North American Auto Industry Crisis news **Pontiac's Last Day (page 28)**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2009, 12:29 AM
  #681  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Consolidate, take out the best, leave all junks behind. That's the best way for GM to stay afloat.
Old 04-24-2009, 01:55 AM
  #682  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by chill_dog
As much as I hate to admit it, it makes more sense to keep Buick. There are a lot more Chinese people who want a Buick than Americans who want a Buick or a Pontiac...hell, Buick and Pontiac combined! One billion Chinese people can't be wrong.

If GM has any sense (it is debatable), they'll rebadge the G8 somwhere.

The one I don't get is GMC. Every truck there has a Chevy counterpart; there's no need for it.

My thinking:

Chevy - regular cars, trucks, and SUVs
Buick - mid-range cars and SUVs
Cadillac - luxury cars and SUVs
Pontiac - performance cars; Solstice, G4, G6, G8, and Firebird
Exactly my thinking.... what the hell are they thinking still holding onto GMC? I like the Sierra more than the Silverado but aside from that I could care less about any of the GMC counterparts. and when my friend said his mom (who is Chinese) had a Buick I was surprised at first then I remembered how Buick has a strong foothold in China.... usually Asians are not fond of American cars, aside from the male members of my family (myself included )

And I hope the G8 GXP is cheap that'd be sweet
Old 04-24-2009, 06:31 AM
  #683  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
....the only people that will benefit from this are the lawyers....

I'm sure Obama's car "czar" was in on those meetings and made some deals with Fiat to make their return to the US. Obama wants US consumers to downsize to what he considers "adequate" in a car. And Fiat has enough product at that end of the market that it can bring to the US (or have it made in the US) quickly to meet that "demand". Having Euro sized Fiat models roll off the assembly line from some former Michigan Chrysler plant by the 2012 MY is certainly possible.
Old 04-24-2009, 06:41 AM
  #684  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
GM and Ford need to follow suit as well immediately. They need to use this opportunity to trim the fat and restructure. They cant sit around and wait.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:25 AM
  #685  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by Bearcat94
So What?

Say you take the G8 and keep manufacturing it, but with Chevy badges, same car, different lable.

Pontiac was supposed to be Niche/Performance, but the niche and the brand were terribly diluted: mini-vans, SUV/CUV's, Chevy Camaro, Chevy Corvette, Saturn Sky, etc, etc.

IOW - GM never let it be what it was supposed to be and it got lost in the GM crowd. If Pontiac has/had hot-sellers that were making good money, they'll be back in re-badged form.



As for Ford, they have about $21B in cash reserves so, they're not quite circling the drain. ...and CNN (TV, not .com) just reported that Ford will be increasing production.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:53 AM
  #686  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4



As for Ford, they have about $21B in cash reserves so, they're not quite circling the drain. ...and CNN (TV, not .com) just reported that Ford will be increasing production.
If Ford could start building their euro products in America/Mexico/Canada they'd turn around very quickly.

Ford gave out like 500 Fiestas for people via a lottery to drive and spread their thoughts through word of mouth. I would have definitely signed up for that had I known about it.

Ford has to keep those new cars out of rental fleets though. Otherwise, I'm not going to even consider buying a new one.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:53 AM
  #687  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by swami
If GM and Chrysler both end up filing bankruptcy I think Ford will come out smellin like a rose. Time to buy some shares in Ford.
Don't think so. The supply chain will get royally screwed by this and every car manufacturer will be impacted. Ford is still bleeding cash. May be in better shape than the other domestics, but by no means rosey.
Old 04-24-2009, 08:55 AM
  #688  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally Posted by Whiskers
But my 89 Pontiac Lemans was such as quality automobile...
That was a rebadged Daewoo IIRC ... Which is another example of how poorly GM has been run for going on 40 years now.
Old 04-24-2009, 12:25 PM
  #689  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrib
Don't think so. The supply chain will get royally screwed by this and every car manufacturer will be impacted. Ford is still bleeding cash. May be in better shape than the other domestics, but by no means rosey.
I agree. If GM and or Chrysler went down so would Ford. The places that make parts for one make parts for all. They would be effected as well and not all would survive.
Old 04-24-2009, 01:22 PM
  #690  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I agree. If GM and or Chrysler went down so would Ford. The places that make parts for one make parts for all. They would be effected as well and not all would survive.
..... as well as all the foreign transplant factories in North America.
Old 04-24-2009, 02:27 PM
  #691  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrib
Don't think so. The supply chain will get royally screwed by this and every car manufacturer will be impacted. Ford is still bleeding cash. May be in better shape than the other domestics, but by no means rosey.

