Costco is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 01:26 AM
  #474  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts
Originally Posted by Costco View Post
You won't

you know me too well.


Mizouse is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by Mizouse:
00TL-P3.2 (04-11-2019), Costco (04-11-2019), nist7 (04-12-2019), thoiboi (04-11-2019)
Old 04-11-2019, 07:00 AM
  #475  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 54
Posts: 11,565
Received 111 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser View Post
It's on top of (i.e. in addition to) existing credits
The way I read it is that it's an additional 400K cars that it would apply to, not that the credit itself will be added to the existing one.
biker is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 03:05 PM
  #476  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 27,549
Received 2,211 Likes on 1,314 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse View Post
you know me too well.

saving that gif for later use

I have had the new car itch for about a year now. I'm being patient, but damn have I done a lot of research for a while now.
Costco is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (04-11-2019)
Old 04-12-2019, 06:02 PM
  #477  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 54
Posts: 11,565
Received 111 Likes on 88 Posts
As suddenly as the $35,000 Tesla Model 3 had appeared, the $35,000 model has disappeared from Tesla's online ordering menu. It's a menu that a very short time ago would have replaced nearly all Tesla stores but is now not replacing them because the automaker backpedaled on a decision to close them.

In the latest major shakeup to its model range just in 2019, Tesla has reshuffled a number of options and prices for its most affordable model.

For starters, all Tesla vehicles will now be offered with the Autopilot semiautonomous driver assist system. "For example, Model 3 Standard Plus used to cost $37,500, plus $3,000 for the Autopilot option. It now costs $39,500, with Autopilot included," the automaker said.

The move is tied to the company's greater emphasis on semiautonomous tech in its cars, which has led to Tesla offering a controversially named "Full Self-Driving Capability" that adds highway on-ramp and off-ramp ability, promises stop sign and traffic light recognition later this year, but still requires driver attention at all times and does "not make the vehicle autonomous," in contrast to what one would expect from a system that promises, you know, "Full Self-Driving." To be fair, you yourself would still be driving no matter what, so in that sense it could be thought of as "self-driving."


Tesla will also offer leasing for the Model 3, but, curiously enough, you will not be able to buy one at the end of the lease as the company plans to use off-lease cars as part of an upcoming ride-hailing network. The automaker will offer lessees the option of 10,000-, 12,000- and 15,000-mile annual options, with a minimum lease deposit of $3,000 and an amount due at signing that starts at $4,199 and stretches to over $4,500 depending on the spec of the Model 3.

The most jarring, if not completely unexpected, move of the latest reshuffle was the removal of the long-awaited $35,000 Model 3 -- well, $36,200 with destination -- from the online menu. Customers will still be able to order one from a store, just not online.

"Given the popularity of the Standard Plus relative to the Standard, we have made the decision to simplify our production operations to better optimize cost, minimize complexity and streamline operations," Tesla said. "As a result, Model 3 Standard will now be a software-limited version of the Standard Plus, and we are taking it off the online ordering menu, which just means that to get it, customers will need to call us or visit any one of the several hundred Tesla stores. Deliveries of Model 3 Standard will begin this weekend."

That's right: Deliveries haven't even begun, but it's already being sidelined from the main menu.


This move presents a bit of a problem for Tesla, which promised a budget variant of the Model 3 several years ago, failed to deliver on it until weeks ago, and is now making it harder to buy this proletarian-spec Model 3 days before the first examples are even delivered to buyers. The $35,000 Model 3 had been a thorn in Tesla's side for some time even as the company warned that it wouldn't actually get to making it for a while, opting for pricier models with their fatter profit margins for financial reasons, but the $35,000 Model 3 featured prominently in company promises when the Model 3 was first announced. Now, it has become a bit of an asterisk which one cannot even order online.

The removal of the $35,000 Model 3 from the online menu won't do much to Tesla's bottom line, but it does expose the promise of the $35,000 Model 3 as a bit hollow. Wasn't this the version that was supposed to get people out of their gas-engined cars and into electrics? What about the investors who had relied on promises of this version for years? The $35,000 Model 3 was simultaneously used as a prop for politicians, investors and the car-buying public, but now it is apparently an off-menu item that isn't important anymore. There is a disconnect there.
biker is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 07:23 PM
  #478  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 56,677
Received 1,370 Likes on 968 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse View Post

Standard Range Plus
Pearl White paint
19” sport wheels
Black Interior
Autopilot
Purchase Price = $44,000
This same build is now $1500 cheaper.

The cost of white paint was reduced by $500.
Also Autopilot is standard and only costs $2000 vs a $3000 option previously.

Updated Purchase Price = $42,500
Mizouse is offline  
Old 04-22-2019, 01:11 PM
  #479  
Q('.')=O
iTrader: (1)
 
imj0257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DFW, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 22,825
Received 625 Likes on 449 Posts
Surveillance Video of Tesla Exploding in Shanghai Parking Lot Goes Viral

Tesla is adamant that its cars are significantly less likely to catch fire than your average car, as Reuters reports, but that still hasn’t kept a surveillance video from spreading worldwide, showing a Tesla Model Sbursting into flame and all but disappearing, Spinal Tap-style, in a parking garage reportedly in Shanghai.

That location is a funny one, as Tesla is gearing up to start making its own cars outside the city, with Gigafactory 3 under construction at the moment.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1119997229530406913

imj0257 is online now  
Old 04-22-2019, 04:00 PM
  #480  
Registered Member
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 15,591
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,778 Posts
With so much electricity packed into small battery, i am not even surprised. Actually this is not just Tesla's problem to solve. It is all the manuf. who plan to build EVs,
oonowindoo is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AZuser
Fifth Generation TLX (2015+)
15
10-01-2016 07:46 AM
gavriil
Automotive News
116
05-03-2016 05:25 PM
BC01191980
Fifth Generation TLX (2015+)
74
04-23-2016 02:59 AM
LaCostaRacer
Car Talk
11
04-14-2016 09:43 AM
#1 STUNNA
Car Talk
2
03-31-2016 04:44 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tesla: Model III News


Contact Us - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.