There will be a ripple effect that WILL touch the brands more dear to the hearts of those here.

EDIT: GM to pull the plug on Pontiac Brand

Hopefully, GM transplants the G8 to Chevrolet as the 2010 Chevelle.
Old 04-24-2009, 02:56 PM
  #692  
1919
 
Scottman111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 39
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes on 134 Posts
I had no idea about Buick being so big in China. I heard in class the other day that China is buying more cars than any other country right now and that will continue to rise as their middle class expands...so I guess good news for GM.
Old 04-24-2009, 05:07 PM
  #693  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
There will be a ripple effect that WILL touch the brands more dear to the hearts of those here.

EDIT: GM to pull the plug on Pontiac Brand

Hopefully, GM transplants the G8 to Chevrolet as the 2010 Caprice/Impala SS.
fixed, because the current FWD Impala SS is a joke and resurrecting a decades-old coupe nameplate as a sedan is for Dodge only (Charger)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holden_Statesman
Old 04-24-2009, 06:24 PM
  #694  
Moderator Alumnus
 
BigLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,125
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
fuuuuuuuuu--------

I like my Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Caliber...looks like the cars won't be worth shit if Chrysler files.
Old 04-24-2009, 06:33 PM
  #695  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
sebring and caliber.....

no comment.
Old 04-24-2009, 07:17 PM
  #696  
Moderator Alumnus
 
BigLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,125
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
^

dunno why everybody has to hate.
Old 04-24-2009, 07:23 PM
  #697  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by Scottman111
I had no idea about Buick being so big in China. I heard in class the other day that China is buying more cars than any other country right now and that will continue to rise as their middle class expands...so I guess good news for GM.
It's not just Buick, many American products and trends in general are VERY popular in China. It's been that way for years now and has been increasing steadily.
Old 04-24-2009, 09:01 PM
  #698  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BigLizard
^

dunno why everybody has to hate.
My parents also have a Sebring (2004).
Old 04-24-2009, 09:15 PM
  #699  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
GM and Ford need to follow suit as well immediately. They need to use this opportunity to trim the fat and restructure. They cant sit around and wait.
Restructure and get it over with, and get rid of or reduce the legacy costs.

Chevy and Cadillac make money, they should be part of the new GM. Buick, as has been pointed out previously in this thread, is HUGE in China, and so should stay as at least an international division. GMC should die. I won't miss Pontiac, Saab, Hummer in the least. Maybe Saturn, a little, as they were becoming a "green" brand. Then again, those cars can just be rebadged as Chevys anyway.

That is all.
Old 04-24-2009, 11:20 PM
  #700  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by BigLizard

I like my Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Caliber...looks like the cars won't be worth shit if Chrysler files.

That would imply that they are worth something now.

Last edited by sho_nuff1997; 04-24-2009 at 11:23 PM.
Old 04-24-2009, 11:21 PM
  #701  
Moderator Alumnus
 
BigLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,125
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
That would imply that they are worth something now....
Really? You honestly think I could receive a high trade in for either one of them?
Old 04-24-2009, 11:22 PM
  #702  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes on 4,342 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I agree. If GM and or Chrysler went down so would Ford. The places that make parts for one make parts for all. They would be effected as well and not all would survive.

I don't get this.


Americans buy x number of cars. Those cars need x number of parts.

If GM dissappears, the number of cars purchased and the number of parts needed stays the same. More Fords, more Accords, no Chevys, same total number of cars.

I get the part that if GM goes bankrupt, they don't pay parts suppliers dollar for dollar on money owed and that could wipe out some (many?) suppliers.

I don't get "if GM doesn't exist, the parts suppliers will lose production".
Old 04-24-2009, 11:24 PM
  #703  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by BigLizard
Really? You honestly think I could receive a high trade in for either one of them?

Old 04-25-2009, 12:58 AM
  #704  
Moderator Alumnus
 
BigLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,125
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
I didn't think so.
Old 04-25-2009, 09:04 AM
  #705  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by BigLizard
^

dunno why everybody has to hate.
I've spent some time in the Caliber....it's not hate. It's reality. I'm not sure even where to start on my hangups, as there are so many.

My hard earned money would never be used to purchase a Chrysler product....I don't care how powerful a Charger SRT-8 may be, I'd still opt for the slower TL SH-AWD (ugly as that may be, I'm certain it has top notch build quality). Heck, I'd go with the G8 hands down.
Old 04-25-2009, 11:33 AM
  #706  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
General Motors is preparing to announce that the Pontiac car brand, once marketed as GM's "Excitement division," will be killed off, according to a source familiar with the decision.

An official announcement is expected Monday.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/24/auto...obit/index.htm

Old 04-25-2009, 06:36 PM
  #707  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Bearcat94
I don't get this.


Americans buy x number of cars. Those cars need x number of parts.

If GM dissappears, the number of cars purchased and the number of parts needed stays the same. More Fords, more Accords, no Chevys, same total number of cars.

I get the part that if GM goes bankrupt, they don't pay parts suppliers dollar for dollar on money owed and that could wipe out some (many?) suppliers.

I don't get "if GM doesn't exist, the parts suppliers will lose production".
Thats all fine and dandy Going by the assumption that all of them can take up the slack of what is lost by one (say GM) closing (at min say 300k cars) One year of that missing could take a serious toll on parts suppliers and run many out of business. Many of these companies are running pretty much max production in most of the facilities. It would take many years to be able to ramp up enough volume to allow suppliers to make whats needed. And in that time how many would go under or lay off due to less production?

If said company is making 3x parts for company x,y,z and company z goes under now they are making 2x parts. Its possible that they need 3x to break even or come out ahead. If you reduce output jobs could be lost. If you buy said product in this quantity for this price but now you can only buy 2/3 that material price goes up. That trickles down to buyer (auto companies) in an already struggling economy which comes out to more for us.
Old 04-26-2009, 09:30 AM
  #708  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts

on your avatar.
Old 04-26-2009, 02:42 PM
  #709  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally Posted by BigLizard
Really? You honestly think I could receive a high trade in for either one of them?
You wouldn't regardless of Chrysler's financial standing.

Any dealer can go to their local auction and find five billion of either of those cars in any color they want.

All the rental companies that buy those cars kill the used car market when they get sold at auction. Literally thousands of 200x Calibers and Sebrings get dumped at the same time.

It's part of the reason why the used American car market has sucked for a long time compared to Japanese and European competitors.
Old 04-26-2009, 04:07 PM
  #710  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
All the rental companies that buy those cars kill the used car market when they get sold at auction. Literally thousands of 200x Calibers and Sebrings get dumped at the same time.

It's part of the reason why the used American car market has sucked for a long time compared to Japanese and European competitors.
I haven't rented a car in a long time but was astonished at the number of Accords on the Orlando Hertz lot.
Old 04-26-2009, 09:26 PM
  #711  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
<table class="sidebarTBLtable" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="220"><tbody><tr><td class="sidebarTBLheadline">2008 GM Vehicle Sales</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cnnTMcontent"> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Chevrolet</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">1,801,131</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">GMC</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">376,996</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Pontiac</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">267,348</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">Saturn</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">188,004</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Cadillac</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">161,159</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">Buick</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">137,197</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Hummer</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">27,485</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">Saab</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">21,368</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Total</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">2,980,688</td> </tr> </tbody></table> </td> </tr> </tbody></table>
Old 04-26-2009, 10:51 PM
  #712  
E92
 
TommySalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: socal
Age: 36
Posts: 8,039
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
We've had a rental Caliber a few times in Florida, and they suck hard.

I also doubt that the G8 will go away with Pontiac shutting down. It's too new and they'd be taking too much of a hit with development costs not to keep it in production.
Old 04-26-2009, 10:53 PM
  #713  
A Black TL
 
TL|GTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Idk, y u guys are complaining about GMC so much. Id rather take a GMC Denali over a tahoe, and suburban. And rather take Envoy of a Trailblazer also, not the SS but if i wanted a go fast SUV i would get a Jeep Str8, GMC's are just better looking cars period.
Old 04-27-2009, 01:36 AM
  #714  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
<table class="sidebarTBLtable" width="220" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="sidebarTBLheadline">2008 GM Vehicle Sales</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cnnTMcontent"> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Chevrolet</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">1,801,131</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">GMC</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">376,996</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Pontiac</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">267,348</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">Saturn</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">188,004</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Cadillac</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">161,159</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">Buick</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">137,197</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Hummer</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">27,485</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnIERowAltBG"> <td class="cc10" align="left">Saab</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">21,368</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="cc10" align="left">Total</td> <td class="cc10" align="right">2,980,688</td> </tr> </tbody></table> </td> </tr> </tbody></table>
I'd actually like to know which of those brands are the most profitable.

It means nothing if they are selling 300k cars and losing money with each sale.
Old 04-27-2009, 02:10 AM
  #715  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
It means nothing if they are selling 300k cars and losing money with each sale.
Big - like all those dealers that are trying to undercut everyone else by saying they'll make it up on volume. .
Old 04-27-2009, 02:13 AM
  #716  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
Originally Posted by TL|GTX
Idk, y u guys are complaining about GMC so much. Id rather take a GMC Denali over a tahoe, and suburban. And rather take Envoy of a Trailblazer also, not the SS but if i wanted a go fast SUV i would get a Jeep Str8, GMC's are just better looking cars period.
Uhh.... GM could just slap a Chevy sticker on the Denali and call it another variant of the Tahoe - and get rid of the GMC brand.

Oh wait, then people won't buy it cause it's a Chevy.
Old 04-27-2009, 02:16 AM
  #717  
Moderator Alumnus
 
BigLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Age: 42
Posts: 8,125
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I haven't had any issues with my Chrysler and Dodge (31k for the Sebring and 11k for the Caliber). I guess I'll be in it for the long haul. Meh, it's all personal preference when it comes to cars. Personally I've never owned a domestic before and I honestly can't complain since I have the higher end models.

I've had very good luck for picking out cars (Except for the 2 Benzes I owned, will never go that route again! :shakehead )

If these damn car companies will just take their head out of their asses they wouldn't be in the f'ing mess. I believe all auto industries should be able to build quality products. Just don't understand why they have to be money hungry pricks to keep our economy down.

I wonder what would happen if a japanese auto maker like Honda take over one of the top 3.
Old 04-27-2009, 02:19 AM
  #718  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...,7152495.story

Chrysler cleared a major hurdle in its bid to stave off bankruptcy by reaching key labor deals Sunday with its unions in the U.S. and Canada.

A tentative pact with the United Auto Workers -- details were undisclosed -- came just hours after membership of the Canadian Auto Workers union ratified a deal late Sunday that could save Chrysler close to $200 million a year.
Old 04-27-2009, 02:22 AM
  #719  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
So, the unions gave some - now let's see if the creditors do the same. Only a few days left till B (bancruptcy) - day.
Old 04-27-2009, 05:22 AM
  #720  
Moderator
 
SodaLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
GM Press Conference is scheduled for 9:00AM EST today, 4/27/09. You can watch it live:

http://gmtv.feedroom.com/

We'll find out soon enough.


Quick Reply: North American Auto Industry Crisis news **Pontiac's Last Day (page 28)**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.